Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
2014-04-14 15:06 GMT+02:00 Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/14/2014 04:35 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: There are a list of packages up for grabs. I cannnot test anymore some of them, or i stopped use them. app-text/fbreader dev-libs/liblinebreak net-wireless/madwimax net-wireless/wimax-tools net-wireless/wimax net-wireless/wpa_supplicant sys-fs/ocfs2-tools www-apps/owncloud www-apps/rutorrent i will like to take net-wireless/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant has multiple active maintainers, but I don't mind you helping as long as gurligebis doesn't. Fine with me :) My usage of wpa_supplicant has been going down lately, so more eyes on it would be a good thing :) /GG - -Zero -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTS91ZAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKYdkP/Ri8dqjpGi4EiNhdTnXRfgug +JDgkRoqzy3ajNWWxwGK3dWgM2mbuZjUdN8x7G3SFJJu80irJv+y4PPVmbVVG2RE GL1bS6YokgeM5PGXVinyDqX2/xXf3zFgbYopxoooFO9+nV/ZEsh3yJG8VM4Vbw4S svYuuEQTFXTHAjY//TT4oO+Q6jobtWkjpBSV3O2uU4ltDKRvBdlwwkS96I5iYqAM le6Kpj4NVxxFx44NHoqk0wKHeKNW4zh1Hngr1eZnWfxdIFbTExr9cJ9D6KPfDF+X 09ry4X2nd4ApzQY5iIrT1DgQVtGeXiPLn7BY/J4Sg/1Y2X8+iIZaGaxObk/niN20 tpgRJ4Mw7cj6dn7DqkxODjkeAB9aDdRAeknAdDGPcTVw8r90XLch8vgATeF2/vhE 9mbdmoO1Oh5XROKdhSS4cNRpx7rv1EDJSsUqb76s5+Wk29b8neMoWKHXXSRZDNHo CcNzSHLG55e3vu33WLPq0dTjrVjO7Zoamp8hIKpBPnEgvIPvFKPz1EpKOTFkFt3N WOMIecy1PzWRf76iKUV6j22tm5slm3sZuZJFOhGTMcA2gi4tdIhxE+YaygxtID7N tp7/ONqf9FBgwt5xmYRGlBguyWGKMczDOc0PP+mhoi/wjycj8aNcR5PWFHGdu8Xw e5Kbp8ZA5NWVWLzFmUCF =rgsR -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problem signing manifests for ebuilds
2011/7/8 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 10:08 ??, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: 2011/7/7 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: On 07/07/2011 10:57 ??, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: I'm having a problem signing manifests from time to time (it's random if it works or not). When I run repoman commit, sometimes it asks for my password, and signs it just fine. But sometimes it just fails silently with the following error: You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen gurlige...@gentoo.org 1024-bit DSA key, ID 14576049, created 2008-08-20 gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled !!! !!! gpg exited with '512' status !!! Disabled FEATURES='sign' Does anyone have an idea of why it fails to sign it randomly? /Bjarke What happens if you edit your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf and add default-key 14576049 ? Hey again, Nope, that doesn't do it, it still fails with the error: gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled What puzzles me is why it is random if it asks for my password and signs it or not. You can try to setup keychain[1] so you only have to type your password once [1]http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/keychain-guide.xml - -- I've tried that, it still does not work. Even if I just login as myself and do something like this: gurligebis@raven ~ $ echo blah test gurligebis@raven ~ $ gpg -n --sign test You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen gurlige...@gentoo.org 1024-bit DSA key, ID 14576049, created 2008-08-20 gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: signing failed: Operation cancelled I cannot figure out why gpg insists that I have cancelled anything, when it by itself fails silently. Any ideas? :) Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFrfTAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCYhwQALCPT6+j3K4/YxlpgR16IBwm 2tu9OCvPqXzhiirNyfjUGZBjyufwRiAq0EIyohKjrFuPXV5MOd+kBT5nxxM7ptlQ 3lrnYobm7ccIPDXRuNfwg176nzJEa9r+dhoWBFi3x3vzBuWDVDJ2nyH9QLhGm+0G wrxpNn5twu4kfrfXW1iCSxD+rHFzmdVawEBMPJMflxquInH4DT+qIRZGTk20BXQz KvxS2F+5QWhSCfg7uo0M+hB+yRau41jE4vuGRD7sl2xclw1emldP8RJ/020RYj85 b3ZdsMWK8MUfgoR7gtL3eVR8Lk/HWrCK1QoczT9rcXx1Guei9nGlkc6673pNfphl PGE+MiH0EKS80oUW57beT0VqnryTdyDfGOtrE58nw4nm9WyDEbnJTZRBAIPFNGBA 1d7OPaM/XiuvyIv37x/5Z5zjqSgvJMkmcxf1AtQz1rpXoeEU6kEcP2pwcSx3fi1m uIiYm2MGS1oCzFEPN8F/ZZ0/Pt3GGWsqukNPf4bC/6VLLVsMxbHBzmurma22oB9B T/3ESOglow3kS7Cqvzj55rt+GIZynLNSCPyvh8NCzanSNdlZUktpEpmAj9TmKSRM XUUZv/reR1TXrFcQUkHtLczrerroqcq/fP30qqqABsckxtDJRwnAY/LPA0YMcy6H cYuRRDC4UPlLtb3PF9PM =1IbZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problem signing manifests for ebuilds
2011/7/8 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 10:08 ??, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: 2011/7/7 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: On 07/07/2011 10:57 ??, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: I'm having a problem signing manifests from time to time (it's random if it works or not). When I run repoman commit, sometimes it asks for my password, and signs it just fine. But sometimes it just fails silently with the following error: You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen gurlige...@gentoo.org 1024-bit DSA key, ID 14576049, created 2008-08-20 gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled !!! !!! gpg exited with '512' status !!! Disabled FEATURES='sign' Does anyone have an idea of why it fails to sign it randomly? /Bjarke What happens if you edit your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf and add default-key 14576049 ? Hey again, Nope, that doesn't do it, it still fails with the error: gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled What puzzles me is why it is random if it asks for my password and signs it or not. You can try to setup keychain[1] so you only have to type your password once [1]http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/keychain-guide.xml It seems to be related to my user not being in the tty group - it still puzzles me why it fails randomly :) - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFrfTAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCYhwQALCPT6+j3K4/YxlpgR16IBwm 2tu9OCvPqXzhiirNyfjUGZBjyufwRiAq0EIyohKjrFuPXV5MOd+kBT5nxxM7ptlQ 3lrnYobm7ccIPDXRuNfwg176nzJEa9r+dhoWBFi3x3vzBuWDVDJ2nyH9QLhGm+0G wrxpNn5twu4kfrfXW1iCSxD+rHFzmdVawEBMPJMflxquInH4DT+qIRZGTk20BXQz KvxS2F+5QWhSCfg7uo0M+hB+yRau41jE4vuGRD7sl2xclw1emldP8RJ/020RYj85 b3ZdsMWK8MUfgoR7gtL3eVR8Lk/HWrCK1QoczT9rcXx1Guei9nGlkc6673pNfphl PGE+MiH0EKS80oUW57beT0VqnryTdyDfGOtrE58nw4nm9WyDEbnJTZRBAIPFNGBA 1d7OPaM/XiuvyIv37x/5Z5zjqSgvJMkmcxf1AtQz1rpXoeEU6kEcP2pwcSx3fi1m uIiYm2MGS1oCzFEPN8F/ZZ0/Pt3GGWsqukNPf4bC/6VLLVsMxbHBzmurma22oB9B T/3ESOglow3kS7Cqvzj55rt+GIZynLNSCPyvh8NCzanSNdlZUktpEpmAj9TmKSRM XUUZv/reR1TXrFcQUkHtLczrerroqcq/fP30qqqABsckxtDJRwnAY/LPA0YMcy6H cYuRRDC4UPlLtb3PF9PM =1IbZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problem signing manifests for ebuilds
2011/7/11 Jonathan Callen a...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: I've tried that, it still does not work. Even if I just login as myself and do something like this: gurligebis@raven ~ $ echo blah test gurligebis@raven ~ $ gpg -n --sign test snip I cannot figure out why gpg insists that I have cancelled anything, when it by itself fails silently. Any ideas? :) Are you doing this from within an X11 session? If so, is DISPLAY set properly? If not, does the output of `eselect pinentry show` indicate that a non-X11 pinentry client is selected? - -- Jonathan Callen Hey, No, I was doing it inside a SSH session (using putty from another machine). It seems to have been fixed by adding my user to the tty group, though it doesn't seems to explain why. /Bjarke -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOGufnAAoJELHSF2kinlg4KCUP/Rz5Y4QuM1G6aBDgoy6HG/Y2 FFf7E4XT+BRp74KanLAsYSlMaHqyVULHCwosuDdlCEa2NvqYUUhVUUtPB4kN3B1a HpFVqZcOAF7Vt8+c2+P217h+6Bp7k+u8Ju8/JK7LOpY9E3oO5Rtld5KEoT1hy/fv oVLckbxPQbyHnMet0OTT1vL0JfbQ2Mua/zE9h6Gn7ZTEyD58oWr0vxeaUS/JdNrf Rd5N3M2hl6O1gIbeD8C/rQTCEAsdKB3UwZ9H7HU7XlL75/A8oancbhINGI8wmEvJ 49D3KoY2kZVIqhqtg53EmduGdGAP8cjnJ2BxefoKJVc6LBQ0f9UhylUyY6kTZXRk oLXVv3+jmIXXsv63AtKzAT+6xjMvo2x5s48IzjI45+516y7sCdeVWI5asXiA2zh1 gpK8x2EmTZO0BEwgzhHq7W1UfbXMoVLLXmy6jRyJMjgnwuuqivY8y1pOKeFbmTh+ N2vjBsJBoxg29QEm59NmfB54Szin0XtJSasgyb9Vgnyxa+utY7l0z18hTIWcStnW 2E3sK7/xeZuLdv08Ub9yyPkeLuRh0LwuHtaka8ilT6mD8XoKjEqZcfsXZmCbwYue W/BXVSOfESfWXijKHzglJCTnxO8DiU/5w2ybxisKAJU6HlBdVgLN6YJxcSWVmTZR DQbDZEuF4liEuxdCeFnJ =08xS -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problem signing manifests for ebuilds
2011/7/7 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/07/2011 10:57 ??, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: I'm having a problem signing manifests from time to time (it's random if it works or not). When I run repoman commit, sometimes it asks for my password, and signs it just fine. But sometimes it just fails silently with the following error: You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen gurlige...@gentoo.org 1024-bit DSA key, ID 14576049, created 2008-08-20 gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled !!! !!! gpg exited with '512' status !!! Disabled FEATURES='sign' Does anyone have an idea of why it fails to sign it randomly? /Bjarke What happens if you edit your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf and add default-key 14576049 ? Hey again, Nope, that doesn't do it, it still fails with the error: gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled What puzzles me is why it is random if it asks for my password and signs it or not. - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFYf1AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCCNYP/1HdKsl1zNjGZ+RQRufdUYA6 0DRHcRc4wz1nnMGPZ3yD+01dJYszULZvec9zDAt72SacZXvPh6IhnNHm3B6kya3f E/IuzU8nqIcZJQPPTMePK6mvVDUmxccBg+tfju+Wa5PHKWdjDPSe/r6InOVwMx6U miwbJevVvg4Np2fhdA3Ad27i+ctfUH6MC0Cxm1eGMoEGtL/P5SqATuM7BthiCTOx jwh7LT4nK+30WoBORi4Y1IRpl0qmZErOibFiC1PTej3yBl8Q/IXr3v5IJ8C2b2eG njSV9f+lLQcnvvYNNKP2ybNEqFQrP2tKjge2TDymVjCofEtZI2Ag8tiNwqohNUfG E4vNurgGOhiZPRFgPXlIEm+0M8M0TdrEZUuwUK+ROorQ1Wx7ppycPhEYmNIdeeD7 RgjF6EO7OwOAK3kBcBKxdCw1tI0vCuj51tKbp3RHmLMqL3TA7CZxokqyr2vW5tEY iNhvVVvkVMowwe9Yj6wUaqcTR0HdlzFJ7OgqBmD7hfAGQkC3t7bvDqLyS7SPFRz+ ZJWM5wlDEgzHek1bn2Q0MH6qevMRAT6oBO89abVfR7SJCF9gWQmTsDo2J6x7Jn3w bPeDqyYeBl+PWrjinhCkOnMBExvLpcwqUUOuVzbF8jmVbMElkCNQ4O4uJ0o+ALrF 6ior3A/OHc0xGyLiILtV =YlcA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] Problem signing manifests for ebuilds
I'm having a problem signing manifests from time to time (it's random if it works or not). When I run repoman commit, sometimes it asks for my password, and signs it just fine. But sometimes it just fails silently with the following error: You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen gurlige...@gentoo.org 1024-bit DSA key, ID 14576049, created 2008-08-20 gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled !!! !!! gpg exited with '512' status !!! Disabled FEATURES='sign' Does anyone have an idea of why it fails to sign it randomly? /Bjarke
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problem signing manifests for ebuilds
2011/7/7 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/07/2011 10:57 ??, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: I'm having a problem signing manifests from time to time (it's random if it works or not). When I run repoman commit, sometimes it asks for my password, and signs it just fine. But sometimes it just fails silently with the following error: You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen gurlige...@gentoo.org 1024-bit DSA key, ID 14576049, created 2008-08-20 gpg: cancelled by user gpg: no default secret key: Operation cancelled gpg: ./Manifest: clearsign failed: Operation cancelled !!! !!! gpg exited with '512' status !!! Disabled FEATURES='sign' Does anyone have an idea of why it fails to sign it randomly? /Bjarke What happens if you edit your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf and add default-key 14576049 ? I'll try that, lets see what happens next time I commit something, if it happens again :) Best regards, Bjarke - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFYf1AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCCNYP/1HdKsl1zNjGZ+RQRufdUYA6 0DRHcRc4wz1nnMGPZ3yD+01dJYszULZvec9zDAt72SacZXvPh6IhnNHm3B6kya3f E/IuzU8nqIcZJQPPTMePK6mvVDUmxccBg+tfju+Wa5PHKWdjDPSe/r6InOVwMx6U miwbJevVvg4Np2fhdA3Ad27i+ctfUH6MC0Cxm1eGMoEGtL/P5SqATuM7BthiCTOx jwh7LT4nK+30WoBORi4Y1IRpl0qmZErOibFiC1PTej3yBl8Q/IXr3v5IJ8C2b2eG njSV9f+lLQcnvvYNNKP2ybNEqFQrP2tKjge2TDymVjCofEtZI2Ag8tiNwqohNUfG E4vNurgGOhiZPRFgPXlIEm+0M8M0TdrEZUuwUK+ROorQ1Wx7ppycPhEYmNIdeeD7 RgjF6EO7OwOAK3kBcBKxdCw1tI0vCuj51tKbp3RHmLMqL3TA7CZxokqyr2vW5tEY iNhvVVvkVMowwe9Yj6wUaqcTR0HdlzFJ7OgqBmD7hfAGQkC3t7bvDqLyS7SPFRz+ ZJWM5wlDEgzHek1bn2Q0MH6qevMRAT6oBO89abVfR7SJCF9gWQmTsDo2J6x7Jn3w bPeDqyYeBl+PWrjinhCkOnMBExvLpcwqUUOuVzbF8jmVbMElkCNQ4O4uJ0o+ALrF 6ior3A/OHc0xGyLiILtV =YlcA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, ~From version 1.4.1.1 of iptables, libiptc headers and library is no longer installed. Since some programs still depends on it (net-misc/miniupnpd which will be hitting the tree as soon as this is sorted out, and probably some other programs too), and there is no real alternative to it right now. What do you think - Should I add this library ebuild to the tree, or should I just give up getting miniupnpd added to the tree, since there is no alternative to using libiptc? I already have an ebuild for it that compiles iptables, and just installs the headers and library files, and my local tests shows that it works fine here. Best regards, Bjarke. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkCUbgACgkQO+Ewtpi9rLFq/ACfdbCQnwa510+Vl91Zo1nk3Fid vpQAn3Puoi6ijvZYihLgSLwxWzhkwUqI =x/5E -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robin H. Johnson skrev: | On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: | What do you think - Should I add this library ebuild to the tree, or | should I just give up getting miniupnpd added to the tree, since there | is no alternative to using libiptc? | I already have an ebuild for it that compiles iptables, and just | installs the headers and library files, and my local tests shows that it | works fine here. | Unless vapier has a strong reason not to include libiptc, you should | rather just modify the main iptables ebuild to install the library | again. | | Adding a separate variant of the package just for the library is a sure | way to cause missed security patches and bugfixes later on (see shades | of xpdf). | Okay, I'll ask him for input on it :) Thanks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkCbVYACgkQO+Ewtpi9rLGlyQCgrNJ9gD6TzhHtkluBGEx0jOav Z/IAn35vLZ6DClVNZ1HTh+tR7RtJL5qY =IEgt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Really sad to see you go :-( You where the one who got me into this mess. Well, good luck to you where ever you may go. Any chance on you coming back later on? Bjarke / GurliGebis Bryan Østergaard skrev: It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally retiring from Gentoo. I've been a Gentoo developer for nearly 4 years now and I like to at least pretend that I've made some important contributions to Gentoo during that time. I've had a lot of fun but my frustrations have grown these past several months and I've been entertaining the idea about retiring from Gentoo for probably 6 months now. The past couple months the desire to leave Gentoo have become much stronger and I think it's finally time for me and Gentoo to go our separate ways. I think I've put my fingerprint on Gentoo in quite a few important ways but lately I've come to the realization that I probably can't do any more for Gentoo. No matter how hard I try fighting for what I feel is right we seem to end up with petty fights, flamewars or what I consider even worse - people simply ignore what I'm working hard towards. So I think it's high time that I leave the project and start looking for another project where I can contribute something important and not just try to keep afloat in a project that I seem to be at odds with to an ever increasing degree. I'll try to reach all the projects I'm leaving over the next few days and see if I can pass on my work in a reasonable manner. I probably won't be around much on irc but if you really need to contact me you can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good luck to all of you and may Gentoo development be as much fun for you as it used to be for me. Best regards, Bryan Østergaard -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXolEO+Ewtpi9rLERAnQUAJ49otKHGgBcgc2LMXw0kMpYwn6pagCfTr27 Us9VdDgyZtiEmi/oZPRbqX8= =yKlP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: net-misc/upnp (June 13.)
# Bjarke Istrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30 May 2007) # masked for removal on 20070629 # Upstream is dead and there are several issues # Please use net-libs/libupnp instead. net-misc/upnp Package has been dead for over a year (last release 20060305). It has several knows issues, that has been fixed in net-libs/libupnp, which is a fork of net-misc/upnp. Unless anyone objects (and with a very good reason), I will remove it from the tree on June 29. GurliGebis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It would be nice if there where some CD/DVD labels created, that people could print and put on their LiveCDs/InstallCDs :-) Bjarke Dawid Węgliński skrev: Hi there As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we enlist everyone who would like to help us in creating artwork gentoo-related stuff. Do not forget to visit us in #gentoo-artwork. :) @ GWN - could you guys write about us in the next version of gwn please? [1]. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/artwork/index.xml Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMcJFO+Ewtpi9rLERAluXAJ4gZZVammSCu5tt1520Ffs3ZZv8uACgrecs 67ymo1sp5zYOGZYoGdw60lo= =+FV8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deskzilla license for Gentoo Bugzilla for everyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thats a known problem. Have a look here: http://bugzilla.almworks.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525 Bjarke Wulf C. Krueger wrote: Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you find the the query field for the cc entries? I failed at that... I couldn't find it either which is why I still use my server-side queries. Another issue I experienced is that the date fields on our Bugzilla can't be parsed. Every single date is displayed as 01-01-70 for me. Anyone else with that problem? -- Regards, Wulf -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLPu6O+Ewtpi9rLERArKNAKDSxK0wreJQMh6pJQE9sWDjzdnnYgCfaMkD 9ImiD/rx021AOa8BIbAIygs= =0dLi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Deskzilla license for Gentoo Bugzilla for everyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That was my intention, since it's public for everyone. - From the email I got it looks like they want me to share it, and spread the word ;-) Bjarke Ned Ludd wrote: You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to revoke this license now. On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 23:05 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: Hey everyone :-) Infra told me to go ahead and email this around, so here it is. Here is a snippet of the email I got: Thanks for your request. Please find attached a site license for Gentoo Linux project. Feel free to share the license key with anyone interested or post it on the web. The license allows any number of users, and it is locked to Gentoo Linux Bugzilla URL. If in the future the URL changes, please let me know and I'll create another license key. Please note that this license key requires Deskzilla 1.3 or later. You can download the latest version from http://almworks.com/deskzilla/download.html . So there it is. For now you can get the ebuild from java-experimental . Best regards Bjarke Istrup Pedersen AKA GurliGebis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGKTWNO+Ewtpi9rLERAi12AJoC7LspOu85L+GvYedd7KrhyaQwHwCdE9wY 8VkTaN9fe1jMMG5TRRpOKXU= =AQbG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday Reminder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey everyone :-) Saturday (that would be tomorrow), it's bugday again, and we would like to see you in #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net :-) We hope to see as many people as possible, and to get as many bugs as possible fixed :-) Bjarke AKA GurliGebis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE+FROO+Ewtpi9rLERAsvlAJ95eT/Z8tRhKoQapMG8s15BsashjgCg2nyP kLQW63t2SVznIwsvxX8Jm1k= =Z04/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday announcement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey everybody. Bugday is moving closer, and we would like to see you on Saturday 1. of July. We are celebrating that it once again is the first saturday of the month. We will be serving virtual cookies to everybody who shows up :-) So please, show up in #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net , we will be starting at 00:00 and ending at 23:59 ca. The new bugday website isn't online yet, due to a few techincal problems that we are working on sorting out :-) Hope to see you all Bjarke (AKA. GurliGebis) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEopoBO+Ewtpi9rLERAk2+AJ9yP3onCkFwxbhUgdYEJBFEMpGVGQCfZkg0 a/ohZ7y4mSGn56u7EVB3rBM= =t2/n -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday today (late reminder)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey everyone :-) So, here we go again, seems like I almost forgot it again, but in case you missed it, it's bugday again today :-) We will be aiming to have the new website only for next bugday, so things will start to be more interresting :-) I know it's a pretty late announcement, but hey, it's still saturday :-) Bjarke -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEgX+EO+Ewtpi9rLERAm85AJ9VwjcEqUb73hJLNK8SJLcp7dAIqQCfeLjZ q/Y9RtVj+3a6fM5X5fTmG1s= =e+7r -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey everybody. It's getting close and close ... is it a bird? is it a plane, no, it's BUGDAY :-) Hehe, and this time it's on April 1. , no, it's no april fools joke. Something interresting has happend since last, the new bugday site has gone into official beta, and can been seen on http://bugday.gentoo.org/bugdaytest . Please do some testing with it, and report any bugs you find back to me. Best regards, and happy bug hunting. GurliGebis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEK+ZEO+Ewtpi9rLERAhvWAKC7oO2apSJhFVit1O8DKGfJWxlTQwCgl3a+ fdlJF/tpDZCmvIz+Eo5j680= =Wu+k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey everybody :-) It's time again to get some bug smashing done. We hope to see you all in #gentoo-bugs tomorrow (saturday 2006/03/04). Best Regards Bjarke Istrup Pedersen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFECJccO+Ewtpi9rLERAuytAJ93igIY6aShwxkFfzcKoO2aZIk2fQCfVAxq XmB6fRnJF9SqtQTyCe0b81k= =k7l+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] enable UTF8 per default?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Lauer skrev: Hi all, at FOSDEM we had a nice discussion about languages, translations etc. Having people from the US (wolf31o2) who never have problems and people from Japan (usata) who always have problems with encodings / charsets / ... was quite interesting. During that discussion we realized that having utf-8 not enabled by default and no utf8 fonts available by default causes lots of recompilation and reconfiguration. Enabling the unicode useflag in the profiles should help our international users and should not cause any problems. Are there any known bugs / problems this would trigger? Any reasons against that? If there are no objections this should be a small but helpful change. On a tangent I wonder if pulling in extra fonts as a dependency of X makes sense (useflag controlled, enabled by default) - that way the unicode capabilities are available without any configuration. Patrick I think it would be nice to have it enabled too :-) You got my vote. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEBOHkO+Ewtpi9rLERAralAJoD2y5E9U6rVKV5WMKyjg/3u6baOACeKXba dOAfrKDeV4ci9W9ykNwtKCQ= =4Qkm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting all log related packages into it's own category (sys-logging)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stuart Herbert skrev: On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 20:30 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be resolved, moving packages around should be avoided. It's a shame we can't find a way to turn package categories into solely a presentational feature, rather than being an integral part of the package's identity as it is today. (And, at the same time, multi-depth categories would also be nice :) With the way things are today, improvements to the structure of the package tree are held back by our historical legacy. As the tree grows, it makes sense to move packages into new groups that weren't viable before - and to clear out historical dumping grounds in the process. If package categories were only something that users used to find things - and weren't used by Portage as part of a package's unique identity - then we could afford to be more flexible on this. Best regards, Stu That sounds like a cool idea, but it requires a few things. We need a way to browse the tree, that supports packages being in several categories. (Lets call them category-keywords). Having a directory structure might not be the best way, since the category-keywords will be more of a metadata thing, than a directory. I'm not sure how this could be implemented, but it sure requires a GLEP. Any suggestions on how this could be implemented? (Maybe having a SQLite database with all the meta info, to save some time syncing and space. Could with a bit of luck have all the metadata for portage, like digests etc. , but thats another idea though). Best Regards Bjarke -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD+ul3O+Ewtpi9rLERAixWAKC8uMwIAcnAmxcvjkgXiia/Z3KK0ACg2Zdg GWZEqPUXAypXf43OMn2vzcs= =SXAM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Putting all log related packages into it's own category (sys-logging)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey. I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their own category? This should be logging daemons, log viewers, logrotate etc. Maybe creating a logging herd would be an idea to, to remove the load from the base-system herd. What do you think? Best regards GurliGebis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD+cCKO+Ewtpi9rLERAt4/AJ0ebe9R88a89NbFcIDWwAjYZmVQWACfd/fE A8oegF7aHMcVJCk1cmSrsBw= =XFwz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alright everybody, it's time again to start breaking your systems and reporting bugs. It will be on next Saturday, 2006-02-04 :-) This time we would like people to try out some packages in ~arch and see how they run, so we can get them moved to stable. I'll see if I can get a list together of packages. As always, if people have questions, we are at #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net Hope to see you all there. Bjarke -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD4n5LO+Ewtpi9rLERArn7AJ97gnm2QOR/8SktAp5gXG1e9a7iMgCgxe6h oE2mbOLKZmY7m5jjIts/wUw= =eGYa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] New developers: Martin Ehmsen (ehmsen) and Michal Kurgan (moloh)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Welcome :-) Nice to see some more danes helping out. Bjarke -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDyuWaO+Ewtpi9rLERAvx5AJ988UUsuZTCSvJDj4fYF7Jwg/QiSQCeOowc wsjKDm3SMauIglsgW+/9iXc= =mXJB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dirk Heinrichs skrev: Am Montag, 2. Januar 2006 21:45 schrieb ext Mark Loeser: Actually, since I plan on moving this to ~arch soon, please report all bugs to us, even if you don't have a patch. I'd like to know of everything that is broken. I filed bug reports for crypto++, botan, monotone and isdn4k-utils. Still have to verify wether OpenOffice.org emerge failure is GCC 4 related or not, but this I will do over the weekend. The bug numbers are: 117547, 117548, 117572 and 117573. Bye... Dirk Is there a metabug where we can keep track of all the GCC 4 bugs? If so, what bug # ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDuqemO+Ewtpi9rLERAo1DAJ9N4zVXqtBBzqpiufQHElqY72rDZQCeIDbj kwN/wVgJUGwPPGops+vVJis= =zgOW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages in the tree
Mark Loeser skrev: Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if necessary. Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand, since its been brought to my attention a virtual would probably be best for this, so we would handle the || ( gcc-3.3.* libstdc++ ) inside of the virtual. I'll make one later unless anyone has strong objections to this for people to use in DEPEND, instead of writing the `or` dep out. Okay, I have added the new-style virtual. If you have a binary application in the tree that requires libstdc++.so.5, please add a dep in your ebuild on =virtual/libstdc++-3.3. Let me know if anything doesn't seem to work right. Thanks Does this mean that gcc-3.4 will no longer have libstdc++ as a dependency? :-D Bjarke -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Langer skrev:
I'm just a more or less simple user of gentoo who somtimes tries to look
a bit behind the curtain, so if you think this posting doesn't belong to
gentoo-dev let me know.
However, maybe this is interesting to you:
Recently i've got serious trouble with one of my hard drives, so that i
was forced to move my gentoo root partition from one hd to another. I
successfully did so by mainly rsync -av source dest directory after
diretcory. However, there are /proc, /dev and /sys which are different.
Especially on the /dev part i was unsure how to do this, so i looked at
the gentoo-udev guide once again, and found out, that for a working
udev, which i can confirm as i'm writing this mail, only the nodes
console and null are requred to exist in the /dev diretory initially.
That's the reason why i was i little bit surprised as
# mkdir test
# mount --bind / test
# cd test/dev
# ls
revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in the /dev
directory.
And this is not only true for the box where i discovered this, which was
brought up from a
2004.x cd, but also true for the box where i just installed gentoo from
2005.1-r1.
Is there any reason for this ?
Matthias
I know this topic is quiet old.
On my systems I only have /dev/{null,console} , and let udev managed the
rest.
When I do the install, I remove all the files in /dev (except those
two), and run mount --bind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev , then I do the install,
and it works fine.
Is there any reason for not doing this, and then recommend that the
users that don't use udev/devfs to run MAKEDEV ?
Bjarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDrWyhO+Ewtpi9rLERAmBcAKCmrYf4h0ToZXY5RjyfC+CG0Fu+wgCfazZm
QyPdHTlEF1vQR8XfMGyfNmw=
=byxb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc, and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 . I know this has been discussed before, but once it's stable I see no reason to keep the dependency in the gcc ebuild, when it could be in the binary packages. Bjarke Mark Loeser skrev: This is basically a heads-up email to everyone to say that we are probably going to be moving gcc-3.4.4-r1 to stable on x86 very soon. If any of the archs that have already done the move from having 3.3 stable to 3.4 could give us a heads up on what to expect, that would be great. Only thing I see as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properly upgrade your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users that have a system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so they get linking errors. Thanks, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDi0h3O+Ewtpi9rLERAibAAKCedui46gqRaBmwMpkufdQdw88ikQCfcgQu UybgL9DJQXbD93CxuiHztEQ= =+tUe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub reiser4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't think it will happend before it gets added to the vanilla kernel, but not sure. Chris Bainbridge skrev: Hi, I was wondering if there's any chance of having the reiser4 patch for grub (or even the whole grub-reiser4 distfile) added to the ebuild. There are various bugs where people have posted patches for 0.96x ebuilds which were never added and the bugs have been WONTFIXed or left dangling. I've been using grub+reiser4 for about 9 months now with no problems. The last reason I heard it wouldn't be added was that no kernels in portage support it; I believe that's not true anymore, at least mm-sources has reiser4. Thanks, Chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDPDTAO+Ewtpi9rLERAlcTAJ4wkJLXHgrGQpxbMz6Vw2Jd+rzY/ACcCfcm 8LKt48wJZuk8NnzjE0b29H4= =93vB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday announcement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey everybody :) It's about time for another bugday, but still no new bugday site (but we are working on it, more about that in my next email). Everything is the same way as always, just #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net on Sunday 1. October and help us resolve as many bugs as possible. Best Regards Bjarke Istrup Pedersen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDPDYsO+Ewtpi9rLERAs48AJ97kBByjwNf5kCPfSYrIIgwASiiWQCfTt0I flW/JSM00cLKN2/xUBl8W6A= =EUb0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Betatesters needed for the new bugday website
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello again everybody. I got a little request for you all. We are working on the new bugday website, there is currently nothing to see, but that should change very soon. Thats why we need a few beta testers, about 5-10 people, due to the fact that the testversion is running outside of the gentoo infrastructure, we have to limit the number of people to stop it from getting flooded with people and taking up all of my bandwidth. So, to sum it up, I need about 5-10 people willing to test it to contact me by email. Gentoo devs are preferred, but not required. So, if you want to participate, send me an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include [BETATESTER] in the topic, so I can filter on it (my email is getting flooded ;) Hope to hear from you guys, if it doesn't put too much load on the system and my connection, more testers might be let in, I keep all the emails, so nobody will be lost, even thought I might not reply at first. Best Regards Bjarke Istrup Pedersen AKA GurliGebis Best Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDPDfgO+Ewtpi9rLERAtoCAKCWINoCYCqY9b6pl+TWMRsJt/ViZQCg0V5s 4Ec+N4FaFno9GFyfEGeSnHo= =6R6z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Huddleston skrev: I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the portage tree, it sparked a little bit of a policy discussion between myself and the core eselect devs on how to best include modules in the tree, so I'd like to let other devs chime in as well. Firstly if you don't know what eselect is, check out: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/eselect/index.xml The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect). Their main reasons for this are better QA and less overhead for releases and merging. I have a problem with this policy because: 1) Stability of the modules should not be tied to stability of the core package. Basically, I'd like to determine when my modules get pushed into stable without considering how it'll effect the eselect modules of other developers. Similarly, I don't want bugs in another module holding up my module from going into stable. 2) Not all users will want all modules. The goal of the eselect project is to provide a framework to replace java-config, motif-config, gcc-config, binutils-config, opengl-update, etc, but not all users will need all modules. 3) Some modules require extra files (opengl-update installs header files, gcc-config installs a wrapper, etc), and the app-admin/eselect package is not the correct place to provide these files. Also, what should the correct way to introduce these modules into portage? Should we keep them in the packages they're replacing (x11-base/opengl-update)? Should we place them in a new package in the same category as the script they're replacing (x11-base/eselect-opengl)? Should we place them in app-admin/eselect-module name or perhaps app-eselect/module name? Note that for backwards compatibility in all cases, x11-base/opengl-update will RDEPEND on this eselect module and install a backwards-compatible frontend to the eselect module until all packages in portage have been updated to use the eselect module instead. Any plans on moving webapp-config as an eselect module? :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDGzt+O+Ewtpi9rLERAiZgAKDAzrI29bEbUoVKdji4r9vaZOFFcwCdGbfo rXlfU7yQb6qvpuMj2BR806Y= =d86l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] why does gcc-3.4.x depend on gcc-3.3.x / libstdc++?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I must say I have been wondering about this for a while too. A solution might be add some sort of flag to packages that are binary, and then let portage install libstdc++ the first time you install this kind of package. Mike Frysinger skrev: On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote: Subject says it all - is there any reason why 3.4.4 installs either gcc-3.3* or libstdc++-v3 built with gcc-3.3? because i got tired of people complaining about broken systems when they emerged gcc-3.4.4 and cleaned out all gcc-3.3.x versions from their system Is it possible to compile a native 3.4 system without the old gcc if I don't need binary compatibility? i just add libstdc++-v3 to my package.provided in /etc/portage/profile/ and call it a day i dont really see there being a clean solution until we have portage support to track ABI dependencies -mike -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDD7fLO+Ewtpi9rLERAi3NAJsEKnxeVaCrJUl6dSvaU1zP3J4OpwCgxa5v HfmJvCp8XDXDYAyFpYDoNu0= =bV8B -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Bugday announcement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alright everybody, here we go again :-) This is my first announcement, so let?s hope I get everything right. On next Saturday it will be bugday again, unfortunately the new bugday website isn't done yet, but the little dwarf sitting under my table doing all the coding has run away, and I haven't been able to find him yet. Well, back to business, it will be on #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net on Saturday. (Thanks to time zones, it almost lasts two days, so join in early). Bugday has existed two years now, and we have an article in the newest GWN, so if you haven't read it yet, take the time to do so, you can find it here: http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20050801-newsletter.xml Hope to see a lot of you there; unfortunately there won't be free cookies this time. Best Regards Bjarke Istrup Pedersen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC8pSzO+Ewtpi9rLERAtI4AJ9wdTbg/iWpkNwzLNqR1QtpYZzqLgCgzYBR LHTDe2BKRzT9+SldEjIesyY= =IALR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Dev Bjarke istrup Pedersen (Gurligebis)
Jochen Maes skrev: Hey all, bjarke, our new dev from the vast lands off Denmark, has been added to the team! He's been working on the bugday website and has been helping out a lot for bugday. his intro: I'm a 20 year old guy from Denmark studying software development. I like spending my time with my friends and family, and working with computers. I enjoy listening to music and walking around outside when the weather allows it. And believe me the weather isn't always that good, so he'll be doing a lot off work for Gentoo :-) Please all give him a warm welcome Jochen Thanks, hope to be able to put some more life into Bugday :) Bjarke -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Dev Bjarke istrup Pedersen (Gurligebis)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen skrev: On Wednesday 20 July 2005 20:21, Jochen Maes wrote: Hey all, bjarke, our new dev from the vast lands off Denmark, has been added to the team! Another member for the Danish conspiracy:-) Welcome on board Bjarke! Thanks, looking forward to getting to work :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC3utzO+Ewtpi9rLERAkMkAJoD7wDP/4xruUP19dgPd5F5pf+6ZACggQj8 nGglwPf97yk21dmteGghH7U= =wPXN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
