Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-08 Thread Curtis Napier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
 On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 23:50 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: MD5

 I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
 Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)

 On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run this past
 our lawyer(s) and make sure we have our i's dotted and out t's crossed.
 I would hate for something good like this to cause us problems down the
 road.
 
 Umm... The Foundation has zero to do with a contract between two third
 parties.  Let me give you an example.  I am currently doing paid Gentoo
 work for a company, who will remain nameless.  I filled out paperwork
 with the company.  My being a member of the Gentoo Foundation, a
 Trustee, or anything else, has exactly zero bearing on my being
 contracted, as an individual, to a company.
 
 I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev,
 maybe she can throw this in as well?
 
 Do we have to do some special law-abiding dance to have sponsors listed
 on the site?  What about advertisers?
 
 What Christel is researching is the tax law related to individuals
 receiving gifts.  It has no bearing on the Foundation itself.
 
 Let's look at this another way.  We have advertisers that sell Gentoo
 servers and Gentoo-based services.  How exactly is this any different?
 Is it because they're developers?  How does that matter?  In the end,
 the contract is entirely between two third-party entities, the
 developer, and whomever contracts him.  It isn't like the Foundation is
 offering services.  It isn't.  The individual developers are offering
 services.  The Foundation is not any of our employer.  We are not bound
 by any legal contract to the Foundation, and it has no ties to us.
 

Giving ad space to our sponsors is legal for us to do as a Not For
Profit because they are donating goods and/or services to us.
Technically we are not giving them ads, we are acknowledging the
donated goods and/or services. Just like PBS does at the beginning of
it's shows, they aren't ads but acknowledgments of donations.

Basically I just want to make sure that we are not breaking any of the
rules of being a Not For Profit foundation. The IRS doesn't accept We
didn't know any better as an excuse when they come knocking on our door
to re-evaluate our Not For Profit status because we are giving free
advertising to people who *ARE* being paid in a For Profit manner.

And if the IRS changes our status we *may* be liable for back taxes.

I know I'm the only one who ever says anything about the legality of
what we do and always brings the Foundation into it but let's face
facts: The Gentoo web properties are owned and operated by the Gentoo
Foundation which means that those web properties MUST follow the law
concerning Not For Profit.

If no one else is concerned about it then I'll drop it but when the day
comes and the IRS is a knockin' don't look at me. Besides, what can
it hurt to have one of the Foundation Trustees ask one of our lawyers
about it?

- --Curtis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBRQIxOEb8Q0uRCeTQAQFDMggAzP8sLxQ1btrjo6OioDxEgU65nvCSNfT0
Qn8gDxlcPA5HtRZA5c3Rw2uM2sCC55C2tW3SVoa5EJFH9Gs/cnzNkAdNeW8HaQTD
ErG9WvZKsI/fvax1JHIgBTq03p81WxIY9GFc6olCdr0BgFptiZIx2kPaxZ+6q/wY
0Zv1nzzvet3lmM2ZYet35vds0WrhyHrqAvUcvlcgcz6gmlsmOXlS/WXazRi8636T
5yytNzfV7pdsf3t2BF+n3Cg93kiF2x4u2OV/rPUFWHpkzpjoTB5XNEgogelrDMQn
wBhxbN4LE96mc/Km+vD7Mt8cBU/8UFmn1wMKyVGsLS6xReADkD4+Ew==
=7+lW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Curtis Napier wrote:
 Giving ad space to our sponsors is legal for us to do as a Not For
 Profit because they are donating goods and/or services to us.
 Technically we are not giving them ads, we are acknowledging the
 donated goods and/or services. Just like PBS does at the beginning of
 it's shows, they aren't ads but acknowledgments of donations.
 
 Basically I just want to make sure that we are not breaking any of the
 rules of being a Not For Profit foundation. The IRS doesn't accept We
 didn't know any better as an excuse when they come knocking on our door
 to re-evaluate our Not For Profit status because we are giving free
 advertising to people who *ARE* being paid in a For Profit manner.

You just made my point. THEY are being paid, not Gentoo. Gentoo receives
no financial support from this, and Gentoo is not offering goods or
services in return for money.

Thanks,
Donnie



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-07 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 23:50 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: MD5
 
 I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
 Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)
 
 On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run this past
 our lawyer(s) and make sure we have our i's dotted and out t's crossed.
 I would hate for something good like this to cause us problems down the
 road.

Umm... The Foundation has zero to do with a contract between two third
parties.  Let me give you an example.  I am currently doing paid Gentoo
work for a company, who will remain nameless.  I filled out paperwork
with the company.  My being a member of the Gentoo Foundation, a
Trustee, or anything else, has exactly zero bearing on my being
contracted, as an individual, to a company.

 I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev,
 maybe she can throw this in as well?

Do we have to do some special law-abiding dance to have sponsors listed
on the site?  What about advertisers?

What Christel is researching is the tax law related to individuals
receiving gifts.  It has no bearing on the Foundation itself.

Let's look at this another way.  We have advertisers that sell Gentoo
servers and Gentoo-based services.  How exactly is this any different?
Is it because they're developers?  How does that matter?  In the end,
the contract is entirely between two third-party entities, the
developer, and whomever contracts him.  It isn't like the Foundation is
offering services.  It isn't.  The individual developers are offering
services.  The Foundation is not any of our employer.  We are not bound
by any legal contract to the Foundation, and it has no ties to us.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-06 Thread Curtis Napier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5

I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)

On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run this past
our lawyer(s) and make sure we have our i's dotted and out t's crossed.
I would hate for something good like this to cause us problems down the
road.

I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev,
maybe she can throw this in as well?


- --Curtis


ps. I didn't read every message in the thread, sorry if I'm repeating
stuff that's already been covered.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBRP+W7kb8Q0uRCeTQAQElJggAvAOIq5cnRqAXgjGUJPpQv3VuQuLPAGY6
HTVRDC24kP3yeOCy7+lyFgwZ9qV90w36zMzAVYHmQzXqVVqjWxKp06HTD+L/3Di+
PEBvtnYSYeeSnooZ0Q8hMqiwCOaImJBImTRh3X/8Y1Omjhvz0+Yw2IPuvmBjyD+D
aAYPOLuqcDP1GUogPv+rBYCQXCU8YrqPJu8AjM0nWktSzgWvxdJC7xDI7IYlmcB3
gUc+arxb9edVOFUZH4nF8ZkhbHWw3R4i104Jd60oCSKdsXo1gBdCb7CwAGeSpVdI
N+qbGYuCsgdGa4f3lMfeuT5/jU7H5phEFEjFobu9S//4nWivx3NIHQ==
=8+RA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-05 Thread Alastair Tse
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:00 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
 On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
  this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
  already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
 
 We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
 developers from the folks they help.  Doesn't matter how well we make
 it clear that these folks are independent; their actions will
 reflect on Gentoo as a whole, and unhappy customers _will_ complain to
 us sooner or later.  Rather than pretent it won't happen, better we're
 pro-active and have something prepared.

I think this is a great idea. If not for paid support, but just a list
of names of developers who are willing to do some freelance consulting
on setting up machines with Gentoo or to debug a problem, etc. I'm sure
there are people who have ended up with a Gentoo machine, but can't hire
a full time dev and would just like to pay someone to handle certain
issues.

I landed some freelancing where one of the reasons I was found was
because I did work for Gentoo, and they have some gentoo servers that
needed to be setup properly and securely.

I'm putting my hand up to help set this up if it is more effort than
putting up a single page on the web site :)

Cheers,

Alastair

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-03 Thread Christel Dahlskjaer
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 00:31 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
 Stuart Herbert wrote:
  Hi,
  
  We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
  developers from the folks they help.  Doesn't matter how well we make
  it clear that these folks are independent; their actions will
  reflect on Gentoo as a whole, and unhappy customers _will_ complain to
  us sooner or later.  Rather than pretent it won't happen, better we're
  pro-active and have something prepared.
 
 That's a very smart thought. Let's do it.

+1


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
 If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
 have to pay for like RHEL.  Their testing is no better than ours, but
 at least paying something entitles you to bitch at them.
 Or consider paying a Gentoo developer [*] as your first level support
 person, and liaison with Gentoo. Thus they consult for you, and tell you
 if your specific combinations are going to work, and do their hardest to
 keep them working.

It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.

Thanks,
Donnie



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-02 Thread Aaron Kulbe
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote: If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you have to pay for like RHEL.Their testing is no better than ours, but
 at least paying something entitles you to bitch at them. Or consider paying a Gentoo developer [*] as your first level support person, and liaison with Gentoo. Thus they consult for you, and tell you
 if your specific combinations are going to work, and do their hardest to keep them working.It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doingthis on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.Thanks,DonnieI have done it before, and it's rather rewarding. Both monetarily, and otherwise.



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-02 Thread Denis Dupeyron

On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.


I was thinking about something like this a couple of weeks ago.
Similar to the adopt-a-dev project but for those of us who are
students (or superhumans) and have enough time and want to make a buck
or two with gentoo. We could list companies/people needing help either
as a one-time action or on a regular basis (like a few hours a month),
and starving and/or bored devs.

The company I work for, for example, has gentoo servers only, and they
use me as a consultant when they need it (my real job is not about
computers). If they didn't have me they'd need somebody to help them,
and I can hardly imagine it's the only company in the world in that
case.

Plus, that would probably make good PR for Gentoo.

Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-02 Thread Stuart Herbert

Hi,

On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.


This is a good idea.

If you do it, it would be a very good idea to also post basic advice
for Gentoo developers who put their name down for this.  Folks'll need
to know about contracts, documenting their work, and insurance.
Per-country advice on independent contracting would also be helpful.

We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
developers from the folks they help.  Doesn't matter how well we make
it clear that these folks are independent; their actions will
reflect on Gentoo as a whole, and unhappy customers _will_ complain to
us sooner or later.  Rather than pretent it won't happen, better we're
pro-active and have something prepared.

Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-02 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis

Stuart Herbert wrote:

Hi,

We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
developers from the folks they help.  Doesn't matter how well we make
it clear that these folks are independent; their actions will
reflect on Gentoo as a whole, and unhappy customers _will_ complain to
us sooner or later.  Rather than pretent it won't happen, better we're
pro-active and have something prepared.


That's a very smart thought. Let's do it.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support

2006-09-02 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Donnie Berkholz wrote:
 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
 If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
 have to pay for like RHEL.  Their testing is no better than ours, but
 at least paying something entitles you to bitch at them.
 Or consider paying a Gentoo developer [*] as your first level support
 person, and liaison with Gentoo. Thus they consult for you, and tell you
 if your specific combinations are going to work, and do their hardest to
 keep them working.
 
 It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
 this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
 already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
 
 Thanks,
 Donnie
 
I like it.  probably should have it's own thread though...

- --
===
Mike Doty  kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
Gentoo Developer Relations
Gentoo Recruitment Lead
Gentoo Infrastructure
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6  F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
===
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBRPnl4oBrouQZ9K4FAQIodQQA8fQLHp3Gk4LTAxF1bACBWCYgvd37Y0QV
rqJIKtqPJr90X9/KUBRxsWh2fxw0/iBEVNU9QptqIRmBUjX3dMzD4oDBagRlemSQ
BKdOkMI/H1T3YX8NSLOWyey9RBP2sIhdoPvNzIZYLbHOhv9gaKfoWZZPxqveh2T1
FuA0sUj/v3U=
=fXMu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list