Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: > I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. > Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. > > -- > ,, > SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto > TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca > > So you broke the threading on the original email, you deleted all the previous content, you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail and then you claim you solved a problem without mentioning what the problem was. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
130401 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: >> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. >> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. > So you broke the threading on the original email, > you deleted all the previous content, > you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail > and then you claim you solved a problem > without mentioning what the problem was. Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation & help other users who may face the same problem, but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:54:08 -0400 From: Philip Webb To: Gentoo User Subject: [gentoo-user] Udev 200 : dhcpcd problem + solution Message-ID: <20130401015408.ga...@ca.inter.net> -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb wrote: > 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: >>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. >>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. >> So you broke the threading on the original email, >> you deleted all the previous content, >> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail >> and then you claim you solved a problem >> without mentioning what the problem was. > > Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. > I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation > & help other users who may face the same problem, > but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. > I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, > but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. > > Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to gentoo-dev just to inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even mentioning the title. And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb wrote: >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. >>> So you broke the threading on the original email, >>> you deleted all the previous content, >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail >>> and then you claim you solved a problem >>> without mentioning what the problem was. >> >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation >> & help other users who may face the same problem, >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. >> >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : >> > > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to > gentoo-dev just to > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even > mentioning the title. > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And has been for almost a year? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote: > > On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb wrote: > >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: > >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: > I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. > Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. > >>> So you broke the threading on the original email, > >>> you deleted all the previous content, > >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail > >>> and then you claim you solved a problem > >>> without mentioning what the problem was. > >> > >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. > >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation > >> & help other users who may face the same problem, > >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. > >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, > >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. > >> > >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : > >> > > > > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to > > gentoo-dev just to > > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even > > mentioning the title. > > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok > > Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And > has been for almost a year? > I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that. The bug is still open
