Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Add a couple new warnings to QA check
On Monday 19 March 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: To this end it would also be useful if the QA notices were _all_ sent to the elog report; the Files were installed with user/group portage one is, but I don't think any of the others are. add qa to your elog classes and any messages that still arent sent arent properly using the eqawarn func and should be trivial to fix -mike pgpPyHYoVVATT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Add a couple new warnings to QA check
On Monday 19 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if it exists and fall back to echo. it isnt part of the PMS ... so it'd need to be added -mike pgpZ3gY5Z6hMF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Add a couple new warnings to QA check
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: On Monday 19 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if it exists and fall back to echo. it isnt part of the PMS ... so it'd need to be added -mike I don't see it being important enough to warrant a place in EAPI=0. EAPI=1 for sure. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
