[gentoo-user] blockers
how would one deal with this situation? what options are there and why is which better in what cases? These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating world dependencies ...done! [ebuildU ] sys-apps/man-pages-1.61 [1.56] [blocks B]
Re: [gentoo-user] hardware clock
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 02:26, Gëzim Hoxha wrote: > --- blade- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gëzim Hoxha wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >I don't know what's happening but my computer clock > > >keeps falling back, I went to the BIOS and changed > > it > > >but after a day or so if fall back by like 10 mins. > > >and keeps doing that. What could be causing this? > > >Note: it's the windows clock too. > > > > > >Thanks, > > >ZiM > > > > > >__ > > >Do you Yahoo!? > > >SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > > >http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > > > >-- > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > Do you turn your computer off overnight or when > > ever? I think this is > > caused by your mobo's battery. > > Yes I turn it off quite often. But I did this always > and it never changed before. > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > well one day have to be the first day the battery fails :D anyway it sounds suspeciously much like a dead or dying battery -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] kdevelop-2.1.5 with kde-3.1.2
now you mention it, that sounds about right, haven't tried it myuself but seem to recall reading it once when i used mandrake. On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 21:58, Dmitry Suzdalev wrote: > IIRC, I solved the problem you have with setting some env variable to correct > value. Its name was something like AUTOCONF_VERSION= -- I don't remember > correctly. > > I recall that when I got the error you are talking about, I was able (don't > actually remember how) to dig out that that variable should be set to correct > autoconf version (which kdevelop needs). After I set it, all worked great w/o > any reemerging of autoconf/automake. If I'm correct, you already have several > versions of autoconf installed (at least I have), you only need to specify > which one you wish to use. > > I hope that anyone can give a hint of what correct name of that env variable > is, cause I cant remember it right now. > > HTH, > Dmitry. > > On Sunday 22 June 2003 14:06, Martin LORANG wrote: > > Yes ! That works for me > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > > > > The easiest way to fix that: > > > rm /usr/bin/autoconf > > > rm /usr/bin/autoheader > > > rm /usr/bin/automake > > > ln -s /usr/bin/autoconf-2.57 /usr/bin/autoconf > > > ln -s /usr/bin/autoheader-2.57 /usr/bin/autoheader > > > ln -s /usr/bin/automake-1.7 /usr/bin/automake > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?
did you do 'make mrproper' between the compiles when it didn't work? it cleans up so it should be like a newly emerged tree. On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 16:02, daniel wrote: > On June 23, 2003 08:53 am, Frank Hellmuth wrote: > > I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources > > on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. > > > > or are the old versions (or at least the headers) still needed? > > > > If it's OK to clean them, why doesn't portage do it by itself when > > updating? > > to be honest, i don't entirely understand what the sources are for. i know > they're required to build a module, but i don't know what files are needed, > or where the modules sit once compiled. but what i do know is this: > > a while back i compiled my kernel (a few times actually) and it kept panicking > on boot. so i took a shot and did the following: > > # emerge --unmerge gentoo-sources > # rm -r /usr/src/* > # emerge gentoo-sources > # cd /usr/src/linux > # make menuconfig (or copy old .config back in) > # make dep && make clean bzImage modules modules_install > # mount /boot/ > # rm /boot/bzImage > # cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/ > # reboot > > and all worked out. i'm pretty sure if i just blew away all of the sources > without re-emerging and recompiling, i'd be in trouble, but the above offered > me no problems. > > ...too bad it looks like a windows solution. some detailed explanation on the > usefulness of the kernel sources would be greatly appreciated. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no sound devices!?
I probably can't help but what'd you do? On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 17:27, Eric Marchionni wrote: > hello > > i did have sound befor, but now i don't :( > > i discovered that there is no /dev/sound anymore. > does anybody know how to fix that. > > thanx, > eric > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] date in past/pam-login 3.11 won't install
ah here we go, got the answere elsewhere. date -s "dd/mm/ hh:mm:ss" works tho it's not nearly how i understand the man page. On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 07:12, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > I've gotten to emerge -u world in the install(right before setting the > timezone). the update of pam-login 3.11 fail because I forgot to set the > month in the BIOS clock, so it think it's April now, pam-login won't > install because the files it create is older than the installer, how do > I solve this problem? > > 'date -s' should be able to do it think but i can't figure out the > format to use. > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] date in past/pam-login 3.11 won't install
I've gotten to emerge -u world in the install(right before setting the timezone). the update of pam-login 3.11 fail because I forgot to set the month in the BIOS clock, so it think it's April now, pam-login won't install because the files it create is older than the installer, how do I solve this problem? 'date -s' should be able to do it think but i can't figure out the format to use. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] supermount
you have to download the supermount patch and aplyh it then it'll show up in menuconfig(at least ought to). On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 15:32, Ben Anderson wrote: > Hello all, > I was reading through the forums where I read scattered comments about > supermount. I checked the mail archives, but couldn't find much. I found > supermount's project on sourceforge. The readme says: > > > To run supermount, compile and install a kernel with the supermount > patches and select "Y" to the question > > Supermount removable media support (CONFIG_SUPERMOUNT) [Y/n/?] > > when you run "make config". You mount a supermount filesystem with > the normal mount command, using the syntax > > mount -t supermount -o ,--, none > > or by adding correpsonding line to /etc/fstab > > none supermount ,--, 0 0 > .. > > > I don't follow the first couple of lines. I have compiled the kernel a few > times, but I just do: > make menuconfig > Is this how everyone compiles the kernel or only in Gentoo? Anyways, I > didn't see any options in there for supermount. Am I on the right track? > Can anyone point me in the right direction? As an aside - what gui irc > client should I emerge? > Thanks, > Ben Anderson > > _ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Anti-virus f-prot
it catch windows stuff too. On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 13:29, Ohad Lutzky wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:23:07PM +0200, JG wrote: > > forgot to mention, that i was using the older program version 3.13. i just saw on > > their homepage that there is v4.0 available and upgraded. here the check-updates > > script is now a perl-script. but again the auto-update is working fine... > > > > JG > > Just curious... just how many viruses for Linux are there out there? Or > does F-Prot scan for Windows viruses that pass through it over the > network? > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ip masquerade
how'd i use this with gentoo? On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 20:07, Christopher Fisk wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > >If it is of any importance this will be used to get two of my computers > >online through the third which is connected to the dorms net which run > >NAT and squid proxy. I can't connect them directly as each person can > >only have one MAC address registered to be allowed online. > > > Why not go with a full firewall? > > http://monmotha.mplug.org/~monmotha/firewall/firewall/2.3/rc.firewall-2.3.8-pre9 > > http://monmotha.mplug.org/firewall/index.php > > > Christopher Fisk -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ip masquerade
According to the HOWTO that's a bad idea, look down in the last section before the explanation for 2.2.x On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:06, Juan Ángel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Well, i have all the nat modules in the iptables section compiled, and i do > use this line: > $IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.2 -o $OINTERFACE -j MASQUERADE > $IPT is 'iptables', OINTERFACE is ppp0 (adsl). It works just fine > Cheers, > - -- > Juan Ángel > PGP key on pgp.rediris.es (8FAF18B7) > or search on http://www.rediris.es/cert/servicios/keyserver/ > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+8d+EaQjbS4+vGLcRAlf9AJ9j5VSXKShPCIzJfWIy0me55jTRvACdFEBt > 7CoA604eA/0Ei7neRyzrwGo= > =H7uK > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ip masquerade
Oops, forgot a few things there... It need to work with ftp, ssh and rsync too. On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:36, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > I'm trying to set up some masquerading here using this HOWTO > > http://www.tldp.net/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/firewall-examples.html > > what should be done different than said in there? > > I want it to be able to work with most everything and pop3 SMTP IRC and > WWW is needed. > > If it is of any importance this will be used to get two of my computers > online through the third which is connected to the dorms net which run > NAT and squid proxy. I can't connect them directly as each person can > only have one MAC address registered to be allowed online. -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] ip masquerade
I'm trying to set up some masquerading here using this HOWTO http://www.tldp.net/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/firewall-examples.html what should be done different than said in there? I want it to be able to work with most everything and pop3 SMTP IRC and WWW is needed. If it is of any importance this will be used to get two of my computers online through the third which is connected to the dorms net which run NAT and squid proxy. I can't connect them directly as each person can only have one MAC address registered to be allowed online. -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] cloning a gentoo installation
yes, but tar doesn't get all things like partitions and bootsectors and such. On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 22:18, Mike Principito wrote: > And there is always tar > > ~mike > > > -><- > > "And don't tell me there isn't one bit of difference between null and > space, because that's exactly how much difference there is. :-)" > --Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, John wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > > > > you could also use dd and make an image of each drive, thus eliminating > > > > I have had good luck with dump/restore (ext2 root). > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] CD Images
if it's a vcd or svcd it can't be mounted normally On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 22:23, gabor wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:33, Tom Wesley wrote: > > On Sunday 15 June 2003 19:19, gabor wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 17:56, Tom Wesley wrote: > > > hmmm.. do you know daemon-tools? > > > > > > basically what i'd like to have is a virtual cd-rom ... > > > And for this there is > > * app-cdr/virtualcd-0.4 > > Latest version available: 0.4 > > Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] > > Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest] > > Homepage:http://outertech.com/robert/virtualcd/ > > Description: mount bin/cue cd images > > > > although I have to admit to not having tried this one. > :( > > i tried it,and 'mounting' a cue/bin into /dev/virtualcd is ok. > > but then mounting /dev/virtualcd to a filesystem directory completely > locks up the computer :(. > > where can i find more info about the lock? /var/log/where? > > gabor -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] cloning a gentoo installation
you could also use dd and make an image of each drive, thus eliminating the need to do more than issue more than the dd command to write it all to the drive. Of course this is only guaranteed to work because they are identical. On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 21:48, Larry Meadors wrote: > For me, I found it was not worth the time to make it an automated > procedure and just used tar and cfdisk to do it. > > - Boot the good machine using the install CD > - Create a tar of each partition > - Burn the tar files to a CD > > - Boot the next machine using the install CD > - Create the partions > - Untar the files from your good box > - Setup the bootloader (grub in my case) > > Larry > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/03 1:34 PM >>> > Hello, > > I have an installation just the way I like it. Now I need to replicate > it > onto 4 other identical machines. > > I'd appreciate input on how best to accomplish this. > > My perfect world scenario would be to be able to create a bootable > installation CD that would do the trick for me. > > Thanks in advance! > > == > Jeff Adams > 650-654-4148 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo and ecs k7som
Ok got the boards today, they're ECS K7SOM+ v5.2C boards. Will install gentoo on one(don't have a hdd for the other one at the moment) of them tomorrow i think, I'm too tired to to set up ip masquerading now to get through to the net from another NIC than the one in this machine, stupid admin types only letting us use one NIC(registered with MAC addy) per person on here On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 20:17, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > Cool, anyone else got some input on this? > Will probably order them tomorrow or at least this week if i'm gonna get > them. If i run into anything I'll probably post it on this thread. > > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 20:07, Mike Roest wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > | Anyone know if there are any other problems with Gentoo and the ECS > > | K7SOM board than the ones mentioned on the forum and if those have been > > | fixed since the postings on there. > > | > > | I was going to get a K7SEM v3.0(or higher) board but can't get them > > | anymore and the K7SOM is about the same price for a board with faster a > > | CPU. > > | > > | Any comments on stability, support and such would be appreciated. > > > > I've been using mine for a couple weeks now, the only problem I had was > > that it wouldn't run my HD in ATA 100/133. It was giving write errors > > and buffer problems all kinds of crap. > > > > Changing to a ATA33 cable fixed these issues. I'm guessing it was > > probably an issue with the ATA100 cable I was using but I haven't had > > time to test another one yet. > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iD8DBQE+5h5sw+I3MvUBM6QRAniYAJ9/Mg8OHcKu69RUGzBlj4o5WX2/CgCgk9RK > > +sTOU9xzOg1GtBcYvryJrdw= > > =VdAX > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] CD Images
yeah know that one on windows, you can get it for linux too?? On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 20:19, gabor wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 17:56, Tom Wesley wrote: > > On Sunday 15 June 2003 16:41, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > > How would i mount a bin/cue set or convert it to a normal iso so it can > > > be mounted with mount -o loop,ro -t > > > > check http://hes.iki.fi/bchunk/ > > yes, that works, but > > hmmm.. do you know daemon-tools? > > basically what i'd like to have is a virtual cd-rom ... > > something that would be able to take an iso or a cue/bin or a > ccd(clonecd) image an 'mount' it to /dev/something, > and then i'd be able to use /dev/something as a regular dvd/cd-rom > drive. > > i know that 'losetup' can do something like this, but i had no success > with mounting a cue/bin... > > i know i can use bchunk to extract all the filesystems from a cue/bin, > and then i can mount the iso files, but for example with > daemon-tools-on-windows, i can mount a cue/bin image of an audio cd, and > then grab the audio tracks from the virtually mounted cd image with any > audiograbber tool. can i do the same on linux? > > thx, > gabor -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] CD Images
How would i mount a bin/cue set or convert it to a normal iso so it can be mounted with mount -o loop,ro -t -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo/m68k
Cool! Could be fun to install Gentoo on my A600 and A1200 :D On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 05:00, Zach Lowry wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Everyone! > > This is to let everyone on these list know about my progress > concerning Gentoo/m68k. I have been working for the past month on the > port and have made signifigant progress. Portage is working, and a > Stage1 has been built. However, I was overzealous with my CFLAGS and > added -O3, which made my Stage1 chroot do odd things. > > Then, I decided to rebuild the entire system, but Debian's gcc > package broke, which had me cursing for about 2 weeks. I had glibc > builds failing left and right. (Well, actually, only one failed every > day, since I'm on a 33MHz machine. :) > > Anyhow, that's all fixed now, and I hope to have an official stage1 > tarball ready soon. What this e-mail is for is to hopefully gather > interest in the port so that the powers that be may make it an > official Gentoo architecture. I realize that m68k is 10-years old, > but it still has several uses, and Gentoo can fulfil those uses quite > nicely. I have two Sun 3/80s that serve as DNS for me, and a Performa > 550 as a NTP server, A Quadra 660AV for video, etc. As the Monty > Python line goes, "They're Not Dead Yet!" > > With Gentoo, we'll be able to squeeze every last bit of performance > out of these old beasts, as well as trim down the distribution to a > minimum, lending itself to netbooding and embedded work. m68k > hardware covers a vast landscape, including but not limited to > Macintosh, NeXT, Sun3, HP300, Amiga, and Atari. These machines were > high-end at the time, and can still be put to good use. > > Thanks for reading, and if you're interested in the work I've done, > please reply, so I can know that what I've done is worth releasing, > and the fine folks at Gentoo can know that m68k is a platform worth > supporting. > > Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net > Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network Administration > > Registered Linux User #264589 > 14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP 7.0.4 > > iQA/AwUBPuvgKIHWQmQc5olOEQIlLgCg2M9CI+s/IjaFg+tSd81+tGsNFPsAnjiT > 4iRbdd5s7es4EyvLZSzpEqRY > =TslV > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo and ecs k7som
Cool, anyone else got some input on this? Will probably order them tomorrow or at least this week if i'm gonna get them. If i run into anything I'll probably post it on this thread. On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 20:07, Mike Roest wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > | Anyone know if there are any other problems with Gentoo and the ECS > | K7SOM board than the ones mentioned on the forum and if those have been > | fixed since the postings on there. > | > | I was going to get a K7SEM v3.0(or higher) board but can't get them > | anymore and the K7SOM is about the same price for a board with faster a > | CPU. > | > | Any comments on stability, support and such would be appreciated. > > I've been using mine for a couple weeks now, the only problem I had was > that it wouldn't run my HD in ATA 100/133. It was giving write errors > and buffer problems all kinds of crap. > > Changing to a ATA33 cable fixed these issues. I'm guessing it was > probably an issue with the ATA100 cable I was using but I haven't had > time to test another one yet. > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQE+5h5sw+I3MvUBM6QRAniYAJ9/Mg8OHcKu69RUGzBlj4o5WX2/CgCgk9RK > +sTOU9xzOg1GtBcYvryJrdw= > =VdAX > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo and ecs k7som
Btw here's the link to the specs in case someone could use them: http://www.ecs.com.tw/products/pd_spec.asp?product_id=317 On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 17:02, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > Anyone know if there are any other problems with Gentoo and the ECS > K7SOM board than the ones mentioned on the forum and if those have been > fixed since the postings on there. > > I was going to get a K7SEM v3.0(or higher) board but can't get them > anymore and the K7SOM is about the same price for a board with faster a > CPU. > > Any comments on stability, support and such would be appreciated. > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] gentoo and ecs k7som
Anyone know if there are any other problems with Gentoo and the ECS K7SOM board than the ones mentioned on the forum and if those have been fixed since the postings on there. I was going to get a K7SEM v3.0(or higher) board but can't get them anymore and the K7SOM is about the same price for a board with faster a CPU. Any comments on stability, support and such would be appreciated. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ECS K7SEM v3.0 motherboard and Gentoo linux
Thanks :) guess i'll have to go buy one or a few, they're so damn cheap and i don't need the upgradeability iI'll sacrifice. On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 02:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>>On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 23:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have several ECS MB's running Gentoo and they work GREAT! > > > >>On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > any k7sem boards? v3.0? > > Yes. Three K7SEM v.3.0's and one K7S5A v.3.1 all running Gentoo... > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ECS K7SEM v3.0 motherboard and Gentoo linux
any k7sem boards? v3.0? On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 23:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have several ECS MB's running Gentoo and they work GREAT! > > > On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to know what your experiences are with the ECS K7SEM v3.0 board > > and gentoo, I'm considering buying one but I tried installing Gentoo on > > a v1.1 board(with 950mhz cpu) and it was all buggy(tho compiled > > aparently right after a few tries, without any changes, when something > > didn't compile right at first try) and took forever(compared to a p3 > > 450) to install. > > > > The board is very cheap and fit my needs so if it will run Gentoo > > reliably it'd be a nice way to upgrade. > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] ECS K7SEM v3.0 motherboard and Gentoo linux
Hello, I'd like to know what your experiences are with the ECS K7SEM v3.0 board and gentoo, I'm considering buying one but I tried installing Gentoo on a v1.1 board(with 950mhz cpu) and it was all buggy(tho compiled aparently right after a few tries, without any changes, when something didn't compile right at first try) and took forever(compared to a p3 450) to install. The board is very cheap and fit my needs so if it will run Gentoo reliably it'd be a nice way to upgrade. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
