Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel failures

2004-01-18 Thread Marianne Taylor
On January 18, 2004 11:07, Kees de Bruin wrote:
 Hi,

 I've just downgraded genkernel to 1.9 again as the 3.0.1beta4/5 versions
 won't work. I can compile the kernel (vanilla 2.4.24) but when I reboot
 the machine I get the following error:

  no reiserfs filesystem on ...

 and the machine hangs.

 Any suggestions on what I can do about this?

 Kind regards,

You need to make sure that reiserfs is selected in the kernel configuration.  
It is under filesystems.  It used to be if you didn't select 
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y at the beginning of the config, that the reiserfs 
option wouldn't show, I don't know if this is still the case.

Hope that helps.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] system time/hw clock

2003-11-24 Thread Marianne Taylor
On November 24, 2003 03:46, Lucas Sallovitz wrote:
 Sorry, I don't know how to solve your problem, but you sure didn't solve
 it as your mail has a tiemstamp of 11/25 1:37 am being 11/24 8:46 here :)

Well the e-mail that left here had the proper time on it, which was 20:37 last 
evening.  I don't have a local mail server for outgoing mail, so if the time 
is getting screwed up it is after it leaves here.




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] system time/hw clock

2003-11-24 Thread Marianne Taylor
On November 25, 2003 08:03, Marianne Taylor wrote:
 On November 24, 2003 03:46, Lucas Sallovitz wrote:
  Sorry, I don't know how to solve your problem, but you sure didn't solve
  it as your mail has a tiemstamp of 11/25 1:37 am being 11/24 8:46 here :)

 Well the e-mail that left here had the proper time on it, which was 20:37
 last evening.  I don't have a local mail server for outgoing mail, so if
 the time is getting screwed up it is after it leaves here.


OOOps!! My bad.  Correct time on my system, but with all the changes and 
rebooting the date was one day ahead.  corrected now.  

I did notice when changing it with the kde tool kcmshell clock that it was 
changing the time zone to UTC -- I think this was likely causing my troubles 
yesterday.  I think someone else mentioned that on the list yesterday.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] system time/hw clock

2003-11-23 Thread Marianne Taylor
On November 19, 2003 18:12, David Friggens wrote:
 * Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-19 09:39]:
  Marianne Taylor wrote:
   Does anyone know the answer to my original question.  Up until about
   a month ago I was keeping good time both in windows and in gentoo
   with my hwclock set to local.  Now for some reason everytime I boot
   gentoo it thinks that the hwclock is set to UTC and corrects for that
   ie) it sets the time 8 hrs earlier.  So where do I look other than
   rc.conf to correct this??
 
  If at some point in the past, you booted the system with UTC in
  /etc/rc.conf and then switched it to LOCAL and shut your system down.  It
  saved the offset time as the local time.  Essentially, your system clock
  was set back 8 hours.  The only fix is to manually update the time
  yourself using 'date'.

 And then deleting /etc/adjusttime ?

 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

I have sort of solved my problem, but not completely.
My link to my time zone at /etc/localtime had disappeared, when I re did that 
and deleted /etc/adjtime my system was back to normal.  After rebooting again 
today, however again the /etc/localtime link had disappeared.  Any 
suggestions as to why this keeps getting deleted?  Is there anyway to track 
what program is deleting it?

Thanks I am very close.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] system time/hw clock

2003-11-19 Thread Marianne Taylor
On November 18, 2003 09:43, A. Craig West wrote:
 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Javier Gostling wrote:
  Actually, Windows assumes the hw clock to be set to local time, so if you
  set Linux to UTC, then Linux will mess your time. I had this happen some
  time ago, and instructing Linux that the hw clock is in local time solved
  the issue.

 I've never really understood why it is that Microsoft does not allow a UTC
 hardware clock. Because of daylight savings time, having the hardware clock
 set to localtime causes the actual hardware clock to be reset twice a year.
 This can result in flakiness with any process that happened to be waiting
 for a time to occur at that instant.

 My solution, which isn't particularly good, is to run any dual boot
 machines in UTC and tell windows that my timezone is Greenwich Mean Time,
 and set it to not adjust the clock for daylight savings. I would rather
 have to deal with times in GMT than have random intermittent flakiness.

Now that we are done the debate on M$ vs. linux I hope? 

Does anyone know the answer to my original question.  Up until about a month 
ago I was keeping good time both in windows and in gentoo with my hwclock set 
to local.  Now for some reason everytime I boot gentoo it thinks that the 
hwclock is set to UTC and corrects for that ie) it sets the time 8 hrs 
earlier.  So where do I look other than rc.conf to correct this??


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] system time/hw clock

2003-11-18 Thread Marianne Taylor
On November 17, 2003 21:57, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 16:10, Marianne Taylor wrote:
  My system ie hwclock is set to the local time.  But each time I reboot my
  system clock is set to 8 hrs before my hwclock.  Somewhere my system
  seems to be correcting for Greenwich time, but I can't figure out where. 
  In rc.conf I have the clock set to local time.  Where else can I look
  for this problem. I don't want to keep correcting this.

 Any chance it's a dual-boot w/ Windows? Windows doesn't treat time
 correctly.

Yes it is, but I am pretty sure until the last month that this system was 
keeping the correct time.  Perhaps it dates back to the last time I did an 
update of the baselayout?  


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Word wrap non-html

2003-11-06 Thread Marianne Taylor
It would be really nice if everyone on this list would use the word wrap 
feature of their e-mail program, and also not send their e-mails in html.  
This list has been fairly nice about it, but in most linux lists they will 
take your heads off if you send stuff without these.
Thanks


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] winex probs

2003-10-07 Thread Marianne Taylor
On October 7, 2003 02:22, Stefan Vunckx wrote:
 Hello,

 I tried compiling Winex3.1 from source today and since this is my first
 install of winex from source, I decided to go with the wineinstall tool.
 But it errors out on me when it reaches the configuration part:

 Could not stat /root/.transgaming/c_drive (No such file or directory),
 ignoring drive C:
 Invalid path 'c:\windows' for windows directory: does not exist

 Right after I entered the fake windows dir ...
 Could anyone help me set up winex manually or point me at what to do to
 avoid this ??

 Thanks,
 Stefan Vunckx

 ps: are there still winex ebuilds to be found actually ?

I think I saw something that they took the e-builds off, I can't remember why.  

I have dealt with this problem by backing out the install
make uninstall in the winex directory
then change to the /winex/docs/samples directory (that may not be the exact 
name) and work on the wine.cfg example there.  I change the info there to 
reflect how I want to set up the c drive, and then I rerun the install.

Hope that helps -- sorry I don't know the exact name of the directory, but 
haven't installed wine on this system yet.



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] How to get postfix to email another local machine?

2003-10-05 Thread Marianne Taylor
On October 5, 2003 07:44, Jason Stubbs wrote:
 On Sunday 05 October 2003 22:02, Peter Ruskin wrote:
  /etc/hosts:
  192.168.0.3 peter.ruskin peter # Peter's linux/Windows box
  192.168.0.5 kroh.ruskin kroh # Liese's linux/Windows box
 
  /etc/nsswitch.conf: (never looked at this one)
  hosts:   files dns
 
  from mail.log:
  Oct  3 01:28:13 kroh postfix/qmgr[2084]: D2C2F90F9A:
  from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=316, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
  Oct  3 01:28:24 kroh postfix/smtp[4250]: D2C2F90F9A:
  to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], orig_to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=11,
  status=bounced (Name service error for name=peter.ruskin type=A: Host
  not found)

 That's quite strange. Postfix has correctly resolved the machine name peter
 to peter.ruskin through the use of /etc/hosts - probably through a glibc
 call. My guess is that postfix is configured to specifically get the A
 record from DNS for security (rather than simply asking for an IP) which
 /etc/hosts does not provide. I haven't got time right now so I can't do it
 myself, but check postfix to see if you can turn off DNS checks. I think
 there's some sort of option to turn off canonifacation (or however you
 spell it ;-) which may fix your problem.

 Jason

I solved the same problem on my home network by appending the following line 
to the main.cf in /etc/postfix directory.

disable_dns_lookups = yes

Hope this helps.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list