Re: [gentoo-user] Scripting Error?

2003-09-21 Thread johnlowell
Dane Elwell wrote:

That file is /etc/issue.

 

Dane,

Many thanks for your response!!

A quick look at /etc/issue in both the effected machine and one of the 
uneffected ones shows the following difference:

Effected machine: This is \n. \O (\s \m \r) \t
Uneffected machine: This is \n. \o (\s \m \r) \t
Changing the "O" to "o" fixes the problem.

Since I used the very latest livecd to do this particular install and 
since there are no differences whatsoever on either machine in their 
respective /etc/hostname files, I'm wondering if the latest materials 
are generating an error of this kind routinely. It's my sense that the 
developers ought to know about this matter. I'll report it as a bug and 
let them make the call as to whether it merits further attention.

Anyway, thanks for helping to lend uniformity to my network. :-)

John Lowell

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Scripting Error?

2003-09-21 Thread johnlowell
I've just successfully reinstalled using the latest livcd. Booting up, 
at the point of reaching runlevel3 and just before logging in I see:

This is localhost2.nknown_domain (Linux i686 2.4.20-r7) 21:30:03

localhost2 is the name in I've placed /etc/hostname and there are 
localhost1, 3, and 4 on this network as well, but in those other cases I 
see:

This is localhost1.(none) (Linux i686 2.4.20-r5) 21:30:03

Now I can understand the kernel version difference, r-5 and r-7, and I 
can even understand how the script might generate (none) in the one case 
and .nknown_domain in the other because I used the most recent livecd 
for localhost2. But what I can't understand is why I'm gettin what would 
appear to be a spelling error and should appear as 
"localhost2.unknown_domain" instead of "localhost2.nknown_domain".

Can someone tell me what file generates this line just before login? The 
misspelling is annoying and clearly should be fixed.

John Lowell

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] X Screen

2003-07-14 Thread johnlowell
Andrew Farmer wrote:

I believe the black background is actually the result of an X patch -
I'm not at my Gentoo machine right now, but I think the name is
something like stupid-*-die-die-die.patch.
Heh. That's why I happened to notice it.

 

Well, as things turnout, Andrew,  the initial black screen with an X 
with a white background can be implemented with, of all things, the 
startx command, i.e.:

startx -- -br

It never even occured to me that an answer might be found going in that 
direction but it works every time.

Many thanks for having tried to be helpful.

Best regards.

John Lowell



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] X Screen

2003-07-14 Thread johnlowell
Andrew Farmer wrote:

I believe the black background is actually the result of an X patch -
I'm not at my Gentoo machine right now, but I think the name is
something like stupid-*-die-die-die.patch.
Heh. That's why I happened to notice it.

 

Thanks for your reply, Andrew. Would it be too much to ask that you 
confirm that for me when you when you get to your Gentoo box?

Thanks again.

John Lowell

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list