Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Leo
A. R. wrote:
 http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/

Nah!
--
 

ditto!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Dave Nebinger
>   http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
> 
> Nah!

It's got to be an april fool's joke...


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Derek Hansen
I have to admit, it had me going for just a little while...

On Apr 1, 2005 8:05 AM, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A. R. wrote:
> 
> >  http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
> >
> >
> >
> >Nah!
> >--
> >
> >
> >
> ditto!
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Ted Ozolins
Dave Nebinger wrote:
 http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
Nah!
   

It's got to be an april fool's joke...
 

Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same 
paragraph?

--
Ted Ozolins(VE7TVO)
Westbank, B. C
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Mark Knecht
> >It's got to be an april fool's joke...

> Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> paragraph?

Not really. Don't you know that 

GENTOO == Gee Everyone NT's Object Oriented?

I'm not a programmer but I hear that Object Oriented programming makes
it trivial to port anything to anything. I'm not the least bit
surprised to hear this...

- Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Leo
Mark Knecht wrote:
It's got to be an april fool's joke...
 

 

Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
paragraph?
   


 

I understand porting as the process of adapting a piece of useful code 
so it works in a system it was not initially designed for.   OO code 
should be no easier / difficult to port then modular code.

I'm not a programmer but I hear that Object Oriented programming makes
it trivial to port anything to anything. I'm not the least bit
surprised to hear this...
- Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 

Is the part about MS buying the posix interface it true?  I can't 
believe I fell for this even if just for the 5 minutes I though about 
how useless running linux on the NT kernel would be.

Leo
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Adi
Vineri 01 Aprilie 2005 18:03, A. R. a scris:
>   http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/

nice one

-- 
Adi
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Covington, Chris
It's a good joke:

# wget
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/nt/distfiles/stages/stage1-latest.tar.
bz2
--12:12:35--
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/nt/distfiles/stages/stage1-latest.tar.
bz2
   => `stage1-latest.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.gentooexperimental.org... 213.131.245.105
Connecting to www.gentooexperimental.org[213.131.245.105]:80...
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
12:12:35 ERROR 404: Not Found. 


---
Chris Covington
IT
Plus One Health Management
75 Maiden Lane Suite 801
NY, NY 10038
646-312-6269
http://www.plusoneactive.com

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Bradley Krumme
On Apr 1, 2005 11:59 AM, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >It's got to be an april fool's joke...
> 
> > Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> > paragraph?
> 
> Not really. Don't you know that
> 
> GENTOO == Gee Everyone NT's Object Oriented?
> 
> I'm not a programmer but I hear that Object Oriented programming makes
> it trivial to port anything to anything. I'm not the least bit
> surprised to hear this...
> 
> - Mark
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 

That's funny.  I saw a couple other things today, too.  I did an
'emerge -uD --newuse world' today which upgraded mplayer to
mplayer-1.0_pre6-r2.  If I hadn't been watching, I wouldn't have seen
it, but there was a message that looked like this:

!!! ERROR: media-video/mplayer-1.0_pre6-r2 failed.
!!! Function src_makarena, Line 1000, Exitcode 555-
!!! All your base are belong to us!
 * APRIL FOOLS!

so it looks like the Gentoo devs are having a good time today :D

--
Brad
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Stroller
On Apr 1, 2005, at 5:59 pm, Leo wrote:
Is the part about MS buying the posix interface it true?  I can't 
believe I fell for this even if just for the 5 minutes I though about 
how useless running linux on the NT kernel would be.
I'd like to have that second sentence framed & hung on the wall of 
every corporate manager on the planet. It won't make any difference, of 
course, but the engineers will at least be able to point at it 
afterwards and say "we told you so".

I'm not sure of the details, and whether the project is completed or 
under development, but Microsoft do indeed intend that one should be 
able to run Linux apps on their XP server products. I _think_ this is 
via system calls rather than a virtual machine, but I don't really know 
- I'm sure a Google would reveal more.

Stroller.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread Robert G. Hays
Bradley:
I hope you're not making fun of the makarena, I happen to like it!  
  < with grin underneath!>

Chris:
& whyinhell would you want the NT kernel on your computer in the first 
place?; worst of both worlds!:: Windoze crash/kernel & Linux crash/GUI?
Get Win4Lin & do it right: Linux bulletproof/kernel & Windoze 
excellent/GUI.  (& I hate saying that last, but Truth Is, & I don't lie 
(not deliberately, anyway!)).

Mark:
Good One, Indeed!
Re Windoze/Gentoo, how about this::
Got Execrable Nasty Tottering Odoriferous Offal  ?
Leo:
Re programming, OO does help a little, but careful design *is* more 
imporant, so yup!, you're right!

rgh
Bradley Krumme wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 11:59 AM, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

It's got to be an april fool's joke...
   

Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
paragraph?
 

Not really. Don't you know that
GENTOO == Gee Everyone NT's Object Oriented?
I'm not a programmer but I hear that Object Oriented programming makes
it trivial to port anything to anything. I'm not the least bit
surprised to hear this...
- Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
   

That's funny.  I saw a couple other things today, too.  I did an
'emerge -uD --newuse world' today which upgraded mplayer to
mplayer-1.0_pre6-r2.  If I hadn't been watching, I wouldn't have seen
it, but there was a message that looked like this:
!!! ERROR: media-video/mplayer-1.0_pre6-r2 failed.
!!! Function src_makarena, Line 1000, Exitcode 555-
!!! All your base are belong to us!
* APRIL FOOLS!
so it looks like the Gentoo devs are having a good time today :D
--
Brad
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-01 Thread David Busby
Stroller wrote:
I'm not sure of the details, and whether the project is completed or 
under development, but Microsoft do indeed intend that one should be 
able to run Linux apps on their XP server products. I _think_ this is 
via system calls rather than a virtual machine, but I don't really know 
- I'm sure a Google would reveal more.

Recently the Seattle Times news paper had an article about how Microsoft 
has a large (1000+ computer) lab dedicated to studying Linux, wish I 
could find the article...

/djb
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo for the Windows NT Kernel

2005-04-03 Thread Robert Persson
On April 1, 2005 08:33 am, quoth Ted Ozolins:
> Dave Nebinger wrote:
> >>  http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
> >>
> >>Nah!
> >
> >It's got to be an april fool's joke...
>
> Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> paragraph?

I'm not sure it is a joke.  Windows as a whole is awful, but the NT kernel was 
designed by Dave Cutler (creator of RSX-11M and VMS) and it has earned a lot 
of respect from people who know about these things.  It is perhaps the only 
genuine innovation MS has ever produced.  I'm not saying it's better or worse 
than Linux or the BSDs.  It may indeed by worse, but it is still a 
respectable attempt at a kernel.

When I was running XP I installed Interix.  I didn't end up doing much with 
it, but it was very useful to be able to kill -9 runaway win 32 processes - 
it meant I had to reboot less often.  At the time I wondered whether it might 
be possible to shut down the win32 subsystem when i didn't need it for 
multimedia stuff and work the *nix way, which I found much less 
uncomfortable.  It wouldn't surprise me too much to hear that someone has 
actually succeeded in doing so.  And isn't there a project somewhere to run a 
linux kernel as an NT subsystem in order to get access to those windoze 
drivers?  Surely this GeNToo, if it is for real, would be a more elegant way 
of going about this. 

The problems I have found with Windows are
1. the insecurity, instability and bloat of the win32 subsystem
2. the crappiness and unreliability of NTFS
3. the lack of tools to tinker with the bootloader to correct problems arising 
from the crappiness of NTFS and other causes.

Interix does nothing to address #1, but a project like the one described 
would.  I assume it would also come with #3.  That would just leave the 
crappiness of NTFS to deal with.  So what if the ReactOS people were to 
develop a reiser4 driver?  Then you could have a dual boot system - Linux and 
the other one - sharing a /home partition and using a reliable and efficient 
(IMO) file system running the same applications - kmail etc - just in one of 
those systems you could launch the win32/wine subsystem (or an improved and 
less bloated wine-based susbstitute) when you wanted it to run cubase or some 
fancy Adobe sofware, and then shut it down again when you finish.  No dealing 
with windoze update either.  What if you could, say, have windows-native 
audio apps exchanging audio and midi data using jack, possibly over a 
network? That's something I wouldn't turn my nose up at.

If wine becomes much easier to work with on Linux then this kind of idea won't 
interest me so much, but for now I am interested because there are so many 
windows apps I miss, even though I don't miss windows itself one bit.

Robert
-- 
Robert Persson

"No matter how much ye shake yer peg
The last wee drap rins doon yer leg."
 
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list