[gentoo-user] fix fstab for tripleboot

2006-10-17 Thread Thufir
How can I fix line 10 of /etc/fstab so that, like /mnt/windows, it's just
automagically available for read and write?




[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf -n
 1  # grub.conf generated by anaconda
 2  #
 3  # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this 
file
 4  # NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
 5  #  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
 6  #  root (hd0,0)
 7  #  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
 8  #  initrd /initrd-version.img
 9  #boot=/dev/hda
10  default=0
11  timeout=5
12  splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
13  #hiddenmenu
14  title Fedora Core (2.6.18-1.2200.fc5)
15  root (hd0,0)
16  kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 ro 
root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
17  initrd /initrd-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5.img
18  title Fedora Core (2.6.17-1.2187_FC5)
19  root (hd0,0)
20  kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 ro 
root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
21  initrd /initrd-2.6.17-1.2187_FC5.img
22  title win2k
23map (hd0) (hd1)
24map (hd1) (hd0)
25rootnoverify (hd1,0)
26chainloader +1
27  title Gentoo
28kernel (hd1,1)/kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.15-gentoo-r5 
root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk=8192 real_root=/dev/hdb4
29initrd (hd1,1)/initramfs-genkernel-x86-2.6.15-gentoo-r5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit
logout

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /etc/fstab -n
 1  /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /   reiserfs defaults  
  1 1
 2  LABEL=/boot /boot   ext3defaults
1 2
 3  devpts  /dev/ptsdevpts  gid=5,mode=620  
0 0
 4  tmpfs   /dev/shmtmpfs   defaults
0 0
 5  proc/proc   procdefaults
0 0
 6  sysfs   /syssysfs   defaults
0 0
 7  /dev/hdb3   swapswapdefaults
0 0
 8  /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swapswapdefaults   
 0 0
 9  /dev/hdb1   /mnt/windowsvfat
users,owner,rw,umask=000 0 0
10  #/dev/hdb4  /mnt/gentoo ext3
users,owner,rw,umask=000 0 0
11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date
Tue Oct 17 07:55:42 IST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$



thanks,

Thufir

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] fix fstab for tripleboot

2006-10-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2006 08:57 schrieb ext Thufir:

> How can I fix line 10 of /etc/fstab so that, like /mnt/windows, it's just
> automagically available for read and write?
>
>ext3users,owner,rw,umask=000

Change it to "ext3 defaults".

HTH...

Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs  | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hambornerstraße 55  | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40472 Düsseldorf  | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net


pgpe5kNv5VY73.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xf86-driver-ati-6.6.3 fails

2006-10-17 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 08:11 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 22:17, Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I started an update world today which ran through xorg-server and xorg-x11
> > before it went along to update x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.6.3.  This
> > package tries to check /etc/portage/profile/make.globals and fails
> > miserably.  :-(  The reason is that I have no such file.  The only file I
> > can find in /etc/portage/profile is profile.bashrc.
> >
> > Needless to say that without an ati driver I have no X and I need this
> > laptop for work!  Would you perhaps know what's gone wrong here?
> >
> > This is the error from the emerge:
> [SNIP]
> 
> I see two options. Either upgrade to latest ~arch portage and see if that 
> fixes it or file a bug..

Where do you see it sourcing for make.globals??

The ebuild is also very simple and short
pkg_setup() {
if use dri && ! built_with_use x11-base/xorg-server dri; then
die "Build x11-base/xorg-server with USE=dri."
fi
}

I just upgraded from xorg-7.0 to xorg-7.1 (this is because I was trying
to get my laptop to support Monitor out at 1680x1050 on a Radeon 9000.
(it's stated max is 1600x1200)

> 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Marco Calviani

Hi list,
  i was running an emerge -e world while emerge stuck on a package
(that was openinventor). The problem was that with the modular X, the
"testing" version was necessary. Now i would like to resume the emerge
process, but however with emerge --resume, Portage wants to install
the older version.
How is it possible to force the newer one?

Regards and thanks,
Marco
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: problems making shareable directory shareable

2006-10-17 Thread Remy Blank
Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
> I know that I can execute a umask every
> time the users log in to insure that all new created files will have
> the correct premissions, but is this really the correct what to
> handle this problem?

That's one way of doing it, which I have seen used on RedHat
distributions (and that I have implemented on my machines). Instead of
having a default umask of 022 and setting the primary group of new users
to "user", you set the umask to 002 and have a separate primary group
for every user (usually with the same name as the user). This way,
shared directories can be set up as you described, and files and
directories are created with 0664 resp. 0775 permissions.

But if you haven't set up your environment for that, the easiest
solution is to use POSIX ACLs (see "man acl"). Set a default ACL of:

  default:user::rwx
  default:group::rwx
  default:other::---

on the (empty) shared directory, then copy over your files.

You might have to enable ACLs in your kernel and /etc/fstab, and to
enable the "acl" USE flag (and re-emerge affected packages) for this to
work.

-- Remy


Remove underscore and suffix in reply address for a timely response.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 09:20, Marco Calviani wrote:
>i was running an emerge -e world while emerge stuck on a package
> (that was openinventor). The problem was that with the modular X, the
> "testing" version was necessary. Now i would like to resume the emerge
> process, but however with emerge --resume, Portage wants to install
> the older version.
> How is it possible to force the newer one?

If you save the attached file I believe that:

# python resume_list.py

should give you the resume list. Then you can alter the resulting list and 
emerge the altered list with --oneshot ...

-- 
Bo Andresen


resume_list.py
Description: application/python


pgpUZWRzv9vyD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:20:02 +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:

>i was running an emerge -e world while emerge stuck on a package
> (that was openinventor). The problem was that with the modular X, the
> "testing" version was necessary. Now i would like to resume the emerge
> process, but however with emerge --resume, Portage wants to install
> the older version.

emerge the testing version of the package manually then use emerge
--resume --skipfirst. Single emerges don't clear the list used by --resume.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Favorite Windoze game: Guess what this icon does?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Marco Calviani

Hi Bo,


# python resume_list.py

should give you the resume list. Then you can alter the resulting list and
emerge the altered list with --oneshot ...


thanks for this. This script gave me the resume list. However i'm not
able to give the file to emerge... i've tried with emerge -1 <
resume.list but with no success, it give me the emerge usage howto...

m
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 10:07, Marco Calviani wrote:
> Hi Bo,
>
> > # python resume_list.py
> >
> > should give you the resume list. Then you can alter the resulting list
> > and emerge the altered list with --oneshot ...
>
> thanks for this. This script gave me the resume list. However i'm not
> able to give the file to emerge... i've tried with emerge -1 <
> resume.list but with no success, it give me the emerge usage howto...

# echo $(python resume_list.py)

# emerge -va1 $(python resume_list.py)

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpkbo8ytwyRc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Marco Calviani

Thanks Bo and Neil,


# echo $(python resume_list.py)
# emerge -va1 $(python resume_list.py)


both of your solutions solved my problem!

Thanks again,
mc
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] prelink -aqR -> Segmentation fault

2006-10-17 Thread Qiangning Hong

I followed HOWTO Hashstyle on gentoo-wiki
(http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Hashstyle) days ago.  However, I found
/etc/cron.daily/prelink produces Segmentation fault.  In command line,
I tried the following:

# prelink -aqR
Segmentation fault

How to resolve this?

`emerge --info` followed:

Portage 2.1.2_pre2-r9 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1,
glibc-2.5-r0, 2.6.18-suspend2 x86_64)
=
System uname: 2.6.18-suspend2 x86_64 AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology MT-30
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.5
Last Sync: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:50:01 +
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.1-r1, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python: 2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache: 2.4-r6
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.17.50.0.3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r4
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -msse3"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/share/X11/xkb"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf
/etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -msse3"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks fixpackages metadata-transfer
parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo http://mirror.gentoo.gr.jp";
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--hash-style=both"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times
--compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats
--timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local
--exclude=/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage /usr/portage/local/layman/sunrise
/usr/portage/local/layman/toolchain_overlay"
SYNC="rsync://hongqn.7766.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X a52 aac acpi alsa ao aoss audiofile automount
bash-completion bitmap-fonts bzip2 cairo caps ccache cdr cjk cli dbus
dlloader dri dv dvd dvdr elibc_glibc emboss encode exo fam fbsplash
firefox gcc64 gif glut gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal hashstyle iconv
imagemagick innodb input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse
input_devices_synaptics isdnlog ithreads jpeg kernel_linux kqemu
libg++ logrotate lzo mad matroska mikmod mjpeg mmap mp3 mpeg ncurses
nls no-old-linux nptl nptlonly nsplugin nvidia offensive ogg opengl
oss pam panel-plugin pcre png ppds pppd quicktime rar readline
reflection sdl session spell spl ssl startup-notification svg tcpd
threads thunar truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode
userland_GNU video_cards_nvidia vim vorbis x264 xcomposite xml xorg xv
xvid zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LINGUAS,
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: speedtouch router 3 pc LAN problems

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Monday 16 October 2006 07:24, Tim Barker wrote:
> Here is the setup:
>
> Workgroup LAN currently with 2 PCs (will be 3). XP home is the OS. Router
> is supplied by Bigpond, a Speedtouch 536 (or 538?) router/modem.
>
> Thought I configured the modem correctly, VNC was in the setup for home
> networks - so how hard can it be? Hah hah ha ... sigh.
>
> I get the 10061 error, Connection refused. I have firewall at server end
> turned of .. so it isn't that, so it's the router
> I can't even ping the silly router - I do loath these particular routers
> .
>
> Any bright ideas??

You'll  need to forward the port that your VNC server is listening at for 
connections from the router to the PC that runs the server.  This is 
called 'port forwarding' and if I recall correctly the documentation has a 
link to a website with instructions for setting this up on different routers.

Basically, if your router does not have a ready made menu on its GUI for port 
forwarding (otherwise you just fill in the port No e.g. 5900 and your PC's 
LAN IP address e.g. 192.168.0.3) you will need to set up a new service at 
your router and a firewall rule to accept that newly set up service.  In the 
service menu fill in the port No., and protocol (TCP and, or UDP) and in the 
firewall rules menu create a new 'allow always' rule and fill in your PC LAN 
IP address and perhaps which IP address(es) you want to accept connections 
from.

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgp5fiHcnxFpo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xf86-driver-ati-6.6.3 fails [SOLVED]

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:11, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 22:17, Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I started an update world today which ran through xorg-server and
> > xorg-x11 before it went along to update x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.6.3.
> >  This package tries to check /etc/portage/profile/make.globals and fails
> > miserably.  :-(  The reason is that I have no such file.  The only file I
> > can find in /etc/portage/profile is profile.bashrc.

> [SNIP]
>
> I see two options. Either upgrade to latest ~arch portage and see if that
> fixes it or file a bug..

Thanks Bo,

I am writing this from a fully gui-fied system!  The problem seems to be 
a "userpriv" parameter in my make.conf.  No idea how userpriv brought up the 
error I posted previously, but with userpriv removed the compile and build 
worked fine.  Another happy camper.  :)
-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgpf0dYlTXbOx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] IMAP servers

2006-10-17 Thread Steve [Gentoo]
Roman Zilka wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:26:23AM +0100, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
>   
>>> it appears that there is one connection per folder
>>> and one process per connection... which seems (to me at least) to be 
>>> overkill.
>>>   
>> Having never used dovecot, I can't comment on this. But maybe this can be 
>> changed in a configuration file somewhere?
>> 
> Confirm. There are a few settings regarding exactly this
> issue. Check out all the "login_process*" and "login_max*" options at least.
>   
This sounded very promising... and I've now spent some time tweaking
those parameters (I'm not sure why I'd previously overlooked them.)

The parameter login_processes_count seems to control the number of
/usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login processes that are run (when idle)
awaiting connections.  The parameter login_max_processes_count appears
to relate to the same imap_login process.  It was not the imap_login
processes which concern me from a scalability perspective - but rather
the imap (/usr/libexec/dovecot/imap) processes.  I'm no longer so sure
about when imap processes are spawned or terminated - but there seem to
be a non-deterministic "lots" of them for each Thunderbird session.




-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] What does "future video mode" mean for the i810 xorg driver?

2006-10-17 Thread Matthew R. Lee
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 10:04, Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using xorg-server 1.1.1-r1, with i810 driver for the Intel 915 on
> board graphics adapter. I tried to use a SUN GDM5410 monitor (with
> matching adapter cable), which now is hanging on a SUN workstation.
> According to the OSD it runs w/ 81.1kHz/76 Hz vert/hor. freq., and a
> resolution of 1280x1024 pixels. BUT if I try to use it on my new! shiny!
> gentoo PC, I only get it to 1024x768 pixels. If I specify no modes in my
> xorg.conf, I get a black screen, If I specify 1024x768, it works. I
> tried to include 1280x1024 and 1280x960 (VESA modi), but got a murderous
> screen flicker - totally unusable. The Xorg.0 logfile said something
> about "Supported Future Video Modes:" which contain a 76Hz 1280x1024
> mode. What does this mean?
> I appended the xorg.cfg used for my tests with this monitor (I used
> ddcxinfo-knoppix to generate mode lines), an Xorg.0 logfile is included
> also.
> Can anyone help me with getting a nice, shiny screen resolution? :-/
>
> TIA,
> Wolfgang Liebich
 I've just set up this card on my new laptop, to get the highest resolution 
you need to emerge 915resolution which patches the video bios, if I 
understand correctly  Try searching on the wiki for this package for the 
exact details of how to set it up properly.  I didn't find it difficult to do

Matt
-- 
%%%
Dr. Matthew R. Lee
CASEB & ECIM
Departamento de Ecologia,
P. Universidad Catolica de Chile,
Alameda 340, Santiago.
CP 6513677
CHILE

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

URL: meiochile.matthewlee.org
%%%
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Stephane Pointu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour:

I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package but
this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a
"emerge -kuav world" it takes this package but if I do a "emerge -uav
world" it does not. Is this a normal behaviour? Shouldn't portage first
check if there is an ebuild for it before installing the package?

Regards,
Stephane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFNKXrWWLMt96bzSoRAm6DAJwKuXH8WXZGc8p1gZYcuRq+Nd3LUwCePxRJ
8WgIpWPIClhC7IgNqg+yKAs=
=eRIS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] fix fstab for tripleboot

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 08:57, Thufir wrote:
> How can I fix line 10 of /etc/fstab so that, like /mnt/windows, it's
> just automagically available for read and write?

[snip]
>   9  /dev/hdb1   /mnt/windows  
>  vfatusers,owner,rw,umask=000 0 0
>  10  #/dev/hdb4  
> /mnt/gentoo ext3users,owner,rw,umask=000 0 0 11

The short answer is that you don't. The long answedr is that you can, if 
you are willing to change permissions.

Your /mnt/windows is a vfat filesystem, which has no idea of unix 
permissions. But it's mounted on a Unix system which must have 
permissions, so the kernel takes a default and applies the default to 
every file and directory

Your /mnt/gentoo is ext3 which DOES understand permissions, so therefore 
the system will use the permissions and owner/group that is already on 
that filesystem. You can't override this, and neither do you want to. 
The defaults you are using mostly do not apply to ext3 either, check 
the man page for mount for valid options to ext3 and ext2.

If you are willing to change owner and permissions on all the files 
on /dev/hdb4 then you can do so and they will be available when 
mounted, but you cannot arbitrarily suspend existing permissions with 
just a mount operation.

alan
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] partition scheme

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 08:54, Thufir wrote:
> For hdb, what's a good partitioning scheme?  I want to go with
> reiser, and keep the vfat (for win2k).  I have 512MB RAM, should I
> change the swap size?  Is there a big advantage to using LVM versus
> just a regular root partition?

Hi,

This is one of those questions that we can't really answer, as the 
correct answer is "it depends".

What do you want to do with this machine, what role does it have in 
life? If you ask me how would I partition a workstation, a busy mail 
server and a company file server, I'd give you three completely 
different answers

I take it this is a workstation though (512M ram). For those it 
think it's a good idea to keep /home on a separate partition so it can 
easily be shared between distros. If you have several users who all 
need to get at the same shared data (like an mp3 collection) then 
putting that on a separate partition is also convenient.

As for lvm - it is amazingly useful, and it's real use if often 
misunderstood: it lets you manipulate partitions and move them around. 
This is amazingly difficult without lvm and usually involves extra 
drives and moving many GB out of the way to make space. So lvm gives 
you no benefit in normal use, but the first time you need to shrink / 
to make a separate /home on a disk with no unpartitioned space, you'll 
thanks your lucky stars you used lvm :-)

That swap size (452M) is ok for normal use. If you find that the machine 
is using lots of that swap in daily use, then you'll have to increase 
it. And if you need suspend/resume, then you'll need to increase that 
partition to at least the size of your ram. Actually, make it 1G 
minimum - ram upgrades are easy, and there's a good chacne you'll do it 
anyway in the future.

alan

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:44, Stephane Pointu wrote:
> Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour:
>
> I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package
> but this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a
> "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package but if I do a "emerge -uav
> world" it does not. Is this a normal behaviour? Shouldn't portage
> first check if there is an ebuild for it before installing the
> package?

No, it makes perfect sense. When you use the -k switch, portage is in a 
position to find and use the prebuilt package, so it will.

When you don't use the -k switch, it won't use /usr/portage/packages per 
the man page, so there's no sense in even attemtping to look for that 
package - as there is no ebuild for that version, it cannot possibly 
build it

Your last question doesn't make sense - how can portage check for an 
ebuild that you earlier clearly said does not exist?

alan
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem installing amavisd-new (Gentoo box)

2006-10-17 Thread Ronald Vazquez

Richard Fish wrote:


Take a look at this file, it will have the actual error message in it.
If it doesn't make sense to you, feel free to post the contents here.

-Richard

Richard:

Thank you for your response.  I haven't had much time to really look.  
Perhaps this evening...  Ok, here are the contents of the output file:


# cat amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch-8250.out
* amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch *

=

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < 
/usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch


=
patching file amavisd
Hunk #1 FAILED at 12914.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file amavisd.rej
=

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < 
/usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch


=
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- amavisd2006-04-07 22:03:15.0 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho  2006-04-07 22:07:00.0 +0200
--
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < 
/usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch


=
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- amavisd2006-04-07 22:03:15.0 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho  2006-04-07 22:07:00.0 +0200
--
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < 
/usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch


=
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- amavisd2006-04-07 22:03:15.0 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho  2006-04-07 22:07:00.0 +0200
--
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < 
/usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch


=
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- amavisd2006-04-07 22:03:15.0 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho  2006-04-07 22:07:00.0 +0200
--
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored


Thanks,
RV

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:44, Stephane Pointu wrote:
> Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour:
>
> I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package but
> this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a
> "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package but if I do a "emerge -uav
> world" it does not. Is this a normal behaviour? Shouldn't portage first
> check if there is an ebuild for it before installing the package?

The binary tbz2 package does contain the ebuild and any other information 
necessary for installing the binary package. qtbz2 from 
app-portage/portage-utils can be used to extract the metadata from a tbz2 
file..

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpL5ZLNJAHOV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Xorg upgrade

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:21, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Just upgraded to xorg-x11-7.1.  Definitely faster than 7.0.  glxgears
> runs at just under 19,000FPS, an increase of about 12%.

Hmm, mine comes up with this:

 $ glxgears
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b
2445 frames in 5.0 seconds = 488.874 FPS
2443 frames in 5.0 seconds = 488.550 FPS
2445 frames in 5.0 seconds = 488.946 FPS

How can I fix this libGL warning?

-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgp3Qfp0ZO30y.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: not accepting connections

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:25, Larry Brigman wrote:
> I have real vncserver (4.1.2) running on WinXP (sp2) with
> ZoneAlarm.  ZoneAlarm is allowing vncserver server access but
> the icon in the tray says that it is not accepting connections.
>
> I don't have any limits on connections in the connection tab of the server
> and I have a password set.  I have also check to see if I had remote
> desktop enabled, I don't.
>
> Anybody give me a cluestick as to what is wrong here?

What do the ZoneAlarm logs show?  Is it dropping the packets?

Just to take ZoneAlarm out of the equation:

- Turn on the WinXP Firewall and turn on its logging.
- disable ZA and then switch it off completely.  Look in WinXP's Task Manager 
to make sure that no ZA processes are left running.
- Try to connect to your VNC server and see what you get. If it doesn't 
connect check the WinXP Firewall logs.  If it does connect you know that it 
was ZoneAlarm's settings that stopped it.

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgpFyddDzLnUY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: Intel HDA soundcard, microphones and skype

2006-10-17 Thread Moshe Kamensky
* Matthew R. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/10/06 09:24]:
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 22:19, Richard Fish wrote:
> > On 10/11/06, Matthew R. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help & info.  I'm in the UK at the moment and it's 
> getting late.  I'll try it in the morning Thanks
> Matt

I have the same problems (with a dv8000 laptop) I applied the patch to 
alsa-1.0.13 (after a few modifications) and the quality of the sound 
improved significantly. I also get more switches in alsamixer. However, 
the microphone still doesn't work. I have a column saying ExtMic in 
alsamixer, but it says only 'L CAPTUR R' in red, and has no volume 
control. Is there a way to make the microphone work as well?

Thanks,
Moshe



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[gentoo-user] ati-driver update

2006-10-17 Thread oskar kapala

Hi,

I have hp zv6000 (amd64) with ati radeon x200. I'm using:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.24.8
or
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.5.8.0
Both work more less ok, but work.

I had >=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.25.18 in my
/etc/portage/package.mask because drivers later than 8.24.8 doesn't
support my card (it's checked by many till 8.27.10-r1)

When I've tried to emerge world it failed, because xorg-server and
xf86-video-ati require to upgrade this driver.

The problem is that if I upgrade my system including ati-drivers and
they won't work I won't be able to return to the old good one -
8.24.8. It's no longer in portage.

I really need a good advice.

Thanks,
oskar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Stephane Pointu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

OK. Actually I didn't know that the ebuild was in the package. However
when I tried to uncompress the archive to see what's in it, I had the
following error:
bzip2: (stdin): trailing garbage after EOF ignored
I have the same error on all packages in /usr/portage/packages
In the piece of data I managed to untar, I don't find any ebuild. I
guess it's in the "trailing garbage". Is there a way to extract it?

Regards,
Stephane

Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> The binary tbz2 package does contain the ebuild and any other information 
> necessary for installing the binary package. qtbz2 from 
> app-portage/portage-utils can be used to extract the metadata from a tbz2 
> file..
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFNMiYWWLMt96bzSoRAkuYAJ4uBEylERT5i10iUR+MENI1rr3xlQCeP+jA
hc0CkYTXzzCo0SkKt70ujSc=
=nDoY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Stephane Pointu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

You didn't get my point. The global idea was that I thought that Portage
first checks ebuilds before installing any package, and as there was no
ebuild, the package shouldn't get installed. I did not know that there
was the ebuild in the package itself.

Stephane

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:44, Stephane Pointu wrote:
>> Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour:
>>
>> I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package
>> but this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a
>> "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package but if I do a "emerge -uav
>> world" it does not. Is this a normal behaviour? Shouldn't portage
>> first check if there is an ebuild for it before installing the
>> package?
> 
> No, it makes perfect sense. When you use the -k switch, portage is in a 
> position to find and use the prebuilt package, so it will.
> 
> When you don't use the -k switch, it won't use /usr/portage/packages per 
> the man page, so there's no sense in even attemtping to look for that 
> package - as there is no ebuild for that version, it cannot possibly 
> build it
> 
> Your last question doesn't make sense - how can portage check for an 
> ebuild that you earlier clearly said does not exist?
> 
> alan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFNMnbWWLMt96bzSoRAjLXAKCMyIind950O8x+r/zqJ3oj2cqXdgCgnenu
ImG22gm7zhrCSTrk8BjVvos=
=zu0Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ati-driver update

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 13:47, oskar kapala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have hp zv6000 (amd64) with ati radeon x200. I'm using:
> x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.24.8
> or
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.5.8.0
> Both work more less ok, but work.
>
> I had >=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.25.18 in my
> /etc/portage/package.mask because drivers later than 8.24.8 doesn't
> support my card (it's checked by many till 8.27.10-r1)
>
> When I've tried to emerge world it failed, because xorg-server and
> xf86-video-ati require to upgrade this driver.
>
> The problem is that if I upgrade my system including ati-drivers and
> they won't work I won't be able to return to the old good one -
> 8.24.8. It's no longer in portage.

Oskar,

You don't say which version of xorg you have and want to upgrade to, so 
I've going to have to take a guess and assume it's the latest stable, 
and that your $ARCH is amd64.

x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 is hardcode to require 
>= x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.6.0
>=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.27.10

Not much you can do about that. You either have to find a version of the 
driver that does work and merge that, or start experimenting:

Create a local overlay in /usr/local/portage - there's info on how to do 
this in the gentoo docs. Copy a modified xorg-xserver ebuild over to 
the overlay and edit the driver requirements. Build, see if it works. 
If so, leave it and use the overlay instead of the main portage tree.

You can also find the older ebuilds on the net that worked for you and 
put them in the overlay as well. Someone mentioned a site here that 
does just that yesterday. Then at least you can revert to a known good 
version that portage won't nuke with every sync :-)

alan
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 14:12, Stephane Pointu wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
[SNIP]
> > qtbz2 from app-portage/portage-utils can be used to extract the metadata
> > from a tbz2 file..
>
[SNIP] 
> I guess it's in the "trailing garbage". Is there a way to extract it?

Was the above unclear or didn't you read it? Either way:

# emerge -va1 portage-utils

# qtbz2 -s portage-2.1.1.tbz2

# qxpak -l portage-2.1.1.xpak

# qxpak -x portage-2.1.1.xpak portage-2.1.1.ebuild

...

PS: Please don't toppost!

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpGKUVkfcGY0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED

2006-10-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 16 October 2006 15:53, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote 
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED':
> But where is CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, since grepping
> make.conf only returns the one line, CONFIG_PROTECT?

Gentoo provides defaults for both values.  Your value in /etc/make.conf 
overrides the default(s).

-- 
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh


pgpAywddX6dNH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 16 October 2006 22:53, maxim wexler wrote:
> But where is CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, since grepping
> make.conf only returns the one line, CONFIG_PROTECT?

Looking at the output of the following commands should answer your question.

# env | grep ^CONFIG_PROTECT

# find /etc/env.d | xargs grep CONFIG_PROTECT

# grep CONFIG_PROTECT /etc/profile.env

# grep -A 1 profile.env /etc/profile

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpFGPZt5JJJ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:57:57 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:

>   Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough.  It works as designed.  I did
> not overwrite the files, but I'm getting annoyed at having to tell
> etc-update "NO" every few weeks when I run etc-update.  There are
> anywhere from 10 to 40 files to plow through.  And I have a 7-year-old
> PIII Dell as my emergency backup machine, so I repeat the process all
> over again.

I've fixed the dispatch-conf patch in Bug #68618 to work with the latest
dispatch-conf. Add a line to /etc/dispatch-conf to specify files to be
ignored by dispatch-conf like

frozen="/etc/rc.conf /etc/conf.d/clock"

 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Don't forget that MS-Windows is just a temporary workaround until you can
switch to a GNU system.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> As I've mentioned several times before, there was a patch to
> dispatch-conf to do just this. You added the files you didn't want
> touching, ever, to a line in the config file. Unfortunately, the patch
> hasn't been updated for a couple of years and stopped working a while
> ago. Why not re-open the bug at
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151685

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgprOQ2Sq7Ok3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] problems rendering unicode characters

2006-10-17 Thread fei huang
I'm not sure, but have a look at your locale settings.. good luckdaniel


[gentoo-user] SMTP Authentication

2006-10-17 Thread Tito Valentin

Hello list:

I have been trying to get SMTP authentication on Gentoo to work with no
success.  I am running qmail (netqmail package) with dovecot and saslauth.
I am able to connect and read my mail through IMAP fine.  The problem is
that I cannot send email using my own SMTP server due to an authentication
issue.  Every time we try to send email out we get an error saying that it
cannot establish a connection because I am not part of the allowed rcphost
list.  I tried adding the remote host in the rcpthosts database but the
problem persists.  The only error I see in the log files for dovecot is
"Disconnected"

Can anyone point me in the right direction as to why I can't be
authenticated when sending email out?  Another thing is, it keeps
prompting me for my passwd.

GV

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:16:01 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:

> > As I've mentioned several times before, there was a patch to
> > dispatch-conf to do just this. You added the files you didn't want
> > touching, ever, to a line in the config file. Unfortunately, the patch
> > hasn't been updated for a couple of years and stopped working a while
> > ago. Why not re-open the bug at
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618  
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151685

I've already posted an updated patch to the original bug.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

What's the difference between ignorance and apathy?
I don't know and I don't care


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Do you leave it on? USE="berkdb"

2006-10-17 Thread Brian Davis
I have mine off.  However, you should see which packages you have 
installed that would take advantage of it before you turn it off globally.


Grant wrote:

Do you guys leave the berkdb USE flag on?  It seems to be a default
flag, but I've been using -berkdb in make.conf ever since I started
using Gentoo.  Is it basically a better way for lots of different
packages to manage their databases?

- Grant

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] problems rendering unicode characters

2006-10-17 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 10/17/06, fei huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure, but have a look at your locale settings.. good luckI currently have LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 and LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 set in /etc/env.d/02locale. And I have the appropriate env variables.  
Does anyone know which variable might affect displaying fonts - in general - or unicode characters - in particular?  
daniel-- Liviu 


Re: [gentoo-user] IMAP servers

2006-10-17 Thread Régis Décamps

On 10/17/06, Steve [Gentoo] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 I'm no longer so sure
about when imap processes are spawned or terminated - but there seem to
be a non-deterministic "lots" of them for each Thunderbird session.


There is one process create each time Thunderbird opens a new
connection, up to a limit which should be configured in your imap
server (MAXPERIP for courier-imap)

Thunderbird opens a connection each time a new folder is accessed, and
closes them when it has reach a limit which is configured in "Account
Setting", , "Server settings", "Advanced", "maximum unmber of
connections to cache"


--
Régis

http://regis.decamps.info/blog/

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem installing amavisd-new (Gentoo box)

2006-10-17 Thread Richard Fish

On 10/17/06, Ronald Vazquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thank you for your response.  I haven't had much time to really look.
Perhaps this evening...  Ok, here are the contents of the output file:

# cat amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch-8250.out
* amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch *


Hmm, this patch is only applied if you have qmail installed, and it
looks like it needs to be updated for 2.4.3.  I'd suggest filing a new
bug report on bugs.gentoo.org, and attach this file to the bug.  In
the mean time, you may want to mask this version with:

echo "# broken with qmail" >> /etc/portage/package.mask
echo =mail-filter/amavisd-new-2.4.3 >>/etc/portage/package.mask

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ati-driver update

2006-10-17 Thread Richard Fish

On 10/17/06, oskar kapala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

When I've tried to emerge world it failed, because xorg-server and
xf86-video-ati require to upgrade this driver.


xorg 7.1 or later require newer drivers.  You either have to use the
xf86-video-ati (the open source drivers included with x.org), or mask
the new version of x.org.

If you want to update to the current x.org, and abandon the
proprietary ATI drivers, remove "fglrx" from VIDEO_CARDS in
/etc/make.conf.

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Wings3d breaks X-window

2006-10-17 Thread JC Denton
Hello!I have a big problem. When I try to construct something with wings3d my x-windows system breaks. I can put a boby or something like this but as soon as I try to rotate the object or manipulate it in some way the system does the same like Ctrl+Shift+Del would do. It just kicks me of my system! I do not know how and wher to look for an error message. Please help!!Thank You!P.S. Because the stable version did not compile I used the ~x86 version. May be this time unstable is the right flag for this? ;) I also used ~x86 for erlang and esdl that were compiled as dependencies. 
		Keine Lust auf Tippen? Rufen Sie Ihre Freunde einfach an. 
 Yahoo! Messenger. Jetzt installieren 
. 


Re: [gentoo-user] partition scheme

2006-10-17 Thread David Grant

I'd like to share mine with the world:

Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

  Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   1490439391348+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda249054917  104422+  83  Linux
/dev/sda349185161 1959930   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda45162   30401   2027403005  Extended
/dev/sda55162   1002539070079+  83  Linux
/dev/sda6   10026   1488939070079+  8e  Linux LVM
/dev/sda7   14890   1975339070079+  8e  Linux LVM
/dev/sda8   19754   2461739070079+  8e  Linux LVM
/dev/sda9   24618   2948139070079+  83  Linux
/dev/sda10  29482   30401 7389899+  83  Linux

# df
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5  38G  258M   38G   1% /
udev  442M  184K  442M   1% /dev
/dev/sda2  99M   15M   79M  16% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg-opt 30G  3.2G   27G  11% /opt
/dev/mapper/vg-usr 20G  7.7G   13G  39% /usr
/dev/mapper/vg-home20G  5.5G   15G  28% /home
/dev/mapper/vg-var 20G   12G  8.6G  58% /var
/dev/mapper/vg-tmp 10G  356M  9.7G   4% /tmp
shm   442M 0  442M   0% /dev/shm

sda6-sda10 are all separate partitions so that I have the flexibility
to throw them into the LVM if I want or use them for something else
later.

Dave

On 10/16/06, Thufir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For hdb, what's a good partitioning scheme?  I want to go with reiser, and
keep the vfat (for win2k).  I have 512MB RAM, should I change the swap
size?  Is there a big advantage to using LVM versus just a regular root
partition?

I figure I'll use hda just for storage of stuff prior to burning to disc.
For a little while, I'll have a triple boot system.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# parted
GNU Parted 1.7.1
Using /dev/hda
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) print all

Disk /dev/hda: 80.0GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End SizeType File system  Flags
 1  32.3kB  107MB   107MB   primary  ext3 boot
 2  107MB   80.0GB  79.9GB  primary   lvm



Disk /dev/hdb: 30.8GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End SizeType File system  Flags
 1  32.3kB  11.7GB  11.7GB  primary  fat32boot, lba
 2  11.7GB  11.8GB  107MB   primary  ext2
 3  11.8GB  12.3GB  452MB   primary  linux-swap
 4  12.3GB  30.7GB  18.4GB  primary  ext3


Error: Unable to open /dev/md0 - unrecognised disk label.

Warning: Unable to open /dev/fd0 read-write (Read-only file system).  /dev/fd0 
has
been opened read-only.
Error: Unable to open /dev/fd0 - unrecognised disk label.

(parted) quit
Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# date
Tue Oct 17 07:37:56 IST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#



thanks,

Thufir

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list






--
David Grant
http://www.davidgrant.ca
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: etc-update vs dispatch-conf

2006-10-17 Thread David Grant

On 10/13/06, Remy Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

maxim wexler wrote:
> What does the group think?

I don't know about the group, but I use etc-update and keep all of /etc
in a Subversion working copy. This allows quickly seeing any changes
made on updates and emerges, reverting changes if anything breaks, and
keeping track of the reasons for specific changes in commit log messages.

I also use a tool to store file and directory ownership and ACLs in an
SVN property. I believe dispatch-conf doesn't track ownership and
permissions.

I even thought about using a distributed VCS like git to be able to push
changes to a group of machines for e.g. updates, but then again, I don't
have enough installations to maintain. Has anybody done something in
this direction?


Great idea to use SVN. RCS on it's own is a pain to deal with.


--
David Grant
http://www.davidgrant.ca
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Wings3d breaks X-window

2006-10-17 Thread b.n.

JC Denton ha scritto:
I have a big problem. When I try to construct something with wings3d my 
x-windows system breaks. I can put a boby or something like this but as 
soon as I try to rotate the object or manipulate it in some way the 
system does the same like Ctrl+Shift+Del would do. It just kicks me of 
my system! I do not know how and wher to look for an error message. 
Please help!!


You can look (and post) error messages you find in /var/log/Xorg.[0/1/2].log

Tell us the video card and the drivers you are using (e.g. "ATI Radeon 
9200 with xorg 'radeon' driver)


Do other 3D apps work? (glxgears? celestia? blender? whatever...)

P.S. Because the stable version did not compile I used the ~x86 version. 


Very strange that the stable version did not compile.
Can you post the output of "emerge --info"?

m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] emerge swt failed: cannot find -lGL

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
Hi all,

I was just performing a routing update recently, and swt failed with
this error:

 * Building OpenGL component
cc -O -Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3232  -DLINUX -DGTK
-I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include
-I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include/linux -fPIC   -c glx.c
cc -O -Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3232  -DLINUX -DGTK
-I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include
-I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include/linux -fPIC   -c glx_structs.c
cc -O -Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3232  -DLINUX -DGTK
-I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include
-I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include/linux -fPIC   -c glx_stats.c
cc -shared -fPIC  -shared -fPIC -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lGL -lGLU -lm -o
libswt-glx-gtk-3232.so swt.o glx.o glx_structs.o glx_stats.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: 
cannot find -lGL
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [libswt-glx-gtk-3232.so] Error 1

!!! ERROR: dev-java/swt-3.2-r2 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1568:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 937:   Called src_compile
  swt-3.2-r2.ebuild, line 141:   Called die

!!! Unable to build OpenGL component
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
stack if relevant.

now, I've had "cannot find -l before, and a revdep-rebuild or
something usually fixes it.  In this case however, I couldn't get around
it.

I have been swapping between xorg's x11-drm radeon driver, and ATI's
fglrx driver recently - but I've used eselect correctly - I'm now using
the x11-drm driver.

I don't know what to look at next - any hints?
thanks,
-- 
Iain Buchanan 

Familiarity breeds contempt -- and children.
-- Mark Twain

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge swt failed: cannot find -lGL

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:55 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was just performing a routing update recently, and swt failed with
> this error:

> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: 
> cannot find -lGL

I worked around it by doing this:
$ cd /usr/lib
$ sudo ln -s /usr/lib/opengl/ati/lib/libGL.so

but I don't know that this is the right thing to do - how do I tell if
it actually works like this?

thanks,
-- 
Iain Buchanan 

FLASH!
Intelligence of mankind decreasing.
Details at ... uh, when the little hand is on the 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread maxim wexler
Hello group,

I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
date. 

I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
the latest versions of software when needed.

Here's the sync line in make.conf.

SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"

Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
something else?

-Maxim

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread maxim wexler
>digg2ogg

should be dir2ogg


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Are newer versions masked for some reason?  When a sync is done it gets all 
the mirror has.


On Tuesday October 17 2006 23:37, maxim wexler wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
> digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
> date.
>
> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.
>
> Here's the sync line in make.conf.
>
> SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
>
> Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
> something else?
>
> -Maxim
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 

Brett I. Holcomb
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Drew

I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
the latest versions of software when needed.


All sync does is download the latest ebuilds into your local portage
tree. If the ebuild maintainers haven't gotten around to creating an
ebuild for package 'foo-1.2.0' (the lastest) and are still using
'foo-0.8' then you're stuck with 'foo-0.8' unless you roll your own
ebuild for 'foo-1.2.0'.

Of course you're also welcome to submit the custom ebuild into
bugzilla to get it included in portage for everyone else to benefit
from.


-Andrew Kay
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Walter Dnes

Thank you, thank you, thank you verrry verrry much


  That's *EXACTLY what I'm looking for.

-- 
Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
My musings on technology and security at http://techsec.blog.ca
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome exit clean

2006-10-17 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 10:51 -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:

> Shaochun Wang wrote:
> > It's /etc/X11/gdm/PostSession
> 
> And I was mistaken, after all! :) So good for the find command :P

If you know the file or directory name (or even part of it), rlocate is
much, much, much faster than trying to 'find' the file.

--- Vladimir
-- 
Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Monday 16 October 2006 22:26, maxim wexler wrote:
>> localhost heathen # grep CONFIG /etc/make.conf
>> CONFIG_PROTECT="-*"
> 
> WHY did you set that??

He already said, why he did that. He was annoyed by the
list of files that he's got to check after emerges, and
somebody in the forum gave him this "hint".

Well, it's correct - after setting this, he doesn't have
to check any files at all anymore.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Wait a minute, Marge.  I saw "Mrs. Doubtfire."  This is a man in drag!

-- Homer Simpson
   Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(annoyed grunt)ocious


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>>digg2ogg
> 
> should be dir2ogg

0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different
version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Don't SANFORIZE me!!

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hello group,
> 
> I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
> digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
> date. 

There is no digg2ogg in the tree.

> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.

Yes.

> Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
> something else?

Well, how about reading docs?

You added an overlay and in this overlay, there's digg2ogg.
You tend to forget quite quickly, what you did, don't you? :)

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How many hardware guys does it take to change a light bulb?

"Well the diagnostics say it's fine buddy, so it's a software problem."


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Darren Kirby
Quoth the Alexander Skwar
> · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>digg2ogg
> >
> > should be dir2ogg
>
> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different
> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"?

Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie: 
newer) version offered. Good enough? 

-d

-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 22:53 -0700, Darren Kirby wrote:
> Quoth the Alexander Skwar
> > · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >>digg2ogg
> > >
> > > should be dir2ogg
> >
> > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different
> > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"?
> 
> Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie: 
> newer) version offered. Good enough? 

Can't argue with that *lol* can I call you UPSTREAM? ;)

This is what I do in cases like this (not aimed at UPSTREAM, but for
anyone's reference :)

1. look in /usr/portage to see if newer ebuild exists.
   - if it does, find out whether it's in ~x86, or hard masked, and
decide if I want to explicitly unmask it (usually I do).

2. if no ebuild exists, check bugs.gentoo.org and see if anyone has
requested it / submitted an ebuild that I can put in my overlay.

3. if not, I look at the app's homepage and see if I really want / need
the latest features, and if so I submit a version bump request on
bugs.gentoo.org, providing as much help in the testing process as I can.

4. if it's a very popular app, like gnome, then I look for unofficial
ebuilds and put them in my overlay.

If you try any of these options (unmask, overlay, or unofficial ebuild),
then be prepared for issues / bugs.  But that's what the game is all
about :)

HTH,
-- 
Iain Buchanan 

In order to discover who you are, first learn who everybody else is;
you're what's left.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
Darren Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Quoth the Alexander Skwar
>> · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>digg2ogg
>> >
>> > should be dir2ogg
>>
>> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different
>> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"?
> 
> Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie: 
> newer) version offered. Good enough? 

No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is,
what's in the tree. And the latest stable version is 0.8, no matter what
you think. The question remains: Why should a different version be offered?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
A closed mouth gathers no foot.


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] sodipodi

2006-10-17 Thread Stéphane ANCELOT

Hi,

I can not find sodipodi in emerge 
where is it ?
Bye
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list