Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
Jan Stępień wrote: Hi everyone, # emerge -avDu world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating world dependencies | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald !!! Depgraph creation failed. Maybe snippets from my /etc/portage/package.* files will be helpful: keywords x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/beryl-core x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-misc/beryl-settings unmask x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/beryl-core x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-plugins/beryl-vidcap x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-misc/beryl-settings I'm not very familiar with unmasking system, so most probably an answer to the question I'm asking is more than just obvious - if so, accept my apologies. Nevertheless, I would be grateful for your support. Best regards, Jan Stępień Hey! There is one interesting part in the output of emerge >> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) This means that the package hasn't been tested yet. So you need to replace the following in package.keywords x11-plugins/beryl-plugins by x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86 If you are using another architecture than x86 (like amd64) you need to write ~amd64 instead Cheers, Jay -- My system configuration (Gentoo Linux): http://www.linux-stats.org/index.php?c=userpage&sys=810 Registered Linux User #373457 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
On Sunday 18 February 2007 13:48, Jakob Buchgraber wrote: > Jan Stępień wrote: > > For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page > > or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. [snip...] > There is one interesting part in the output of emerge > > >> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) > > This means that the package hasn't been tested yet. > So you need to replace the following in package.keywords > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins > by > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86 > > If you are using another architecture than x86 (like amd64) you need to > write ~amd64 instead Before you do any of the above I suggest that you read MASKED PACKAGES section and KEYWORDS section within man emerge. It's better that you understand what you are masking/unmasking in the long run and why. -- Regards, Mick pgprBFvofAbKf.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] while emerging gnome packages graphviz compile failed
Hi. I have been trying to build some X packages and got the following output while trying to merge graphviz. The complete log is available if necessary. Any assistance would be appreciated. Here is the output: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=athlon-xp -pipe -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wall -ffast-math -version-info 2:0:0 -no-undefined -o libgvc.la -rpath /usr/lib/graphviz gvrender.lo gvlayout.lo gvtextlayout.lo gvdevice.lo gvcontext.lo gvjobs.lo gvevent.lo gvplugin.lo gvconfig.lo gvusershape.lo gvc.lo no_builtins.lo ../../lib/cdt/libcdt.la ../../lib/common/libcommon.la ../../lib/graph/libgraph.la ../../lib/pathplan/libpathplan.la -L/usr/lib -lgd -ljpeg -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm /usr/lib/libexpat.la -lexpat -lz -lltdl i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/gvrender.o .libs/gvlayout.o .libs/gvtextlayout.o .libs/gvdevice.o .libs/gvcontext.o .libs/gvjobs.o .libs/gvevent.o .libs/gvplugin.o .libs/gvconfig.o .libs/gvusershape.o .libs/gvc.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../../lib/common/.libs/libcommon.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/cdt/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/graph/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/pathplan/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/graphviz -L/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/cdt/.libs ../../lib/cdt/.libs/libcdt.so ../../lib/graph/.libs/libgraph.so ../../lib/pathplan/.libs/libpathplan.so -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libgd.so /usr/lib/libjpeg.so /usr/lib/libfreetype.so /usr/lib/libpng12.so -lm /usr/lib/libexpat.so -lz /usr/lib/libltdl.so -mtune=athlon-xp -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgvc_builtins.so.2 -o .libs/libgvc_builtins.so.2.0.0 ../../lib/common/.libs/libcommon.a(utils.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple definition of `entities' ../../lib/common/.libs/libcommon.a(htmllex.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libgvc_builtins.la] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/gvrender.o .libs/gvlayout.o .libs/gvtextlayout.o .libs/gvdevice.o .libs/gvcontext.o .libs/gvjobs.o .libs/gvevent.o .libs/gvplugin.o .libs/gvconfig.o .libs/gvusershape.o .libs/gvc.o .libs/no_builtins.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../../lib/common/.libs/libcommon.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/cdt/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/graph/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/pathplan/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/graphviz -L/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/cdt/.libs ../../lib/cdt/.libs/libcdt.so ../../lib/graph/.libs/libgraph.so ../../lib/pathplan/.libs/libpathplan.so -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libgd.so /usr/lib/libjpeg.so /usr/lib/libfreetype.so /usr/lib/libpng12.so -lm /usr/lib/libexpat.so -lz /usr/lib/libltdl.so -mtune=athlon-xp -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgvc.so.2 -o .libs/libgvc.so.2.0.0 ../../lib/common/.libs/libcommon.a(utils.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple definition of `entities' ../../lib/common/.libs/libcommon.a(htmllex.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libgvc.la] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib/gvc' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2/work/graphviz-2.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 !!! ERROR: media-gfx/graphviz-2.8-r2 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1614: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 971: Called qa_call 'src_compile' environment, line 3397: Called src_compile graphviz-2.8-r2.ebuild, line 84: Called die !!! Compile Failed! !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call !!! stack if relevant. !!! A complete build log is located at !!! '/var/log/portage/media-gfx:graphviz-2.8-r2:20070218-134011.log'. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: while emerging gnome packages graphviz compile failed
Search bugzilla before asking please. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165460 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] while emerging gnome packages graphviz compile failed
On Sunday 18 February 2007 17:29, John covici wrote: > Hi. I have been trying to build some X packages and got the following > output while trying to merge graphviz. The complete log is available > if necessary. > > Any assistance would be appreciated. There's an open bug on b.g.o.: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165460 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
One way to get a known mirror is to do this command: emerge -fp It will give you a list of mirrors that should have the file and the address for it too. That assumes he has the information about the mirror/package stored locally. I think he's asking because his wireless card doesn't work under gentoo but does under XP, so non-local data is impossible to snag. ;-) -Drew -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
Drew wrote: >> One way to get a known mirror is to do this command: emerge -fp >> > name> It will give you a list of mirrors that should have the file >> and the >> address for it too. > > That assumes he has the information about the mirror/package stored > locally. I think he's asking because his wireless card doesn't work > under gentoo but does under XP, so non-local data is impossible to > snag. ;-) > > > -Drew I'm not a windoze user but I would run the command in Gentoo, write down the address, boot into windoze and poke it in < I hate this part> IE and download it. Then copy it over, ever how he plans to do that too. :/ Of course, if he can't or doesn't want to do it that way, I gave him another option, just in case. ;-) Dale :-) :-) :-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/dalek1967 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] glsa-check
Hi, everyone Does glsa-check depend on portage tree syncing? If I haven't synced the portage tree for let's say a couple of months would glsa-check show any security updates that appeared after the last syncing? -- Best regards, Daniel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] while emerging gnome packages graphviz compile failed
on Sunday 02/18/2007 Etaoin Shrdlu([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > On Sunday 18 February 2007 17:29, John covici wrote: > > Hi. I have been trying to build some X packages and got the following > > output while trying to merge graphviz. The complete log is available > > if necessary. > > > > Any assistance would be appreciated. > > There's an open bug on b.g.o.: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165460 And now they have stabillized 2.12 so it should work -- thanks. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
On Sunday 18 February 2007, Jakob Buchgraber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Portage
world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins':
> So you need to replace the following in package.keywords
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> by
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86
If you are on x86, those two lines mean exactly the same thing in
package.keywords.
> If you are using another architecture than x86 (like amd64) you need to
> write ~amd64 instead
Or, you could simply leave off the keyword, like he has and have it treated
like ~${ARCH}, where ${ARCH} is your current architecture.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW!
pgpmYGuyHtgGF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
Mick napisał(a): > On Sunday 18 February 2007 13:48, Jakob Buchgraber wrote: >> Jan Stępień wrote: > >>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page >>> or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. > > Before you do any of the above I suggest that you read MASKED PACKAGES > section > and KEYWORDS section within man emerge. It's better that you understand what > you are masking/unmasking in the long run and why. > I assure you I have read it quite a long time ago. The reason I'm asking my question here is that the suggestions on emerge's man page weren't helpful. Neither Google was. Regards, Jan Stępień -- Mailjan at stepien com pl Jabber jano at jabber aster pl GG 1894343 Web http://stepien.com.pl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
Jakob Buchgraber napisał(a): > Jan Stępień wrote: >> # emerge -avDu world >> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >> >> Calculating world dependencies | >> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2" >> have been masked. >> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your >> request: >> - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) >> >> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man >> page or >> refer to the Gentoo Handbook. >> (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild]) >> >> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald >> !!! Depgraph creation failed. > > There is one interesting part in the output of emerge >>> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) > This means that the package hasn't been tested yet. > So you need to replace the following in package.keywords > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins > by > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86 > I've tried to unmask it with keywords "~x86", "~*", "*" and even "-*" but still I've got the same error. I'm afraid that * wildcard isn't working and I can't guess the correct keyword. Have you got any further suggestions? Regards, Jan Stępień -- Mailjan at stepien com pl Jabber jano at jabber aster pl GG 1894343 Web http://stepien.com.pl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
On Sunday 18 February 2007, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked
beryl-plugins':
> >>> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
>
> I've tried to unmask it with keywords "~x86", "~*", "*" and even "-*"
> but still I've got the same error. I'm afraid that * wildcard isn't
> working and I can't guess the correct keyword. Have you got any further
> suggestions?
I don't have an ebuild for that version on beryl, so I can't tell you what
keywords can be used. But, I can tell you how to find out.
e.g.:
$ grep KEYWORD beryl-plugins-0.1.3.ebuild
KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86"
So, you can simply find the KEYWORDS variable in the ebuild you are trying
to use and add one of those keywords to your package.keywords. Of course,
if you do anything other than ~${ARCH}, where ${ARCH} is your current
architecture and it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW!
pgpxj0z2nhe7M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
On Sunday 18 February 2007 22:19, Jan Stępień wrote: > Jakob Buchgraber napisał(a): > > Jan Stępień wrote: > >> # emerge -avDu world > >> > >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > >> > >> Calculating world dependencies | > >> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2" > >> have been masked. > >> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > >> request: > >> - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) > >> > >> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man > >> page or > >> refer to the Gentoo Handbook. > >> (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild]) > >> > >> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald > >> !!! Depgraph creation failed. > > > > There is one interesting part in the output of emerge > > > >>> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) > > > > This means that the package hasn't been tested yet. > > So you need to replace the following in package.keywords > > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins > > by > > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86 > > I've tried to unmask it with keywords "~x86", "~*", "*" and even "-*" > but still I've got the same error. I'm afraid that * wildcard isn't > working and I can't guess the correct keyword. Have you got any further > suggestions? You may want to have a go by adding: ~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 or, =x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 ~x86 (if you don't want subsequent upgrades to unstable packages) to your /etc/portage/package.keywords file and then run: # emerge -upDv beryl-plugins to see if it is being picked up. You may discover additional masked dependencies at this stage and you will need to unmask them in turn. HTH -- Regards, Mick pgpeIrr4MmPwI.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Download with Megaupload
I have Gentoo 2006.1 and the Xfce Desktop with Mozilla Firefox. In order to download from Megaupload, I use the extension "Megaupload3". My question is: There is any script that allow the user to download from Megaupload? I saw Rapget (www.rapget.com) and other utilities doing this on Windows. A script could be great because it allows the users to download in background mode because the Firefox extension can't. Thanks for your time and I expect some answers. -- BrunoProg64
[gentoo-user] Which wireless cardbus?
This must be one of the more often repeated Qs on many forums. I am trying to find out which WiFi cardbus to buy for my laptop. I didn't have much joy with a Belkin and would like to get a card which has a chipset that is supported well in Linux. Which chipsets have the more mature drivers? Is there a list somewhere which is kept up to date - a lot of what I found in Google is of historical importance only. Your insight on this would be much appreciated. :) -- Regards, Mick pgppDUBDrLl6i.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] glsa-check
Daniel Iliev wrote: > Hi, everyone > > Does glsa-check depend on portage tree syncing? If I haven't synced the > portage tree for let's say a couple of months would glsa-check show any > security updates that appeared after the last syncing? > > I found the answer at the link below and it is "yes". Sorry for the noise. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/security/security-handbook.xml?part=1&chap=14 -- Best regards, Daniel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Which wireless cardbus?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Mick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This must be one of the more often repeated Qs on many forums. I am trying > to > find out which WiFi cardbus to buy for my laptop. I didn't have much joy > with a Belkin and would like to get a card which has a chipset that is > supported well in Linux. > > Which chipsets have the more mature drivers? Is there a list somewhere which > is kept up to date - a lot of what I found in Google is of historical > importance only. Atheros is the best supported chipset -- through madwifi-ng drivers -- afaik, I have a D-Link card with an atheros chipset and I never had any problems. Here is a nice site with a list of supported cards: http://linux-wless.passys.nl/ dunno if it's uptodate though > Your insight on this would be much appreciated. :) - -- Ali Polatel (hawking) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://hawking.nonlogic.org/ gpg: F0186CA2 fp: 7110 01E2 F8B6 83A2 AC52 1D9F 986B 76E1 F018 6CA2 () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF2T7CmGt24fAYbKIRAshUAJwK3E8LOKX9uaz5WOSj5fvzhjEvVwCeMj6e sHmVRiNakhfs8JtE1wzf3nA= =Hrc8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
