Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen
Sure, ive attached one to this email. -Kevin On 01/03/2013 03:08 PM, Robert David wrote: > This is wired, can you post screenshot? > > There does not seem to be some condition in code. > > Robert. > > On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0600 > Kevin Brandstatter wrote: > >> i cleared out the configs when i installed the release. Suspend >> works, it even locks now, but i still cant change the settings. no >> dbus problems that i can see >> >> -Kevin >> >> On 01/03/2013 04:26 AM, Robert David wrote: >>> Did you try e with new config with e-17 release? Or you had some >>> previous configs and was replaced with release. Because there was >>> some config upgrade and old configs did not work and some was not >>> replaced correctly (mixer gadget). >>> >>> And suspendig with E works ok? You use pm-suspend? Dont you have >>> some dbus problems? As the events are send through dbus I think, >>> for me it works even with running pm-suspend from console (E locks >>> screen). >>> >>> Robert. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 03:51:34 -0600 >>> Kevin Brandstatter wrote: >>> The problem is the option to lock screen on suspend is greyed out and uncheckable. Did try building with all modules -Kevin On 12/28/2012 04:16 AM, Robert David wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > what exactly you missing on screen lock in E17? I use E17 and > screen lock is ok when suspending. It does not need some > xscreenlock stuff, it is just part of e. Just check > settings->sceen->screen_lock and checkin lock_on_suspend. Thats > all:) > > If you missing something, just make sure you build with all the > modules flags. > > x11-wm/enlightenment-0.17.0 was built with the following: > USE="nls pam spell udev ukit -doc -emotion -static-libs" > ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES="access backlight battery clock comp > conf-applications conf-dialogs conf-display conf-edgebindings > conf-interaction conf-intl conf-keybindings conf-menus conf-paths > conf-performance conf-randr conf-shelves conf-theme > conf-window-manipulation conf-window-remembers connman cpufreq > dropshadow everything fileman fileman-opinfo gadman ibar ibox > illume2 mixer msgbus notification pager quickaccess shot start > syscon systray tasks temperature tiling winlist wizard xkbswitch" > > > Robert. > > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:51:26 -0600 > Kevin Brandstatter wrote: > >> On 12/27/2012 05:16 PM, Mick wrote: >>> On Saturday 22 Dec 2012 01:29:57 Kevin Brandstatter wrote: So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only problem ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock the screen on suspend. I don't think this is a problem on some of the other distributions so thought it could be a policy problem on gentoo. Curious if anyone else uses e17/has this problem and maybe a fix. or just for suggestions of where to look >>> I can't select it here either, but I suspect that this may be >>> because I do not use xscreenlock or equivalent. >>> >>> Have you tried posting either at the e17 or the >>> enlightenm...@gentoo.org mailing lists? >> yes I first posted to the e17-users list. It was working for >> other people so i thought it might be distro specific, I emerged >> xscreensaver to see if that would fix it at all but no luck. I >> had this problem a while ago and i think it had something to do >> with polkit settings >> >> -Kevin >> >> > <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change?
On Jan 4, 2013 8:33 PM, "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:27:59PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > > > The mere fact that you haven't manually typed in... > > > http://www.facebook.com/blah_blah_blah does not mean you're not > > > connecting to it. > > > > But all that's above layer 3, since it's an HTTP redirect, or a page > > transclusion which necessitates a new GET request. Michael's point > > stands. > > And I want to make sure that new GET request is blocked coming and > going. > > -- > Walter Dnes > I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications > And it will, for the simple reason that outbound psckets are dropped, so inbound packets are nevrr valid. That was Michael's point.
[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and ssl
On 01/04/2013 09:59 AM, Robert David wrote: This is not the problem. With firefox-bin I can normally accept the certificate, compiled firefox does not give me the option. You might try entering 'about:buildconfig' as the URL in both versions of firefox to see what differences there may be. Are the two packages supplying the same version of firefox?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:56:44PM +, Mick wrote > On Friday 04 Jan 2013 20:27:38 Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > Under the heading of "grasping-for-straws"... does it have a physical > > write-protect switch? If such a switch was engaged, that would explain > > things. > > Hi Walter, > > No, it doesn't, but just in case it had some virtual lock I tried > (successfully) to run 'hdparm -L 0 /dev/sdb'. It did not make a difference. One last gasp... were you doing this as root? Regular users cannot dd directly to a device, for obvious reasons. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
Re: [Bulk] RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:22:37 -0500 "Mike Edenfield" wrote: > I have never personally run into any case > where I had a single /+/usr and regretted it, but I *have* encountered > situations where I could not get /usr mounted and ended up merging it > with /. FWIW, YMMV, etc. And why was that, not udev? What is your point, others have avoided regretting it by having a seperate /usr. > > I can tell you that Pandu's analogy vis a vis Windows is a bit > flawed. What Windows has done recently is (by default for clean > installs) to split the boot loader and related bootstrap code into a > separate partition from the actual operating system. Claiming that > this is analogous to / and /usr is quite a stretch. It is much more > accurate to make it analogous to / and /boot. The System Partition > has no "Windows" files on it, just the equivalent to grub (and it's > also used if you have BitLocker, to decrypt your boot partition). > > Which, to me, means it has absolutely nothing to do with the current > discussion one way or the other :) He did define the fact that he mentioned it because he claimed the repair tools are stored in a small seperate partition like / or root is defined in the FHS which means he brought more to the discussion than you just have. In any case there are major benefits to having Windows with program files on a seperate partition and you shouldn't be stopped from having a seperate /usr without good reason and which there is not or if there is good reason in a hidden agenda/future plan it has not been brought to any discussion, note though that lies and mystery have. Broken for years indeed, more like tiny issues that few care about and so haven't been fixed by default. I re-assert that eudevs mentioning of moving potentially less stable/audited or even arbitrary code to later in the boot process is also welcomed by me.
Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change?
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:27:59PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > The mere fact that you haven't manually typed in... > > http://www.facebook.com/blah_blah_blah does not mean you're not > > connecting to it. > > But all that's above layer 3, since it's an HTTP redirect, or a page > transclusion which necessitates a new GET request. Michael's point > stands. And I want to make sure that new GET request is blocked coming and going. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 22:31:53 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:32:14 + > > Mick wrote: > > I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to > > have locked itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and > > purposes I cannot write to it in any conceivable way. > > > > I tried to delete /dev/sdb1 with c/fdisk, the dd zeros > > into /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdb and also the first 512B to delete the > > partition table, but nothing seems to work. > > > > /dev/sdb1 is still there no matter how I try to > > delete/format/overwrite it. > > > > Is there a way of resetting whatever needs resetting in the USB flash > > chip to make it work again? > > USB sticks don't last long. When they do that, they are nuked. > > They cost about as much as a packet of smokes. Chuck it in the bin, buy > a new one, move on. It's not worth the time to even attempt to fix it. Yep, you're right. I have come to the conclusion that it is terminal. Out of sheer good luck I ran a backup just a day before it croaked! :-) -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 20:27:38 Walter Dnes wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:16:51PM +, Mick wrote > > > Thanks James, no luck with parted either. It'll see the old vfat > > partition in there, but it will not delete it, reformat it on in > > any way change it. > > > > Different MSWindows tools also fail to operate on it. > > Under the heading of "grasping-for-straws"... does it have a physical > write-protect switch? If such a switch was engaged, that would explain > things. Hi Walter, No, it doesn't, but just in case it had some virtual lock I tried (successfully) to run 'hdparm -L 0 /dev/sdb'. It did not make a difference. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
> From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 6:08 PM > > On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:56:52 +0700 > Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > In case you haven't noticed, since Windows 7 (or Vista, forget which) > > Microsoft has even went the distance of splitting between C: > > (analogous to /usr) and 'System Partition' (analogous to /). The boot > > process is actually handled by the 100ish MB 'System Partition' > > before being handed to C:. This will at least give SysAdmins a > > fighting chance of recovering a botched maintenance. (Note: Said > > behavior will only be visible if installing onto a clean hard disk. > > If there are partitions left over from previous Windows installs, > > Win7 will not create a separate 'System Partition') So, if Microsoft > > saw the light, why does Red Hat sunk into darkness instead? > I'm not sure about Microsoft's motivations in what you describe. My first > reaction is that the Great Circle of IT Life is turning and MS are trying > something new for them. Whether it's applicable to us here as an illustration > remains to be seen - I know very little about Windows so can't even begin to > draw sensible parallels. I know little about the history of UNIX before 1993, and the sum of my experience with Linux is that I have never personally run into any case where I had a single /+/usr and regretted it, but I *have* encountered situations where I could not get /usr mounted and ended up merging it with /. FWIW, YMMV, etc. I can tell you that Pandu's analogy vis a vis Windows is a bit flawed. What Windows has done recently is (by default for clean installs) to split the boot loader and related bootstrap code into a separate partition from the actual operating system. Claiming that this is analogous to / and /usr is quite a stretch. It is much more accurate to make it analogous to / and /boot. The System Partition has no "Windows" files on it, just the equivalent to grub (and it's also used if you have BitLocker, to decrypt your boot partition). Which, to me, means it has absolutely nothing to do with the current discussion one way or the other :) --Mike
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:32:14 + Mick wrote: > I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to > have locked itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and > purposes I cannot write to it in any conceivable way. > > I tried to delete /dev/sdb1 with c/fdisk, the dd zeros > into /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdb and also the first 512B to delete the > partition table, but nothing seems to work. > > /dev/sdb1 is still there no matter how I try to > delete/format/overwrite it. > > Is there a way of resetting whatever needs resetting in the USB flash > chip to make it work again? USB sticks don't last long. When they do that, they are nuked. They cost about as much as a packet of smokes. Chuck it in the bin, buy a new one, move on. It's not worth the time to even attempt to fix it. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?
On 4/1/2013, "Randy Barlow" wrote: >On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the >> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've >> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? > >Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. >For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for >reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great >features and extensions. I'm trying to set Thunderbird up, but I'm not telling it the right values to connect to my ISP's POP server. I suppose I should have a rest and try again tomorrow. Thanks for the recommendation. >For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to >configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. I may even have to resort to Mutt if I can't get anything else running. What a state to be in in 2013! (I don't imply that Mutt's not good, just that Kmail should never have been released in its present state. Doesn't anyone ever learn?)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:16:51PM +, Mick wrote > Thanks James, no luck with parted either. It'll see the old vfat > partition in there, but it will not delete it, reformat it on in > any way change it. > > Different MSWindows tools also fail to operate on it. Under the heading of "grasping-for-straws"... does it have a physical write-protect switch? If such a switch was engaged, that would explain things. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change?
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:32:58PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote >> On 12/30/2012 10:21 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: >> > [0:0] -A FECESBOOK -j LOG --log-prefix "FECESBOOK:" --log-level 6 >> > [0:0] -A FECESBOOK -j DROP >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 192.168.123.248/29 -i eth0 -j ACCEPT >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 169.254.0.0/16 -i eth0 -j ACCEPT >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID,NEW -j UNSOLICITED >> >> In fact, since you're blocking all outgoing packets to facebook, the >> only state that a packet from facebook can have here is INVALID or NEW. >> So traffic from facebook will be sent to the UNSOLICITED chain and DROPped. >> >> >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.63.176.0/20 -j FECESBOOK >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.220.144.0/20 -j FECESBOOK >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.63.176.0/20 -j FECESBOOK >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.171.224.0/19 -j FECESBOOK >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 200.58.112.0/20 -j FECESBOOK >> > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 213.155.64.0/19 -j FECESBOOK >> >> ...making these pointless =) > > > I've run into at least one newspaper website (I forget which, > it's occasionally used for links on Slashdot) which ends up trying to > redirect me to a Facebook site even though the URL does not mention > Facebook at all. There is other integration as well. See the first > post in > http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26618459-Increasing-integration-of-facebook-into-many-web-sites > I believe this may have been straightened out since then, but 13 months > ago that post was correct. And then there's the "LIKE" button which > shows up all over the web. > > The mere fact that you haven't manually typed in... > http://www.facebook.com/blah_blah_blah does not mean you're not > connecting to it. But all that's above layer 3, since it's an HTTP redirect, or a page transclusion which necessitates a new GET request. Michael's point stands. -- :wq
Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change?
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:32:58PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote > On 12/30/2012 10:21 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > [0:0] -A FECESBOOK -j LOG --log-prefix "FECESBOOK:" --log-level 6 > > [0:0] -A FECESBOOK -j DROP > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 192.168.123.248/29 -i eth0 -j ACCEPT > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 169.254.0.0/16 -i eth0 -j ACCEPT > > [0:0] -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT > > [0:0] -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID,NEW -j UNSOLICITED > > In fact, since you're blocking all outgoing packets to facebook, the > only state that a packet from facebook can have here is INVALID or NEW. > So traffic from facebook will be sent to the UNSOLICITED chain and DROPped. > > > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.63.176.0/20 -j FECESBOOK > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.220.144.0/20 -j FECESBOOK > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.63.176.0/20 -j FECESBOOK > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 69.171.224.0/19 -j FECESBOOK > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 200.58.112.0/20 -j FECESBOOK > > [0:0] -A INPUT -s 213.155.64.0/19 -j FECESBOOK > > ...making these pointless =) I've run into at least one newspaper website (I forget which, it's occasionally used for links on Slashdot) which ends up trying to redirect me to a Facebook site even though the URL does not mention Facebook at all. There is other integration as well. See the first post in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26618459-Increasing-integration-of-facebook-into-many-web-sites I believe this may have been straightened out since then, but 13 months ago that post was correct. And then there's the "LIKE" button which shows up all over the web. The mere fact that you haven't manually typed in... http://www.facebook.com/blah_blah_blah does not mean you're not connecting to it. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
On 1/4/2013 14:31, Kevin Chadwick wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:52:29 -0600 "Dustin C. Hatch" wrote: You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e. `rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot afterward is probably a good idea as well. I'm interested in what may crash, do you mean after logging out and in again etc.. I have started and stopped udev in the past during testing without any apparent problems. I'm not sure what would crash, if anything. It may very well be fine; I was just offering the suggestion just in case. If it were me doing it, I'd at least do it on a virtual console and not in an X11 terminal, in case your keyboard stops working (which seems unlikely, but I've learned that nothing is too crazy to expect when dealing with udev) -- ♫Dustin
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:52:29 -0600 "Dustin C. Hatch" wrote: > You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e. > `rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot > afterward is probably a good idea as well. I'm interested in what may crash, do you mean after logging out and in again etc.. I have started and stopped udev in the past during testing without any apparent problems.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
On 1/4/2013 10:23, James wrote:
Dustin C. Hatch gmail.com> writes:
The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev:
>=sys-fs/udev-181
>=virtual/udev-181
Then emerge -avuD1 udev and see if that fixes it.
I get the downgrades you would expect:
UD ] virtual/udev-171 [196]
UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9
I also get some weird companion downgrades:
blocks B ] >x11-libs/qt-script-4.8.2-r:4
(">x11-libs/qt-script-4.8.2-r:4" is blocking x11-libs/qt-declarative-4.8.2,
x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.8.2,
x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-multimedia-4.8.2,
x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.8.2)
[blocks B ]
I don't have Qt installed anywhere, so I can't reproduce that problem. I
also don't see that particular version of qt-script in the tree, so I
can't be sure, but my guess is some Qt dep that you already have
installed depends on a newer version of udev than you will be getting
after the downgrade, thus requiring it to downgrade as well.
and these:
Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
virtual/udev:0
(virtual/udev-171::gentoo,ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
=virtual/udev-180 required by (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed)
(and 1 more with the same problem)
sys-fs/udev:0
(sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
=sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?]
required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed)
(sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
~sys-fs/udev-171[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?] required by
(virtual/udev-171::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
Does this look normal?
Yes, I expected something like that. In all likelihood, you'll need to
completely remove sys-fs/udev and virtual/udev and then reinstall the
older version. You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e.
`rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot
afterward is probably a good idea as well.
--
♫Dustin
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl
On 1/4/2013 06:45, Robert David wrote: Hi all, anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed firefox and firefox-bin. Firefox: Problem loading page: Secure connection failed. Firefox-bin: No problem loading page. I tryed with/without system-sqlite. Rebuild nss. Nothing helped. Robert David The only time I've ever seen that error/situation in Firefox was due to multiple certificates using the same serial number. Although that may not be exactly the problem you are encountering, it may be similar in how Firefox deals with what it considers a woefully invalid certificate. Have you tried with a fresh profile? You could also try renaming/removing the cert8.db and key3.db files in your profile directory. -- ♫Dustin
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 19:12:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 04/01/13 18:32, Mick wrote: > > I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to have > > locked itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and purposes I > > cannot write to it in any conceivable way. > > Can you elaborate on that? Do you get any error messages from dd or in > dmesg? dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/iso/bigfile.txt bs=512 dd: writing ‘/mnt/iso/bigfile.txt’: Input/output error 376705+0 records in 376704+0 records out 192872448 bytes (193 MB) copied, 1.01944 s, 189 MB/s rm /mnt/iso/bigfile.txt rm: cannot remove ‘/mnt/iso/bigfile.txt’: Read-only file system The output of mount: /dev/sdb1 on /mnt/iso type vfat (rw) (was mounted rw as root just in case). This is what dmesg shows: hub 2-1:1.0: state 7 ports 8 chg evt 0002 hub 2-1:1.0: port 1, status 0101, change 0001, 12 Mb/s hub 2-1:1.0: debounce: port 1: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x101 hub 2-1:1.0: port 1 not reset yet, waiting 10ms usb 2-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 8 using ehci_hcd hub 2-1:1.0: port 1 not reset yet, waiting 10ms usb 2-1.1: default language 0x0409 usb 2-1.1: udev 8, busnum 2, minor = 135 usb 2-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=1307, idProduct=0163 usb 2-1.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 usb 2-1.1: Product: USB Mass Storage Device usb 2-1.1: Manufacturer: USBest Technology usb 2-1.1: SerialNumber: 08032204c2f5fd usb 2-1.1: usb_probe_device usb 2-1.1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice usb 2-1.1: adding 2-1.1:1.0 (config #1, interface 0) usb-storage 2-1.1:1.0: usb_probe_interface usb-storage 2-1.1:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id scsi10 : usb-storage 2-1.1:1.0 scsi 10:0:0:0: Direct-Access Ut163USB2FlashStorage 0.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 sd 10:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0 sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 1974271 512-byte logical blocks: (1.01 GB/963 MiB) sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 00 00 00 sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Asking for cache data failed sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Asking for cache data failed sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through sdb: sdb1 sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Asking for cache data failed sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk I can't recall the hdparm errors (run it on a different box) but if important I can get these for you. Thanks. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:18:45 -0500 Michael Mol wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Mick > wrote: > > > > On Friday 04 Jan 2013 12:45:01 Robert David wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed > >> firefox and firefox-bin. > >> > >> Firefox: > >> Problem loading page: Secure connection failed. > >> > >> Firefox-bin: > >> No problem loading page. > >> > >> > >> I tryed with/without system-sqlite. Rebuild nss. Nothing helped. > >> > >> > >> > >> Robert David > > > > Hmm it should flag up a warning and once you accept it there > > shouldn't be a problem connecting. > > Some browsers (I don't know if FF is one of them) won't allow bypass > depending on the cert details. I've seen "the server has requested > strict validation" before. > > > -- > :wq > Not seen certs that do that but HSTS http headers can prevent override. Unfortunately even though an incorrect clock is perfectly acceptable to SSL it is not to HSTS. I expect to hear user complaints getting play.com to disable HSTS due to flat bios batteries (and no NTP is seemingly no answer to this problem). My preference is a compulsory header redirect to ssl. I've suggested a disable HSTS option enabled by setting the mozilla master password. In any case he said it worked in one copy of firefox so It's unlikely to be the culprit. I assume you tested with the same url?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 18:43:48 James wrote: > Mick gmail.com> writes: > > Is there some cryptic hdparm command I could run on it to reset it? I > > mean, it's bricked as is anyway, so it can't get *much* worse. > > Try putting it on a windows system and delete what you can. > Then try various tools to mount or reformat the usb stick. > > I've had a few and I just had to hack at them for a while. > > It helps if you can remember/determine, how the drive was set up. > Fat? Fat32? NTFS? ext3? > > then test with appropriate tools > > parted may work, or tell you something about the stick. > > hth, > James Thanks James, no luck with parted either. It'll see the old vfat partition in there, but it will not delete it, reformat it on in any way change it. Different MSWindows tools also fail to operate on it. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 17:32:14 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Mick wrote: > > Is there some cryptic hdparm command I could run on it to reset it? I > > mean, it's bricked as is anyway, so it can't get *much* worse. > > "hdparm -z /dev/sdX" will force kernel to re-read the partition table, > which should be the same that happens when you plug it in, but maybe > it'll help... I had a SD card that I had to issue that command every > time I plugged it in, the first read always failed. > > Otherwise, Transcend have a recovery utility (for Windows) that claims > it can recover some dead flash drives. Might be worth a try if you > have access to Windows box or a virtual machine: > > http://www.transcend-info.com/Products/online_recovery_2.asp > > Good luck. Thank you Paul! It seems that I'm running out of luck. I tried the transcend tool, which failed to detect the drive, as well as any hdparm command I could think of to reset/restore the darn thing. I think its condition is terminal. :-( -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
On 04/01/13 18:32, Mick wrote: I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to have locked itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and purposes I cannot write to it in any conceivable way. Can you elaborate on that? Do you get any error messages from dd or in dmesg?
[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Resetting USB flash
Mick gmail.com> writes: > Is there some cryptic hdparm command I could run on it to reset it? I mean, > it's bricked as is anyway, so it can't get *much* worse. Try putting it on a windows system and delete what you can. Then try various tools to mount or reformat the usb stick. I've had a few and I just had to hack at them for a while. It helps if you can remember/determine, how the drive was set up. Fat? Fat32? NTFS? ext3? then test with appropriate tools parted may work, or tell you something about the stick. hth, James
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl
This is not the problem. With firefox-bin I can normaly accept the certificate, compiled firefox does not give me the option. Robert. On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:13:20 + Mick wrote: > > On Friday 04 Jan 2013 12:45:01 Robert David wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed > > firefox and firefox-bin. > > > > Firefox: > > Problem loading page: Secure connection failed. > > > > Firefox-bin: > > No problem loading page. > > > > > > I tryed with/without system-sqlite. Rebuild nss. Nothing helped. > > > > > > > > Robert David > > Hmm it should flag up a warning and once you accept it there > shouldn't be a problem connecting.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Mick wrote: > Is there some cryptic hdparm command I could run on it to reset it? I mean, > it's bricked as is anyway, so it can't get *much* worse. "hdparm -z /dev/sdX" will force kernel to re-read the partition table, which should be the same that happens when you plug it in, but maybe it'll help... I had a SD card that I had to issue that command every time I plugged it in, the first read always failed. Otherwise, Transcend have a recovery utility (for Windows) that claims it can recover some dead flash drives. Might be worth a try if you have access to Windows box or a virtual machine: http://www.transcend-info.com/Products/online_recovery_2.asp Good luck.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:23 AM, James wrote: > > > Does this look normal? > > > James Does anything when you are running unstable (~amd64) and then trying to push it toward stable? That's always been difficult and dare I say unsupported. OK, I only run stable so I have no experience in this area however I am wondering whether you tried to temporize to something like mdev stable, and went from mdev stable to udev stable if the results might be more predictable/less obscure? Just a thought, Mark
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 16:48:41 Michael Mol wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Mick wrote: > > I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to have > > locked itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and purposes I > > cannot write to it in any conceivable way. > > > > I tried to delete /dev/sdb1 with c/fdisk, the dd zeros into /dev/sdb1, > > /dev/sdb and also the first 512B to delete the partition table, but > > nothing seems to work. > > > > /dev/sdb1 is still there no matter how I try to delete/format/overwrite > > it. > > > > Is there a way of resetting whatever needs resetting in the USB flash > > chip to make it work again? > > -- > > Regards, > > Mick > > Was it a drive with U3 on it? If so, there are tools you might use, > but I can't remember their name. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U3 No, it's a normal USB flash stick: Bus 002 Device 006: ID 1307:0163 Transcend Information, Inc. 256MB/512MB/1GB Flash Drive Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x1307 Transcend Information, Inc. idProduct 0x0163 256MB/512MB/1GB Flash Drive bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 USBest Technology iProduct2 USB Mass Storage Device iSerial 3 08032204c2f5fd bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 39 bNumInterfaces 1 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0x80 (Bus Powered) MaxPower 80mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 8 Mass Storage bInterfaceSubClass 6 SCSI bInterfaceProtocol 80 Bulk-Only iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 1 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 1 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN bmAttributes3 Transfer TypeInterrupt Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 8 Device Qualifier (for other device speed): bLength10 bDescriptorType 6 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 bNumConfigurations 1 Device Status: 0x000a (Bus Powered) Remote Wakeup Enabled Is there some cryptic hdparm command I could run on it to reset it? I mean, it's bricked as is anyway, so it can't get *much* worse. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Mick wrote: > > On Friday 04 Jan 2013 12:45:01 Robert David wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed firefox and >> firefox-bin. >> >> Firefox: >> Problem loading page: Secure connection failed. >> >> Firefox-bin: >> No problem loading page. >> >> >> I tryed with/without system-sqlite. Rebuild nss. Nothing helped. >> >> >> >> Robert David > > Hmm it should flag up a warning and once you accept it there shouldn't be > a problem connecting. Some browsers (I don't know if FF is one of them) won't allow bypass depending on the cert details. I've seen "the server has requested strict validation" before. -- :wq
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 12:45:01 Robert David wrote: > Hi all, > > anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed firefox and > firefox-bin. > > Firefox: > Problem loading page: Secure connection failed. > > Firefox-bin: > No problem loading page. > > > I tryed with/without system-sqlite. Rebuild nss. Nothing helped. > > > > Robert David Hmm it should flag up a warning and once you accept it there shouldn't be a problem connecting. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 04:13:21 Randy Barlow wrote: > On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the > > mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've > > seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? > > Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. > For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for > reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great > features and extensions. > > For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to > configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. Can mutt be made to use autocompletion for email addresses and to automatically select encryption keys (gpg and/or s/mime)? Last time I tried it briefly this became a sticking point for me ... -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Mick wrote: > I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to have locked > itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and purposes I cannot write to > it in any conceivable way. > > I tried to delete /dev/sdb1 with c/fdisk, the dd zeros into /dev/sdb1, > /dev/sdb and also the first 512B to delete the partition table, but nothing > seems to work. > > /dev/sdb1 is still there no matter how I try to delete/format/overwrite it. > > Is there a way of resetting whatever needs resetting in the USB flash chip to > make it work again? > -- > Regards, > Mick Was it a drive with U3 on it? If so, there are tools you might use, but I can't remember their name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U3 -- :wq
[gentoo-user] [OT] Resetting USB flash
I was trying to zero out a USB stick and at some point it seems to have locked itself up. By that I mean that for all intends and purposes I cannot write to it in any conceivable way. I tried to delete /dev/sdb1 with c/fdisk, the dd zeros into /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdb and also the first 512B to delete the partition table, but nothing seems to work. /dev/sdb1 is still there no matter how I try to delete/format/overwrite it. Is there a way of resetting whatever needs resetting in the USB flash chip to make it work again? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] graphite2 won't emerge | powerpc mac | Undefined symbols for architecture ppc
I recently "renewed" a friend's old Quicksilver G4 power PC, and forced an install of system 10.5.8 on it. I started installing from scratch a Gentoo Prefix, and built up to GD and ImageMagick (and their requirements) since I use them in graphics programming. I'm running "~arch" (testing mode) and things have been working fine with all of the testing packages so farI updated system and then world for some changes in use flags, and noticed that graphite2 was installing as new. This is listed as a stable package for the powerpc (http://packages.gentoo.org/package/media-gfx/graphite2), yet it chokes at the very end of the install. Any insight is appreciated. The problem seems to come here (info log follows): Undefined symbols for architecture ppc: "saveFP", referenced from: graphite2::Segment::justify(graphite2::Slot*, graphite2::Font const*, float, graphite2::justFlags, graphite2::Slot*, graphite2::Slot*)in Justifier.cpp.o graphite2::Pass::dumpRuleEventOutput(graphite2::FiniteStateMachine const&, graphite2::Rule const&, graphite2::Slot*) constin Pass.cpp.o graphite2::Segment::append(graphite2::Segment const&)in Segment.cpp.o graphite2::Slot::finalise(graphite2::Segment const*, graphite2::Font const*, graphite2::Position&, graphite2::Rect&, unsigned char, float&)in Slot.cpp.o "restFP", referenced from: graphite2::Segment::justify(graphite2::Slot*, graphite2::Font const*, float, graphite2::justFlags, graphite2::Slot*, graphite2::Slot*)in Justifier.cpp.o graphite2::Pass::dumpRuleEventOutput(graphite2::FiniteStateMachine const&, graphite2::Rule const&, graphite2::Slot*) constin Pass.cpp.o graphite2::Segment::append(graphite2::Segment const&)in Segment.cpp.o graphite2::Slot::finalise(graphite2::Segment const*, graphite2::Font const*, graphite2::Position&, graphite2::Rect&, unsigned char, float&)in Slot.cpp.o "___floatundisf", referenced from: graphite2::SegCache::purge(graphite2::SegCacheStore*)in SegCache.cpp.o "___fixunssfdi", referenced from: graphite2::SegCache::purge(graphite2::SegCacheStore*)in SegCache.cpp.o ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture ppc collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [src/libgraphite2.3.0.1.dylib] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/work/graphite2-1.2.0_build' make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/graphite2.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/work/graphite2-1.2.0_build' make: *** [all] Error 2 * ERROR: media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0 failed (compile phase): * emake failed * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0'`. * The complete build log is located at '/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/temp/environment'. * Working directory: '/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/work/graphite2-1.2.0_build' * S: '/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/work/graphite2-1.2.0' >>> Failed to emerge media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0, Log file: >>> >>> '/Volumes/SNARK/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0/temp/build.log' * Messages for package media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0: * ERROR: media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0 failed (compile phase): * emake failed * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0'`, emerge --info =media-gfx/graphite2-1.2.0 Portage 2.2.01.21476-prefix (prefix/darwin/macos/10.5/ppc, gcc-4.2.1, unavailable, 9.8.0 Power Macintosh) = System Settings = System uname: Darwin-9.8.0-Power_Macintosh-powerpc-32bit Timestamp of tree: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:37:46 + distcc 2.18.5-Apple.1 i386-apple-darwin9.0 (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled] app-shells/bash: 4.2_p39-r1::gentoo_prefix dev-lang/python: 2.7.3-r2::gentoo_prefix, 3.3.0::gentoo_prefix dev-util/cmake: 2.8.9::gentoo_prefix dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.27.1::gentoo_prefix sys-devel/autoconf: 2.69::gentoo_prefix sys-devel/automake: 1.12.4::gentoo_prefix sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.8-r00.1::gentoo_prefix sys-devel/libtool:2.4.2::gentoo_prefix sys-devel/make: 3.82-r4::gentoo_prefix Repositories: gentoo_prefix ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~ppc-macos" ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" CBUILD="powerpc-apple-darwin9" CFLAGS=" -O2 -pipe-mcpu=G4 -mtune=G4" CHOST="powerpc-apple-darwin9" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/term
Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd and lvm
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Robin Atwood wrote: > Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a laptop. > It actually seems to work quite well and it is a lot faster. However I am > having trouble getting my LVM partitions mounted. I installed the LVM > service unit from the Gentoo Wiki but it never completes, timing-out on a > job that mounts /var. The VG is actually created by an initramfs and when > systemd dumps you out to the emergency shell you can use lvs to see the > volumes, /dev/mapper has all the correct devices and "dmsetup ls" shows the > LVs. In fact, everything appears as it should, the partitions just don't get > mounted. I circumvented this by putting "mount -a" in the lvm.service unit, > which then completes and the mount jobs time-out. Everything seems to be OK > but it is a bit of a kludge. One thing I notice is: > > > > # udevadm info -p /dev/mapper/vg00-rootfs -q all > > syspath not found > > > > Udev seems not to know about the LVs. Any ideas? How did you create your initramfs? Have you tried dracut, with DRACUT_MODULES="lvm"? Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
[gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
Dustin C. Hatch gmail.com> writes:
> The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
> virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
> the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev:
> >=sys-fs/udev-181
> >=virtual/udev-181
> Then emerge -avuD1 udev and see if that fixes it.
I get the downgrades you would expect:
UD ] virtual/udev-171 [196]
UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9
I also get some weird companion downgrades:
blocks B ] >x11-libs/qt-script-4.8.2-r:4
(">x11-libs/qt-script-4.8.2-r:4" is blocking x11-libs/qt-declarative-4.8.2,
x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.8.2,
x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-multimedia-4.8.2,
x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.8.2)
[blocks B ]
and these:
Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
virtual/udev:0
(virtual/udev-171::gentoo,ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
=virtual/udev-180 required by (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed)
(and 1 more with the same problem)
sys-fs/udev:0
(sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>=sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?]
required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed)
(sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
~sys-fs/udev-171[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?] required by
(virtual/udev-171::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
Does this look normal?
James
[gentoo-user] Systemd and lvm
Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a laptop. It actually seems to work quite well and it is a lot faster. However I am having trouble getting my LVM partitions mounted. I installed the LVM service unit from the Gentoo Wiki but it never completes, timing-out on a job that mounts /var. The VG is actually created by an initramfs and when systemd dumps you out to the emergency shell you can use lvs to see the volumes, /dev/mapper has all the correct devices and "dmsetup ls" shows the LVs. In fact, everything appears as it should, the partitions just don't get mounted. I circumvented this by putting "mount -a" in the lvm.service unit, which then completes and the mount jobs time-out. Everything seems to be OK but it is a bit of a kludge. One thing I notice is: # udevadm info -p /dev/mapper/vg00-rootfs -q all syspath not found Udev seems not to know about the LVs. Any ideas? TIA -Robin -- -- Robin Atwood. "Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst, Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst" from "Mandalay" by Rudyard Kipling --
Re: [gentoo-user] Old ATI Radeon RV350 driver broken after system update
On 2013-01-03 13:59, Bruce Hill wrote: xorg-server-1.13.1 (25 Dec 2012) Your mirror must be *really* lagging. :( Not so much: 30 Dec 2012; Agostino Sarubbo xorg-server-1.13.1.ebuild: Stable for amd64, wrt bug #448562 This was the second update since then, maybe the first time (around Jan 1st) the mirror was lagging a bit. (Since I didn't know for sure that it was xorg-server's fault or if it was fixed there I didn't keyword that package.) Peter.
[gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl
Hi all, anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed firefox and firefox-bin. Firefox: Problem loading page: Secure connection failed. Firefox-bin: No problem loading page. I tryed with/without system-sqlite. Rebuild nss. Nothing helped. Robert David
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:19:09AM -0600, Dustin C. Hatch wrote: > > > The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not > virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both > the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev: > > >=sys-fs/udev-181 > >=virtual/udev-181 > > Then emerge -avuD1 udev and see if that fixes it. Maybe this is true for a downgrade, but not normally: mingdao@workstation ~ $ eshowkw udev Keywords for sys-fs/udev: | | u | | a a p s | n | | l m h i m m p s p | u s | r | p d a p a 6 i p c 3 a x | s l | e | h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p | a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o ---+---+-+--- 141-r1 | ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | # 0 | gentoo 146-r1 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | # | gentoo 149 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | # | gentoo 151-r4 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | # | gentoo 164-r2 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | # | gentoo [I]171-r9 | + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + | o | gentoo 171-r10 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo 195 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | # | gentoo 196-r1 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo | o o o o o o o o o o o o o | o | gentoo mingdao@workstation ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask >=sys-fs/udev-181 >=dev-lang/python-3 And, yes, this udev mask is used on 8 Gentoo boxen on this LAN. -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ supp...@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
Re: [gentoo-user] Issues emerging Calligra
Hi Michael :) On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/03/2013 06:33 AM, Rafa Griman wrote: >> Hi all :) >> >> First off: Happy New Year ;) >> >> I'm trying to emerge Calligra but I get stuck on the following error >> when glew gets emerged: >> > > Make sure your 'eselect opengl' looks like it should, and then if that > doesn't help, file a bug. The "cannot find -lGLU" usually indicates a > missing dependency, but everything in the ebuilds looks OK to me at > first glance. Thanks for your answer :) I don't have my computer here with me but will check the eselect opengl option. > You've got media-libs/glu installed? I checked it yesterday and IIRC, yes I do ... but I'd have to double check when I get back home. Thanks !!! Rafa
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
Bruce Hill wrote: > > Too late, too tired, but do you have: >> =sys-fs/udev-181 > in /etc/portage/package.mask ? Ehm... according to http://packages.gentoo.org/category/sys-fs?full_cat udev-171-r9 is the only stable x86 version, and udev-181 doesn't exist at all?! -Matt (still using 171 because at emerge -u world, an update never appeared)
