Re: [gentoo-user] insane backends
Further to the thread re mysterious behaviour of 'sane-backends', I remembered what happened when I set my new scanner up earlier in 2017. There is no driver in 'sane-backends', because it contains a binary blob. You have to download an appropriate pkg for the V550 from Epson, which provides installers for Debian or RPM. Presumably one of those worked with Gentoo & that's where the 'epkowa' driver came from in /usr/lib64/sane/ . So relieved that I'd got it working, I failed to update my notes, which I've now done. Thanks for Neil's suggestions. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Ian Zimmermanwrote: > On 2017-11-05 14:22, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> Second, my actual objection is more to sticking wrappers around an >> upstream program just to extend its capabilities, when other software >> is maintained upstream that already does what you're re-inventing. >> When you already have 47 different cron implementations out there, I'm >> not sure it adds a lot to have a distro-specific solution. The distro >> should certainly be providing stuff like /etc/cron.*/ and the scripts >> inside when upstream isn't providing them. By all means include a >> stock wrapper /etc/crontab that runs that stuff at set times for those >> running 24x7 with vixie cron. If run-scripts was implemented in >> python instead of shell this objection wouldn't go away. > > I really want to stop prologing the agony of this thread, but I just > have to point out that when you install cronie with the anacron flag (as > I just did, if only to know what I'm talking about), you _still_ get a > wrapper: it's called /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron. Simpler than run-crons > for sure, but the principle is the same. Sure, but that is upstream-maintained, and that is my point. It comes out of the upstream contrib directory: https://github.com/cronie-crond/cronie/blob/master/contrib/0anacron > After all distros exist for a reason (over and above building packages). > If upstreams always did the glue job right, a bot could handle all the > package builds and you gentoo devs could go home ;-) In your example upstream DID do the glue job right. Even so, the glue isn't the part I object to. Running cron jobs after a system comes back online isn't glue - that is core functionality, even if not every implementation has it. Distros will always have to do integration work, and that is fine. That is the role of a distro. And sometimes distros have to roll their own tools when they just aren't available. Once upon a time service managers fell into that category. Now this is less the case. There is of course nothing wrong if people want to implement things. I just tend to prefer to stick with stuff that has an upstream that is bigger than one distro. -- Rich
[gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 2017-11-05 21:40, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Agreed again. My desktop cronjobs are all empty and when I had some > they were of the "do this once a week or once a day" variety. I didn't > care when they ran, just that they did every so often What about the synchronization and predictability aspect, which I mentioned in my 1st entry in this thread? I want _all_ my machines to do a full fsck when I turn them on the 1st of a month. (if a month seems too long, substitute "Sunday"). Anything else is madness. And yeah, desktops matter to me. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
[gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 2017-11-05 14:22, Rich Freeman wrote: > Second, my actual objection is more to sticking wrappers around an > upstream program just to extend its capabilities, when other software > is maintained upstream that already does what you're re-inventing. > When you already have 47 different cron implementations out there, I'm > not sure it adds a lot to have a distro-specific solution. The distro > should certainly be providing stuff like /etc/cron.*/ and the scripts > inside when upstream isn't providing them. By all means include a > stock wrapper /etc/crontab that runs that stuff at set times for those > running 24x7 with vixie cron. If run-scripts was implemented in > python instead of shell this objection wouldn't go away. I really want to stop prologing the agony of this thread, but I just have to point out that when you install cronie with the anacron flag (as I just did, if only to know what I'm talking about), you _still_ get a wrapper: it's called /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron. Simpler than run-crons for sure, but the principle is the same. After all distros exist for a reason (over and above building packages). If upstreams always did the glue job right, a bot could handle all the package builds and you gentoo devs could go home ;-) -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 05/11/2017 17:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Alan McKinnonwrote: >> >> There are other schedulers out there that succeed where cron fails (eg >> Control-M, chronos, quartz), but those are all large, bulky, designed >> for big complex installs/requirements and probably not suited for simple >> things you'd deploy out of a base in portage >> > > Amusing that you classify 99.999% of all desktop installs as "big > complex installs." Heh :-) Well, to a first approximation all Linux installs are servers or phones so whatever is going on in desktop space can be disregarded > > But, I agree that it makes far more sense to just have desktop users > use an appropriate cron implementation designed to handle the machine > being off most of the time vs trying to use shell scripting to make > vixie cron into such an implementation. Vixie cron and it's clones needs to die, really. The number of places where it makes sense is falling by the day; showing no sign of slowing down. I think I have 3 cronjobs left across my fleet that actually make sense and all of them are just-in-case-I-screwed-up-elsewhere safety nets. The very idea of cron itself comes from the '80s and to be honest, we don't work anymore like we did in the 80s > > FWIW this is probably the reasoning behind including cron-like > functionality in systemd, and having it support optionally running > jobs if the system was down during a calendar-based event. It was > considered bare-bones functionality that any desktop or generic server > would need. It is, of course, optional, and just about any kind of > rule is supported. I personally use systemd-cron which basically is a > wrapper+generator around /etc/crontab and the various /etc/cron.*/ > scripts. Agreed again. My desktop cronjobs are all empty and when I had some they were of the "do this once a week or once a day" variety. I didn't care when they ran, just that they did every so often -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Ian Zimmermanwrote: > On 2017-11-05 07:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> But, I agree that it makes far more sense to just have desktop users >> use an appropriate cron implementation designed to handle the machine >> being off most of the time vs trying to use shell scripting to make >> vixie cron into such an implementation. >> >> FWIW this is probably the reasoning behind including cron-like >> functionality in systemd, and having it support optionally running >> jobs if the system was down during a calendar-based event. It was >> considered bare-bones functionality that any desktop or generic server >> would need. > > If Kai is right that fcron handles it, the reason is probably systemd > people thought that had to match the functionality to be considered a > full replacement. Especially since fcron is the normal system cron on > Fedora/RH, right? Honestly, I think it is more because it is almost impossible to cover both desktops and servers without these features, so there is little point in adding timers if you don't support both. The reason they're there at all is because it falls into "core functionality" which is a goal of systemd - it is a bit like busybox in that regard (and, indeed busybox also implements a crond). However, while systemd aims to go further than busybox it doesn't actually aim to replace all the other tools that it overlaps with. For example, resolved isn't a full substitute for bind, and timesyncd isn't a full substitute for ntp (the latter of which is relatively popular on random systems and not just dedicated servers). In general they try to focus on the client-side stuff only, with a moderate but not minimal scope. > >> I personally use systemd-cron which basically is a wrapper+generator >> around /etc/crontab and the various /etc/cron.*/ scripts. > > If your dislike for having this in cron itself comes down to shell > script vs. C code, and it appears so from the above, I'm not at all sure > I agree. This to me seems one of the few tasks where shell script is in > fact a good fit: mainly looking at files, timestamps, and running other > programs. So, two things here: First, I'm honestly not sure I buy that shell scripts are the best tool here. Yes, they can look at files and timestamps, but I tend to be of the school that shell scripts are poor environments to write actual software in. At best they work reasonably well for glue. I'm not advocating for C, but if I were implementing a cron I wouldn't be doing it in bash. Second, my actual objection is more to sticking wrappers around an upstream program just to extend its capabilities, when other software is maintained upstream that already does what you're re-inventing. When you already have 47 different cron implementations out there, I'm not sure it adds a lot to have a distro-specific solution. The distro should certainly be providing stuff like /etc/cron.*/ and the scripts inside when upstream isn't providing them. By all means include a stock wrapper /etc/crontab that runs that stuff at set times for those running 24x7 with vixie cron. If run-scripts was implemented in python instead of shell this objection wouldn't go away. Sure, back in the early days of Gentoo maybe it made a little more sense to have our own tools just like everybody else did, and I'm not sure I'd advocate to go removing them either. However, I can certainly sympathize with WONTFIX when people want to continue to add features to them. They're just a minimal starting point that is implementation-agnostic - use the right tool if your requirements exceed these. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 2017-11-05 18:12, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:56:56 +0100, Kai Peter wrote: OT: Seems that since the last update of my MUA the formatting of my mails is broken - at least at reply's. There are extra line breaks. G - if you not do everything by yourself ... ;-) ... at least you have someone else to blame. Nobody to blame, it's more to excuse me. -- Sent with eQmail-1.10
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:56:56 +0100, Kai Peter wrote: > OT: Seems that since the last update of my MUA the formatting of my > > mails is broken - at least at reply's. There are extra line breaks. > > G - if you not do everything by yourself ... ;-) ... at least you have someone else to blame. -- Neil Bothwick WinErr 678: This will end your Windows session. Do you want to play another game? pgplUCij_CE3p.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
There are other schedulers out there that succeed where cron fails (eg Control-M, chronos, quartz), but those are all large, bulky, designed for big complex installs/requirements and probably not suited for simple things you'd deploy out of a base in portage Long time ago I decided to use fcron only. The reasons doesn't matter, but thus I can talk about fcron only. But you are right, there are a lot of others. At least I tried to answer Ian's question as exact as possible. I realized the inaccuracy in it too. Wasn't it to me? Than sorry for the noise. cron is stupid and deliberately so. We really ought to let it remain stupid The decision what have to be done MUST be made by the user/sysadmin first. Than you can do the config to reach your goal. But that does go to far now. +1 agreed. I've always maintained that cron cannot possibly know what the scripts it launches deem to be correct. It's a countdown time and launcher, not an orchestrator. It can figure out what to do if 2am happens twice (just don't do it the second time), but not what should happen if 2am was missed for any reason, including DST or poweroff or overeager ntpdate The simplest approach to fixing missed jobs is to have the script itself track what is correct. If it's lock and records files indicate something didn't happen when it should, the script can do it's own repair or do it's work twice. Or whatever else is appropriate. @Alan, I like your writings. Unfortunately I'm not able to do so, thus my (very seldom) answers are sometimes to short. ;-) OT: Seems that since the last update of my MUA the formatting of my mails is broken - at least at reply's. There are extra line breaks. G - if you not do everything by yourself ... ;-) -- Sent with eQmail-1.10
[gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 2017-11-05 07:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > But, I agree that it makes far more sense to just have desktop users > use an appropriate cron implementation designed to handle the machine > being off most of the time vs trying to use shell scripting to make > vixie cron into such an implementation. > > FWIW this is probably the reasoning behind including cron-like > functionality in systemd, and having it support optionally running > jobs if the system was down during a calendar-based event. It was > considered bare-bones functionality that any desktop or generic server > would need. If Kai is right that fcron handles it, the reason is probably systemd people thought that had to match the functionality to be considered a full replacement. Especially since fcron is the normal system cron on Fedora/RH, right? > I personally use systemd-cron which basically is a wrapper+generator > around /etc/crontab and the various /etc/cron.*/ scripts. If your dislike for having this in cron itself comes down to shell script vs. C code, and it appears so from the above, I'm not at all sure I agree. This to me seems one of the few tasks where shell script is in fact a good fit: mainly looking at files, timestamps, and running other programs. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 16:46:07 +0200 > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. What, like KDE-4, KDE-plasma, ... ? -- Regards, Peter.
[gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On 11/05 04:04, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 11/05 04:46, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: > > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM,wrote: > > >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, wrote: > > > > > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > > > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > > > > > What is that? > > > > > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > > > How to handle that? > > > > Does it use this spec? > > > > https://appimage.org/ > > >>> > > >>> Dont know... > > >>> How can I unpack that to look into it? > > >> > > >> From > > >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit > > >> > > >> wget > > >> "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage; > > >> etc... > > >> > > > > > > > > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. > > > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use > > > AppStream metadata > > > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and > > > should be unpacked > > > To be implemented > > > > > > unpacking is not implemented yet. > > > > > > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. > > > > And yet they distribute using it. > > > > I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and > > find something better by an author with more clue. > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > > -- > > Alan McKinnon > > alan.mckin...@gmail.com > > > > > > As so often, the persons 'up' in the hierarch decide things the people > 'down' the hierarchy would keep their fingers off - but they will not > be asked. > > I am 'down' the hierarchy and want to unpack that > archive/image/whatever. > > Currently I am recompiling my kernel to support squashfs as it seems > that this image is one of that images. > If so, mounting it as an image and copying the files out of the > mountpoints directory may work. > > Fingers crossed... > > Cheers > Meino > > OK, I have found a way -- for all hesitating with this closed-opensource AppImage-blobs: chmod file.AppImage ./file.AppImage # wait ... mount # find mount point of this sealed bag,,,mine was /tmp/.mount-someting cp -a /tmp/.mount-something ~/somesaveplace That's it. Happy tinkering! Cheers Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Alan McKinnonwrote: > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tu...@posteo.de wrote: >> >> unpacking is not implemented yet. > > > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. > > And yet they distribute using it. > Nah, they just don't consider extracting the stuff without running it important. Nor apparently do they consider it important to support the 0.1% of Linux users on a distro that doesn't support appimage (just a rough estimate based by all the logos on their webpage - I can't vouch for how well it works on the distros they list). The concept behind it isn't terrible, but if you want to use it your first step is to get it packaged/working on Gentoo. I don't see any reason that this couldn't be done - it just probably doesn't scratch many Gentoo user's itches. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Alan McKinnonwrote: > > There are other schedulers out there that succeed where cron fails (eg > Control-M, chronos, quartz), but those are all large, bulky, designed > for big complex installs/requirements and probably not suited for simple > things you'd deploy out of a base in portage > Amusing that you classify 99.999% of all desktop installs as "big complex installs." But, I agree that it makes far more sense to just have desktop users use an appropriate cron implementation designed to handle the machine being off most of the time vs trying to use shell scripting to make vixie cron into such an implementation. FWIW this is probably the reasoning behind including cron-like functionality in systemd, and having it support optionally running jobs if the system was down during a calendar-based event. It was considered bare-bones functionality that any desktop or generic server would need. It is, of course, optional, and just about any kind of rule is supported. I personally use systemd-cron which basically is a wrapper+generator around /etc/crontab and the various /etc/cron.*/ scripts. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On 11/05 04:46, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM,wrote: > >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, wrote: > > > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > > > What is that? > > > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > > How to handle that? > > Does it use this spec? > > https://appimage.org/ > >>> > >>> Dont know... > >>> How can I unpack that to look into it? > >> > >> From > >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit > >> > >> wget > >> "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage; > >> etc... > >> > > > > > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. > > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use > > AppStream metadata > > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and > > should be unpacked > > To be implemented > > > > unpacking is not implemented yet. > > > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. > > And yet they distribute using it. > > I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and > find something better by an author with more clue. > > Am I missing something? > > > -- > Alan McKinnon > alan.mckin...@gmail.com > > As so often, the persons 'up' in the hierarch decide things the people 'down' the hierarchy would keep their fingers off - but they will not be asked. I am 'down' the hierarchy and want to unpack that archive/image/whatever. Currently I am recompiling my kernel to support squashfs as it seems that this image is one of that images. If so, mounting it as an image and copying the files out of the mountpoints directory may work. Fingers crossed... Cheers Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On 05/11/2017 15:48, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM,wrote: >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, wrote: > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > What is that? > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > How to handle that? Does it use this spec? https://appimage.org/ >>> >>> Dont know... >>> How can I unpack that to look into it? >> >> From >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit >> >> wget >> "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage; >> etc... >> > > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use > AppStream metadata > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should > be unpacked > To be implemented > > unpacking is not implemented yet. Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. And yet they distribute using it. I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and find something better by an author with more clue. Am I missing something? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 05/11/2017 16:28, Kai Peter wrote: > > > On 2017-11-04 18:42, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >> On 2017-11-04 01:39, Kai Peter wrote: > >> > >>> > If you want to run a monthly job on a host that is not always on, do > >>> > you have to pretend it's an hourly job and check in the script > >>> > itself? > >>> > >>> This is a special case to me. IMHO special cases have to be handled > >>> special or much better: avoid it. > >> > >> Sorry, I don't get this. How do you avoid this situation? By not > >> having any monthly jobs? > > No, monthly jobs are fine, but you mentioned a special case as the host > is may be off at that time. Perhaps you can do: run all jobs which > didn't run because the host was off at next startup once. fcron has such > an option. Depending on the exact situation it could require additional > configuration/checks. It is not really cron's job to figure out what it thinks the user might want if the machine was off when the job should have run. That is expecting far too much intelligence from cron. Cron is wall-clock time and time based: When the time is *this*, then do *that* anacron has some logic for this case of jobs not run but to do it, it had to give up it's strictly wall-clock time based approach There are other schedulers out there that succeed where cron fails (eg Control-M, chronos, quartz), but those are all large, bulky, designed for big complex installs/requirements and probably not suited for simple things you'd deploy out of a base in portage cron is stupid and deliberately so. We really ought to let it remain stupid > The decision what have to be done MUST be made by the user/sysadmin > first. Than you can do the config to reach your goal. But that does go > to far now. +1 agreed. I've always maintained that cron cannot possibly know what the scripts it launches deem to be correct. It's a countdown time and launcher, not an orchestrator. It can figure out what to do if 2am happens twice (just don't do it the second time), but not what should happen if 2am was missed for any reason, including DST or poweroff or overeager ntpdate The simplest approach to fixing missed jobs is to have the script itself track what is correct. If it's lock and records files indicate something didn't happen when it should, the script can do it's own repair or do it's work twice. Or whatever else is appropriate. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition
On 2017-11-04 18:42, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On 2017-11-04 01:39, Kai Peter wrote: > If you want to run a monthly job on a host that is not always on, do > you have to pretend it's an hourly job and check in the script > itself? This is a special case to me. IMHO special cases have to be handled special or much better: avoid it. Sorry, I don't get this. How do you avoid this situation? By not having any monthly jobs? No, monthly jobs are fine, but you mentioned a special case as the host is may be off at that time. Perhaps you can do: run all jobs which didn't run because the host was off at next startup once. fcron has such an option. Depending on the exact situation it could require additional configuration/checks. The decision what have to be done MUST be made by the user/sysadmin first. Than you can do the config to reach your goal. But that does go to far now. -- Sent with eQmail-1.10
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM,wrote: > > On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, wrote: > >>> > >>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > >>> has the extension "*.AppImage". > >>> > >>> What is that? > >>> > >>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > >>> How to handle that? > >> > >> Does it use this spec? > >> > >> https://appimage.org/ > > > > Dont know... > > How can I unpack that to look into it? > > From > https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit > > wget > "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage; > etc... > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked To be implemented unpacking is not implemented yet.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Systemd
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 19:23:40 GMT Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Nikos Chantziaraswrote: > > On 04/11/17 18:15, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: > >> I have a short question to systemd. I would like to ask your experience > >> in the changeover. Was it easy? Were there problems? > >> Change or reinstall? What mean the profis here? > > > > I did both. Changed one system to systemd, re-installed one from scratch > > with systemd. > > > > Both worked. The only problem I have with systemd is that it's unable to > > reliably restore the ALSA mixer volumes/settings on startup. It fails 50% > > of the time. Which is very annoying, but not the end of the world. > > Out of curiosity - are you using alsa-state or alsa-restore? > Apparently alsa provides two different ways of preserving state. You > might consider switching them (which is triggered by the existence of > /etc/alsa/state-daemon.conf - but it might have some other > requirements which I didn't bother to check on). I am using alsasound as a boot service, but in openrc - see below. > I've seen similar issues with iptables-restore. To be fair those are > rare and I've also seen issues with that under openrc. I have the same issue on one of my Gentoo systems, but I use openrc. It seems to me this is occurring some times only, because the system is trying to read /usr when it has not yet been fully mounted, but I'm not sure. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM,wrote: > On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, wrote: >>> >>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which >>> has the extension "*.AppImage". >>> >>> What is that? >>> >>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? >>> How to handle that? >> >> Does it use this spec? >> >> https://appimage.org/ > > Dont know... > How can I unpack that to look into it? From https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage; etc...
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM,wrote: > > > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > > > What is that? > > > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > > How to handle that? > > Does it use this spec? > > https://appimage.org/ > Dont know... How can I unpack that to look into it? Cheers Meino
[gentoo-user] CURA font renderer
Hi, Since cura/curaengine (portage) does not compile on my system and is relatively old I downloaded cura for Linux from www.ultimaker.com. This runs on my system without the installation of addtional applications/libraries. Unfortunately the font rendering screwed up and makes menu entries, text boxes etc. hard to read. This is an issue with cure, since the cura blog lists postings of cura users, which have these kinds of problems on MacOSX (and nvida cards). I also run a nvidia card. In the cura code the devs have already fixed that by switching the font renderer (qs vs. native)...but this fix will be published in cura 3.1 (current version is 3.04). Something echoed in my brain to have similiar problems which an application on Linux a long time ago and I fixed that by doing "something" with the font renderer/font cache or such. Any idea how to fix this font issue or trying to are very appreciated! Cheers Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM,wrote: > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > What is that? > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > How to handle that? Does it use this spec? https://appimage.org/
[gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
Hi, I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which has the extension "*.AppImage". What is that? Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? How to handle that? Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Cheers Meino