Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:36 AM, wrote: > On 03/25 10:02, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:47 AM, wrote: >> >> >>> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the >>> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the apt-get >>> and apt-install commands? >> >> A "deb" file, which you can expand with "ar" (no need to install "dpkg"). >> >> >>> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program when >>> I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) >> >> I'll use systemd because I used the Ubuntu maintainer's systemd ppa >> two or three years ago and I still have that url bookmarked. >> >> To get the regular systemd deb: >> >> http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/s/systemd/ >> >> [ I've chosen the "de" repository given your email address. ] >> >> To get the ppa systemd deb (the ppa is called "pitti/systemd"): >> >> http://ppa.launchpad.net/pitti/systemd/ubuntu/ >> >> >>> I onlu need the archives of the complete program. Like Blender the >>> archive is "all inclusive" ... : >> >> Make sure that the source package isn't split up into more than one >> deb. If you look at the systemd example above, you'll find many >> "lib..." debs as well as "systemd..." and "udev..." debs. >> >> >> >> >> Rather than grabbing a "deb", unpacking it, and dropping its >> components into "/usr/local/", you might want to look into using >> Ubuntu's snap that allows you to install self-contained applications >> in the same way that Android and iOS do. >> >> [ I have no idea whether snap is available on Gentoo or whether your >> app is packaged as a snap. ] > > thanks for your help !!! :) You're welcome. JIC, for snap, there's no Gentoo "upstream" package but there is: https://docs.snapcraft.io/core/install-gentoo
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
On 03/26/2018 07:37 PM, Elijah Mark Anderson wrote: > Out of curiosity, have you tried just grabbing phpMyAdmin from the up-stream > website and running it as a regular PHP site? I've always found working with > distro-packaged PHP apps to be cumbersome; more trouble than their supposed > advantages are worth, especially now that most PHP apps can update themselves. I was told I should try 4.7.9 (latest, not in portage yet). Since 4.4.12 (is old ) and working I'm in no hurry to try to upgrade. Will wait for portage version I think, even unstable :-/ I wish there were some alternatives to phymyadmin in portage. -- Thelma > > On Monday, March 26, 2018 11:27:31 AM CDT the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8 >> but when I try to edit a table, no data is loaded, I get an empty screen. >> >> I have downgraded to phpmyadmin-4.7.7-r1 but system shows I have two >> version installed. How do I know which one is active, or select lower >> version? >> >> eshowkw phpmyadmin >> >> Keywords for dev-db/phpmyadmin: >> | | u | >> | >> | a a p a s | n | >> | l m h i p r m m s p | e u s | r >> | p d a p a p c x m 6 i 3 a | a s l | e >> | h 6 r p 6 p 6 8 6 8 p 9 s r | p e o | p >> | a 4 m a 4 c 4 6 4 k s 0 h c | i d t | o >> >> -+-+---+--- >> 4.0.10.20| + + o + ~ + + + o o o o o + | 5 o 4.0.10.20 | gentoo >> -+-+---+--- >> 4.7.0| + + ~ + ~ + + + o o o o o + | 5 o 4.7.0 | gentoo >> -+-+---+--- >> [I]4.7.7-r1 | + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + o o o o o ~ | 5 o 4.7.7-r1 | gentoo >> -+-+---+--- >> [I]4.7.8| + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + o o o o o ~ | 5 o 4.7.8 | gentoo
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
Out of curiosity, have you tried just grabbing phpMyAdmin from the up-stream website and running it as a regular PHP site? I've always found working with distro-packaged PHP apps to be cumbersome; more trouble than their supposed advantages are worth, especially now that most PHP apps can update themselves. On Monday, March 26, 2018 11:27:31 AM CDT the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8 > but when I try to edit a table, no data is loaded, I get an empty screen. > > I have downgraded to phpmyadmin-4.7.7-r1 but system shows I have two > version installed. How do I know which one is active, or select lower > version? > > eshowkw phpmyadmin > > Keywords for dev-db/phpmyadmin: > | | u | > | > | a a p a s | n | > | l m h i p r m m s p | e u s | r > | p d a p a p c x m 6 i 3 a | a s l | e > | h 6 r p 6 p 6 8 6 8 p 9 s r | p e o | p > | a 4 m a 4 c 4 6 4 k s 0 h c | i d t | o > > -+-+---+--- > 4.0.10.20| + + o + ~ + + + o o o o o + | 5 o 4.0.10.20 | gentoo > -+-+---+--- > 4.7.0| + + ~ + ~ + + + o o o o o + | 5 o 4.7.0 | gentoo > -+-+---+--- > [I]4.7.7-r1 | + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + o o o o o ~ | 5 o 4.7.7-r1 | gentoo > -+-+---+--- > [I]4.7.8| + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + o o o o o ~ | 5 o 4.7.8 | gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone have experience with Brother's Scan Key Tool?
That really is surprising! lol What model are you using? If you feel like tackling the printing again, I may be able to help. On Monday, March 26, 2018 6:00:07 PM CDT Michael King wrote: > It actually was (surprisingly) as straight-forward as it sounds. I was > successful at getting a network Brother printer to scan, just by > following the Gentoo Printing Wiki. Now, getting it to print, well, > that's a whole other ball of wax that I was not successful at and never > pursued further! > > On 03/23/2018 01:08 PM, Elijah Mark Anderson wrote: > > > I'm wondering if anyone has any experience in installing the Brother Scan > > Key Tool on Gentoo, and could give me a heads up on any oddities I may > > encounter while setting it up? I haven't had much luck in finding > > information on this topic on-line. I'm hoping that's just because it's a > > straight forward as it seems like it should be. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Elijah Mark Anderson > > m...@kd0bpv.name > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"
On 03/26/18 06:19, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just > installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as > expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures: > both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line. > > It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked > through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the > environment with this box's, but nothing stands out. > > Finally, following the hint in the portage output, I ran "FEATURES='-sandbox - > usersandbox' emerge -1 --color n sandbox". It made no discernible difference. > > I've attached the logs etc from sandbox. > > Has anyone a clue? > I ran into this some time ago and one of the updates removed the /lib -> /lib64 symlink. I simply ran `ln -s /lib64 /lib` and it was fine after that. Dan
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone have experience with Brother's Scan Key Tool?
It actually was (surprisingly) as straight-forward as it sounds. I was successful at getting a network Brother printer to scan, just by following the Gentoo Printing Wiki. Now, getting it to print, well, that's a whole other ball of wax that I was not successful at and never pursued further! On 03/23/2018 01:08 PM, Elijah Mark Anderson wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone has any experience in installing the Brother Scan Key > Tool on Gentoo, and could give me a heads up on any oddities I may encounter > while setting it up? I haven't had much luck in finding information on this > topic on-line. I'm hoping that's just because it's a straight forward as it > seems like it should be. > > Thanks, > Elijah Mark Anderson > m...@kd0bpv.name
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
On 03/26/2018 10:41 AM, nils.freyd...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hello thelma,
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:27:31 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
>> I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8
>> but when I try to edit a table, no data is loaded, I get an empty screen.
> I had similar issue when I installed v4.7.8, and enabling PHP debug output to
> the website helped me fixing the actuall PHP issue (while I couldn't get the
> logging to write these messages to any logfile).
>
> Here is my nginx snippet for phpmyadmin in a subdirectory:
> #=== POSTFIXADMIN ===
> location /postfixadmin {
> try_files $uri $uri/ index.php;
> }
> location ~ .php$ {
> #fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$;
> include fastcgi_params;
> fastcgi_pass php-handler; # see below
> fastcgi_index index.php;
> include fastcgi_params;
> fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
> fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
> fastcgi_buffer_size 16k;
> fastcgi_buffers 4 16k;
> }
> #EOF
> #=== snippet for the php-handler:
> upstream php-handler{
> server 127.0.0.1:9000;
> }
> #EOF
>
>> I have downgraded to phpmyadmin-4.7.7-r1 but system shows I have two
>> version installed. How do I know which one is active, or select lower
>> version?
> With portage you install something like a "draft" to /usr, and then app-admin/
> webapp-config actually manages the files inside your webroot. For details how
> to use it take a look to our wiki page:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Webapp-config
>
>> […]
>
> HTH,
> Nils
I've pulled phpmyadmin-4.4.12 from attic and it is working.
So some additional setting have changed that is not allowing me to
access and edit database entries.
--
Thelma
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
Are there any alternative to phpmyadmin in portage? All do is editing/deleting one entry from a table in mysql database. -- Thelma
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:34:38 +0200, nils.freyd...@posteo.de wrote: > > In the past I didn't have to do anything after upgrading phpmyadmin. > Then you either > a) actually never updated the files actually used by your webserver, or > b) run your webserver to serve files from /usr, which sounds a > bit…stranges and might bring security implications, or > c) installed phpmyadmin without portage (which means you wouldn't have > to care anyway), or > d) portage installed earlier into a webroot (what is quite unlikely). If the vhosts USE flag is unset, the ebuild runs webapp-config when installing a new version. If you want to switch back to the older version you should run webapp-config manually. -- Neil Bothwick If you cannot fix it, feature it. pgp2pBdtNOaAe.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
On 03/26/2018 11:34 AM, nils.freyd...@posteo.de wrote: > Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:53:51 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: >> On 03/26/2018 10:41 AM, nils.freyd...@posteo.de wrote: >>> Hello thelma, >>> >>> Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:27:31 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8 [...] >> In the past I didn't have to do anything after upgrading phpmyadmin. > Then you either > a) actually never updated the files actually used by your webserver, or > b) run your webserver to serve files from /usr, which sounds a bit…stranges > and might bring security implications, or > c) installed phpmyadmin without portage (which means you wouldn't have to > care > anyway), or > d) portage installed earlier into a webroot (what is quite unlikely). > >> Here is my current: config.inc.php >> b> /* >> * Generated configuration file >> * Generated by: phpMyAdmin 3.4.0 setup script >> * Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:23:03 -0400 >> */ > > 3.4.0 from _2011_ is not even in the tree anymore (if it was). I don't know > what happens on upgrades, but if this header is correct then your setup is > still on a state nearly seven years old. Maybe check for that with ls? I've emerge "phpmyadmin-4.7.8" with "setup" and try to run run configuration from from a web-browser: http://localhost//phpmyadmin/setup/ but it complained it couldn't find any web-server. So I rename the: config.sample.inc.php to: config.inc.php It found my server but same effect: When I try to open a table to edit data inside I get an empty screen. -- Thelma
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:53:51 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 03/26/2018 10:41 AM, nils.freyd...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hello thelma, > > > > Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:27:31 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > >> I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8 [...] > In the past I didn't have to do anything after upgrading phpmyadmin. Then you either a) actually never updated the files actually used by your webserver, or b) run your webserver to serve files from /usr, which sounds a bit…stranges and might bring security implications, or c) installed phpmyadmin without portage (which means you wouldn't have to care anyway), or d) portage installed earlier into a webroot (what is quite unlikely). > Here is my current: config.inc.php > b /* > * Generated configuration file > * Generated by: phpMyAdmin 3.4.0 setup script > * Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:23:03 -0400 > */ 3.4.0 from _2011_ is not even in the tree anymore (if it was). I don't know what happens on upgrades, but if this header is correct then your setup is still on a state nearly seven years old. Maybe check for that with ls? -- GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B' Nils Freydank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
On 03/26/2018 10:41 AM, nils.freyd...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hello thelma,
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:27:31 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
>> I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8
>> but when I try to edit a table, no data is loaded, I get an empty screen.
> I had similar issue when I installed v4.7.8, and enabling PHP debug output to
> the website helped me fixing the actuall PHP issue (while I couldn't get the
> logging to write these messages to any logfile).
>
> Here is my nginx snippet for phpmyadmin in a subdirectory:
> #=== POSTFIXADMIN ===
> location /postfixadmin {
> try_files $uri $uri/ index.php;
> }
> location ~ .php$ {
> #fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$;
> include fastcgi_params;
> fastcgi_pass php-handler; # see below
> fastcgi_index index.php;
> include fastcgi_params;
> fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
> fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
> fastcgi_buffer_size 16k;
> fastcgi_buffers 4 16k;
> }
> #EOF
> #=== snippet for the php-handler:
> upstream php-handler{
> server 127.0.0.1:9000;
> }
> #EOF
>
>> I have downgraded to phpmyadmin-4.7.7-r1 but system shows I have two
>> version installed. How do I know which one is active, or select lower
>> version?
> With portage you install something like a "draft" to /usr, and then app-admin/
> webapp-config actually manages the files inside your webroot. For details how
> to use it take a look to our wiki page:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Webapp-config
>
>> […]
>
> HTH,
> Nils
In the past I didn't have to do anything after upgrading phpmyadmin.
I can see the table, but when I try to edit data inside them I get an empty
screen:
Here is my current: config.inc.php
b
Re: [gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
Hello thelma,
Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 18:27:31 CEST schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
> I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8
> but when I try to edit a table, no data is loaded, I get an empty screen.
I had similar issue when I installed v4.7.8, and enabling PHP debug output to
the website helped me fixing the actuall PHP issue (while I couldn't get the
logging to write these messages to any logfile).
Here is my nginx snippet for phpmyadmin in a subdirectory:
#=== POSTFIXADMIN ===
location /postfixadmin {
try_files $uri $uri/ index.php;
}
location ~ .php$ {
#fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$;
include fastcgi_params;
fastcgi_pass php-handler; # see below
fastcgi_index index.php;
include fastcgi_params;
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
fastcgi_buffer_size 16k;
fastcgi_buffers 4 16k;
}
#EOF
#=== snippet for the php-handler:
upstream php-handler{
server 127.0.0.1:9000;
}
#EOF
> I have downgraded to phpmyadmin-4.7.7-r1 but system shows I have two
> version installed. How do I know which one is active, or select lower
> version?
With portage you install something like a "draft" to /usr, and then app-admin/
webapp-config actually manages the files inside your webroot. For details how
to use it take a look to our wiki page:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Webapp-config
> […]
HTH,
Nils
--
GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B'
Nils Freydank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] phpmyadmin - edit (empty screen)
I've updated to phpmyadmin-4.7.8 but when I try to edit a table, no data is loaded, I get an empty screen. I have downgraded to phpmyadmin-4.7.7-r1 but system shows I have two version installed. How do I know which one is active, or select lower version? eshowkw phpmyadmin Keywords for dev-db/phpmyadmin: | | u | | a a p a s | n | | l m h i p r m m s p | e u s | r | p d a p a p c x m 6 i 3 a | a s l | e | h 6 r p 6 p 6 8 6 8 p 9 s r | p e o | p | a 4 m a 4 c 4 6 4 k s 0 h c | i d t | o -+-+---+--- 4.0.10.20| + + o + ~ + + + o o o o o + | 5 o 4.0.10.20 | gentoo -+-+---+--- 4.7.0| + + ~ + ~ + + + o o o o o + | 5 o 4.7.0 | gentoo -+-+---+--- [I]4.7.7-r1 | + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + o o o o o ~ | 5 o 4.7.7-r1 | gentoo -+-+---+--- [I]4.7.8| + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + o o o o o ~ | 5 o 4.7.8 | gentoo -- Thelma
Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"
On Monday, 26 March 2018 15:34:30 BST Dale wrote: > I did some googling on this. Thanks. Looks like you turned something up that I didn't. > I seem to recall running into this once to > but can't recall what I did to fix it. Sorry, I'm getting older. > Anyway, check how /tmp is mounted, or whatever directory you have > portage's work directory on. It seems that sometimes it may not be > mounted correctly. I also found a somewhat recent post on the forums > that mentioned disabling the pie USE flag. I'm assuming that would be > for gcc. Posting link to forum to see if it makes more sense to you. > > If none of that helps, maybe someone else will come along with something > else to try. > > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1073552-start-0.html I did what it suggested but it didn't help. > https://www.howtoforge.com/community/threads/error-cannot-run-c-compiled-pro > grams.44647/ You and Andres mentioned tmp directories. I have a sepaate partition for /var/ tmp/portage, so I tried remounting it with specifice options rw and exec; I also tried just unmounting it. No change. -- Regards Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 03/26 09:22, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
On Sunday, March 25, 2018, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the
> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the
> apt-get and apt-install commands?
> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program
> when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?)
>
I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now?
I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions
match the .deb's.
>>> This could just be a language barrier issue, but it isn't entirely
>>> clear to me what the question is, and whether it has been answered.
>>>
>>> The original question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Gentoo,
>>> so I'm not sure why we're talking about "Gentoo's library versions."
>>>
>>> If the intent really was to ask how to fetch ubuntu packages for use
>>> with ubuntu then it would probably make more sense to ask about it on
>>> an Ubuntu list/forum/etc.
>>>
>>> If this is a Gentoo question and the submitter is just unfamiliar with
>>> Gentoo and is using Ubuntu terminology that is fine, but I think it
>>> would be helpful to have a bit more clarification, such as what the
>>> end goal is. Are we asking for tarballs of sources (distfiles)? Are
>>> we asking for binary packages? Is this a question about generating
>>> ebuilds for versions not in the main repo? Is this about how to get a
>>> .deb made for Ubuntu working on Gentoo?
>>>
>>> I think everybody is trying to be helpful, but is interpreting the
>>> question differently. Perhaps the original submitter already got the
>>> answer they're looking for, which is fine.
>>>
>> Well, yes - I think the question as asked has been answered, but I'm
>> trying to figure out what he was doing. I did assume he was going to
>> be using the packages with Gentoo somehow, just based on the mailing
>> list he used.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for my horrific bad English. I will try to explain, what I
> intended to do, again. Hopefully this time with more success:
>
> There is a package, which is "selfcontained". As an example here:
> Blender, which can easily be downloaded from builder.blender.org as
> *.bz2 archives, is also "selfcontained" as it includes everything,
> what it needs to run successfully.
>
> Despite the fact, that this way of packaging makes a software quite
> independant from the layout of the distribution it will be installed
> on, the maintainer of that package only support Debian/Ubunto and
> has publishes onlu the commands needed to instruct the package
> management system of thoses systems to install that software -- as
> mentioned -- on Debian/Ubuntu-like systems.
>
> As I am using Gentoo and wanted that package and didn't found any
> other source and this package uses qt4 (included), I asked on this
> mailing list for help, how to get access to the physical package,
> which I wanted to unpack (low level) and try to get it working
> somehow.
>
> I dont asked on a Debian/Ubuntu mailing list as these are for
> questions about -- beside other related things -- installing
> packages on Debian/Ubuntu.
>
> I asked on this mailing list, since I wanted to run that
> Debian/Ubuntu package on a Gentoo system.
>
> Cheers
> Meino
>
If you want to install blender, it's in the tree already. Just emerge it.
eix blender
* media-gfx/blender
Available versions: 2.72b-r4 ~2.79 ~2.79-r1 {+boost +bullet
collada colorio cuda cycles +dds debug doc +elbeem ffmpeg fftw
+game-engine headless jack jemalloc jpeg2k libav llvm man ndof nls
openal opencl +openexr openimageio openmp +opennl opensubdiv openvdb osl
player redcode sdl sndfile test tiff valgrind CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse sse2"
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_5 python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_4
python3_5 python3_6"}
Homepage: https://www.blender.org
Description: 3D Creation/Animation/Publishing System
If you want to install a version not in the tree, some really new
experimental/untested release, then you may can take those ebuilds and
tweak them to work with the new version. Sometimes it is as simple as
replacing the version but sometimes it is almost a complete rewrite.
If you just used blender as a example, ignore this since it may not
help. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
On 03/26 09:22, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sunday, March 25, 2018, wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the > >>> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the > >>> apt-get and apt-install commands? > >>> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program > >>> when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) > >>> > >> > >> I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now? > >> I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions > >> match the .deb's. > >> > > > > This could just be a language barrier issue, but it isn't entirely > > clear to me what the question is, and whether it has been answered. > > > > The original question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Gentoo, > > so I'm not sure why we're talking about "Gentoo's library versions." > > > > If the intent really was to ask how to fetch ubuntu packages for use > > with ubuntu then it would probably make more sense to ask about it on > > an Ubuntu list/forum/etc. > > > > If this is a Gentoo question and the submitter is just unfamiliar with > > Gentoo and is using Ubuntu terminology that is fine, but I think it > > would be helpful to have a bit more clarification, such as what the > > end goal is. Are we asking for tarballs of sources (distfiles)? Are > > we asking for binary packages? Is this a question about generating > > ebuilds for versions not in the main repo? Is this about how to get a > > .deb made for Ubuntu working on Gentoo? > > > > I think everybody is trying to be helpful, but is interpreting the > > question differently. Perhaps the original submitter already got the > > answer they're looking for, which is fine. > > > > Well, yes - I think the question as asked has been answered, but I'm > trying to figure out what he was doing. I did assume he was going to > be using the packages with Gentoo somehow, just based on the mailing > list he used. > Hi, sorry for my horrific bad English. I will try to explain, what I intended to do, again. Hopefully this time with more success: There is a package, which is "selfcontained". As an example here: Blender, which can easily be downloaded from builder.blender.org as *.bz2 archives, is also "selfcontained" as it includes everything, what it needs to run successfully. Despite the fact, that this way of packaging makes a software quite independant from the layout of the distribution it will be installed on, the maintainer of that package only support Debian/Ubunto and has publishes onlu the commands needed to instruct the package management system of thoses systems to install that software -- as mentioned -- on Debian/Ubuntu-like systems. As I am using Gentoo and wanted that package and didn't found any other source and this package uses qt4 (included), I asked on this mailing list for help, how to get access to the physical package, which I wanted to unpack (low level) and try to get it working somehow. I dont asked on a Debian/Ubuntu mailing list as these are for questions about -- beside other related things -- installing packages on Debian/Ubuntu. I asked on this mailing list, since I wanted to run that Debian/Ubuntu package on a Gentoo system. Cheers Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"
2018-03-26 9:34 GMT-05:00 Dale : > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just > > installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as > > expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two > failures: > > both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line. > > > > It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked > > through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the > > environment with this box's, but nothing stands out. > > > > Finally, following the hint in the portage output, I ran > "FEATURES='-sandbox - > > usersandbox' emerge -1 --color n sandbox". It made no discernible > difference. > > > > I've attached the logs etc from sandbox. > > > > Has anyone a clue? > > > > Peter, I would check /etc/portage/make.conf for a typo in the main variables (CHOST, CFLAGS,CXXFLAGS)
Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"
Peter Humphrey wrote: > I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just > installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as > expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures: > both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line. > > It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked > through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the > environment with this box's, but nothing stands out. > > Finally, following the hint in the portage output, I ran "FEATURES='-sandbox - > usersandbox' emerge -1 --color n sandbox". It made no discernible difference. > > I've attached the logs etc from sandbox. > > Has anyone a clue? > I did some googling on this. I seem to recall running into this once to but can't recall what I did to fix it. Sorry, I'm getting older. Anyway, check how /tmp is mounted, or whatever directory you have portage's work directory on. It seems that sometimes it may not be mounted correctly. I also found a somewhat recent post on the forums that mentioned disabling the pie USE flag. I'm assuming that would be for gcc. Posting link to forum to see if it makes more sense to you. If none of that helps, maybe someone else will come along with something else to try. https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1073552-start-0.html https://www.howtoforge.com/community/threads/error-cannot-run-c-compiled-programs.44647/ Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> >> >> On Sunday, March 25, 2018, wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the >>> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the >>> apt-get and apt-install commands? >>> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program >>> when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) >>> >> >> I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now? >> I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions >> match the .deb's. >> > > This could just be a language barrier issue, but it isn't entirely > clear to me what the question is, and whether it has been answered. > > The original question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Gentoo, > so I'm not sure why we're talking about "Gentoo's library versions." > > If the intent really was to ask how to fetch ubuntu packages for use > with ubuntu then it would probably make more sense to ask about it on > an Ubuntu list/forum/etc. > > If this is a Gentoo question and the submitter is just unfamiliar with > Gentoo and is using Ubuntu terminology that is fine, but I think it > would be helpful to have a bit more clarification, such as what the > end goal is. Are we asking for tarballs of sources (distfiles)? Are > we asking for binary packages? Is this a question about generating > ebuilds for versions not in the main repo? Is this about how to get a > .deb made for Ubuntu working on Gentoo? > > I think everybody is trying to be helpful, but is interpreting the > question differently. Perhaps the original submitter already got the > answer they're looking for, which is fine. > Well, yes - I think the question as asked has been answered, but I'm trying to figure out what he was doing. I did assume he was going to be using the packages with Gentoo somehow, just based on the mailing list he used.
Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: > > > On Sunday, March 25, 2018, wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the >> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the >> apt-get and apt-install commands? >> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program >> when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) >> > > I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now? > I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions > match the .deb's. > This could just be a language barrier issue, but it isn't entirely clear to me what the question is, and whether it has been answered. The original question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Gentoo, so I'm not sure why we're talking about "Gentoo's library versions." If the intent really was to ask how to fetch ubuntu packages for use with ubuntu then it would probably make more sense to ask about it on an Ubuntu list/forum/etc. If this is a Gentoo question and the submitter is just unfamiliar with Gentoo and is using Ubuntu terminology that is fine, but I think it would be helpful to have a bit more clarification, such as what the end goal is. Are we asking for tarballs of sources (distfiles)? Are we asking for binary packages? Is this a question about generating ebuilds for versions not in the main repo? Is this about how to get a .deb made for Ubuntu working on Gentoo? I think everybody is trying to be helpful, but is interpreting the question differently. Perhaps the original submitter already got the answer they're looking for, which is fine. -- Rich
[gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"
I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures: both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line. It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the environment with this box's, but nothing stands out. Finally, following the hint in the portage output, I ran "FEATURES='-sandbox - usersandbox' emerge -1 --color n sandbox". It made no discernible difference. I've attached the logs etc from sandbox. Has anyone a clue? -- Regards. Peter # emerge -pqv '=sys-apps/sandbox-2.12::gentoo' [ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12 ABI_X86="(32) (64) (-x32)" # Output to tty4 of FEATURES='-sandbox -usersandbox' emerge -1 --color n sandbox # >>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-apps/sandbox-2.12::gentoo * sandbox-2.12.tar.xz BLAKE2B SHA512 size ;-) ... [ ok ] >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking sandbox-2.12.tar.xz to /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work >>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work >>> Preparing source in >>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work/sandbox-2.12 ... >>> Source prepared. >>> Configuring source in >>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work/sandbox-2.12 ... * abi_x86_32.x86: running multilib-minimal_abi_src_configure * econf: updating sandbox-2.12/config.guess with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.guess * econf: updating sandbox-2.12/config.sub with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work/sandbox-2.12/configure --prefix=/usr --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-dependency-tracking --disable-silent-rules --docdir=/usr/share/doc/sandbox-2.12 --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/sandbox-2.12/html --libdir=/usr/lib32 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/lib/portage/python3.5/ebuild-helpers/xattr/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether make supports nested variables... yes checking whether make supports nested variables... (cached) yes checking environment state... ok checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... configure: error: in `/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work/sandbox-2.12-abi_x86_32.x86': configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support: !!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.12/work/sandbox-2.12-abi_x86_32.x86/config.log * ERROR: sys-apps/sandbox-2.12::gentoo failed (configure phase): * econf failed * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 124: Called src_configure * environment, line 2816: Called multilib-minimal_src_configure * environment, line 1934: Called multilib_foreach_abi 'multilib-minimal_abi_src_configure' * environment, line 2148: Called multibuild_foreach_variant '_multilib_multibuild_wrapper' 'multilib-minimal_abi_src_configure' * environment, line 1864: Called _multibuild_run '_multilib_multibuild_wrapper' 'multilib-minimal_abi_src_configure' * environment, line 1862: Called _multilib_multibuild_wrapper 'multilib-minimal_abi_src_configure' * environment, line 337: Called multilib-minimal_abi_src_configure * environment, line 1928: Called multilib_src_configure * environment, line 2363: Called econf *phase-helpers.sh, line 666: Called __helpers_die 'econf failed' * isolated-functions.sh, line 117: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die "$@" * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=sys-apps/sandbox-2.12::gentoo'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=sys-apps/sandbox-2.12::gentoo'`. * If configure failed with a 'cannot run C compiled programs' error, try this: * FEATURES='-sandbox -usersandbox' emerge s
Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
On Sunday, March 25, 2018, wrote: > Hi, > > is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the > world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the > apt-get and apt-install commands? > And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program > when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) > I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now? I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions match the .deb's. Cheers, R0b0t1
[gentoo-user] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)
I've switched one of my older box to desktop profile-17 updated gcc to 6.4.0-r1 and it compile just fine. But when I do emerge -e @world recompile gcc-6.4.0-r1 get stuck on" * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: * * >=dev-libs/mpfr-2.4.2:0/0= pulled in by: * (sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0-r1:6.4.0/6.4.0::gentoo, installed) emerge --info Portage 2.3.24 (python 3.5.4-final-0, default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop, gcc-6.4.0, glibc-2.25-r10, 4.9.6-gentoo-r1 x86_64) = System uname: Linux-4.9.6-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Atom-TM-_CPU_330_@_1.60GHz-with-gentoo-2.4.1 KiB Mem: 2038868 total,807572 free KiB Swap:2097148 total, 2047452 free Timestamp of repository gentoo: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:00:01 + Head commit of repository gentoo: 04417076a13a10d172b6e00d22f04ffa128eae38 sh bash 4.4_p12 ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.28 p1.2) 2.28 app-shells/bash: 4.4_p12::gentoo dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0-r3::gentoo dev-lang/perl:5.24.3::gentoo dev-lang/python: 2.7.14-r1::gentoo, 3.4.5::gentoo, 3.5.4-r1::gentoo dev-util/cmake: 3.9.6::gentoo dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.29.2::gentoo sys-apps/baselayout: 2.4.1-r2::gentoo sys-apps/openrc: 0.34.11::gentoo sys-apps/sandbox: 2.12::gentoo sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13::gentoo, 2.69-r4::gentoo sys-devel/automake: 1.11.6-r3::gentoo, 1.15.1-r2::gentoo sys-devel/binutils: 2.28-r2::gentoo, 2.29.1-r1::gentoo sys-devel/gcc:4.9.4::gentoo, 5.4.0-r3::gentoo, 6.4.0-r1::gentoo sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.8-r1::gentoo sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6-r3::gentoo sys-devel/make: 4.2.1::gentoo sys-kernel/linux-headers: 4.13::gentoo (virtual/os-headers) sys-libs/glibc: 2.25-r10::gentoo Repositories: gentoo location: /usr/portage sync-type: rsync sync-uri: rsync://10.10.0.6/gentoo-portage priority: -1000 sync-rsync-extra-opts: sync-rsync-verify-metamanifest: no Local location: /usr/local/portage masters: gentoo priority: ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA PUEL dlj-1.1 Oracle-BCLA-JavaSE" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/brsanenetdevice4.cfg /usr/lib64/fax /usr/share/easy-rsa /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/spool/fax/etc" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c" CXXFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask-write=y --keep-going --with-bdeps=y" FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync multilib-strict news parallel-fetch preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync xattr" FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo http://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/download/gentoo-mirror"; LANG="en_US.utf8" LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" MAKEOPTS="-j5" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages --exclude=/.git" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" USE="X a52 aac acpi alsa amd64 apache2 berkdb bluetooth branding brandingdvd bzip2 cairo cdda cdr cgi cli consolekit crypt cups cxx dbus dri dts dvd dvdr emboss encode exif fam flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gimp gimpprint glamor gpm gtk iconv ipv6 java jpeg lcms ldap libnotify lm_sensors lock mad mmx mng modules mp3 mp4 mpeg multilib mysql ncurses nls nplt nptl ogg opengl openmp pam pango pcre pdf png policykit ppds qt3support qt5 readline scanner sdl seccomp session spell sse sse2 ssl startup-notification svg tcpd tetex thunar tiff truetype type1 udev udisks unicode upower usb vorbis wxwidgets x264 xattr xcb xml xv xvid zlib" ABI_X86="64" ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000 atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938 es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0 intel8x0m maestro3 trident usb-audio via82xx via82xx-modem ymfpci" APACHE2_MODULES="authn_core authz_core socache_shmcb unixd actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache cgi cgid dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env expires ext_filter file_cache filter headers include info log_config logio mem_cache mime mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif sp
Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
On 03/25 10:02, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:47 AM, wrote: > > > > is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the > > world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the apt-get > > and apt-install commands? > > A "deb" file, which you can expand with "ar" (no need to install "dpkg"). > > > > And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program when > > I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) > > I'll use systemd because I used the Ubuntu maintainer's systemd ppa > two or three years ago and I still have that url bookmarked. > > To get the regular systemd deb: > > http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/s/systemd/ > > [ I've chosen the "de" repository given your email address. ] > > To get the ppa systemd deb (the ppa is called "pitti/systemd"): > > http://ppa.launchpad.net/pitti/systemd/ubuntu/ > > > > I onlu need the archives of the complete program. Like Blender the > > archive is "all inclusive" ... : > > Make sure that the source package isn't split up into more than one > deb. If you look at the systemd example above, you'll find many > "lib..." debs as well as "systemd..." and "udev..." debs. > > > > > Rather than grabbing a "deb", unpacking it, and dropping its > components into "/usr/local/", you might want to look into using > Ubuntu's snap that allows you to install self-contained applications > in the same way that Android and iOS do. > > [ I have no idea whether snap is available on Gentoo or whether your > app is packaged as a snap. ] > Hi Tom, thanks for your help !!! :) Cheers Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] New xorg-proto package blocks everything else.
2018-03-25 21:40 GMT+03:00 Franz Fellner : > Just a stupid question: Did you add =scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1 to > package.mask? Because the -r2 is stable and nothing should prevent it from > being merged... > I am running partly testing and the time xorg-proto was added I had to deal > with hard blocks which I circumvented by un-keywording (remove from > package.accept-keywords) and selectively masking. Making emerge-webrsync the next day solved the problem. Now x11-proto/scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r2 is marked stable and x11-proto/xcb-proto-1.13 is marked unstable, whereas yesterday it was vice versa.
