[gentoo-user] Problems with bluetooth dongle and bnep

2006-12-14 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk

Hi,

I'm trying to setup BNEP network with a gentoo box as as master in NAP
mode. The client (dell laptop) connects using internal bluetooth
module. Everything looks nice and happy. Laptop connects to my gentoo
box, I set up bridge between eth0 and bnep0, dhcp allocates the IP and
laptop becomes connected to my lan over bluetooth.
Unfortunately after about a minute (and only standard
windows-background traffic - roughly about 1KB each way) - the
connection stops. I can't ping over it any more, but the bnep0 stays
up. The only way to bring it back to shape is to remove the dongle
from the usb port (removing the modules from the kernel doesn't seem
to help).

The dongle is made by Integrated System Solution Corp, its a KY-BT100
Bluetooth Adapter.

Moving the dongle to a different usb port doesn't help. Restarting
laptop doesn't help, which suggests that the problem is with the
dongle.

Any ideas or suggestions what might be causing the problems?

regards
pshemko
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] File system full issues

2006-02-15 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
On 16/02/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>On this machine the file system reports it's 100% full even after
> I've removed 500MB of stuff. What can I do to clean this up?
>
>
> dragonfly / # df
> Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda8  9621848   9161608 0 100% /
>

If the filesystem is ext2 or ext3 it's pretty likely that this 500MB
is the 5% reserved for root :-)
So you can't see it, but the space is there. Google around this, as
I'm not sure whether root should see this 5% as available or not.

regards
pshemko

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] hdparm error

2005-10-05 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
On 06/10/05, LostSon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Hello
>  I am trying to set hdparm on my laptop and keep getting this error
>  setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
> using_dma  = 0 (off)
>
>  I have gone through my kernel configs looking for anything dma related
> i may need but cant seem to find anything. Any ideas, thanks.

Probably you didn't compile in the right chipset. Have a look in kernel config:
Device Drivers -> ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support and make sure that you
have  "Generic PCI bus-master DMA support" turned on together with the
right chipset.

regards
pshemko

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] New Zealand Gentoo Users

2005-08-01 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
I'd definitely be interested in taking part in that group. I have some
experience with gentoo (since 1.4) and linux in general, can share
some knowledge. Wouldn't mind learning some new tricks too ;->

regards
pshemko


On 01/08/05, Jamie Dobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to scope out the interest that New Zealand based Gentoo users
> would have to to establishment of a Gentoo Users Group specifically for NZ
> based users.
> 
> The items to be established are:
> 
> 1/ Is there sufficient interest?
> 
> 2/ Is there anything to stop us using the term "Gentoo Users New Zealand
> (GUNZ)"?
> 
> 3/ What should the aims of such a group be?
> 
> 4/ How should such a group function/be structured?
> 
> Apologies to all for a slightly off-topic post, but this is the only place
> I can think of to gauge interest in such an idea.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jamie
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Size of a gentoo mirror

2005-07-31 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Thank you all for that information.

regards
pshemko


On 01/08/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 31 July 2005 22:05, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
> > Together with my boss we are thinking about mirroring gentoo (both
> > distribution and packages) . Can someone tell me how much space should
> > we reserve for that?
> 
> http://www.mirror.ac.uk/mirror/distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo
> suggests around 40gigs at the moment.
> 
> --
> Mike Williams
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Size of a gentoo mirror

2005-07-31 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi,

Together with my boss we are thinking about mirroring gentoo (both
distribution and packages) . Can someone tell me how much space should
we reserve for that?

regards
pshemko

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Apache IfDefine error

2005-06-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
On 09/06/05, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
>  * Apache2 has detected a syntax error in your configuration files:
> Syntax error on line 280 of /etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
> Expected  but saw 
> 
> But it looks fine to me:
> 
> > sed -n '280p' /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
> 
> 
> Any ideas?

Shoudn't that be 


(instead of )?

regards
pshem

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up a route through a point-to-point interface

2005-05-12 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
On 12/05/05, Jim Hatfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

{cut}

>  ifconfig tun0 up mtu 1450 pointopoint
>  route add -net 192.168.10.0/24 dev tun0
> 
> However I get a:
> SIOCADDRT: No such device
> 
> which suggests that the tun device doesn't support the right
> ioctl variants.
> 
> Has anyone done this? It's easy enough to do it using throw-away
> IP addresses for the two "ends" of the tunnel, but it's neater if
> they can be avoided.

I'd try to use the iproute2 package for that:

 # ip route show
10.1.1.0/24 dev br0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.1.2
127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1 dev lo  scope link
default via 10.1.1.1 dev br0

 # ip route add 10.20.0.0/16 dev br0

# ip route show
10.1.1.0/24 dev br0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.1.2
10.20.0.0/16 dev br0  scope link
127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1 dev lo  scope link
default via 10.1.1.1 dev br0

I guess that it should work the same for the other devices.
Before adding routing you should bring the interface up:
# ip link set tun0 up

regards
pshem

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] make new files writable by group by default?

2005-05-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
On 09/05/05, Robert Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 8, 2005 08:24 pm Ciaran McCreesh was like:
> > On Sun, 8 May 2005 20:06:46 -0700 Robert Persson
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Could anyone tell me how to make a user's new files writable by the
> > | user's  group by default (i.e. 664 rather than 644)?  I would like
> > | robert (a member  of p2p) to be able to move or erase files created by
> > | p2p:p2p without having  to log in as p2p or root.
> >
> > man umask
> 
> Ah.  So I need to put a umask command somewhere.  Should I put it in
> ~/.profile or somewhere else?
> 

If you what to do that only for a few users - then put it in
~/.profile - otherwise - have a look in /etc/profile

regards
pshemko

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OK, now this is weird-- where are the subjects?

2005-05-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
On 09/05/05, Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
> > Now I just replied to a message with a subject, and my reply has no
> > subject??!!
> >
> > I don't even know if this will have a subject.
> >
> >
> > What could be going on?
> *BuRP*
> 
> Sorry, I was hungry. :)
> 
> I don't know what's going on, but I've been seeing subject-less messages
> for the past several hours, although not every message lacks a subject.
> 
> It's only this list, too.

The subjects are there, unfortunately, there is more the one pre
message, which causes the confusion:

for example:

Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OK, now this is weird-- where are the subjects?
Subject: [gentoo-user] 

I guess that something wrong with the list software.

regards
pshemko

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] First Install - Help Setting Root Password

2005-05-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi,

> > sh-2.05b# su 
> > su(pam_unix)[1911]:  session opened for user  by (uid=0)
> > bash-2.05b$ su
> > Password:
> > setgid: Operation not permitted
> 
> Because of the setgid error I don't think it is a password problem.
> The normal output on wrong passwords are:
> 
> # su
> Password:
> su: Authentication failure
> Sorry.
> 
> Something else (pam?) is not allowing you to become root.

I'm just guessing, but do you use any kind of hardened/secured version
of any software?

regards
pshem

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list