Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-06 Thread Lord Sauron
On 4/5/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:49, Lord Sauron
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user]
 Beautification - Splash':
   You sent two copies of your message, one signed, the other not.  You
   also didn't publish your public key on any keyserver that my kmail
   polls for keys (I think I poll 6 servers, though at least 3 of other
   shares keys among themselves, too).
 
  So that's what people are talking about whenever they say there's
  gonna be a public key signing!  I've been idly wondering what that
  could be.
 
  Okay...  that makes sense now.

 No, a public key signing is when you verify that the key(s) provided by the
 keyserver match the person they are supposed to.  The keyserver provides a
 key to you based on it's ID, and the key itself contains what emails
 address it can be attached to, but that's don't tell you that *I* signed
 it.  You'd have to talk face-to-face with me (or some other pre-secured
 method) to know that *I* uploaded that key.  Anyone can upload a key
 purporting to be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then send a message signed
 with that key. (Keys are essentially random, and anyone can send a mail
 with the From header saying [EMAIL PROTECTED].  In the most
 paranoid case, mail TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] [assuming it isn't a send-only
 email address] can be intercepted by anyone with physical or root access
 to the computer pointed to by the MX record of volumehost.net.

Yeah, no system is foolproof.

   This message is validly singed, although probably by a key you don't
   trust (nor should you until to verify the key actually belongs to the
   person it claims to).
 
  Most key servers use hardened linux or SE Linux, right?  Since that is
  what they're supposed to be for?  I think I could scrape together
  another cheap-o server to make into my own key server...  that'd be
  cool.  If nothing else it'd be nice to play with it a bit : )

 Most keyservers were up and running before hardened or SE Linux was
 available, but may have been upgraded.  They are supposed to be difficult
 to break into and/or spoof, just like any public server, but they are
 *NOT* a source of trust.  They accept and provide keys without any tests.
 They are a convenient publishing method, they are *NOT* part of the trust
 equation.

Yeah, I was just thinking Hardened Linux would be a good choice b/c
it's more resistant to some cracker breaking in and screwing stuff up
all over the place.

Good data in, good data out; bad data in, bad data out is the
keyserver, but I don't want cracker pinhead to take the data and make
it bad.

   If there's one thing we've established over the years,
   it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
   clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
   -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
 
  I honestly hope you're just joking.  Really, the world gets much
  scarier when that is true...

 Check the Gmane archives if you don't believe me.  Ciaran said it and has
 yet to even take notice of my signature quoting him.  Hell, sometimes I
 almost believe it.  In my most cynical moments, I think we should stop
 helping people install Gentoo, just so we have some minimum competency
 requirement for users.

Yeah, there is a significant advantage to having competent users,
however, when you make that distinction you narrow your target
audience to so few people...

 Then, I realize that I probably wouldn't have the wonderful Gentoo system I
 have now without the support of the other Gentoo users; I'd probably be
 running Debian. :/

I was a good person and learned all I could on Debian before trying
Gentoo.  That's why you don't see me asking questions like what's
bash and where's the start menu?

Luckily for you, that's where I picked up what few mailing-list
manners I have ; )

You should have seen my posts before...  scary.

--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-05 Thread Lord Sauron
On 4/4/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 April 2006 19:33, Lord Sauron
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user]
 Beautification - Splash':
  PS:  I'm playing with this GPG stuff...  I want to see if any of you
  can use [verify] this.  I'm just curious...  I had some nut case
  ghosting off of my domain and email and then emailing some friends.  I
  was not happy.  Someone suggested signing my messages.  So, I'm
  trying.  Tell me if I'm doing it right if it's conveinient.

 You sent two copies of your message, one signed, the other not.  You also
 didn't publish your public key on any keyserver that my kmail polls for
 keys (I think I poll 6 servers, though at least 3 of other shares keys
 among themselves, too).

So that's what people are talking about whenever they say there's
gonna be a public key signing!  I've been idly wondering what that
could be.

Okay...  that makes sense now.

Don't laugh - it was my very first try and encryption.

 This message is validly singed, although probably by a key you don't trust
 (nor should you until to verify the key actually belongs to the person it
 claims to).

Most key servers use hardened linux or SE Linux, right?  Since that is
what they're supposed to be for?  I think I could scrape together
another cheap-o server to make into my own key server...  that'd be
cool.  If nothing else it'd be nice to play with it a bit : )

 --
 If there's one thing we've established over the years,
 it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
 clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
 -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh

I honestly hope you're just joking.  Really, the world gets much
scarier when that is true...  withdraws into own little programmer
world where everything is written in C and MS doens't exsist

--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-05 Thread Lord Sauron
On 4/4/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday 05 April 2006 02:33, Lord Sauron wrote:
 [SNIP]
  So I now use the theme livecd-2006.0 Just my $0.02, but it's sorta
  difficult to change themes.  Soon as I'm more bash literate, I'll try
  to make a script to change themes in a easier manner
  (lsauron_cngsplshthm [theme], perhaps?  I dunno...  Mind of a
  programmer, once more).  I counted 2 places I have to change to change
  themes:
 
  /etc/splash splashutils_geninitramfs... // generate new initramfs file
  /boot/grub/menu.lst // point to it, and make sure kernel command line
  args are nice and happy
 [SNIP]

 I guarantee nothing... ;) :

 #!/bin/bash
 RES=1400x1050
 THEME=${1}
 splash_geninitramfs ${THEME} -r ${RES} -g /boot/fbsplash -v
 sed -i -e 's/theme:[a-z0-9.-]*/theme:'${THEME}'/' /boot/grub/menu.lst

Hmm...  I'll have to play around with that in KDevelop and see if I
can make it guaranteeable... that'd be a good project for a nut like
me...

--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-04 Thread Lord Sauron
I was a good cookie and went and tried my best.  I did see some signs
of success, however, they're not all complete...  no pictures.  The
one sign of success was that the resolution was at [EMAIL PROTECTED],
which is a good sign.  However, I think that was more attributable to
my recompile of the kernel, which I'm happy to say I'm reletively
expert at now.  I can make menuconfig and make  make install my way
around now, so that's good news.

On 4/2/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash

I followed these instructions, however, something didn't work, because
there were no pretty pictures : (  I did appreciate the increased
resolution, however.

The instructions I took were pretty simple:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash#Non-genkernel_users

Then I:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash#Non-genkernel_users

and then I modified /boot/grub/menu.lst:

localhost ~ # cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
default 0
timeout 7
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
title Current Kernel
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda3
initrd /fbsplash
there is the
change
title Old Kernel
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz.old root=/dev/hda3
title Failsafe
root (hd0,0)
kernel  /kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.15-gentoo-r5 root=/dev/ram0
init=/linuxrc ramdisk=8192 real_root=/dev/hda3
initrd /initramfs-genkernel-x86-2.6.15-gentoo-r5

However, there are no graphics.  To correct this, I'm going to try and
run through the list another time, however, if anyone sees something
wrong, please tell me.

Oh, and I know there's a descrepency between the names made by
splash_geninitramfs... and what menu.lst points to.  I created a more
generically named file to facilitate easy switching between themes by
just generating a new initramfs of the same name whenever I want.  I
thought I was being rather clever, personally...  I couldn't do neat
tricks like that in windows, so I'm really having fun!

Thanks for any help!

--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-04 Thread Bo Andresen
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20:48, Lord Sauron wrote:
[SNIP]
 and then I modified /boot/grub/menu.lst:

 localhost ~ # cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
 default 0
 timeout 7
 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
 title Current Kernel
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda3
 initrd /fbsplash
 there is the
[SNIP]

So now you have told it where to find the theme files. Now you just need to
alter your kernel line to specify what theme to use and in which mode. An 
example is given in [1]. But to view full documentation of kernel parameters 
for splash type in a terminal (this assumes that you have splashutils 
installed):

# zcat -c /usr/share/doc/splashutils*/kernel_parameters.gz | less

Also I have just added two sections to the howto i.e. [2] and [3].

[1] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gensplash#GRUB_Example
[2] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gensplash#View_contents_of_initramfs
[3] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gensplash#Choosing_a_theme

-- 
Bo Andresen
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-04 Thread Lord Sauron
Yeah, I read you.  I found that during lunch.  It works now : )

On 4/4/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20:48, Lord Sauron wrote:
 [SNIP]
  and then I modified /boot/grub/menu.lst:
 
  localhost ~ # cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
  default 0
  timeout 7
  splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
  title Current Kernel
  root (hd0,0)
  kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda3
  initrd /fbsplash
  there is the
 [SNIP]

 So now you have told it where to find the theme files. Now you just need to
 alter your kernel line to specify what theme to use and in which mode. An
 example is given in [1]. But to view full documentation of kernel parameters
 for splash type in a terminal (this assumes that you have splashutils
 installed):

 # zcat -c /usr/share/doc/splashutils*/kernel_parameters.gz | less

 Also I have just added two sections to the howto i.e. [2] and [3].

 [1] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gensplash#GRUB_Example
 [2] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gensplash#View_contents_of_initramfs
 [3] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gensplash#Choosing_a_theme

 --
 Bo Andresen
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list




--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-04 Thread Lord Sauron
To be a bit more verbose...

I downloaded the web page to disk so I could toy with it during lunch,
when I'm not connected to the internet.  After about ten reboots I
finally had it nailed down.  My Windoze friends are gonna hate this...
 they've always regarded Window's bootup graphics as making windows
superior in some way or another.  I think they've just let their
minds be harmed by all the years of windows ; )

So I now use the theme livecd-2006.0 Just my $0.02, but it's sorta
difficult to change themes.  Soon as I'm more bash literate, I'll try
to make a script to change themes in a easier manner
(lsauron_cngsplshthm [theme], perhaps?  I dunno...  Mind of a
programmer, once more).  I counted 2 places I have to change to change
themes:

/etc/splash splashutils_geninitramfs... // generate new initramfs file
/boot/grub/menu.lst // point to it, and make sure kernel command line
args are nice and happy

but otherwise it was rather painless.  The initial install was
painful...  when you have to do a manual rc-update add or whatever it
is, that's a sign that you need to make a script of some kind...  my
personal feelings, of course.

So thanks for the help - Probably wouldn't have gotten this far by
myself (I have a habit of bouncing off the same walls until someone
explains to me why my thinking isn't right, even though it is quite
logical).

PS:  I'm playing with this GPG stuff...  I want to see if any of you
can use [verify] this.  I'm just curious...  I had some nut case
ghosting off of my domain and email and then emailing some friends.  I
was not happy.  Someone suggested signing my messages.  So, I'm
trying.  Tell me if I'm doing it right if it's conveinient.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

To be a bit more verbose...

I downloaded the web page to disk so I could toy with it during lunch,
when I'm not connected to the internet.  After about ten reboots I
finally had it nailed down.  My Windoze friends are gonna hate this...
 they've always regarded Window's bootup graphics as making windows
superior in some way or another.  I think they've just let their
minds be harmed by all the years of windows ; )

So I now use the theme livecd-2006.0 Just my $0.02, but it's sorta
difficult to change themes.  Soon as I'm more bash literate, I'll try
to make a script to change themes in a easier manner
(lsauron_cngsplshthm [theme], perhaps?  I dunno...  Mind of a
programmer, once more).  I counted 2 places I have to change to change
themes:

/etc/splash splashutils_geninitramfs... // generate new initramfs file
/boot/grub/menu.lst // point to it, and make sure kernel command line
args are nice and happy

but otherwise it was rather painless.  The initial install was
painful...  when you have to do a manual rc-update add or whatever it
is, that's a sign that you need to make a script of some kind...  my
personal feelings, of course.

So thanks for the help - Probably wouldn't have gotten this far by
myself (I have a habit of bouncing off the same walls until someone
explains to me why my thinking isn't right, even though it is quite
logical).

- --
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEMw9zHcNVi48i054RAi3sAJ0cV7/YUJVybJiPjGBtL2T5SsFINwCfeDEu
fFpF1fK9A/3ocaiuN3J6tus=
=g3tf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-04 Thread Bo Andresen
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 02:33, Lord Sauron wrote:
[SNIP]
 So I now use the theme livecd-2006.0 Just my $0.02, but it's sorta
 difficult to change themes.  Soon as I'm more bash literate, I'll try
 to make a script to change themes in a easier manner
 (lsauron_cngsplshthm [theme], perhaps?  I dunno...  Mind of a
 programmer, once more).  I counted 2 places I have to change to change
 themes:

 /etc/splash splashutils_geninitramfs... // generate new initramfs file
 /boot/grub/menu.lst // point to it, and make sure kernel command line
 args are nice and happy
[SNIP]

I guarantee nothing... ;) :

#!/bin/bash
RES=1400x1050
THEME=${1}
splash_geninitramfs ${THEME} -r ${RES} -g /boot/fbsplash -v
sed -i -e 's/theme:[a-z0-9.-]*/theme:'${THEME}'/' /boot/grub/menu.lst

 PS:  I'm playing with this GPG stuff...  I want to see if any of you
 can use [verify] this.  I'm just curious...  I had some nut case
 ghosting off of my domain and email and then emailing some friends.  I
 was not happy.  Someone suggested signing my messages.  So, I'm
 trying.  Tell me if I'm doing it right if it's conveinient.

Message was signed on 1/1-1970 00:59 with unknown key 0x8F22D39E.
The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
[SNIP]
End of signed message

I guess not...

-- 
Bo Andresen
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-04 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 19:33, Lord Sauron 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] 
Beautification - Splash':
 PS:  I'm playing with this GPG stuff...  I want to see if any of you
 can use [verify] this.  I'm just curious...  I had some nut case
 ghosting off of my domain and email and then emailing some friends.  I
 was not happy.  Someone suggested signing my messages.  So, I'm
 trying.  Tell me if I'm doing it right if it's conveinient.

You sent two copies of your message, one signed, the other not.  You also 
didn't publish your public key on any keyserver that my kmail polls for 
keys (I think I poll 6 servers, though at least 3 of other shares keys 
among themselves, too).

This message is validly singed, although probably by a key you don't trust 
(nor should you until to verify the key actually belongs to the person it 
claims to).

-- 
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh


pgpSCeBNs1ypM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-02 Thread Lord Sauron
Hello once more.

I was good this time and did look through the documentation.  In order
to get the beautification on Gentoo I wanted (the nice graphics
during the install and stuff) I researched it and installed
splashutils.  However, installation wasn't enough.  There's a way to
activate it.  I found how to choose which theme I wanted - it was
rather straightforward, a symlink to a folder.  However, I don't know
how to really activate the darn thing such that it'll work.  I went to
the software's homepage and found a installation document which
basically said that it differs from distro to distro.  If there were
instructions for me, I didn't see them.

Anyways, I hope you can help me here.  I hope I'm not all that
annoying, either.  I know I am rather elementary, however, I was a
good Dark Lord this time and I did do my homework and tried my best to
work the problem by myself before asking for help - I really did!

--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Beautification - Splash

2006-04-02 Thread Bo Andresen
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash

-- 
Bo Andresen
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list