Re: [gentoo-user] Choosing a new profile: multilib or not?

2014-12-23 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 23 Dec 2014 03:44:30 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
 On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:53:06 + Mick wrote:
  It used to be the case that adobe flash and other applications would not
  work with a no-multilib profile.
  
  However, I was surprised to see that a previous no-multilib installation
  of mine was able to play flash in Firefox.  So, I thought of asking here
  if there is any reason to avoid installing a no-multilib profile these
  days.  What applications binary (e.g. Skype) or source compiled won't
  work with no- multilib?
 
 For skype you have to either build qt, X11 and some other libs with
 multilib support (abi_x86_32) or use emul-linux-x86-* prebuilt
 packages. Either way your system will end up with 32-bit libraries
 installed, but in case of multilib they will be optimized for your
 hardware and use cases (*FLAGS and USE).

Thanks Andrew, I was afraid that the user will ask one day for some binary or 
obscure application that *must* use 32bit objects and then I would be faced 
with a reinstall, or chroot.  Therefore, I bit the bullet now and am 
installing with multilib support.

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] Choosing a new profile: multilib or not?

2014-12-22 Thread Mick
It used to be the case that adobe flash and other applications would not work 
with a no-multilib profile.

However, I was surprised to see that a previous no-multilib installation of 
mine was able to play flash in Firefox.  So, I thought of asking here if there 
is any reason to avoid installing a no-multilib profile these days.  What 
applications binary (e.g. Skype) or source compiled won't work with no-
multilib?

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Choosing a new profile: multilib or not?

2014-12-22 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:53:06 + Mick wrote:
 It used to be the case that adobe flash and other applications would not work 
 with a no-multilib profile.
 
 However, I was surprised to see that a previous no-multilib installation of 
 mine was able to play flash in Firefox.  So, I thought of asking here if 
 there 
 is any reason to avoid installing a no-multilib profile these days.  What 
 applications binary (e.g. Skype) or source compiled won't work with no-
 multilib?

For skype you have to either build qt, X11 and some other libs with
multilib support (abi_x86_32) or use emul-linux-x86-* prebuilt
packages. Either way your system will end up with 32-bit libraries
installed, but in case of multilib they will be optimized for your
hardware and use cases (*FLAGS and USE).

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko


pgpE9EeFAs2rB.pgp
Description: PGP signature