Re: [gentoo-user] Re: About interpreting output of df -h

2010-12-02 Thread Jake Moe
On 12/03/10 12:38, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Harry Putnam  writes:
>
>> Jake Moe  writes:
> Jake, I am soo sorry for seeming to aim my joking post at you when it
> was Mr. Indexer who seemed to be needing a little ribbing.
>
>
Not a problem, I got what you were aiming for...

Jake Moe



[gentoo-user] Re: About interpreting output of df -h

2010-12-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam  writes:

> Jake Moe  writes:

Jake, I am soo sorry for seeming to aim my joking post at you when it
was Mr. Indexer who seemed to be needing a little ribbing.




[gentoo-user] Re: About interpreting output of df -h

2010-12-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Jake Moe  writes:


>> > I know I can look in fstab... but that is something of a crap shoot
>> > since it is user configured.
>>
>> So? It should not be touchable by human hands unless they have root.
>> The only way this would change is if someone changed it, and you can
>> easily track who with sudo and modification times etc.

Next time don't say So? in such a impolite manner...

That was my point, fstab might be handwritten as opposed to coming
from hardware recognition tools.

>> > So what commands will show real devices not makebelieve baloney, and
>> > allow me to see the usage devices are put to?

>> Next time ask nicely. What is so hard about saying "Im a bit lost, how
>> do i find the device that this points to".

Err... I think your concept of what is `not nice' could stand a little
tweaking ... hehe.

> Out of curiousity, why don't I have a "rootfs" entry?

Carefull there... you may not get any answers due to your harsh usage
of `curiousity'.  Next time say: I'm probably just an idiot and have
thoroughly trashed my machine due to foolish blundering but