[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Bon Echo (why?)

2007-02-25 Thread Christian Marie
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:15:14PM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
 I prefer something like FlameCanid that more properly expresses the
 fact that ours is almost-exactly-but-not-quite-perfectly-the-same. 

We use Bon Echo as it's upstreams default unbranded name. Many other
distros are using Bon Echo and changing it to something else would
require a reasonably painful amount of patching and maintenance.

You are allowed to build Firefox with branding, you can't distribute any
binaries you build though. We're currently considering enabling branding
by default with USE=bindist however it's a complicated issue.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Bon Echo (why?)

2007-02-25 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 26 February 2007 00:06:55 Christian Marie wrote:
 You are allowed to build Firefox with branding, you can't distribute any
 binaries you build though. We're currently considering enabling branding
 by default with USE=bindist however it's a complicated issue.

I assume you meant when USE=bindist is disabled.

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgp3zRpI978oi.pgp
Description: PGP signature