OpenWRT on Netgear (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Waaaaaay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-()

2006-05-06 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 05 May 2006 18:05, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Waay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to 
ask. :-(':
 On 05/05/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What model?  You throw OpenWRT on it, if possible, and then all your
  documentation is then online. :)  FWIW, Most linksys models
  automatically (layer-3) bridge 802.11a/b/g and all wired connections
  exception for the 'WAN' port, so you should be able to see each other
  unless on is using the WAN (but then your Internet would probably be
  having problems, too.)

 Very interesting!  Will it work with netgear routers?

Some, to various degrees:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware

I've never tried it because I only own a old Linksys WRT54G.

-- 
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh


pgpVUw6EFArC7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OpenWRT on Netgear (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Waaaaaay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-()

2006-05-06 Thread Mick

On 06/05/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Very interesting!  Will it work with netgear routers?

Some, to various degrees:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware


Thanks, I've had a look and it seems to be work-in-progress.  When it
becomes stable I may have a go.
--
Regards,
Mick

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: OpenWRT on Netgear (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Waaaaaay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-()

2006-05-06 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Saturday 06 May 2006 05:20, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
about 'Re: OpenWRT on Netgear (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Waay [OT] 
Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-()':
 Thanks, I've had a look and it seems to be work-in-progress.  When it
 becomes stable I may have a go.

The project is a Work In Progress only as much as Linux is a work is 
progres: there's active development.  WhiteRussian (the latest release) is 
stable as a rock and has a lot of features.

Now, the Netgear support might not be ready yet.  Maybe that's just a 
feature they they have planned for the next release (not sure if the 
Kamikaze name is like Sid in Debian [always the name of UNSTABLE] or 
not...).  Of course, you can always try Kamakaze.  I've gotten it to build 
cleanly a number of times, but never had the drive to flash it on my WRT 
it.

-- 
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh


pgpDXjHF1imHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OpenWRT on Netgear (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Waaaaaay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-()

2006-05-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 10:20:00AM +, Mick wrote:
 
 Thanks, I've had a look and it seems to be work-in-progress.  When it
 becomes stable I may have a go.

I've been running White Russian RC3 for 9 months - zero problems.
-- 
It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a
clearer picture of reality than those who wield it.
  Noam Chomsky


pgpwU1Pcojpk2.pgp
Description: PGP signature