Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net syntax under new baselayout?
Hi Walter, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:19:10PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > config_eth0= The quote on the line below this should be moved up, so it looks like: config_eth0=" 192.168.123.249/29 broadcast 192.168.123.255 mtu 1454 169.254.1.3/16 broadcast 169.254.255.255" routes_eth0= Same here: routes_eth0=" default via 192.168.123.254 metric 2 192.168.123.248/29 via 192.168.123.254 metric 0 169.254.0.0/16 via 169.254.1.3 metric 0" Try that and write back if it doesn't work. William pgpUw2tYJwHdU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] etc/conf.d/net format ?
On 23 Feb 2009, at 13:14, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
...
So to fix this, I'd like to do some 'sleep' after /usr/bin/br2684ctl
has
executed.
Where is the syntax
br2684ctl_nas0= ...
explained and how can I insert some 'sleep'?
In my /etc/conf.d/net I have:
preup() {
if [[ ${IFACE} == "br0" ]] ;
then sleep 30 ;
fi
return 0
}
HTH,
Stroller.
Re: [gentoo-user] etc/conf.d/net format ?
On 23 Feb, Mike Kazantsev wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:31:18 +0500 > Mike Kazantsev wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:14:28 +0100 (CET) >> Helmut Jarausch wrote: >> >> > config_ppp0="ppp" # Runs /lib/rcscripts/net/pppd.sh >> > link_ppp0='nas0' # The name of the RFC2684 bridge interface >> >> I've never used "link_*" syntax to specify dependencies, prehaps it has >> been obsoleted and not working properly? >> >> Try: >> rc_need_ppp0="nas0" >> >> Certainly works for me. >> > > Sorry, I was too rash to send it away without looking at my actual net > file. You should specify init.d script name in rc_need, not just some > interface name, so it should look like this: > > rc_need_ppp0="net.nas0" > Thanks but removing the link_* didn't help. Furthermore it's suggested in the current net.example file -- Helmut Jarausch Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik RWTH - Aachen University D 52056 Aachen, Germany
Re: [gentoo-user] etc/conf.d/net format ?
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:31:18 +0500 Mike Kazantsev wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:14:28 +0100 (CET) > Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > > config_ppp0="ppp" # Runs /lib/rcscripts/net/pppd.sh > > link_ppp0='nas0' # The name of the RFC2684 bridge interface > > I've never used "link_*" syntax to specify dependencies, prehaps it has > been obsoleted and not working properly? > > Try: > rc_need_ppp0="nas0" > > Certainly works for me. > Sorry, I was too rash to send it away without looking at my actual net file. You should specify init.d script name in rc_need, not just some interface name, so it should look like this: rc_need_ppp0="net.nas0" -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] etc/conf.d/net format ?
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:14:28 +0100 (CET) Helmut Jarausch wrote: > config_ppp0="ppp" # Runs /lib/rcscripts/net/pppd.sh > link_ppp0='nas0' # The name of the RFC2684 bridge interface I've never used "link_*" syntax to specify dependencies, prehaps it has been obsoleted and not working properly? Try: rc_need_ppp0="nas0" Certainly works for me. -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net postup help
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:44:10 -0700, Grant wrote:
> >> postup() {
> >>set -xv
> >>if [[ ${IFACE} == "ath0" ]] ; then
> >>iwconfig ath0 rate 2M
> >>fi
> >>return 0
> >> }
> >
> > What is wrong, the syntax looks fine. Does running the iwconfig
> > manually after connection work?
>
> I can't test the computer that's having the issue right now, but it
> outputs some strange stuff like:
>
> /a/t/h/0/
Try it without the set line, this is not running in a bash shell. If you
need information as the script runs, echo it to a file and tail that
file.
--
Neil Bothwick
"Bother," said Pooh, more from force of habit than anything else.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net postup help
>> I've tried a lot of stuff but I can't seem to get the postup syntax
>> right:
>>
>> postup() {
>>set -xv
>>if [[ ${IFACE} == "ath0" ]] ; then
>>iwconfig ath0 rate 2M
>>fi
>>return 0
>> }
>
> What is wrong, the syntax looks fine. Does running the iwconfig manually
> after connection work?
I can't test the computer that's having the issue right now, but it
outputs some strange stuff like:
/a/t/h/0/
during boot and the rate isn't locked down. Running the command
manually definitely works. I can get more specific info on the output
tomorrow, but please let me know if anything pops into your head.
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net postup help
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:02:33 -0700, Grant wrote:
> I've tried a lot of stuff but I can't seem to get the postup syntax
> right:
>
> postup() {
>set -xv
>if [[ ${IFACE} == "ath0" ]] ; then
>iwconfig ath0 rate 2M
>fi
>return 0
> }
What is wrong, the syntax looks fine. Does running the iwconfig manually
after connection work?
--
Neil Bothwick
NOTICE:
-- THE ELEVATORS WILL BE OUT OF ORDER TODAY --
(The nearest working elevators are in the building
across the street.)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net postup help
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 12:02 -0700, Grant wrote:
> I've tried a lot of stuff but I can't seem to get the postup syntax right:
>
> postup() {
>set -xv
>if [[ ${IFACE} == "ath0" ]] ; then
>iwconfig ath0 rate 2M
>fi
>return 0
> }
>
> Can anybody help with this?
looks fine to me. What's happening, (or not)? Any error messages, or
any output at all? Maybe you're using iwconfig too soon (before
association), but I'm only geussing. Full paths could also help.
HTH,
--
Iain Buchanan
Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it
should be hard to understand.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net woes with baselayout2
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ egrep -v '^#|^$' /etc/conf.d/net > > iface_eth0="dhcp" > > iface_wlan0="dhcp" > > Those should be config_xxx="dhcp" > > > modules=( "iwconfig" ) > > And this should now be modules="iwconfig", although I inadvertently > left a couple of Bash arrays in mine and it still worked (and I think > iwconfig is the default for wireless anyway). Thanks Neil. I see now what happened - baselayout-2/openrc nuked my existing /etc/conf.d/net so I remade it, but used an old net.example for the syntax. Second time this has bitten me! -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net woes with baselayout2
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:38:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Does baselayout-2 use /etc/conf.d/net? It seems not from this: Yes, and with no changes needed here apart from the removal of Bash arrays. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 restart > * Bringing up interface wlan0 > * Configuring wireless network for wlan0 > * Scanning for access points > * Found "tania" at 00:60:B3:30:8D:AB, managed, encrypted > * Found "belkin54g" at 00:30:BD:99:D3:8B, managed > * Connecting to "tania" in managed mode (WEP enabled - > open) ... [ ok ] > * wlan0 connected to SSID "tania" at ** > * in managed mode (WEP enabled - open) > * No configuration specified; defaulting to DHCP > * dhcp ... > * Running > dhcpcd ... [ ok ] > * received address > 10.0.0.3/24 [ ok ] > > Note the "no configuration specified". However: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ egrep -v '^#|^$' /etc/conf.d/net > iface_eth0="dhcp" > iface_wlan0="dhcp" Those should be config_xxx="dhcp" > modules=( "iwconfig" ) And this should now be modules="iwconfig", although I inadvertently left a couple of Bash arrays in mine and it still worked (and I think iwconfig is the default for wireless anyway). > Has the location of the net init scripts changed? Not unless you count an earlier baselayout2 ebuild sometimes deleting /etc/conf.d/net when it shouldn't :( -- Neil Bothwick Programming just with goto's is like swatting flies with a sledgehammer. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 01:52 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > 060819 David Corbin wrote: > > I emerged a bunch of stuff this morning, and got this: > > "Gentoo is moving toward common config file for all network interfaces. > > I looked at /etc/conf.d/net.example & it's woefully unclear > > how I port my /etc/init.d/net.ppp0 to the new file/format. > > Yes, the dox are not as detailed as they sb. > To repeat my explanation to another troubled user a few weeks ago : Philip, Docs on /etc/conf.d/net are about as clear as mud from where I sit. The last thing I need to figure out is what exactly is the difference between config_eth0 and iface_eth0 entries? config_eth0 simply does not work for me at all - if the net cable is not plugged in, dhcp takes 60 seconds to time out. But iface_eth0 realizes in less than a second that there is no network cable and does the smart thing. I once found a note in some other obscure doc that iface_eth0 seems to be the syntax for ifconfig, while config_eth0 seems to be for iproute2. Can anyone confirm or deny this? alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net
060819 David Corbin wrote: > I emerged a bunch of stuff this morning, and got this: > "Gentoo is moving toward common config file for all network interfaces. > I looked at /etc/conf.d/net.example & it's woefully unclear > how I port my /etc/init.d/net.ppp0 to the new file/format. Yes, the dox are not as detailed as they sb. To repeat my explanation to another troubled user a few weeks ago : I needed 3 things to get it working : (1) in /etc/init.d , delete the old net.ppp0 (or rename it neutrally) & do 'ln -s net.lo net.ppp0' ; (2) do 'rc-update del net.eth0 default' 'rc-update add net.ppp0 default' (this is the bit which isn't adequately documented: anyone would think that both are simply symlinks to net.lo so what's the difference ? but in fact, it affects how Baselayout configures the connection); (3) create a new /etc/conf.d/net following net.example : mine is config_eth0=( "192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255" ) # We have to instruct ppp0 to actually use ppp config_ppp0=( "ppp" ) # Each PPP interface requires an interface to use as a "Link" link_ppp0="eth0" # PPPoE requires an ethernet interface # Specify what pppd plugins you want to use: plugins_ppp0=( "pppoe" ) # PPP requires at least a username. # It will use the password specified in /etc/ppp/*-secrets username_ppp0='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' pppd_ppp0=( "updetach" "defaultroute" ) I found the 2 items in the last line were required by testing items. You may need a bit of trial+error to get it right for your system+ISP. If you really can't get it to work, you can go on using Rp-pppoe: just omit/reverse steps (1-2) & restore your old /etc/conf.d/net ; there's a section in net.example confirming this. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net
On Saturday 19 August 2006 13:09, Pablo Antonio wrote: > Quick answer: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4 Well, I look there, and like the example file, there is nothing about ppp and where to put all the ppp options. The closest thing is the ADSL, but it's not really helpful to me. David -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net
Quick answer: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4 -- Pablo A. http://www.pablo-a.com.ar/ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
