subject:"Re\: \[gentoo\-user\] OpenOffice"


On 10/20/13 20:09, J. Roeleveld wrote:

  Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:

I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon l
og in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
one x86 and one amd64 are effected by this bug, two other system working normall
y :-/

  Sounds like a font issue.
  You could try 'emerge -vae small package showing this problem'
  I wouldn't try this with openoffice right away.
  --
  Joost
  --
  Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Do you mean:
emerge -vae app-office/openoffice-bin
or 
emerge -vae slim


In both cases I get 306 packages needs rebuilding, this will be a log way to 
try to fix this problem :-/

--
Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice-bin-4.0.1 - no menu text on top


On 10/20/13 20:09, J. Roeleveld wrote:

  Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:

I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon l
og in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
one x86 and one amd64 are effected by this bug, two other system working normall
y :-/

  Sounds like a font issue.
  You could try 'emerge -vae small package showing this problem'
  I wouldn't try this with openoffice right away.
  --
  Joost
  --
  Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


In addition I have tried fc-list and try to compare font on the same systems, 
they are all the same.

system called atom - not effected
system called syscon2 - effected by not showing text the menu.

All fonts that are in atom are present in syscon2 so I don't think this is 
problem with the fonts.

--
Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice-bin-4.0.1 - no menu text on top


On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:


I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon 
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.

How to go about this bug?
I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
one x86 and one amd64 are effected by this bug, two other system working 
normally :-/


Is there any helpful output on the console if you start LO from there?
What about revdep-rebuild?
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service.

Automation is man’s attempt of shaping work so that women can do it.


What is LO ?
I've tried to start the oowriter from the command line, there are no errors 
reported :-/


--
Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice-bin-4.0.1 - no menu text on top


On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:


I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon 
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.

How to go about this bug?
I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
one x86 and one amd64 are effected by this bug, two other system working 
normally :-/


Is there any helpful output on the console if you start LO from there?
What about revdep-rebuild?
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service.

Automation is man’s attempt of shaping work so that women can do it.



Solved.
This is a problem with xorg-server-1.14.3
Downgrading to x11-base/xorg-server-1.13.4-r1 solved the problem.

--
Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice-bin-4.0.1 - no menu text on top

2013-10-20 Thread J. Roeleveld

Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:

 I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
 First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password
text upon log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.

 How to go about this bug?
 I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
 one x86 and one amd64 are effected by this bug, two other system
working normally :-/

Is there any helpful output on the console if you start LO from there?
What about revdep-rebuild?
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook
service.

Automation is man’s attempt of shaping work so that women can do it.


Solved.
This is a problem with xorg-server-1.14.3
Downgrading to x11-base/xorg-server-1.13.4-r1 solved the problem.

-- 
Joseph

Glad to hear it.
I had similar issues in the past. Those were solved by a full rebuild.

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-29 Thread BRM

From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 I noticed this today:

 The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
 #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
 # /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
 # Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2011)
 # Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
 # app-office/openoffice - app-office/libreoffice
 # app-office/openoffice-bin - app-office/libreoffice-bin
 # app-text/wpd2sxw - app-text/wpd2odt
=app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1

 Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?

Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.

Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.

I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)

I wouldn't. While LibreOffice may have some advances at the moment, I'm still 
interested in following main-line OOo - now being setting under Apache.

Please do not force us to convert from OO to LO. I have no problem with 
separate installs for each, but there will be those (like me) that want the 
official OO installs.

That said, I have more confidence in Apache managing OO than I do TDF with LO, 
having observed TDF's mailing lists for several months (before finally dropping 
off in favor of Apache OO). I know others will have different opinions; but 
that (again) is why we should allow those using OO to remain using OO.

Ben

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-29 Thread Dale

BRM wrote:

From: Paul Hartmanpaul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com  wrote:

I noticed this today:

The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org  (27 Jul 2011)
# Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
# app-office/openoffice -  app-office/libreoffice
# app-office/openoffice-bin -  app-office/libreoffice-bin
# app-text/wpd2sxw -  app-text/wpd2odt

=app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1

Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?

Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.

Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.

I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)

I wouldn't. While LibreOffice may have some advances at the moment, I'm still 
interested in following main-line OOo - now being setting under Apache.

Please do not force us to convert from OO to LO. I have no problem with 
separate installs for each, but there will be those (like me) that want the 
official OO installs.

That said, I have more confidence in Apache managing OO than I do TDF with LO, 
having observed TDF's mailing lists for several months (before finally dropping 
off in favor of Apache OO). I know others will have different opinions; but 
that (again) is why we should allow those using OO to remain using OO.

Ben

If you want it to stay in the tree, you will have to find someone to 
maintain it or maintain it yourself.  Otherwise, it looks like OOo is 
going to be checking out pretty soon.  I would rather stay with OOo 
myself but I'm not a dev and to be honest, have no interest in being one 
either.

Just saying.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Paul Hartman

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 I noticed this today:

 The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
 #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
 # /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
 # Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2011)
 # Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
 # app-office/openoffice - app-office/libreoffice
 # app-office/openoffice-bin - app-office/libreoffice-bin
 # app-text/wpd2sxw - app-text/wpd2odt
=app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1


 Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?

Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.

Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.

I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Dale


Paul Hartman wrote:

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com  wrote:
   

I noticed this today:

The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org  (27 Jul 2011)
# Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
# app-office/openoffice -  app-office/libreoffice
# app-office/openoffice-bin -  app-office/libreoffice-bin
# app-text/wpd2sxw -  app-text/wpd2odt
 

=app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1
   


Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?
 

Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.

Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.

I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)

   


OK.  I just wanted to make sure I was reading that right.  I guess 
Openoffice is a thing of the past now.


Question, is libreoffice available on winders too?  I need to put that 
on my bro's rig to if it is.  My bro still uses winders.  I been waiting 
on him to get up some cash to build a new rig with Gentoo on it.  ;-)


Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread skiarxon

Yeap there is a version for windows and it works fine. :)

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Paul Hartman

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 Paul Hartman wrote:

 On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com  wrote:


 I noticed this today:

 The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
 #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
 # /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
 # Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org  (27 Jul 2011)
 # Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
 # app-office/openoffice -  app-office/libreoffice
 # app-office/openoffice-bin -  app-office/libreoffice-bin
 # app-text/wpd2sxw -  app-text/wpd2odt


 =app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1


 Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?


 Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.

 Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
 anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
 patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
 there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
 splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
 back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
 OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.

 I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)



 OK.  I just wanted to make sure I was reading that right.  I guess
 Openoffice is a thing of the past now.

 Question, is libreoffice available on winders too?  I need to put that on my
 bro's rig to if it is.  My bro still uses winders.  I been waiting on him to
 get up some cash to build a new rig with Gentoo on it.  ;-)

Yep, I use it on my Windows 7 machine at work, everything is fine.
Also available for Macintosh users (or Mac as they seem to call it
these days).

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Mick

On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
  Paul Hartman wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com  wrote:
  I noticed this today:
  
  The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
  #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
  # /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
  # Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org  (27 Jul 2011)
  # Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
  # app-office/openoffice -  app-office/libreoffice
  # app-office/openoffice-bin -  app-office/libreoffice-bin
  # app-text/wpd2sxw -  app-text/wpd2odt
  
  =app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1
  
  Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?
  
  Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.
  
  Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
  anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
  patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
  there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
  splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
  back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
  OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.
  
  I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)
  
  OK.  I just wanted to make sure I was reading that right.  I guess
  Openoffice is a thing of the past now.
  
  Question, is libreoffice available on winders too?  I need to put that on
  my bro's rig to if it is.  My bro still uses winders.  I been waiting on
  him to get up some cash to build a new rig with Gentoo on it.  ;-)
 
 Yep, I use it on my Windows 7 machine at work, everything is fine.
 Also available for Macintosh users (or Mac as they seem to call it
 these days).

All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and 
on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Kfir Lavi

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
   Paul Hartman wrote:
   On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com  wrote:
   I noticed this today:
  
   The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
   #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
   # /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
   # Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org  (27 Jul 2011)
   # Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
   # app-office/openoffice -  app-office/libreoffice
   # app-office/openoffice-bin -  app-office/libreoffice-bin
   # app-text/wpd2sxw -  app-text/wpd2odt
  
   =app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1
  
   Does this mean that libreoffice is going to replace OOo in the tree?
  
   Looks like it. It has already replaced it on all my computers.
  
   Gentoo's OpenOffice has included the go-oo patches for a long time
   anyway, which were the big thing changed about LibreOffice (those
   patches included in mainline), and using the two I can honestly say
   there's really no difference as far as I can tell, aside from the
   splash screen. Somebody posted about some Sun templates a while
   back... maybe something proprietary like that is changed, but
   OpenTemplate.org is meant to replace those anyway.
  
   I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)
  
   OK.  I just wanted to make sure I was reading that right.  I guess
   Openoffice is a thing of the past now.
  
   Question, is libreoffice available on winders too?  I need to put that
 on
   my bro's rig to if it is.  My bro still uses winders.  I been waiting
 on
   him to get up some cash to build a new rig with Gentoo on it.  ;-)
 
  Yep, I use it on my Windows 7 machine at work, everything is fine.
  Also available for Macintosh users (or Mac as they seem to call it
  these days).

 All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge
 and
 on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
 --
 Regards,
 Mick

Yes,
but give it a credit. This big monster of code, compiles without a hitch.

KFir

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Paul Hartman

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and
 on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.

Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the
emerge process.

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Mick

On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
  All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
  emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
 
 Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
 my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the
 emerge process.

By about +3G may be more!
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Tanstaafl

On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
 emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.

 Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
 my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the
 emerge process.

 By about +3G may be more!

I think this is not so with the new 3.4.x versions...

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Dale


Tanstaafl wrote:

On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com  wrote:
   

On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
 

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com  wrote:
   

All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
 
   

Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the
emerge process.
   
   

By about +3G may be more!
 

I think this is not so with the new 3.4.x versions...


   


This is so far.

root@fireball / # du -shc /var/tmp/portage/app-office/
2.6G/var/tmp/portage/app-office/
2.6Gtotal
root@fireball /

It's not done yet either.  My /var is at 94% so I am moving some 
http-rep* stuff out of the way.  One of these days, I'm just going to 
mount it on tmpfs and let it rip.  lol


Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?

2011-07-28 Thread Bill Kenworthy

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
 Tanstaafl wrote:
  On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com  wrote:
 
  On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
   
  On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com  wrote:
 
  All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
  emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
   
 
  Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
  my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the
  emerge process.
 
 
  By about +3G may be more!
   
  I think this is not so with the new 3.4.x versions...
 
 
 
 
 This is so far.
 
 root@fireball / # du -shc /var/tmp/portage/app-office/
 2.6G/var/tmp/portage/app-office/
 2.6Gtotal
 root@fireball /
 
 It's not done yet either.  My /var is at 94% so I am moving some 
 http-rep* stuff out of the way.  One of these days, I'm just going to 
 mount it on tmpfs and let it rip.  lol
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)
 

For systems without enough space I just map some more with nfs (before
you start obviously) - yes it is a lot slower, and you need a reliable
network with nfs over tcp for best reliability but it works fine. 

BillK

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice remerge failed

2011-07-24 Thread Stéphane Guedon

On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:27:34 Mick wrote:
 It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
 very last minute!
 
 It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS=-j1 but just
 in case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
 ===
 =
 Building module xmlsecurity
 
 Entering /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/inc
 mkout -- version: 1.8
 
 Entering /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/mscrypt
 
 Entering /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss
 Compiling: xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenvironment_nssimpl.cxx
 In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-
 v4/string:41,
  from /usr/include/unicode/std_string.h:39,
  from /usr/include/unicode/unistr.h:31,
  from /usr/include/unicode/strenum.h:14,
  from /usr/include/unicode/uenum.h:24,
  from /usr/include/unicode/ucnv.h:51,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:31,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:807,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/globals.h:18,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/threads.h:35,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlmemory.h:218,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/tree.h:1248,
  from /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/solver/320/unxlngx6.pro/inc/external/xmlsec/xm
 lsec.h:18, from /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenviron
 ment_nssimpl.hxx:64, from /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenviron
 ment_nssimpl.cxx:38:
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:44:
 error: template with C linkage
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:47:
 error: template with C linkage
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:50:
 error: template with C linkage
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:54:
 error: template specialization with C linkage
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:59:
 error: template specialization with C linkage
 In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-
 v4/bits/char_traits.h:42,
  from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-
 v4/string:42,
  from /usr/include/unicode/std_string.h:39,
  from /usr/include/unicode/unistr.h:31,
  from /usr/include/unicode/strenum.h:14,
  from /usr/include/unicode/uenum.h:24,
  from /usr/include/unicode/ucnv.h:51,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:31,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:807,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/globals.h:18,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/threads.h:35,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlmemory.h:218,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/tree.h:1248,
  from /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/solver/320/unxlngx6.pro/inc/external/xmlsec/xm
 lsec.h:18, from /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenviron
 ment_nssimpl.hxx:64, from /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-
 r1/work/ooo/build/OOO320_m19/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenviron
 ment_nssimpl.cxx:38:
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/postypes.h:111:
 error: template with C linkage
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/postypes.h:214:
 error: template with C linkage
 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-v4/bits/postypes.h:219:
 error: template with C linkage
 In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/include/g++-
 v4/string:42,
  from /usr/include/unicode/std_string.h:39,
  from /usr/include/unicode/unistr.h:31,
  from /usr/include/unicode/strenum.h:14,
  from /usr/include/unicode/uenum.h:24,
  from /usr/include/unicode/ucnv.h:51,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:31,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:807,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/globals.h:18,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/threads.h:35,
  from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlmemory.h:218,
  from

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice remerge failed

2011-07-24 Thread Dale


Mick wrote:

It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
very last minute!

It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS=-j1 but just in
case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
  SNIP
Before I start again, shall I switch to libreoffice-3.3.1 or is it not yet as
polished as OOo?
   


I found a post on the forums that mentioned disabling the nsplugin as a 
fix.  You may want to try that if it is not a really long compile for 
you.  If it is a long one, may want to wait and see if anyone else 
thinks this will work.


Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice and IDL

2011-02-02 Thread Dale


Bill Kenworthy wrote:

I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
(actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
build hangs.

Anyone seen this before? - it is happening on only one of my systems and
I google isnt showing me any similar situations.

BillK

   


Since that is a huge package to build, you got enough memory?  How about 
drive space on portages work directory?  May want to check with top and 
df to see if one of those is causing problems.


May not help but worth checking.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice and IDL

2011-02-02 Thread Alan McKinnon

Apparently, though unproven, at 06:14 on Thursday 03 February 2011, Dale did 
opine thusly:

 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
  I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
  (actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
  build hangs.
  
  Anyone seen this before? - it is happening on only one of my systems and
  I google isnt showing me any similar situations.
  
  BillK
 
 Since that is a huge package to build, you got enough memory?  How about
 drive space on portages work directory?  May want to check with top and
 df to see if one of those is causing problems.

Also try build with j=-1

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice and IDL

2011-02-02 Thread Bill Kenworthy

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 07:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
 Apparently, though unproven, at 06:14 on Thursday 03 February 2011, Dale did 
 opine thusly:
 
  Bill Kenworthy wrote:
   I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
   (actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
   build hangs.
   
   Anyone seen this before? - it is happening on only one of my systems and
   I google isnt showing me any similar situations.
   
   BillK
  
  Since that is a huge package to build, you got enough memory?  How about
  drive space on portages work directory?  May want to check with top and
  df to see if one of those is causing problems.
 
 Also try build with j=-1
 

Done that, plus ~210 gigabytes spare, tried no ccache, blank cflags etc
etc, and its built successfully many times on this machine - up until a
month or so ago.

However, I'm running python-updater as Ive discovered a few other things
are not working, so its probably some obscure part of the build
chain/supporting apps is broken.

Billk

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice-3.1.0: nsplugin USE flag does nothing?

2009-06-16 Thread Alan McKinnon

On Tuesday 16 June 2009 18:23:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
 I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged.  Curiously,
 nothing changed.  There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11).  Am I
 missing something obvious?  I'm on AMD64.

 OOo has been emerged with following USE flags:

 bash-completion dbus gtk linguas_en linguas_en_US nsplugin

I also don't know what it does, but I do know I had to remove the flag to get 
OOo to build since about 4 months ago.

More info at bug 256773. Perhaps you can make sense of it and even get your 
question answered, it's all a bit over my head.

I would assume that USE=nsplugin gives you browser plugins to view OOo files. 
It's a major hassle but have you looked in the emerge log for clues? Perhaps 
the plugins couldn't be built and th reason is buried deep in that massive 
build log. 

You might even need to MAKEOPTS=-j1 to get a sane order in the log ... :-)

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice-3.1.0: nsplugin USE flag does nothing?

2009-06-16 Thread Paul Hartman

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged.  Curiously,
 nothing changed.  There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11).  Am I
 missing something obvious?  I'm on AMD64.

 OOo has been emerged with following USE flags:

 bash-completion dbus gtk linguas_en linguas_en_US nsplugin

I seem to recall some issue where OOo was building the plugin against
a different xulrunner when you have both 1.8 and 1.9 installed. In
other words maybe it build the FF2 plug-in instead of FF3? If that is
even possible. I could be totally wrong. :)

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice 3.0.0 with dead keys

2009-05-08 Thread Florian Philipp

Jim Cunning schrieb:
 I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented 
 characters (e.g., ´   + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts 
 and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and 
 other windows, but the dead key combinations in OpenOffice are simply 
 dead--no characters produced at all.  When switching back to the US layout 
 without dead keys, the same key presses to OpenOffice produce two characters, 
 as one would expect.
 
 I do this all the time with OpenOffice on my laptop with openSUSE 10.3.  Is 
 there something I´ve not setup correctly on my gentoo system?

What USE flags are set for Openoffice? Does openoffice-bin have the same
problem?

Since you can't have both of them installed, use quickpkg to make a
binary package of your openoffice installation before unmerging it.
Then try out openoffice-bin. When you want your old version back, use
emerge -k openoffice to install from the binary package.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice 3.0.0 with dead keys

2009-05-08 Thread Dave Jones

Jim Cunning wrote on 08/05/09 06:49:
 I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
 characters (e.g., ´   + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
 layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
 kmail and other windows, but the dead key combinations in OpenOffice are
 simply dead--no characters produced at all.  When switching back to the
 US layout without dead keys, the same key presses to OpenOffice produce
 two characters, as one would expect.

 I do this all the time with OpenOffice on my laptop with openSUSE 10.3. 
 Is there something I´ve not setup correctly on my gentoo system?
 Did you remember to compile OpenOffice with LINGUAS=fr? May be
 something to consider adding to your make.conf to get around
 language/localization issues.

 I'm not sure that's what I need.  I would like OpenOffice to be in English, 
 not French, but do want to be able to enter accented characters as used in 
 French, German, etc., when I select the us-intl keyboard layout.  

Using KDE 3.5.9, OOo 3.0.0 USE='cups dbus gtk java kde ldap linguas_en
linguas_en_GB nsplugin opengl pam'

International keyboard support changed recently with the upgrade to xorg
 1.5.3 with evdev.  Before the xorg  upgrade, I had the international
keyboard layout specified in my xorg.conf:

Section InputDevice
 Identifier  Keyboard0
 Driver  kbd
 Option  XkbLayout us_intl # Enable accents
EndSection

If you're using the (default) evdev interface you should comment out the
old style input devices for your keyboard and mouse in xorg.conf.

Since implementing xorg 1.5.3 with evdev, I use the KDE keyboard tool to
change the keyboard layout 'on the fly'.

In KDE I've set up my keyboard as a generic 105 key international, with
two layouts: US and US International.

With the keyboard set to US International using KDE keyboard tool, the
deadkey combinations produce accented characters as expected.

Hope this helps.

Cheers, Dave

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice 3.0.0 with dead keys

2009-05-07 Thread Jim Cunning

On Monday 04 May 2009 18:10:50 Saphirus Sage wrote:
 Jim Cunning wrote:
  I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
  characters (e.g., ´   + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
  layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
  kmail and other windows, but the dead key combinations in OpenOffice are
  simply dead--no characters produced at all.  When switching back to the
  US layout without dead keys, the same key presses to OpenOffice produce
  two characters, as one would expect.
 
  I do this all the time with OpenOffice on my laptop with openSUSE 10.3. 
  Is there something I´ve not setup correctly on my gentoo system?

 Did you remember to compile OpenOffice with LINGUAS=fr? May be
 something to consider adding to your make.conf to get around
 language/localization issues.

I'm not sure that's what I need.  I would like OpenOffice to be in English, 
not French, but do want to be able to enter accented characters as used in 
French, German, etc., when I select the us-intl keyboard layout.  

Where can I get documentation on the environment variables OpenOffice build 
uses, and how OpenOffice uses alternate keyboard layouts?  I've googled, but 
nothing I've encountered describes how to avoid my situation.
-- 
Jim


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice 3.0.0 with dead keys

2009-05-04 Thread Saphirus Sage

Jim Cunning wrote:
 I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented 
 characters (e.g., ´   + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts 
 and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and 
 other windows, but the dead key combinations in OpenOffice are simply 
 dead--no characters produced at all.  When switching back to the US layout 
 without dead keys, the same key presses to OpenOffice produce two characters, 
 as one would expect.

 I do this all the time with OpenOffice on my laptop with openSUSE 10.3.  Is 
 there something I´ve not setup correctly on my gentoo system?
   
Did you remember to compile OpenOffice with LINGUAS=fr? May be
something to consider adding to your make.conf to get around
language/localization issues.

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice 3.0.0 with dead keys

2009-05-04 Thread Saphirus Sage

Jim Cunning wrote:
 I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented 
 characters (e.g., ´   + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts 
 and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and 
 other windows, but the dead key combinations in OpenOffice are simply 
 dead--no characters produced at all.  When switching back to the US layout 
 without dead keys, the same key presses to OpenOffice produce two characters, 
 as one would expect.

 I do this all the time with OpenOffice on my laptop with openSUSE 10.3.  Is 
 there something I´ve not setup correctly on my gentoo system?
   
(Resending, due to SMTP failure notice)

Did you remember to compile OpenOffice with LINGUAS=fr? May be
something to consider adding to your make.conf to get around
language/localization issues.

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice-bin spellchecker not working

2008-12-02 Thread Robin Atwood

On Monday 01 Dec 2008, Fernando Antunes wrote:
 2008/12/1 James [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Any ideas how to fix?
 
  ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and  aspell-en are
  all installed.
 
  James, ooo 3 use extensions  to install dictionaries.
 
 
 
  James

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-711397-highlight-openoffice.html?sid=83d3c5c7c6cee4cdef59a8b447b5e343

HTH
-- 
--
Robin Atwood

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice-bin spellchecker not working

2008-12-01 Thread Fernando Antunes

2008/12/1 James [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Any ideas how to fix?

 ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and  aspell-en are
 all installed.

 James, ooo 3 use extensions  to install dictionaries.



 James

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
 On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
  SO please check how much available memory you have

 I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.

 So, I killed firefox to free up memory and let it build overnight. The build
 completed successfully. Perhaps it was a memory issue.

 I'm starting to think that ebuilds need available memory requirements. Don't
 build this without 1Gig of free memory, etc...

There is this in the Openoffice ebuild
# Check if we have enough RAM and free diskspace to build this beast
CHECKREQS_MEMORY=512
use debug  CHECKREQS_DISK_BUILD=8192 || CHECKREQS_DISK_BUILD=5120
check_reqs

I have one observation and one doubt
Observation: more packages should have warnings against this. GCC 4.3
needs more than 1.5GiB of disk space to build, at least with the USE
flags fortran gcj gtk mudflap openmp.

Doubt: don't you have enough swap? Does Openoffice need so much memory
that even with swap it failed?

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-21 Thread Redouane Boumghar

ha ha ! :)

Ok thanks for the GWB citations
there is one I love too :

I beleive that fish and human being can coexist !
GWB
At Some Conference where he had random access.

Ok by the way the RAM doesn't seem to be a problem
since Micheal(?) has 1GB and I hope 256 MB were at least free during the
compilation time.

Good luck.

I am misunderestimating g_dgettext function !!!
I've got lots of broken packages missing reference to that function.
oh well..

Red.


On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:57:38AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
 Redouane Boumghar wrote:
 Hello everyone,

 I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.

 so we overestimated it then?

 They misunderestimated me.
 George W. Bush
 November 6, 2000
 Comment made in Bentonville, Arkansas.

 Those who think that they can say we're only going to have a stimulus
 package, but let's forget tax relief, misunderestimate -- excuse me,
 underestimate (laughter) -- just making sure you were paying attention.  
 You
 were.
 George W. Bush
 March 29, 2001
 White House press conference.

 not that I'm comparing you to GWB :) no offense intended, it just made me 
 chuckle :)
 -- 
 Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

 Cleanliness is next to impossible.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-21 Thread Michael P. Soulier

On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
 On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
  SO please check how much available memory you have
 
 I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.

So, I killed firefox to free up memory and let it build overnight. The build
completed successfully. Perhaps it was a memory issue.

I'm starting to think that ebuilds need available memory requirements. Don't
build this without 1Gig of free memory, etc...

Anywho, it works now. 

Mike
-- 
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
--Albert Einstein


pgpIfVgX32kkA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-21 Thread Paul Hartman

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Daniel Pielmeier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 2008/11/21 Paul Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
 don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.


 So what do you think are the following SRC_URI's from the current
 openoffice-3 for?

You're absolutely right. When I emerged Ooo 3.x, I did not notice it
pull anything but maybe it was just background downloaded. On
Go-oo.org, the source code download link is for 2.x series. Apparently
they have 3.x and just aren't publicizing it. I have been shamed. :P

Paul

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-21 Thread Joshua Murphy

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
 On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
  SO please check how much available memory you have

 I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.

 So, I killed firefox to free up memory and let it build overnight. The build
 completed successfully. Perhaps it was a memory issue.

 I'm starting to think that ebuilds need available memory requirements. Don't
 build this without 1Gig of free memory, etc...

 Anywho, it works now.

 Mike
 --
 Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
 touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
 --Albert Einstein

Both RAM and disk space are non-issues on my system[1] and last
night's ooo rebuild still managed to fail (too far away from my logs
to see that error easily, but pretty sure it was module 'sw' rather
than 'chart2'). I restarted it this morning, but didn't get to stay
and watch... and I'll be out of town all weekend. Maybe next week I'll
have time to see if it's willing to cooperate... same general error
message as OP, but different place in the build.

[1] 4GB ram, less than 1gb used when I'm not compiling, and I was
building ooo with portage temp pointed toward my half-empty 500GB
drive (since it wasn't going to fit in tmpfs like nearly everything
else does).

-- 
Poison [BLX]
Joshua M. Murphy

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Qian Qiao

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:39, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [snip]

 Anyone see this before?

 Thanks,
 Mike

To quote the error message:

* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
 * relevant.
 * A complete build log is located at
 * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at
 * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/environment'.

Joe

-- 
There are 3 kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and
those who can't.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:

 To quote the error message:
 
 * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
  * relevant.
  * A complete build log is located at
  * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
  * The ebuild environment file is located at
  * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/environment'.

Sorry...

Running processes: 0
deliver -- version: 1.130
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 261 files copied, 0 files unchanged

1 module(s): 
chart2
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/work/ooo/build/ooo300-m9/chart2/source/controller/chartapiwrapper

Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your
the build issuing command build --from chart2

rmdir /tmp/24595
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
 * 
 * ERROR: app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *   ebuild.sh, line   49:  Called src_compile
 * environment, line 5415:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *   make || die Build failed
 *  The die message:
 *   Build failed

I have -java in my USE flags...

MIke
-- 
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
--Albert Einstein


pgpnw7fLqXd4K.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread deface


Michael P. Soulier wrote:

On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:

  

To quote the error message:

* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
 * relevant.
 * A complete build log is located at
 * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at
 * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/environment'.



Sorry...

Running processes: 0
deliver -- version: 1.130
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 261 files copied, 0 files unchanged

1 module(s): 
chart2

need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/work/ooo/build/ooo300-m9/chart2/source/controller/chartapiwrapper

Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your
the build issuing command build --from chart2

rmdir /tmp/24595
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
 * 
 * ERROR: app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 failed.

 * Call stack:
 *   ebuild.sh, line   49:  Called src_compile
 * environment, line 5415:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *   make || die Build failed
 *  The die message:
 *   Build failed

I have -java in my USE flags...

MIke
  

Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Qian Qiao

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:48, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
 Running processes: 0
 deliver -- version: 1.130
 Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 261 files copied, 0 files unchanged

 1 module(s):
chart2
 need(s) to be rebuilt

 Reason(s):

 ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
 /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/work/ooo/build/ooo300-m9/chart2/source/controller/chartapiwrapper

 Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your
 the build issuing command build --from chart2

 rmdir /tmp/24595
 make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
  *
  * ERROR: app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 failed.
  * Call stack:
  *   ebuild.sh, line   49:  Called src_compile
  * environment, line 5415:  Called die
  * The specific snippet of code:
  *   make || die Build failed
  *  The die message:
  *   Build failed

 I have -java in my USE flags...

That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
actual error in build.log, or attach it.

-- Joe

-- 
There are 3 kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and
those who can't.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:

 Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin

Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into 
your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.

Bye...

Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs  | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanheimerstraße 68  | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40468 Düsseldorf  | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Florian Philipp

Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
 Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
 
 Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
 
 Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into 
 your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
 
 Bye...
 
   Dirk



..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
http://go-oo.org/discover/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Dirk Uys

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dirk Heinrichs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:

 Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin

 Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
 your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.

 Bye...
 --
 Dirk Heinrichs

Saying compiling OO is idiotic is a bit harsh and a generalization,
but there are merit to the underlying idea.

First off, as far as I can remember, compiling OO from source and
installing the binary version is not exactly the same. The source one
install OO from go-oo.org while the binary package is the normal Sun
OO.

Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
on the hardware you are doing this on using a binary package that
most likely doesn't fit into your otherwise self-compiled system may
not be that idiotic.

Regards
Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:

 Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
 build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
 on the hardware you are doing this on using a binary package that
 most likely doesn't fit into your otherwise self-compiled system may
 not be that idiotic.

If my hardware is not compilation friendly, I'd use a binary distribution and 
end up with an OOo that fits into the system (given that the maintainers of 
the chosen distribution also compiled the package from sources).

Bye...

Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs  | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanheimerstraße 68  | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40468 Düsseldorf  | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

On 20/11/08 deface said:
 Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin

Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that. 

Mind you, I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using
Gentoo. I'm getting quite a mixed message here. 

Mike
-- 
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
--Albert Einstein


pgpumGkY4q74U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Philip Webb

081120 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
 On 20/11/08 deface said:
 Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
 Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that. 
 I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using Gentoo.
 I'm getting quite a mixed message here. 

Don't feed trolls, esp when they don't give a real name in their messages.

I compiled OO 3.0.0 without any problem, but I do include Java.
You should take the advice you got at first  search out the real error,
also check the Gentoo Forum  Bugzilla because others may have hit this too.
Otherwise, try compiling with Java (and any extra pkgs that requires).

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Redouane Boumghar

Hello everyone,

I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
I had the same problem, I could not compile openoffice.
I just had the same warning message and the merge stopped.
I only had 512 of RAM from which 128 are used by my graphic card,
and with the system running it wasn't enough RAM room for Ooo to
compile (at least 256 MB ?!).

ANyway I bought myself a 1GB RAM card and that's it,
I could emerge openoffice and, yesterday, I have successfully compiled
it in like 4 hours hehe !

SO please check how much available memory you have

Be Pleasant, nothing is idiotic, it's just a matter of choice ;-)
Red.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 07:48:18AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:

To quote the error message:

* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
* relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
* '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
* '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/environment'.

Sorry...

Running processes: 0
deliver -- version: 1.130
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 261 files copied, 0 files unchanged

1 module(s):
chart2
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/work/ooo/build/ooo300-m9/chart2/source/controller/chartapiwrapper

Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your
the build issuing command build --from chart2

rmdir /tmp/24595
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
*
* ERROR: app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 5415: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* make || die Build failed
* The die message:
* Build failed

I have -java in my USE flags...

MIke
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
--Albert Einstein

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:

 That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
 actual error in build.log, or attach it.

http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz

Mike
-- 
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
--Albert Einstein


pgp1hbvb0Q8m9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
 SO please check how much available memory you have

I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.

I've had issues in the past with Gentoo on small memory systems, but if that's
the problem here, it's the first time it's happened since install.

Mike


pgpLtopTlap3G.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 15:51:54 schrieb ext Michael P. Soulier:
 On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
  That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
  actual error in build.log, or attach it.

 http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz

So you should add this part of it to the bug you've already created:

/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/work/ooo/build/ooo300-
m9/chart2/source/controller/dialogs
Running processes: 2
--
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/ObjectNameProvider.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/DataSeriesPointWrapper.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/TimerTriggeredControllerLock.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/ChangingResource.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/DataBrowser.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/DiagramWrapper.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/DataBrowserModel.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/GridWrapper.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/DialogModel.obj
Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/LegendWrapper.obj
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1013: Error: invalid character (0x16) in operand 1
{standard input}:9931: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
{standard input}:9931: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized 
character is `%'
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
'../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/LegendWrapper.obj'
Running processes: 1

Bye...

Dirk

BTW: grep -i error the_log_file would have helped a lot.
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs  | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanheimerstraße 68  | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40468 Düsseldorf  | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Dale

Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
 Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:

   
 Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
 build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
 on the hardware you are doing this on using a binary package that
 most likely doesn't fit into your otherwise self-compiled system may
 not be that idiotic.
 

 If my hardware is not compilation friendly, I'd use a binary distribution and 
 end up with an OOo that fits into the system (given that the maintainers of 
 the chosen distribution also compiled the package from sources).

 Bye...

   Dirk
   

I agree, if you are going to use a OS that is source based, you need to
be source based.  It may take 6 or 7 hours to compile OOo on my rig but
everything on my system is compiled as far as I know.

Also, isn't whether a person uses a binary or not up the the person in
the chair?  Why is it that every time someone comes here to get help
with OOo that a comment is made to install the binary?  That is not
exactly a fix for the problem.  I have read about problems with the
binary version too and the compiled version will work fine.  Let the
person that owns the puter make up their own mind.  It's not our place
to tell them what packages to install unless they ask.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Iain Buchanan


Florian Philipp wrote:


..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
http://go-oo.org/discover/


oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!

--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

BOFH Excuse #414:

tachyon emissions overloading the system

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Paul Hartman

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Florian Philipp wrote:

 ..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
 http://go-oo.org/discover/

 oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!

This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing

2008-11-20 Thread Iain Buchanan


Redouane Boumghar wrote:

Hello everyone,

I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.


so we overestimated it then?

They misunderestimated me.
George W. Bush
November 6, 2000
Comment made in Bentonville, Arkansas.

Those who think that they can say we're only going to have a stimulus
package, but let's forget tax relief, misunderestimate -- excuse me,
underestimate (laughter) -- just making sure you were paying attention.  You
were.
George W. Bush
March 29, 2001
White House press conference.

not that I'm comparing you to GWB :) no offense intended, it just made 
me chuckle :)

--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

Cleanliness is next to impossible.

Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice emerge failing