Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:38, Richard Fish wrote: On 8/24/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not using the symlink flag and just to make sure I removed the /usr/src/linux symlink and relinked it to the latest stable kernel sources. The only thing I can think of is that I used make oldconfig, when I compiled a kernel with those sources - does it matter? I wouldn't think so... I've looked into it a bit more. The error refers to autoconf.h: === KLIBCAS klibc/syscalls/umask.o KLIBCAS klibc/syscalls/chroot.o In file included from linux/include/linux/linkage.h:4, from linux/include/asm/signal.h:5, from include/signal.h:13, from klibc/fork.c:9: linux/include/linux/config.h:6:28: warning: linux/include/linux/autoconf.h: Permission denied linux/include/linux/config.h:6:28: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory KLIBCAS klibc/syscalls/symlink.o make[2]: *** [klibc/fork.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs === Looking at the access rights only root can play with it: -rw--- 1 root root 47664 Aug 24 20:44 autoconf.h Just in case, what's the autoconf.h access rights on your boxen? -- Regards, Mick pgpT5RmVWWdnY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On 8/25/06, Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just in case, what's the autoconf.h access rights on your boxen? $ ll /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r5/include/linux/autoconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40K 19 Aug 2006 13:25 /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r5/include/linux/autoconf.h ditto -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On Friday 25 August 2006 18:46, Richard Fish wrote: On 8/25/06, Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just in case, what's the autoconf.h access rights on your boxen? $ ll /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r5/include/linux/autoconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40K 19 Aug 2006 13:25 /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r5/include/linux/autoconf.h ditto Thank you both. I find this really odd. I happen to have three kernel sources on this laptop. This is what they show: == # ls -la /usr/src/linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r13/include/linux/autoconf.h -rw--- 1 root root 46596 Jul 19 11:10 /usr/src/linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r13/include/linux/autoconf.h # ls -la /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r4/include/linux/autoconf.h -rw--- 1 root root 47664 Aug 24 20:44 /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r4/include/linux/autoconf.h # ls -la /usr/src/linux-2.6.18-rc4/include/linux/autoconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18921 Aug 15 14:04 /usr/src/linux-2.6.18-rc4/include/linux/autoconf.h == Can anyone explain this . . . ? -- Regards, Mick pgp8QeMQJJRUV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
Mick wrote: Any ideas at all, please? Tried bugs.gentoo.org? If you don't find it there yet, file a new bug. Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On 8/23/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas at all, please? I'm pretty sure both of these require configured kernel sources. They should have checks for this, but I guess those checks could be confused. Does /usr/src/linux point to a configured kernel? Are you using the symlink use flag? (which could be the culprit in this case) -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On Thursday 24 August 2006 07:24, Richard Fish wrote: I'm pretty sure both of these require configured kernel sources. They should have checks for this, but I guess those checks could be confused. Does /usr/src/linux point to a configured kernel? Are you using the symlink use flag? (which could be the culprit in this case) Thanks Richard, I am not using the symlink flag and just to make sure I removed the /usr/src/linux symlink and relinked it to the latest stable kernel sources. The only thing I can think of is that I used make oldconfig, when I compiled a kernel with those sources - does it matter? -- Regards, Mick pgpqz0JNE5YHZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On 8/24/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not using the symlink flag and just to make sure I removed the /usr/src/linux symlink and relinked it to the latest stable kernel sources. The only thing I can think of is that I used make oldconfig, when I compiled a kernel with those sources - does it matter? I wouldn't think so... -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Neither klibc nor splashutils will emerge
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:38, Richard Fish wrote: On 8/24/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not using the symlink flag and just to make sure I removed the /usr/src/linux symlink and relinked it to the latest stable kernel sources. The only thing I can think of is that I used make oldconfig, when I compiled a kernel with those sources - does it matter? I wouldn't think so... Thanks, I've filed a bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145016 -- Regards, Mick pgpYx23uInN9N.pgp Description: PGP signature
