[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geoserver-master #4629

2017-04-25 Thread monitor 
See 

--
[...truncated 106568 lines...]
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'RoadSegments', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Geometryless', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Forests', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Lakes', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'NamedPlaces', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Bridges', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Buildings', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Ponds', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'BasicPolygons', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'MapNeatline', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Streams', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'DividedRoutes', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded store 'cgf', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Polygons', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'MPolygons', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'MPoints', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Lines', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Points', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'MLines', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded store 'cdf', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Nulls', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Inserts', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Locks', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Fifteen', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Other', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Updates', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Seven', enabled
Apr 26, 2017 4:30:34 AM org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersister log
INFO: Loaded feature type 'Deletes', enabled
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.654 sec

Results :

Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:jar (default-jar) @ gs-dxf-wps ---
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:test-jar (default) @ gs-dxf-wps ---
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-source-plugin:2.2.1:jar-no-fork (attach-sources) @ gs-dxf-wps 
---
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-source-plugin:2.2.1:test-jar-no-fork (attach-sources) @ 
gs-dxf-wps ---
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.4:install (default-install) @ gs-dxf-wps ---
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/geoserver/extension/gs-dxf-wps/2.12-SNAPSHOT/gs-dxf-wps-2.12-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/geoserver/extension/gs-dxf-wps/2.12-SNA

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Modest code complete for CSS styling

2017-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett 
That looks great Andrea, we did something similar for YSLD for one of our
products - using a REST api to access the function list. I would be happy
to port that over if you think you could make use of it.

--
Jody Garnett

On 25 April 2017 at 06:04, Andrea Aime  wrote:

> Hi,
> in my spare time I am playing with writing a large-ish set of CSS styles
> for a basemap and found
> that I'm really missing code completion.
>
> So I looked into what code mirror has to offer, and adding support for our
> custom
> variant of CSS is not hard and works reasonably well (for modest
> ambitions), .e.g:
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
> [image: Inline image 3]
>
> Let me qualify "modest" ambitions:
>
>- There is no CQL autocomplete support
>- The list of values for a given property is not context sensitive, it
>just gives you all possible values for all possible propeties
>- The few function like values (url, symbol, color-map-entry) just
>complete as "keyword(" and you have to add the rest manually
>
> Of course it can be improved with some time and JS skills, but I believe
> even this small contribution is a big improvement compared to no completion
> at all.
> Pull request here (I'll add a ticket and fix the commit before merging of
> course):
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2283
>
> I checked how this plays with other languages, and it seems it's not
> interfering, you just get no completion on CTRL-SPACE.
> Then, I looked at adding support for other languages too and ... well..
> what I've found seem to require a lot of effort, at
> least for SLD.
>
> XML completion is available, but one needs to define a schema-like data
> structure in JSON, and then setup
> some specific codemirror initialization [1]. There is a tool [2] to
> generate such description from a XSD, I gave it a very
> quick check and for SLD 1.0 it generates a 200+KB json file... but then,
> we'd have to generate another for SLD 1.1 too,
> and figure out which schema to give the editor (not sure one can do both
> at the same time, the sld namespace is shared among
> SLD 1.0 and 1.1, but maybe with some hand-tweaking and some runtime
> inconsistency it might be doable).
>
> Soo... to get there one would need some extensions to StyleHandler,
> CodeMirrorEditor, maybe some figuring out of the
> right SLD version on the fly (since we just say "SLD") and then inject the
> right large json blob into the editor.
> That seems to be way too much work for spare time :-p
>
> Oh, I also checked potential YSLD compatibility, yaml code highlighting is
> available in the latest version of CodeMirror
> (we'd may have to upgrade, 5.11 we're using currently does not have it)
> but there is no hinting support for completion.
> Mapbox styling wise, there is javascript highlight, and some javascript
> completion support, but I don't see a quick way
> to add completion towards a specific schema. See [3] for an example.
>
> Anyways, two questions:
>
>- Do you see any issue merging CSS completion support?
>- Anyone interested in taking over support for completion in other
>languages?
>
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> [1]: If interested, see the source of this example, in particular, the
> "tags" variable https://codemirror.net/demo/xmlcomplete.html
> [2]: http://q42jaap.github.io/xsd2codemirror/
> [3]: https://codemirror.net/demo/complete.html
>
>
>
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and extra variables

2017-04-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies 
On 26/04/17 00:08, Andrea Aime wrote:
> I did not look at it and don't know if it's proposal worthy. But I believe
> that, message wise, it's problematic to stand up a
> proposal and then move on without a discussion on it, others might follow
> in your footsteps for stuff that is truly
> proposal worthy (because it happened before, you know, it sets a precedent,
> and people are not always inclined
> to check the details or context and just get the narrative suiting them and
> go with it).

Andrea, I agree. It is also risky to implement a proposal when someone 
might have a good objection that requires a completely different 
approach and much rework. The purpose of a GSIP is to obtain agreement 
before expending effort on an implementation. I did not know how to 
proceed in the absence of any response to the discussion thread or to 
other list emails to requesters of these features. Would it have been 
better to call for a vote to force discussion? I was hoping that a 
concrete implementation would attract more attention. In any case, I 
will wait for comments and reviews and change the implementation if 
required.

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-8111) Add drag and drop support for reordering layers in a layer group

2017-04-25 Thread Andrea Aime [Administrator] (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Andrea Aime [Administrator] created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 GeoServer /  GEOS-8111  
 
 
  Add drag and drop support for reordering layers in a layer group   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Andrea Aime [Administrator]  
 
 
Attachments: 
 layer-group-dnd.gif  
 
 
Components: 
 web  
 
 
Created: 
 25/Apr/17 8:51 PM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Medium  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Andrea Aime [Administrator]  
 

  
 
 
  
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.910.0#100040-sha1:0b083fc)

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and extra variables

2017-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett 
You could move the page to
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Maintenance if a vote is not
needed.

I would also be willing to combine the proposal page and the maintenance
page so we get a consistent breakdown of changes by version number.

--
Jody Garnett

On 25 April 2017 at 04:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies  wrote:

> Andrea,
>
> this proposal is (almost) entirely confined to one module
> (gs-netcdf-out), changes no API, is (almost) fully backwards compatible
> in behaviour, and is fully backwards compatible in serialised settings.
> The GSIP might not even be required, but I thought it a useful way to
> ask for comments. I do not expect it to be contentious; I welcome all
> feedback.
>
> There was some prior discussion on GeoTools PR #1417
>  which was most helpful
> in dissuading me from that approach, and I also got an off-list analysis
> of the cost of opening NetCDF/GRIB files (I have asked for permission to
> copy it as a Jira comment).
>
> I agree that there was no response to my original proposal, perhaps
> because of the REST migration sprint, and perhaps because a module
> maintainer was on leave. The only feedback I got on this one was your
> comment on GEOT-5709 (thanks!). I hope that the screenshot, user manual
> section, and fully implemented pull requests will attract more attention.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben.
>
> On 25/04/17 18:44, Andrea Aime wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> > I've lost track of this one, seems like a step was skipped?
> > No big deal, but checking the history I see GSIP-158 switching from
> > a "preliminary discussion" thread (unfortunately empty) to a pull
> > request without a vote in the middle.
> >
> > Have I missed it?
> >
> > No big deal, we can vote and review at the same time.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Andrea
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I have submitted pull requests for review.
> >>
> >> See the GSIP 158 page for screenshot and user manual:
> >> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-158
> >>
> >> A small change is required to GeoTools:
> >>
> >> [GEOT-5709] Support coverage property SourceUrl
> >> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1564
> >> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5709
> >>
> >> Most of the implementation is in GeoServer:
> >>
> >> [GEOS-8099] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and
> >> extra variables
> >> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2281
> >> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8099
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Ben.
> >>
> >> On 25/03/17 17:15, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> >>> I have added some GitHub branch comparisons in the implementation
> >>> section. The implementation is incomplete; discussion comes first. It
> is
> >>> still too early for pull requests.
> >>>
> >>> On 25/03/17 16:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>  Preliminary GSIP for discussion, no Jira issues yet:
>  https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-158
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben Caradoc-Davies 
> >> Director
> >> Transient Software Limited 
> >> New Zealand
> >>
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> >> ___
> >> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> >> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies 
> Director
> Transient Software Limited 
> New Zealand
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-8110) Making a WMS request with no Layers results in an IndexOutOfBoundsException

2017-04-25 Thread Torben Barsballe (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Torben Barsballe created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 GeoServer /  GEOS-8110  
 
 
  Making a WMS request with no Layers results in an IndexOutOfBoundsException   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Created: 
 25/Apr/17 6:01 PM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Medium  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Torben Barsballe  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The WMS response is: 

 

  
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1
String index out of range: -1
  

 

 With the corresponding exception: 

 
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1
	at java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.setLength(AbstractStringBuilder.java:207)
	at java.lang.StringBuffer.setLength(StringBuffer.java:192)
	at org.geoserver.wms.WMSWorkspaceQualifier.toCommaSeparatedList(WMSWorkspaceQualifier.java:116)
	at org.geoserver.wms.WMSWorkspaceQualifier.qualifyLayerNamesKVP(WMSWorkspaceQualifier.java:68)
	at org.geoserver.wms.WMSWorkspaceQualifier.qualifyRequest(WMSWorkspaceQualifier.java:30)
	at org.geoserver.ows.WorkspaceQualifyingCallback.serviceDispatched(WorkspaceQualifyingCallback.java:44)
	at org.geoserver.ows.Dispatcher.fireServiceDispatchedCallback(Dispatcher.java:575)
	at org.geoserver.ows.Dispatcher.service(Dispatcher.java:570)
	at org.geoserver.ows.Dispatcher.handleRequestInternal(Dispatcher.java:245)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.AbstractController.handleRequest(AbstractController.java:147)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.SimpleControllerHandlerAdapter.handle(SimpleControllerHandlerAdapter.java:50)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:959)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:893)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(

[Geoserver-devel] Modest code complete for CSS styling

2017-04-25 Thread Andrea Aime 
Hi,
in my spare time I am playing with writing a large-ish set of CSS styles
for a basemap and found
that I'm really missing code completion.

So I looked into what code mirror has to offer, and adding support for our
custom
variant of CSS is not hard and works reasonably well (for modest
ambitions), .e.g:

[image: Inline image 1]

[image: Inline image 2]
[image: Inline image 3]

Let me qualify "modest" ambitions:

   - There is no CQL autocomplete support
   - The list of values for a given property is not context sensitive, it
   just gives you all possible values for all possible propeties
   - The few function like values (url, symbol, color-map-entry) just
   complete as "keyword(" and you have to add the rest manually

Of course it can be improved with some time and JS skills, but I believe
even this small contribution is a big improvement compared to no completion
at all.
Pull request here (I'll add a ticket and fix the commit before merging of
course):

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2283

I checked how this plays with other languages, and it seems it's not
interfering, you just get no completion on CTRL-SPACE.
Then, I looked at adding support for other languages too and ... well..
what I've found seem to require a lot of effort, at
least for SLD.

XML completion is available, but one needs to define a schema-like data
structure in JSON, and then setup
some specific codemirror initialization [1]. There is a tool [2] to
generate such description from a XSD, I gave it a very
quick check and for SLD 1.0 it generates a 200+KB json file... but then,
we'd have to generate another for SLD 1.1 too,
and figure out which schema to give the editor (not sure one can do both at
the same time, the sld namespace is shared among
SLD 1.0 and 1.1, but maybe with some hand-tweaking and some runtime
inconsistency it might be doable).

Soo... to get there one would need some extensions to StyleHandler,
CodeMirrorEditor, maybe some figuring out of the
right SLD version on the fly (since we just say "SLD") and then inject the
right large json blob into the editor.
That seems to be way too much work for spare time :-p

Oh, I also checked potential YSLD compatibility, yaml code highlighting is
available in the latest version of CodeMirror
(we'd may have to upgrade, 5.11 we're using currently does not have it) but
there is no hinting support for completion.
Mapbox styling wise, there is javascript highlight, and some javascript
completion support, but I don't see a quick way
to add completion towards a specific schema. See [3] for an example.

Anyways, two questions:

   - Do you see any issue merging CSS completion support?
   - Anyone interested in taking over support for completion in other
   languages?


Cheers
Andrea

[1]: If interested, see the source of this example, in particular, the
"tags" variable https://codemirror.net/demo/xmlcomplete.html
[2]: http://q42jaap.github.io/xsd2codemirror/
[3]: https://codemirror.net/demo/complete.html




-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and extra variables

2017-04-25 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
wrote:

> Andrea,
>
> this proposal is (almost) entirely confined to one module (gs-netcdf-out),
> changes no API, is (almost) fully backwards compatible in behaviour, and is
> fully backwards compatible in serialised settings. The GSIP might not even
> be required, but I thought it a useful way to ask for comments. I do not
> expect it to be contentious; I welcome all feedback.
>

Hi Ben,
I did not look at it and don't know if it's proposal worthy. But I believe
that, message wise, it's problematic to stand up a
proposal and then move on without a discussion on it, others might follow
in your footsteps for stuff that is truly
proposal worthy (because it happened before, you know, it sets a precedent,
and people are not always inclined
to check the details or context and just get the narrative suiting them and
go with it).

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and extra variables

2017-04-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Andrea,

this proposal is (almost) entirely confined to one module 
(gs-netcdf-out), changes no API, is (almost) fully backwards compatible 
in behaviour, and is fully backwards compatible in serialised settings. 
The GSIP might not even be required, but I thought it a useful way to 
ask for comments. I do not expect it to be contentious; I welcome all 
feedback.

There was some prior discussion on GeoTools PR #1417 
 which was most helpful 
in dissuading me from that approach, and I also got an off-list analysis 
of the cost of opening NetCDF/GRIB files (I have asked for permission to 
copy it as a Jira comment).

I agree that there was no response to my original proposal, perhaps 
because of the REST migration sprint, and perhaps because a module 
maintainer was on leave. The only feedback I got on this one was your 
comment on GEOT-5709 (thanks!). I hope that the screenshot, user manual 
section, and fully implemented pull requests will attract more attention.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 25/04/17 18:44, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> I've lost track of this one, seems like a step was skipped?
> No big deal, but checking the history I see GSIP-158 switching from
> a "preliminary discussion" thread (unfortunately empty) to a pull
> request without a vote in the middle.
>
> Have I missed it?
>
> No big deal, we can vote and review at the same time.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
> wrote:
>
>> I have submitted pull requests for review.
>>
>> See the GSIP 158 page for screenshot and user manual:
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-158
>>
>> A small change is required to GeoTools:
>>
>> [GEOT-5709] Support coverage property SourceUrl
>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1564
>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5709
>>
>> Most of the implementation is in GeoServer:
>>
>> [GEOS-8099] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and
>> extra variables
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2281
>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8099
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Ben.
>>
>> On 25/03/17 17:15, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>>> I have added some GitHub branch comparisons in the implementation
>>> section. The implementation is incomplete; discussion comes first. It is
>>> still too early for pull requests.
>>>
>>> On 25/03/17 16:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
 Preliminary GSIP for discussion, no Jira issues yet:
 https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-158
>>
>> --
>> Ben Caradoc-Davies 
>> Director
>> Transient Software Limited 
>> New Zealand
>>
>> 
>> --
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-8109) WFS geometry or/and attributes issues

2017-04-25 Thread Nathan (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Nathan created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 GeoServer /  GEOS-8109  
 
 
  WFS geometry or/and attributes issues   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Affects Versions: 
 2.11.0  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 ArcSDE, Control-flow  
 
 
Created: 
 25/Apr/17 10:23 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Highest  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Nathan  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hello all  Not sure if it is a bug or a misconfiguration. There the story : We use Geoserver and we are 4 to work with the geoserver and QGIS solution.  We use a file as a container of shapefiles and we all have to work on the sames shapefiles at the same time. But we encounter some issues that we don't understand :  When we modify the geometry or, the attributes of multiple entities in the shapefiles, if we dont save the shapefile between EVERY MODIFICATION, the attributes or the geometry is cloned and all the objects that we have modified have now the same geometry or the same attributes (the same as the last modified). Can somebody explain me why and what we have to fix it.  
 

  
 
 
  
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment

[Geoserver-devel] Private Placement

2017-04-25 Thread Mr. Ernest Pinto 
Good day,

Welcome to our Private Placement Portfolio.

I am a Staff of a Venture Capital Firm specializing in Growth Capital 
Investments/Loans.We seek to invest in Projects with Public and Private sectors 
in a broad range of areas including Real estate, Agriculture, Energy, Oil and 
Gas, emerging markets and high-technology. Within the technology sector, the 
firm focuses on communications, software, digital content and services.

We have the capacity to invest a considerable amount of funds in any viable 
project(s) that your company requires funding for on an investment 
capacity/Loan Application. Upon the review of your company's Project Business 
Plan we shall determine on the project(s) possible funding. This will be form 
of a silent and Private Placement Investments.

Endeavor to respond promptly if the investment proposal meets your company's 
approval.

Kind Regards,
Ernest Pinto

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel