Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

2019-08-09 Thread Brad Hards
+1.

 

Brad

 

From: Andrea Aime  
Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 8:26 PM
To: Geoserver-devel 
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

 

Hi all,

based on previous discussions on this list, and the list of merged PRs by 
Fernando Mino

I'm proposing him for commit access.

 

Here is my +1

 

Cheers

Andrea

 

== GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V 
for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions 
S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: 
+39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it 
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it 
--- Con riferimento alla 
normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento 
generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza 
inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è 
un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo 
scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, 
ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene 
notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European 
Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or 
the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us 
immediately by telephone or e-mail. 

___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

2019-08-09 Thread Jody Garnett
+1 and congrats Fernando
--
Jody Garnett


On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 03:26, Andrea Aime 
wrote:

> Hi all,
> based on previous discussions on this list, and the list of merged PRs by
> Fernando Mino
> I'm proposing him for commit access.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
> Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
> (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
> http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> --- *Con riferimento
> alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
> Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
> circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
> allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
> destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
> errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
> sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
> “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or e-mail.*
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Re: [Geoserver-devel] I would like to propose the following improvement

2019-08-09 Thread Jody Garnett
That list Ian provide was to collect the results of saving a new Shapefiles
(representing query results). In this case you want to go back to the
original file and collect up some of the details...
--
Jody Garnett


On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 02:39, Hornby D.  wrote:

> Dear Jody,
>
>
>
> If reclassifying my idea as a feature request then please do. I don’t see
> this as a major change to anything just a tweak to include an additional
> file if it exists.
>
>
>
> For your two questions, don’t know and don’t understand what you are
> asking.
>
>
>
> As for your ideas, idea 1 is exactly what I was thinking, simply include
> the xml file in the zip and if I have understood you correctly that is more
> of a tweak to GeoTools than anything to do with GeoServer? Ian’s response
> seems to hint that it could be a simple change in the code here (
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/wfs/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wfs/response/ShapeZipOutputFormat.java#L231)?
> Or is it a tweak to both systems?
>
>
>
> Your second idea was initially more interesting but when you look at that
> GeoTools page you provide a link to the additional files are either
> symbology files or indexing files. Indexes can easily be created by the end
> user and is less data to be storing and throwing around the internet and
> well I’m of the opinion that the colour scheme I like is never what you
> like or want so why include it. If a corporate styling is required that
> could be obtained via alternative means. So this focusses me back to idea 1
> which is simply include the xml file in the zipfile it is exists. This
> fulfils my desire to be supplying data with its metadata (if it has it).
> Idea 3 seems not appropriate to me?
>
>
>
> Duncan
>
>
>
> *From:* Jody Garnett 
> *Sent:* 08 August 2019 23:20
> *To:* Hornby D. 
> *Cc:* geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] I would like to propose the following
> improvement
>
>
>
> The real challenge is our community does not have any spare capacity to
> tackle new feature requests at present. However let's see if this is
> possible, incase you want to pursue this with a volunteer or service
> provider...
>
>
>
> Initially I think this would be a feature request - we tend to save
> proposals for strategic choices that impact application stability (and thus
> need to be voted on.)
>
>
>
> GeoServer by itself does not interact directly with Shapefiles, we use the
> GeoTools data access library. GeoTools, does not have any significant
> support for the shape file metadata file, so ...
>
>
>
> Q: Do you know if the ESRI the shp,xml file format is documented anywhere,
> or has been reverse engineered?
>
>
>
> Q: Does the shape file metadata xml file include the concept of bounds or
> a description of attributes? Both may of been modified or processed as part
> of a WFS request ...
>
>
>
> Options/Ideas:
>
>
>
> 1. Improve the GeoTools shape file representation
> 
> to communicate if an metadata xml file was present, allowing us to check if
> is present and blindly include the contents when zipping ...
>
>
>
> 2. Improve the GeoServer FeatureTypeInfo API, so any format can nominate
> files to be included when zipping. This would allow other things like a
> readme, sld, etc... to be packaged up if present. This would be an API
> change so a proposal would be required.
>
>
>
> 3. Create a new custom format that does exactly what you want ...
>
> --
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 07:14, Hornby D.  wrote:
>
> Dear GeoServer,
>
>
>
> I have been directed to this mailing list as a place to propose an
> improvement. I had asked this question originally on GIS StackExchange
> thinking it was a geonetwork problem but a reply has pointed me to it being
> a GeoServer issue.
>
>
>
> My question is well documented in this Q thread (
> https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/329684/how-to-include-the-metadata-in-a-shapefile-download-from-geonetwork
> )
> so please have a quick look at it to understand the issue.
>
>
>
> In summary I would like GeoServer to include the XML (metadata) file along
> with the rest of the files that are zipped up for a shapefile. I would
> typically document my dataset using ArcCatalog and that creates the
> additional XML file holding all the metadata. As I say in my question on
> GIS SE we 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

2019-08-09 Thread Jody Garnett
As an alternative to a debugger adding log statements into the code can
also help.
--
Jody Garnett


On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 01:59, Paul Wittle 
wrote:

> Hi Jody,
>
>
>
> Thank you for this I will have a look again and see if I can work out how
> to build a local copy to test…unfortunately that is the bit that I’ve been
> struggling with on a Windows machine and with my level of Java experience.
>
>
>
> As a quick side note I should say that when I used the proxy base URL I
> was using ${X-Forwarded-Host} as we access the server via a number of
> domains. It may be this that cased the port to still be present but I will
> investigate further.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> *From:* Jody Garnett 
> *Sent:* 06 August 2019 00:06
> *To:* Paul Wittle 
> *Cc:* Geoserver-devel 
> *Subject:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities
>
>
>
> Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where
> the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an
> override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS
> port 443 that should be fine.
>
>
>
> Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java
>
>
>
> Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used
> correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.
>
> --
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 07:49, Paul Wittle 
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is
> correct for me?
>
>
>
> I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a
> GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on
> there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down
> the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the
> GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always
> present.
>
>
>
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415
>
>
>
> I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as
> req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any
> obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without
> making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on
> my own profile or something like that not the real repo).
>
>
>
> I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local
> copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on
> this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or
> wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain
> unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be
> handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to
> receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to
> anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify
> the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or
> monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in
> this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
> specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset
> Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or
> other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have
> been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments
> whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer
> viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost,
> damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of
> its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your
> information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433
>
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain
> unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be
> handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to
> receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to
> anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify
> the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or
> monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in
> this message are those of the individual sender, 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 175 - Promote status monitoring module from Community to Extension

2019-08-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Thank you Nuno - it is a great "new" capability :)
--
Jody Garnett


On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 00:57, Nuno Oliveira 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the proposal with the votes:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-175
>
> The PRs have been merged:
>
>
>- https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3590
>- https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3688
>
>
> Thank you all for the feedback and discussion!
>
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 22:14 +0200, Alessio Fabiani wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 18:46 Kevin Smith 
> ha scritto:
>
> +1
>
> --
>   Kevin Michael Smith
>   smit...@draconic.ca
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019, at 3:50 AM, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
> *Lähettäjä:* Nuno Oliveira 
> *Lähetetty:* maanantai 5. elokuuta 2019 12.35
> *Vastaanottaja:* Jody Garnett ;
> fernando.m...@geo-solutions.it
> *Kopio:* GeoServer 
> *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 175 - Promote status monitoring module
> from Community to Extension
>
>
>
> Dear PSC,
>
>
>
> I would kindly ask you if you can vote on this one, proposal link for
> reference:
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-175
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 09:03 +0100, Nuno Oliveira wrote:
>
> Dear all, Jody,
>
> thank you for the feedback!
>
>
>
> We have implemented the feedback we got in this two PRs:
>
>- https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3590 (2.16.x core)
>- https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3688 (2.15.x extension)
>
>
>
> Summarizing the feedback that was applied:
>
>- migrated to the latest version of OSHI, MIT License
>- renamed the module to system-status
>- added internationalization support
>- added swagger documentation for the REST API
>- make it core in 2.16.x
>
>
>- documentation moved to configuration status [1]
>
>
>- make it an extension to 2.15.x
>
>
>
> Please let's us know if we missed anything.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nuno Oliveira
>
>
>
> [1] https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/configuration/status.html
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 17:27 -0700, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> Those activities sound fine, may also need to move some documentation
> around also?
>
>
>
> I have made sure to add my +1 to the proposal.
>
> --
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 11:04, fernando.m...@geo-solutions.it <
> fernando.m...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have a proposal for integrate promoted system-status module code into
> Geoserver core on master:
>
>
>
> *Relocate System status logic classes:*
> Rename package org.geoserver.status.monitoring.collector to
> org.geoserger.systemstatus
> Put it in gs-main module.
>
>
>
> *Relocate Web classes:*
> Rename package org.geoserver.status.monitoring.web to
> org.geoserver.web.systemstatus
> Put it in gs-web-core module.
>
>
>
> *Relocate Rest classes:*
> rename package org.geoserver.status.monitoring.rest to
> org.geoserver.rest.systemstatus
> Put it in gs-restconfig module.
>
>
> What do you think about?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Fernando Mino
>
> ==
>
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>
> ==
>
> Fernando Mino
>
> Software Engineer
>
>
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>
> Via di Montramito 3/A
>
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>
> Italy
>
> phone: +39 0584 962313
>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>
>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg.
> UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From "Nuno Oliveira" nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it
>
> To andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it
>
> Cc "geoserver-devel" geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> Date Wed, 10 Jul 2019 09:53:02 +0100
>
> Subject Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 175 - Promote status monitoring module
> from Community to Extension
>
>
>
> Thank you all for the feedback, answering the open points:
>
>
>
>- regarding the naming:
>- what do you think 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2019-08-06

2019-08-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Build Discussion

> Windows builder server … asking around …
>>
>>-
>>
>>GeoSolutions may have old / unmaintained?
>>
>>
> Checked, it does not exist anymore
>

I also checked, GeoCat does not have a windows build server (but would like
one ...).

>
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

2019-08-09 Thread Ian Turton
+1

Ian

On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 11:26, Andrea Aime 
wrote:

> Hi all,
> based on previous discussions on this list, and the list of merged PRs by
> Fernando Mino
> I'm proposing him for commit access.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
> Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
> (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
> http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> --- *Con riferimento
> alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
> Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
> circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
> allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
> destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
> errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
> sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
> “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or e-mail.*
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>


-- 
Ian Turton
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Re: [Geoserver-devel] I would like to propose the following improvement

2019-08-09 Thread Hornby D .
Dear Jody,

If reclassifying my idea as a feature request then please do. I don't see this 
as a major change to anything just a tweak to include an additional file if it 
exists.

For your two questions, don't know and don't understand what you are asking.

As for your ideas, idea 1 is exactly what I was thinking, simply include the 
xml file in the zip and if I have understood you correctly that is more of a 
tweak to GeoTools than anything to do with GeoServer? Ian's response seems to 
hint that it could be a simple change in the code here 
(https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/wfs/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wfs/response/ShapeZipOutputFormat.java#L231)?
 Or is it a tweak to both systems?

Your second idea was initially more interesting but when you look at that 
GeoTools page you provide a link to the additional files are either symbology 
files or indexing files. Indexes can easily be created by the end user and is 
less data to be storing and throwing around the internet and well I'm of the 
opinion that the colour scheme I like is never what you like or want so why 
include it. If a corporate styling is required that could be obtained via 
alternative means. So this focusses me back to idea 1 which is simply include 
the xml file in the zipfile it is exists. This fulfils my desire to be 
supplying data with its metadata (if it has it). Idea 3 seems not appropriate 
to me?

Duncan

From: Jody Garnett 
Sent: 08 August 2019 23:20
To: Hornby D. 
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] I would like to propose the following improvement

The real challenge is our community does not have any spare capacity to tackle 
new feature requests at present. However let's see if this is possible, incase 
you want to pursue this with a volunteer or service provider...

Initially I think this would be a feature request - we tend to save proposals 
for strategic choices that impact application stability (and thus need to be 
voted on.)

GeoServer by itself does not interact directly with Shapefiles, we use the 
GeoTools data access library. GeoTools, does not have any significant support 
for the shape file metadata file, so ...

Q: Do you know if the ESRI the shp,xml file format is documented anywhere, or 
has been reverse engineered?

Q: Does the shape file metadata xml file include the concept of bounds or a 
description of attributes? Both may of been modified or processed as part of a 
WFS request ...

Options/Ideas:

1. Improve the GeoTools shape file 
representation
 to communicate if an metadata xml file was present, allowing us to check if is 
present and blindly include the contents when zipping ...

2. Improve the GeoServer FeatureTypeInfo API, so any format can nominate files 
to be included when zipping. This would allow other things like a readme, sld, 
etc... to be packaged up if present. This would be an API change so a proposal 
would be required.

3. Create a new custom format that does exactly what you want ...
--
Jody Garnett


On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 07:14, Hornby D. 
mailto:d...@geodata.soton.ac.uk>> wrote:
Dear GeoServer,

I have been directed to this mailing list as a place to propose an improvement. 
I had asked this question originally on GIS StackExchange thinking it was a 
geonetwork problem but a reply has pointed me to it being a GeoServer issue.

My question is well documented in this Q thread 
(https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/329684/how-to-include-the-metadata-in-a-shapefile-download-from-geonetwork)
 so please have a quick look at it to understand the issue.

In summary I would like GeoServer to include the XML (metadata) file along with 
the rest of the files that are zipped up for a shapefile. I would typically 
document my dataset using ArcCatalog and that creates the additional XML file 
holding all the metadata. As I say in my question on GIS SE we get into a 
scenario of distributing datasets without any metadata which is not good!

Ian's reply seems to suggest a tweak in the source code could resolve this, but 
I'm neither a heavy user of github nor a web developer so I'm hoping this could 
be something that is added by someone way more competent than I!

One thing I can think of is the xml file is not a mandatory part of a shapefile 
so the tweak to the source code would need to include it 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

2019-08-09 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
+1

-Jukka Rahkonen-

Lähettäjä: Andrea Aime 
Lähetetty: perjantai 9. elokuuta 2019 13.26
Vastaanottaja: Geoserver-devel 
Aihe: [Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

Hi all,
based on previous discussions on this list, and the list of merged PRs by 
Fernando Mino
I'm proposing him for commit access.

Here is my +1

Cheers
Andrea



== GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V 
for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions 
S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: 
+39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it 
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it 
--- Con riferimento alla 
normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento 
generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza 
inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è 
un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo 
scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, 
ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene 
notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European 
Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or 
the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us 
immediately by telephone or e-mail.
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


[Geoserver-devel] Proposing Fernando Mino for commit access

2019-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all,
based on previous discussions on this list, and the list of merged PRs by
Fernando Mino
I'm proposing him for commit access.

Here is my +1

Cheers
Andrea


== GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
(LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
--- *Con riferimento
alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
“GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
telephone or e-mail.*
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting GEOS-9255 (authkey promotion to extension)

2019-08-09 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+0

Il giorno ven 9 ago 2019 alle 10:54 Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto:

> Hi, I would like to backport extension status of the authkey module to
> 2.15.x.
>
> The related pull request is here:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3701
>
> Any concern, objections?
>
> Mauro
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mauro Bartolomeoli
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Dott. Mauro Bartolomeoli
> @mauro_bart
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3
> 
> /A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
>
> mobile: +39 393 904 1756
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax:  +39 0584 1660272
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> ---
>
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
-- 
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini.
GeoSolutions Director

- sent from my mobile, apologies for brevity and typos-
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting GEOS-9255 (authkey promotion to extension)

2019-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Mauro,
none here, if the module has passed graduation, I believe it can get
graduated in all active branches, no?

Cheers
Andrea

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:56 AM Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:

> Hi, I would like to backport extension status of the authkey module to
> 2.15.x.
>
> The related pull request is here:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3701
>
> Any concern, objections?
>
> Mauro
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mauro Bartolomeoli
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Dott. Mauro Bartolomeoli
> @mauro_bart
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
>
> mobile: +39 393 904 1756
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax:  +39 0584 1660272
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> ---
>
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>


-- 

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054
Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339
8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
--- *Con riferimento
alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
“GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
telephone or e-mail.*
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


[Geoserver-devel] Backporting GEOS-9255 (authkey promotion to extension)

2019-08-09 Thread Mauro Bartolomeoli
Hi, I would like to backport extension status of the authkey module to
2.15.x.

The related pull request is here:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3701

Any concern, objections?

Mauro



-- 

Regards,

Mauro Bartolomeoli

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for more information.
==

Dott. Mauro Bartolomeoli
@mauro_bart
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy

mobile: +39 393 904 1756
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:  +39 0584 1660272

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel