[Geotools-devel] GEOT-4386 pull requests ready to go
Mauro, I see you have issued the GeoTools pull request for GEOT-4386: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/135 I have issued the corresponding one for GeoServer (required to not break the build): https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/152 I would merge both now but I am just about to leave the office and prefer not to merge and run. :-) Justin, Andrea, or anyone else willing to clean up if things go wrong, please feel free to merge these two. Otherwise, I will merge them tomorrow morning (UTC+8). Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
[Geotools-devel] Backporting of the SchemaResolver patch to 8.x and 9.x branches
Hi, I would like to ask opinions for the backporting of the GEOT-4386 patch to 8.x and 9.x branches that has just landed on master. My thought for the backport would be to mantain compatibility with existing code, simply avoiding to remove classes in app-schema-resolver, but letting them extend the corresponding new classes in gt-xml (AppSchemaResolver - SchemaResolver, and so on). Following this approach the impact of the backport should not be dramatic, and also GeoServer should not need to be touched. Do you think this could be done? Thanks Mauro Bartolomeoli -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Dott. Mauro Bartolomeoli @mauro_bart Senior Software Engineer GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
[Geotools-devel] Extending the DescribeParameter annotation
Hi I am doing a bit of work on the GeoServer WPS builder interface, adding, among oter things, validation of numerical values to check if they are is between allowed min and max values. Unfortunately, there are no processes that have those values defined. The problem is that they can go on the metadata of the parameter, but cannot be defined using the annotation, so no process defines them, since almost all use annotations. Is it OK to extend to annotation with those parameters (minValue and maxValue) and adapt the AnnotationDrivenProcessFactory class to it? that would make it easier to enter those values, and I could improve the processes by defining them. That would give sense to the WPS builder checking. Thanks in advance Victor -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] Extending the DescribeParameter annotation
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Victor Olaya vol...@opengeo.org wrote: Hi I am doing a bit of work on the GeoServer WPS builder interface, adding, among oter things, validation of numerical values to check if they are is between allowed min and max values. Unfortunately, there are no processes that have those values defined. The problem is that they can go on the metadata of the parameter, but cannot be defined using the annotation, so no process defines them, since almost all use annotations. Is it OK to extend to annotation with those parameters (minValue and maxValue) and adapt the AnnotationDrivenProcessFactory class to it? that would make it easier to enter those values, and I could improve the processes by defining them. That would give sense to the WPS builder checking. Yes, works for me Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
[Geotools-devel] PMC: Proposal Replace Contribution Agreement
As per Monday's meeting, discussion has finished up (Ben's questions were answered by going through the email history). There are still a few questions listed in the tasks section Q: Is secret...@osgeo.org for email correct? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org Q: Do we have a fax number for the foundation? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org Q: Do we need to contact pervious contributors? A: Not required, previous contributors clearly provided code to the foundation so we are good. Q: Do we need to contact current contributors? A: Perhaps, if only so we are all operating on the same terms conditions. If you are content with the above vote +1, if not discuss and we can revise the proposal. -- Jody Garnett On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: Proposal is up: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Replace+Contribution+Agreement I had a couple questions in the tasks section which may be worth discussion. -- Jody Garnett -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Proposal Replace Contribution Agreement
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote: As per Monday's meeting, discussion has finished up (Ben's questions were answered by going through the email history). There are still a few questions listed in the tasks section Q: Is secret...@osgeo.org for email correct? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org Jody, I do not think that secret...@osgeo.org exists, though I could create it. However, it might be just as well to send them to i...@osgeo.org which is more likely to be properly maintained and supported. Q: Do we have a fax number for the foundation? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org I do not think so. I'd suggest we not list a fax number, and if someone really needs to fax (why would you?) it be arranged by email with the secretary. Best regards, -- ---+-- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Software Developer -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Proposal Replace Contribution Agreement
Q: Is secret...@osgeo.org (mailto:secret...@osgeo.org) for email correct? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org (mailto:bo...@osgeo.org) Jody, I do not think that secret...@osgeo.org (mailto:secret...@osgeo.org) exists, though I could create it. However, it might be just as well to send them to i...@osgeo.org (mailto:i...@osgeo.org) which is more likely to be properly maintained and supported. Agreed, sounds a bit odd however. Okay I will update the page. Q: Do we have a fax number for the foundation? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org (mailto:bo...@osgeo.org) I do not think so. I'd suggest we not list a fax number, and if someone really needs to fax (why would you?) it be arranged by email with the secretary. Fax is typical for sending legal paperwork, it has a signature and a timestamp of the old school variety. I assume the secretary can be contacted at i...@osgeo.org ?-- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Proposal Replace Contribution Agreement
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote: Q: Is secret...@osgeo.org for email correct? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org Jody, I do not think that secret...@osgeo.org exists, though I could create it. However, it might be just as well to send them to i...@osgeo.org which is more likely to be properly maintained and supported. Agreed, sounds a bit odd however. Okay I will update the page. Q: Do we have a fax number for the foundation? I will ask bo...@osgeo.org I do not think so. I'd suggest we not list a fax number, and if someone really needs to fax (why would you?) it be arranged by email with the secretary. Fax is typical for sending legal paperwork, it has a signature and a timestamp of the old school variety. Jody, Blech. I don't see any reason a scanned copy of the document that would have been faxed should not be sufficient to our needs. I assume the secretary can be contacted at i...@osgeo.org ? Whoever answers i...@osgeo.org can forward to the secretary. This has been established as the live contact point for OSGeo. Best regards, -- ---+-- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Software Developer -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Proposal Replace Contribution Agreement
On 20/02/13 08:26, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Fax is typical for sending legal paperwork, it has a signature and a timestamp of the old school variety. Jody, Blech. I don't see any reason a scanned copy of the document that would have been faxed should not be sufficient to our needs. +1. My organisation relies on scans for legal documentation. We only have one fax left in the building. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
[Geotools-devel] Nominate Mauro Bartolomeoli for GeoTools commit access
Mauro Bartolomeoli has been writing some rather useful and thorough GeoTools code, such as the recent AppSchemaResolver promotion and corresponding work on the WMS client. Mauro already has commit access for GeoServer, but it has come to my attention that he is not yet a GeoTools committer. I nominate Mauro Bartolomeoli for GeoTools commit access (and hope that he will accept). Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting of the SchemaResolver patch to 8.x and 9.x branches
+1. That is a good idea. Because the added classes have new names and a new package, this change is a pure API extension and localised to GeoTools. This change should wait until after the next beta, and will need support (and perhaps a vote?). Note that 8.x is almost obsolete as 9.0 is in beta and will soon be stable. Would you be happy to put it into 9.x only? Kind regards, Ben. On 19/02/13 18:28, Mauro Bartolomeoli wrote: Hi, I would like to ask opinions for the backporting of the GEOT-4386 patch to 8.x and 9.x branches that has just landed on master. My thought for the backport would be to mantain compatibility with existing code, simply avoiding to remove classes in app-schema-resolver, but letting them extend the corresponding new classes in gt-xml (AppSchemaResolver - SchemaResolver, and so on). Following this approach the impact of the backport should not be dramatic, and also GeoServer should not need to be touched. Do you think this could be done? Thanks Mauro Bartolomeoli -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Dott. Mauro Bartolomeoli @mauro_bart Senior Software Engineer GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- -- Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Proposal Replace Contribution Agreement
Sounds good, I have updated the proposed text to reflect i...@osge.org, and have no references to sending a fax. -- Jody Garnett On Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 1:11 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: On 20/02/13 08:26, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Fax is typical for sending legal paperwork, it has a signature and a timestamp of the old school variety. Jody, Blech. I don't see any reason a scanned copy of the document that would have been faxed should not be sufficient to our needs. +1. My organisation relies on scans for legal documentation. We only have one fax left in the building. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au (mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au) Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
