Re: [Geotools-devel] feature collection cleanup is a go

2012-11-19 Thread Jody Garnett
> I just fixed a test compile failure in gt-webservice (unsupported; we 
> build it on our Jenkins), replacing a size method with 
> DataUtilities.count . Yes, *another* size method, who would have 
> thought? :-)
> 
> 

measure twice, cut once. 
> This cleanup was made much easier by your excellent documentation. I am 
> so pleased with it that I am linking to it here for all to see:
> http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com.au/2012/11/featurecollection-cleanup.html
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/FeatureCollection+cleanup
> 
> 

You missed the two that can use a review!
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/welcome/upgrade.html
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/main/collection.html 

> You made some mention in confluence and git commit logs of the unsafe 
> use of use utility classes in app-schema (simple feature assumptions?). 
> I see your in-code comments. Please direct us to remaining areas of 
> concern and we will at the least get them into Jira.
> 
> 

It is more that I was very focused not he feature collection cleanup, and ran 
into the unsafe casts you describe. That makes me concerned that there may be 
similar assumptions in the app-schema code. So I do not have anything specific; 
just a general request for a code review / QA pass.
(even just filling in all the generics as I was doing turns up a bit).
> Thanks also for your improvements to dodgy size implementations in 
> app-schema tests. Some of these classes go back to 2007 or earlier and 
> need some attention.
> 
> 

You can thank Andrea for his detailed review, and the direction of minimising 
code duplication.
(Thanks Andrea)

Jody--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


Re: [Geotools-devel] feature collection cleanup is a go

2012-11-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Thanks a lot, Jody, this has been a huge effort.

Great success!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J88-RdWnNT0

I just fixed a test compile failure in gt-webservice (unsupported; we 
build it on our Jenkins), replacing a size method with 
DataUtilities.count . Yes, *another* size method, who would have 
thought?  :-)

This cleanup was made much easier by your excellent documentation. I am 
so pleased with it that I am linking to it here for all to see:
http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com.au/2012/11/featurecollection-cleanup.html
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/FeatureCollection+cleanup

You made some mention in confluence and git commit logs of the unsafe 
use of use utility classes in app-schema (simple feature assumptions?). 
I see your in-code comments. Please direct us to remaining areas of 
concern and we will at the least get them into Jira.

Thanks also for your improvements to dodgy size implementations in 
app-schema tests. Some of these classes go back to 2007 or earlier and 
need some attention.

Kind regards.

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel