consumption rates comparisons

2009-09-22 Thread VanDeveer, Stacy
Colleagues,

I am wondering if some of you can point me toward any comparisons of Northern  
Southern consumption of various resources (agricultural, mineral, whatever...) 
- current consumption, rates over time, etc.

Ideas, citations and naked self-promotion are all most welcome.

--Stacy









Stacy D. VanDeveer
Associate Professor

University of New Hampshire
Dept. of Political Science
Horton SSC
Durham, NH 03824 USA

stacy.vandev...@unh.edumailto:stacy.vandev...@unh.edu

tel:
fax:
mobile:
Skype ID:

(+1) 603-862-0167 [cid:image001.gif@01CA3B79.B5594AD0] 
http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=%28%2B1%29+603%2D862%2D0167email=...@cisunix.unh.edu
(+1) 603-862-0178
(+1) 781-321-5880 [cid:image001.gif@01CA3B79.B5594AD0] 
http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=%28%2B1%29+781%2D321%2D5880email=...@cisunix.unh.edu
stacy.vandeveer







Want to always have my latest 
info?https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=51539758810src=client_sig_212_1_banner_joininvite=1lang=en

Want a signature like 
this?http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_banner_siglang=en



inline: image001.gif

Re: The Age of Stupid Premiers

2009-09-22 Thread Elizabeth Chalecki
Yes, I went here in Boston, and the theater was packed (maybe because it was
the only one accessible by public transit?).  I found the film to be more
than a little depressing!

As far as scientific information goes, Al Gore did a better job in An
Inconvenient Truth of explaining why climate change is happening and what
are the scientific underpinnings of the theory, as well as providing a sense
of hopefulness that the average viewer can yet take action.  What Age of
Stupid did was to paint some possible results of the worst-case warming
scenario, and it did so in a very fatalistic manner, from the wind turbine
guy in the UK to the French Alpine climber to the two Iraqi kids.  I even
saw some people in the theater crying at the end, when Pete Postlethwaite
sends the Archive message into space.  I couldn't stay for the New
York-based QA after the film (nothing is sure in this world but death,
taxes, and that the dog must be let out), so I don't know if they provided
ideas for action, but future screenings of the film will not have a QA
afterward.

Overall, it's a good addition to the growing body of environmental films,
but I'm afraid that it's hopeless tone will push the average person into a
sense of futility.

-Beth

-- 
Elizabeth L. Chalecki
Visiting Asst. Professor, International Studies Program
Boston College
Carney 213
140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA  02467
chalecki [at] bc.edu
elizabeth.chalecki [at] gmail.com

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Alcock, Frank falc...@ncf.edu wrote:

  Did anyone besides myself see the film tonight?  If so, what did you
 think?

 --
 *From:* owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu on behalf of rldavis
 *Sent:* Sat 9/12/2009 4:48 PM
 *To:* NEES List; Global Environmental Education
 *Cc:* Monique Bosch
 *Subject:* The Age of Stupid Premiers

 Hi all-forgive me for cross posting. I wanted to bring the premier of a
 very important film to you attention. I was fortunate enough to see *The
 Age of Stupid* at a special showing for the attendees of the Climate
 Project’s Nashville Summit in March. At that time, it had only been released
 in the UK. It is a provocative, powerful, plausible, and disturbing film set
 in a post global warming world of 2055. From that perspective, it looks back
 at our own time, the “age of stupid” and chronicles 6 highly plausible (in
 fact, I see most of them actually going on now) stories that are interwoven
 to show how we got to a destroyed world. It is beautifully acted with Pete
 Postlethwaite as the principle and the production is excellent. About 20%
 fiction and 80% documentary. Here is the “blurb” from the web site:

 *The Age of Stupid* is the new four-year epic from McLibel director Franny
 Armstrong. Oscar-nominated Pete Postlethwaite stars as a man living alone
 in the devastated world of 2055, looking at old footage from 2008 and
 asking: why didn’t we stop climate change when we had the chance? *MORE
 *
 This will be premiered at a special showing at 400 theaters in North
 America on Monday 21 September at 7:30 eastern (6:30 central, etc.). I will
 be urging my own students to attend and I urge you to bring it to the
 attention of your students, friends, colleagues. You can get further
 information on both the film at the premier at the following web site:
 http://www.ageofstupid.net/screenings/country/United%20States the actual
 web site for the film (there is a link on the previous web site) is
 www.ageofstudpid.net. This site also talks about where to see the premier
 in 149 other countries around the world.

 For a review of the film from the *Sydney Herald* (it premiered in Aust
 and NZ in late August) go to
 http://www.ageofstupid.net/review/the_age_of_stupid_movie_review.

 Larry Davis




RE: consumption rates comparisons

2009-09-22 Thread Gary Gardner
Hi Stacy--
 
Brand new, easy to access report on consumption of resources worldwide 
available at:
 
http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2009/Overconsumption_Sep09.pdf
 
Hope this helps.
 
Gary
 
Gary Gardner
Senior Researcher
Worldwatch Institute

California office (to reach Gary) 
411 Central Avenue
Grass Valley, CA 95945
TEL: 530-273-7027
ggard...@worldwatch.org 

Main office 
1776 Massachusetts Avenue, NW  
Washington, DC 20036  
TEL: 202-452-1999
www.worldwatch.org



From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu on behalf of VanDeveer, Stacy
Sent: Tue 9/22/2009 11:42 AM
To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: consumption rates  comparisons



Colleagues,

 

I am wondering if some of you can point me toward any comparisons of Northern  
Southern consumption of various resources (agricultural, mineral, whatever...) 
- current consumption, rates over time, etc.  

 

Ideas, citations and naked self-promotion are all most welcome.

 

--Stacy

 

 

 

 

 

Stacy D. VanDeveer
Associate Professor 

University of New Hampshire
Dept. of Political Science
Horton SSC
Durham, NH 03824 USA 

stacy.vandev...@unh.edu mailto:stacy.vandev...@unh.edu  

tel: 
fax: 
mobile: 
Skype ID:

(+1) 603-862-0167   
http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=%28%2B1%29+603%2D862%2D0167email=...@cisunix.unh.edu
 
(+1) 603-862-0178
(+1) 781-321-5880  
http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=%28%2B1%29+781%2D321%2D5880email=...@cisunix.unh.edu
 
stacy.vandeveer 

 

Want to always have my latest info? 
https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=51539758810src=client_sig_212_1_banner_joininvite=1lang=en
 

Want a signature like this? 
http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_banner_siglang=en 

 

inline: image001.gif

RE: The Age of Stupid Premiers

2009-09-22 Thread Wright, Angus

I did see it, and have to confess that I was disappointed. A heart-felt and 
sincere efort, but, in my view, not successful. Despite some brilliant pieces 
and insights, there were a lot of problems. Too many loose ends and points made 
vaguely or imprecisely. Too many questions embedded in the basic narrative 
(How's that guy providing the energy and maintenance for all those massive 
computers as humanity nearly vanishes and society has collapsed? Or didn't the 
filmmakers just love all too much that fancy computer wizardry as a way of 
telling a story, so, what the hell with the basic narrative underpinning?) How 
about telling us the real story of the long conflict in the Nigerian Delta 
region?  And, by the by, why did that bright young lady decide she was going to 
be famous instead of becoming a doctor--maybe because she was seeing herself 
depicted on film and having those good times with the film makers--a problem of 
the observed being changed by the observor, perhaps? And, ho!
 w about pointing out that the Delta region itself is likely to be an early 
victim of sea level rise? And, similarly, throughout the film, just a lot of 
things that are not well carried through nor adequately explored.

And, in forty years of activism and teaching, if there is one thing that I 
think I have learned it is that you are not likely to get very far with people 
by calling them stupid. No better way to close a mind than that. Or invite 
irritated counter-arguments that are likely to be beside the point but that 
assert a will and intelligence on the part of the one called stupid.

For me, one of the most important and well-done segments was the one on NIMBY 
and wind farms in England. This one was well-framed and beautifully told in a 
way that at least should have an impact. One felt that the film-makers were 
more assured and competent on their home ground.

As an example of organizing, it didn't seem well-organized--there was virtually 
no local publicity and the theater was near empty in Sacramento, and clearly 
with the already deeply converted. The Hollywood premier imitation was cheesey 
and distracting. And, rather than simply having an academic tell us that mass 
organizing was a good idea, or in addition to that, actually telling us about 
some of the many examples of effective organizing that are going on?

It seems to me that An Inconvenient Truth remains a much better film whether 
one is looking for accuracy or impact.

I would be interested in reading what others think.

Angus

Angus Wright
Professor Emeritus of Environmental Studies
California State University, Sacramento

From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu 
[owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Alcock, Frank 
[falc...@ncf.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 7:34 PM
To: rldavis; NEES List; Global Environmental Education
Cc: Monique Bosch
Subject: RE: The Age of Stupid Premiers

Did anyone besides myself see the film tonight?  If so, what did you think?


From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu on behalf of rldavis
Sent: Sat 9/12/2009 4:48 PM
To: NEES List; Global Environmental Education
Cc: Monique Bosch
Subject: The Age of Stupid Premiers

Hi all-forgive me for cross posting. I wanted to bring the premier of a very 
important film to you attention. I was fortunate enough to see The Age of 
Stupid at a special showing for the attendees of the Climate Project’s 
Nashville Summit in March. At that time, it had only been released in the UK. 
It is a provocative, powerful, plausible, and disturbing film set in a post 
global warming world of 2055. From that perspective, it looks back at our own 
time, the “age of stupid” and chronicles 6 highly plausible (in fact, I see 
most of them actually going on now) stories that are interwoven to show how we 
got to a destroyed world. It is beautifully acted with Pete Postlethwaite as 
the principle and the production is excellent. About 20% fiction and 80% 
documentary. Here is the “blurb” from the web site:

The Age of Stupid is the new four-year epic from McLibel director Franny 
Armstrong. Oscar-nominated Pete Postlethwaite stars as a man living alone in 
the devastated world of 2055, looking at old footage from 2008 and asking: why 
didn’t we stop climate change when we had the chance? MORE

This will be premiered at a special showing at 400 theaters in North America on 
Monday 21 September at 7:30 eastern (6:30 central, etc.). I will be urging my 
own students to attend and I urge you to bring it to the attention of your 
students, friends, colleagues. You can get further information on both the film 
at the premier at the following web site: 
http://www.ageofstupid.net/screenings/country/United%20States the actual web 
site for the film (there is a link on the previous web site) is 
www.ageofstudpid.net. This site also talks about where to see the premier in 
149 other countries around the world.

For a 

RE: The Age of Stupid Premiers

2009-09-22 Thread Alcock, Frank
I suspect that many of my colleagues will disagree with me but let me
share some thoughts.

 

If this film's intent is to catalyze action across a broad range of
demographic groups I doubt it will have its intended effect.  Worse, it
might actually have some unintended consequences.  I think that hard
core climate change activists will see it as a therapeutic venting
exercise and/or an energizing call to arms.  But for most Americans I
fear that it plays into the worst stereotypes of global warming alarmism
and it violates just about every principle of effective communications
strategies for stimulating social change (doomsday scenarios and shaming
rarely invoke the desired response).  There were a few segments that I
liked.  The cartoons were harsh societal critiques but presented in a
witty sort of way.  And the Alps and UK-NIMBY chronicles were compelling
in many respects.  On the whole, however, I had a lot of issues with the
coherence and likely impact of the messages implicit in many of the
chronicles - some of which are touched upon by Beth, Angus and Michelle
- and I thought the solutions segment was a ripe target for political
ridicule.  For those of you that pay close attention to rhetoric in
American political debates, you probably have noticed how hard the
conservative talking heads have worked to associate the word rationing
and images of Soviet style bread lines with liberal and/or democratic
policy agendas.  They don't want you to think of rationing when you
think of health care reform, they want rationing to be an immediate
psychological response to the word liberal or democrat in a word
association exercise for every American. So you can probably guess what
my reaction was to the carbon rationing card idea.  I'd go so far as to
say that those who would like to see American climate change legislation
derailed would probably want as many Americans as possible to see that
segment if not the entire film.  I wouldn't be surprised to see some of
the conservative talk show hosts drawing people's attention to the movie
and encouraging them to see it.  No need for presenting distorted
caricatures.  Here's your liberal worldview and accompanying policy
agenda in all its glory.

 

I'm afraid this movie (and the accompanying premier theatrics)
reinforced my sense that climate activists like to make movies that
appeal to climate activists.  They also like to congratulate themselves
for doing so.  Meanwhile, powerful interest groups that have a stake in
the status quo continue to pay people to communicate messages to
targeted demographic groups through a variety of media channels with
very effective results.

 

Feel free to disagree.

 

Frank

 

 



From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu
[mailto:owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of
Betsill,Michele
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:19 PM
To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: RE: The Age of Stupid Premiers

 

I too went to the premier but left before the after show events (turns
out kids must also be tended to!). I think I'm still processing my
response and will be interested to hear reactions tomorrow from some of
my students. I definitely went away with a sick feeling in my stomach
but wasn't convinced it was a great mechanism for educating the general
public about climate change. I agree with Angus that many points were
unconnected and/or left vague and I wonder whether those who do not
spend 24/7 thinking about climate change would really be able to put the
pieces together. I'm afraid people will leave either feeling that the
situation is hopeless or incredibly guilty, neither of which is
particularly helpful in mobilizing society for change. Finally, I was
surprised by the faith the filmmakers put in multilateral environmental
agreements. At the end, they suggest the fate of the human species rests
on the outcome of Copenhagen. That's a REALLY scary thought and misses
so many of the other opportunities we have for addressing the issue. 

 

My two cents for what it's worth.

 

Michele

 

 

___

Michele Betsill, PhD

Associate Professor

Department of Political Science

Clark B350

Colorado State University

Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

USA

+1 970 491 5270

 

Founder and co-leader, Environmental Governance Working Group
http://egwg.colostate.edu http://egwg.colostate.edu/ 

 

From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu
[mailto:owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Elizabeth
Chalecki
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Alcock, Frank; gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: The Age of Stupid Premiers

 

Yes, I went here in Boston, and the theater was packed (maybe because it
was the only one accessible by public transit?).  I found the film to be
more than a little depressing!  

As far as scientific information goes, Al Gore did a better job in An
Inconvenient Truth of explaining why climate change is happening and
what are the 

Re: consumption rates comparisons

2009-09-22 Thread Peter Jacques


Hi all
related to Stacy's request, can someone tell me the original source of the "20% of population consuming 80% of the worlds resources" dynamic? I think it was a world bank pub somewhere but I can not find it.

Peter


Peter J. Jacques, Ph.D. 
Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Central FloridaP.O. Box 1613564000 Central Florida Blvd.Orlando, FL 32816-1356 Phone: (407) 823-2608 Fax: (407) 823-0051http://ucf.academia.edu/PeterJacques 
 "VanDeveer, Stacy" stacy.vandev...@unh.edu 9/22/2009 11:42 AM 

Colleagues,

I am wondering if some of you can point me toward any comparisons of Northern  Southern consumption of various resources (agricultural, mineral, whatever…) – current consumption, rates over time, etc. 

Ideas, citations and naked self-promotion are all most welcome.

--Stacy






























Stacy D. VanDeveerAssociate Professor 

University of New HampshireDept. of Political ScienceHorton SSCDurham, NH 03824 USA 


stacy.vandev...@unh.edu 





tel: fax: mobile: Skype ID:

(+1) 603-862-0167 (+1) 603-862-0178(+1) 781-321-5880 stacy.vandeveer 












Want to always have my latest info?

Want a signature like this?



RE: The Age of Stupid Premiers

2009-09-22 Thread David L. Levy
I didn't get to see it, but have been following the substantial
publicity, especially with all the celebs and politicians at the British
launch earlier in the year, and the reviews have generally been
positive. http://www.ageofstupid.net/press_reviews

 

Films can be very powerful emotionally without having the tidy coherence
of an academic article - from the trailers and clips, I imagine that Age
of Stupid could move a lot of people from concern to activism. At least
it's not as silly as Day after Tomorrow! But it's also likely to be
polarizing, giving fuel to the Glenn Beck followers who hate health care
reform and everything else coming out of the Obama administration. 

 

Disaster scenarios such as Age of Stupid and Christopher Steiners'
recent $20 per Gallon provide the hook for my latest blog item about
drivers for climate action, The Age of Wisdom?
http://climateinc.org/2009/09/the-age-of-wisdom/   (was that another
plug for my Climate Inc. http://climateinc.org/  blog?!)

 

Cheers

David

 

David L. Levy 

Professor and Chair

Department of Management and Marketing
University of Massachusetts, Boston 

100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125, USA 
http://www.faculty.umb.edu/david_levy/
http://www.faculty.umb.edu/david_levy/  

Climate Inc. http://climateinc.org/  - Business and Climate Change
Blog

 



student activism (?) and climate change song from down under

2009-09-22 Thread Charlotte Epstein
Dear All

To add slightly different note on activism, and on music rather than film, some 
time ago a list was circulated with climate change songs. My students really 
enjoyed it. So much so they’ve sent me one of their own. So here’s to add a 
song from down under and a GEP student

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x-13jNXux8

 

charlotte

Dr Charlotte Epstein

Senior Lecturer

Department of Government and International Relations

School of Social and Political Sciences

The University of Sydney

Room 287 | Merewether Building (HO4) 

NSW  2006| Australia 

P 61 2 9351 2082 F 61 2 9351 3624
e c.epst...@usyd.edu.aul | w 
http://www.arts.usyd.edu.au/departs/government/staff/charlotte_epstein.htm



RE: consumption rates comparisons

2009-09-22 Thread HARRIS, Paul Gordon
But this seems to equate people with states. The statement seems to be saying 
that high-income countries are consuming 20%, etc. People here are proxies for 
states. Consequently, I would not rely on these statistics. After all, there 
are now more 'high-income' people in China than in, say, Germany, and certainly 
the UK (and possibly the US)...


-Original Message-
From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu on behalf of Olivia Bina
Sent: Wed 9/23/2009 1:09 PM
To: Pam Chasek
Cc: Peter Jacques; gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: consumption rates  comparisons
 
Dear all,

since I too needed the exact reference, I went off to look for it.  
Thanks Pam!

UNDP (1998) Human Development Report 1998 Consumption for Human  
Development - Overview, Summary version, the United Nations  
Development Programme, New York, http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr1998/ 
  (accessed: 22/9/09).

'Inequalities in consumption are stark. Globally, the 20% of the  
world's people in the highest-income countries account for 86% of  
total private consumption on expenditures - the poorest 20% a  
miniscule 1.3%'
page 2

and graph, p.3

best

Olivia


***
Olivia Bina
Assistant Professor, Energy, Sustainable Development, SEA
International Deputy Director, Centre for Strategic Environmental  
Assessment for China
Department of Geography and Resource Management
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong S.A.R.

Tel work: (00852) 2609 6647
Email: o.c.bina...@cantab.net
Skype: oliviabina
***

On 23 Sep 2009, at 04:31, Pam Chasek wrote:

 I believe the source was
 UNDP, Human Development Report 1998 (New York: Oxford University  
 Press, 1998).


 Pam
 Pamela Chasek, PhD
 Executive Editor, Earth Negotiations Bulletin
 IISD Reporting Services

 300 East 56th Street #11A
 New York, NY 10022 USA
 +1-212-888-2737
 E-mail: p...@iisd.org
 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
 www.iisd.org
 IISD Reporting Services - Earth Negotiations Bulletin
 www.iisd.ca
 Subscribe for free to our publications
 http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm



 From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu 
 [mailto:owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu 
 ] On Behalf Of Peter Jacques
 Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:57 PM
 To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
 Subject: Re: consumption rates  comparisons

 Hi all
 related to Stacy's request, can someone tell me the original source  
 of the 20% of population consuming 80% of the worlds resources  
 dynamic? I think it was a world bank pub somewhere but I can not  
 find it.

 Peter

 Peter J. Jacques, Ph.D.
 Department of Political Science
 University of Central Florida
 P.O. Box 161356
 4000 Central Florida Blvd.
 Orlando, FL 32816-1356

 Phone: (407) 823-2608
 Fax: (407) 823-0051
 http://ucf.academia.edu/PeterJacques

  VanDeveer, Stacy stacy.vandev...@unh.edu 9/22/2009 11:42 AM  
 
 Colleagues,

 I am wondering if some of you can point me toward any comparisons of  
 Northern  Southern consumption of various resources (agricultural,  
 mineral, whatever.) - current consumption, rates over time, etc.

 Ideas, citations and naked self-promotion are all most welcome.

 --Stacy





 Stacy D. VanDeveer
 Associate Professor
 University of New Hampshire
 Dept. of Political Science
 Horton SSC
 Durham, NH 03824 USA
 stacy.vandev...@unh.edu
 tel:
 fax:
 mobile:
 Skype ID:
 (+1) 603-862-0167 image001.gif
 (+1) 603-862-0178
 (+1) 781-321-5880 image001.gif
 stacy.vandeveer

 Want to always have my latest info?
 Want a signature like this?