Re: Emerging environmental issues?

2006-04-05 Thread Kirstenworm
Dear Beth,

Last semester a student of mine wrote a very interesting paper on energy and 
securitization of energy. The issue can be an interest of its own in view on 
the recent EU initiative to adopt a common energy stratgy. However, the issue 
can also be viewed as an input to the climate agenda or even a future 
competing issue with the climate issue in view of the US strategy to develop 
alternatives to the Kyoto mechnisms based on clean energy technology.

Besides, in line with the Copenhagen school og 'securitizationen' I have in my 
course this semester introduced the  issue of securitization of environment as 
an answer to the claims on 'death of environmenalism' and the challenges 
facing  the Stockholm-Rio environmental agende from the Millennium goals, fear 
 of terriorism etc.


Best regards,

Kirsten Worm
Department of Political Science,
University of Copenhagen

On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:53:26 -0400, Beth DeSombre wrote
 For a committee I'm on (proposing directions for a university
 environmental institute) I've been charged with determining what 
 people in my research community see as emerging environmental 
 issues.  These can be based on topic/issue area (e.g. nanotechnology,
  nitrogen pollution), approach (e.g. market mechanisms for 
 environmental regulation, private regulatory processes), or even 
 thinking about other ways we might usefully consider environmental 
 issues (e.g. consumption, sufficiency).
 
 So, if you're willing to weigh in, where do you see our field going 
 in the not-too-distant future?  What are the things we as scholars 
 should be gearing up to try to consider?
 
 Incidentally, this shouldn't be limited to an international focus -- 
 all scales, from very local, through national and international, are 
 relevant.
 
 Thanks in advance to those willing to conceptualize and speculate.
 
 Beth
 
 Elizabeth R. DeSombre
 Wellesley College





Re: Emerging environmental issues?

2006-04-04 Thread DG Webster

Hello everyone,

I thought I would take this opportunity to introduce myself, since I'm 
new to the list, and to chime in on Beth's question at the same time.  
I'm currently a postdoc at the University of Southern California's 
Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies. My degree (also from USC) 
is in political economy and public policy.  I'm interested in modeling 
institutional change as an evolutionary process, especially in regards 
to the ways in which decision makers modify their beliefs and policy 
preferences as the costs of overexploitation manifest. In my work agents 
are expected to satisfice, rather than maximize, as they bargain over 
common pool resources. I strive to address the larger questions of 
whether or not effective action will be taken in time to avert 
irreversible events and how much retroactive attempts to deal with 
global environmental problems will cost if/when they occur.  To date, 
the majority of my research has been focused on the origins of recent 
innovations in international fisheries management, especially the 
relatively new trade-based monitoring and enforcement mechanisms that 
have been adopted in several of the largest multilateral fisheries 
commissions. I've also done work in the areas of forest regulation, 
perceptions of beach amenities, and the role of natural vs. human 
resources in economic development.


Given all that, I certainly hope that Armin is right and global 
fisheries depletion will receive more attention in the future, along 
with most of the other issues that have already been mentioned, 
particularly transparency, accountability, and measuring effectiveness. 
Along those lines, I'm somewhat surprised that ocean mining or farming 
have yet to be mentioned. As the land becomes exhausted, growing demand 
and technological innovations are making each more profitable.


In addition, it seems like a major methodological issue that will become 
increasingly important is the problem of dealing with complexity, both 
in human and natural systems.  This should entail the development of new 
tools for exploring non-linearity in dynamic systems, such as agent 
based models, as well as escalation of the trend toward 
multi-disciplinary analysis.


Lastly, new work regarding cognition and information technologies is 
highly pertinent to environmental studies, since both play a critical 
role in policy-making, institution building, and the empowerment of 
civil society. A better understanding of the way in which we find and 
process information should shed light on old problems, like the 
influence of activism, and growing concerns, such as our collective 
ability to adapt to environmental changes that we have been unable to 
prevent.


livwell,
DG Webster

PS Yes, I really do go by my innitials. It may seem strange at first, 
but most people get used to it.


Beth DeSombre wrote:


For a committee I'm on (proposing directions for a university
environmental institute) I've been charged with determining what people in
my research community see as emerging environmental issues.  These can be
based on topic/issue area (e.g. nanotechnology, nitrogen pollution),
approach (e.g. market mechanisms for environmental regulation, private
regulatory processes), or even thinking about other ways we might usefully
consider environmental issues (e.g. consumption, sufficiency).

So, if you're willing to weigh in, where do you see our field going in the
not-too-distant future?  What are the things we as scholars should be
gearing up to try to consider?  


Incidentally, this shouldn't be limited to an international focus -- all
scales, from very local, through national and international, are relevant.

Thanks in advance to those willing to conceptualize and speculate.

Beth

Elizabeth R. DeSombre
Wellesley College



 



Re: Emerging environmental issues?

2006-04-03 Thread Radoslav Dimitrov
One recurrent theme at various intergovernmental meetings is  
Coordination. With a plethora of multilateral agreements, many of  
which are interrelated, there is frequent talk about coordinating  
their implementation. Synergies is a keyword in global policy  
discourse and an item on the formal agendas of many meetings.  
Similarly, the overpopulation with IGOs of overlapping mandates and  
jurisdiction, there are constant discussions at various fora about  
coordinating IGO activities. Various examples can be offered, from  
workshops on synergies among the Rio Conventions, to setting up a  
Collaborative Partnership on Forests (among 7 or so IGOs), to  
persistent proposals to  create a grandiose environmental  
organization. (I mean ideas that circulate among governments, apart  
from the academic proposals of Esty, Biermann and others. There are  
have been high level meetings on this topic, involving ministers).


So, there is a coordination or Governing governance theme that can  
be treated as an emerging issue in global environmental politics.


Hope this helps, Beth.

Rado

Radoslav S. Dimitrov, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
University of Western Ontario
Social Science Centre
London, Ontario
Canada N6A 5C2
Tel. +1(519) 661-2111 ext. 85023
Fax +1(519) 661-3904
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 3-Apr-06, at 5:53 PM, Beth DeSombre wrote:


For a committee I'm on (proposing directions for a university
environmental institute) I've been charged with determining what  
people in
my research community see as emerging environmental issues.  These  
can be

based on topic/issue area (e.g. nanotechnology, nitrogen pollution),
approach (e.g. market mechanisms for environmental regulation, private
regulatory processes), or even thinking about other ways we might  
usefully

consider environmental issues (e.g. consumption, sufficiency).

So, if you're willing to weigh in, where do you see our field going  
in the

not-too-distant future?  What are the things we as scholars should be
gearing up to try to consider?

Incidentally, this shouldn't be limited to an international focus  
-- all
scales, from very local, through national and international, are  
relevant.


Thanks in advance to those willing to conceptualize and speculate.

Beth

Elizabeth R. DeSombre
Wellesley College






RE: Emerging environmental issues?

2006-04-03 Thread Wil Burns
Hey Beth (and I hope your new campus-wide initiative will provide us all
with ample funds to work on these things),

I have one micro and one more macro suggestion:

1. Nanotechnology: in my mind this could be GMOs on steroids as an
environmental threat; in many ways, I see the same kind of responses
nationally and internationally:
a. A feckless operationalization of the precautionary principle;
b. Inadequate assessments of potential impacts in the face of huge
prospective profits and the dazzling packaging to date of its applications;
c. Very little public engagement, and most of that extremely ill-informed;

2. Macro issue: developing indicators to assess the ecologically
effectiveness of treaty regimes and to facilitate the development of
benchmarks. In the wildlife arena, where I work the most, regimes e.g. CMS
and CBD are just beginning to grapple with this critical issue.

I also agree with Radoslav that treaty congestion, or whatever metaphor
one prefers, has become a very hot topic, again evinced by substantial
amounts of time being devoted at the meetings of the parties in regimes such
as Rotterdam, CBD, CMS, Barcelona Convention. wil

Wil Burns
Associate Professor
International Environmental Policy Program
Monterey Institute of International Studies
460 Pierce Street
Monterey, CA.  93940-2659 USA
831.647.7104 (Phone)
831.647.4199 (Fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.miis.edu/gsips-progs-maiep.html
_
In the end we will conserve only what we love;
we will love only what we understand; and
we will understand only what we are taught.
  Baba Dioum



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Radoslav
Dimitrov
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 3:10 PM
To: Beth DeSombre
Cc: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Emerging environmental issues?

One recurrent theme at various intergovernmental meetings is  
Coordination. With a plethora of multilateral agreements, many of  
which are interrelated, there is frequent talk about coordinating  
their implementation. Synergies is a keyword in global policy  
discourse and an item on the formal agendas of many meetings.  
Similarly, the overpopulation with IGOs of overlapping mandates and  
jurisdiction, there are constant discussions at various fora about  
coordinating IGO activities. Various examples can be offered, from  
workshops on synergies among the Rio Conventions, to setting up a  
Collaborative Partnership on Forests (among 7 or so IGOs), to  
persistent proposals to  create a grandiose environmental  
organization. (I mean ideas that circulate among governments, apart  
from the academic proposals of Esty, Biermann and others. There are  
have been high level meetings on this topic, involving ministers).

So, there is a coordination or Governing governance theme that can  
be treated as an emerging issue in global environmental politics.

Hope this helps, Beth.

Rado

Radoslav S. Dimitrov, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
University of Western Ontario
Social Science Centre
London, Ontario
Canada N6A 5C2
Tel. +1(519) 661-2111 ext. 85023
Fax +1(519) 661-3904
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 3-Apr-06, at 5:53 PM, Beth DeSombre wrote:

 For a committee I'm on (proposing directions for a university
 environmental institute) I've been charged with determining what  
 people in
 my research community see as emerging environmental issues.  These  
 can be
 based on topic/issue area (e.g. nanotechnology, nitrogen pollution),
 approach (e.g. market mechanisms for environmental regulation, private
 regulatory processes), or even thinking about other ways we might  
 usefully
 consider environmental issues (e.g. consumption, sufficiency).

 So, if you're willing to weigh in, where do you see our field going  
 in the
 not-too-distant future?  What are the things we as scholars should be
 gearing up to try to consider?

 Incidentally, this shouldn't be limited to an international focus  
 -- all
 scales, from very local, through national and international, are  
 relevant.

 Thanks in advance to those willing to conceptualize and speculate.

 Beth

 Elizabeth R. DeSombre
 Wellesley College








Re: Emerging environmental issues?

2006-04-03 Thread Armin Rosencranz
My list includes three obvious issues -- accelerating climate change and its
effects, biodiversity loss and global fisheries depletion, plus two that
seem to have gotten less attention than they deserve, land degradation in
Africa and scarcity of fresh water in Africa and Asia.

armin





Quoting Beth DeSombre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 For a committee I'm on (proposing directions for a university
 environmental institute) I've been charged with determining what people
 in
 my research community see as emerging environmental issues.  These can be
 based on topic/issue area (e.g. nanotechnology, nitrogen pollution),
 approach (e.g. market mechanisms for environmental regulation, private
 regulatory processes), or even thinking about other ways we might
 usefully
 consider environmental issues (e.g. consumption, sufficiency).

 So, if you're willing to weigh in, where do you see our field going in
 the
 not-too-distant future?  What are the things we as scholars should be
 gearing up to try to consider?

 Incidentally, this shouldn't be limited to an international focus -- all
 scales, from very local, through national and international, are
 relevant.

 Thanks in advance to those willing to conceptualize and speculate.

 Beth

 Elizabeth R. DeSombre
 Wellesley College