Re: [Gimp-user] Editing gradients

2005-01-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
Hi Judy,

On Thursday 13 January 2005 19:25, Judy Wilson wrote:
> I want to edit a couple of gradients and I am unable to make the
> gradient editor work. I click on a gradient and I get the edit
> gradient dialog, but I am not able to do anything else. I right and
> left click on the segments and it seems that they are frozen. What
> am I doing wrong? I have googled for help and find some
> instructions, but they don't seem to work. I'm using Gimp 2.0 on
> Mepis. Thanks for any help!

So, the gradients that come pre-isntaled with the GIMP are read only - 
so they can't be edited, and the interface fails to show that by 
dispalying disabled controls. What is diasbled instead is the right 
click context menu.

All you have to do is click first on the "duplicate gradient" button, 
or in the "new gradient". That will bring up a working gradient 
editor dialog.

Regards,
JS
-><-


>
> Judy Wilson
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Editing gradients

2005-01-13 Thread Judy Wilson
Sorry, I just discovered that if I hit Duplicate gradient, I can edit 
it. Thanks!

Judy Wilson wrote:
I want to edit a couple of gradients and I am unable to make the 
gradient editor work. I click on a gradient and I get the edit gradient 
dialog, but I am not able to do anything else. I right and left click on 
the segments and it seems that they are frozen. What am I doing wrong? I 
have googled for help and find some instructions, but they don't seem to 
work. I'm using Gimp 2.0 on Mepis. Thanks for any help!

Judy Wilson
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Editing gradients

2005-01-13 Thread Judy Wilson
I want to edit a couple of gradients and I am unable to make the 
gradient editor work. I click on a gradient and I get the edit gradient 
dialog, but I am not able to do anything else. I right and left click on 
the segments and it seems that they are frozen. What am I doing wrong? I 
have googled for help and find some instructions, but they don't seem to 
work. I'm using Gimp 2.0 on Mepis. Thanks for any help!

Judy Wilson
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] gimp-gap compile

2005-01-13 Thread Andrew
I cannot compile gimp-gap (CVS). Autogen.sh tells me to go ahead and 
type 'make'. The output is below, but I don't really understand what 
it's telling me. Can anyone help?
TIA
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-gap]$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap'
Making all in images
make[2]: Entering directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap/images'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap/images'
Making all in libwavplayclient
make[2]: Entering directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap/libwavplayclient'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap/libwavplayclient'
Making all in libgapvidapi
make[2]: Entering directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap/libgapvidapi'
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..  -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT 
-DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/usr/local/include/gimp-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 
-I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 
-I/usr/include/freetype2/freetype2 
-I/usr/include/freetype2/freetype2/config   -I/usr/local/include/ffmpeg  
-I/usr/local/include/libmpeg3 -I/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/audio 
-I/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/video   -I/usr/local/include 
-DLOCALEDIR=\""/usr/local/share/locale"\" -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED 
-DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGIMP_DISABLE_DEPRECATED  -g -O2 -Wall -MT 
gap_vid_api.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/gap_vid_api.Tpo" -c -o gap_vid_api.o 
gap_vid_api.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/gap_vid_api.Tpo" ".deps/gap_vid_api.Po"; else rm -f 
".deps/gap_vid_api.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
In file included from gap_vid_api.c:714:
gap_vid_api_ffmpeg.c: In function `p_wrapper_ffmpeg_seek_frame':
gap_vid_api_ffmpeg.c:902: warning: implicit declaration of function `round'
gap_vid_api_ffmpeg.c: In function `p_ff_open_input':
gap_vid_api_ffmpeg.c:1682: error: structure has no member named 
`aspect_ratio'
gap_vid_api.c: At top level:
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:363: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_getbyte_noptr' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:381: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_getbit_noptr' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:400: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_getbits' defined but not 
used/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:407: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_showbits24_noptr' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:420: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_showbits32_noptr' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:433: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_showbits' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:439: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_getbits_reverse' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:448: warning: 
'mpeg3bits_showbits_reverse' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:514: warning: 
'mpeg3io_next_char' defined but not 
used/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:522: warning: 
'mpeg3io_read_int32' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:538: warning: 
'mpeg3io_read_int24' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:552: warning: 
'mpeg3io_read_int16' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:627: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_getbits2' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:642: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_getbyte' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:657: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_getbits' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:664: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_showbits16' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:680: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_showbits9' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:696: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_showbits5' defined but not used
/usr/local/include/libmpeg3/mpeg3protos.h:711: warning: 
'mpeg3slice_showbits' defined but not used
make[2]: *** [gap_vid_api.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap/libgapvidapi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/HDA2/cvs/gimp-gap'
make: *** [all] Error 2

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] undo scissors point

2005-01-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
On Thursday 13 January 2005 17:22, Gert Cuykens wrote:

>
> I am trying to select a character on a bike from a image and it has
> alot of shape variations in it ?
>
> How would you select complicated objects from a image ?

Depending on the image, a variety of techniches might be tried, in 
order to achieve the fastest or best results.

Using the scissors tool for starting, and later retouching it with the 
Free Select tool in add and subtract modes is an option. But you 
could find it is better to retouch the selection using the quickmask 
(click on the small square to the left of the horizontal scroll bar = 
doing this you will be able to 'paint' on the selection with any 
paint tool.

Regards,

JS
-><-

> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] undo scissors point

2005-01-13 Thread Gert Cuykens
>You don't.
>
>The scissors tool needs to be rewritten, and it's interface is from
>ancient times. You can move scissor points, but not undo them - just
>switch to another tool and back to scissors to start over.
>
>I'd advice you to use the Path tool instead - It will be good to
>select an object like a car window even.
>
>Moreover, paths are re-usable - just check the "Paths" dialog, which
>by default is on the third tab on the same place were is your layers
>dialog.

I am trying to select a character on a bike from a image and it has
alot of shape variations in it ?

How would you select complicated objects from a image ?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] undo scissors point

2005-01-13 Thread Gert Cuykens
How do you undo a scissors point ?

i tryed ctrl+shift but the sissosor point doesnt go away.

PS How do you select a part of a image for example a window of a car ?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


RE: [Gimp-user] Install gimp2

2005-01-13 Thread Ron Eggler




>On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 06:32:43AM +0100, Ron Eggler wrote:
>> hi,
>>  
>> i try to install gimp2.
>> had to update glib(2.6.0), pkconfig (0.14.0) but still get this error:
>> [c&p]
>> checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking for GLIB 
>> - version >= 2.4.5... no
>>  
>i am just guessing, it has been a long time since i have had pkg-config
problems; perhaps you are searching only in >/usr/local and not in /usr/.
>
>the first place i would check that your linking system searches both
locations.
>

Hi,

Erm how do I check that?

chEErs roN
 

Ron Eggler
Alte Römerstr.34
CH-8404 Winterhur 
Switzerland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rideon.ch





___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gap-xanim-SOLVED

2005-01-13 Thread Beatriz Botero
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:24AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
 

Hi,
Beatriz Botero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
   

Carol, that is the problem: I don't have the option "Extract
Videorange" I only have "Any XANIM readable". I have the programs
installed in /usr/bin that is in the path. The option Video is
working I did some tutorials with it.
 

Carol is using the CVS version of GAP which has much better support
for importing video and doesn't any longer rely on the outdated XAnim.
   

well, there you go, now we both know.  to get gap from cvs follow these
instructions:
http://www.gimp.org/source/howtos/stable-cvs-get.html
only use "cvs checkout gimp-gap" instead of "cvs checkout -r gimp-2-2
gimp" as the tutorial says.
carol
 

Using the Gimp-gap CVS and after making little changes to some of the 
programs that  Gimp-gap needs, I have  working the "Xtns ->Split video 
into Frames option". It gives me three options:

Extract Videorange
MPlayer based extract
XANIM based extract.
I just try the Videorange option with the mvi_0082.avi 
(http://carol.gimp.org/gimp/2.1/gap/extract/) and the extraction of the 
frame worked.

Thanks Carol and Sven for your help
Beatriz
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Graphire3 flakiness in gimp (1.2.5 and 2.0.4)

2005-01-13 Thread Mark D. Montgomery II

> 
> This seems rather arbitrary. Why is 2.0.4 considered more stable than
> 2.0.6? 2.0.6 is purely minor bugfixes over 2.0.4, so if anything, 2.0.6
> should be considered more stable than 2.0.4. So this doesn't make any
> sense.
> 

hehe.
No idea.
I feel the same way sometimes.  :)


> > Gimp 2.2.0 is currently hard masked.
> > 
> > As I dug around (and tried compiling gimp2 from the stock source), I
> > discovered that gimp 2.2.x require freetype 2.1.7 or greater.
> > The current stable version in gentoo is 2.1.5-r1.
> > 2.1.7 is not in portage.
> > 2.1.9 is masked in portage because of problems with it and Mozilla and
> > Firefox being compiled with older versions.
> > To install 2.1.9, you must first uninstall Mozilla and Firefox.
> > For me, however, they would not recompile afterwards (I'll have to try
> > again later and see if it was just a fluke).
> > 
> > So the current state of gimp 2.2.x on gentoo seems to depend on the
> > freetype/Mozilla issue.
> 
> Except there isn't an issue with freetype 2.1.9 and mozilla. Other
> distros are working happily with this combination. Again, this doesn't
> make any sense.
> 
> This didn't really clear anything up. It just looks like a bunch of
> arbritrary rules not grounded in reality.
> 
:)
Who knows.
Ask the developers.  :)
Well, I found postings in the forum about how to go about the upgrade
and not break stuff (there's a slightly newer version of firefox in
portage that doesn't have whatever issue the last one did),

So I'm now happily running gimp 2.2.0 (2.2.2 isn't in portage yet).
Unfortunately, it didn't fix my problem.  :(

> -Yosh

Mark II




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Gimp-user] Graphire3 flakiness in gimp (1.2.5 and 2.0.4)

2005-01-13 Thread Manish Singh
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:27:25PM -0500, Mark D. Montgomery II wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > i think we are having some problems because i dont really understand how
> > gentoo works.
> > 
> 
> hehe.
> Basically, it uses a package tree system (similar to debian I believe).
> When you tell it to install a package, it downloads the source and
> specified patches from the gentoo archives and compiles the program.
> When the maintainers for the specified package in the tree (for instance
> gimp), deem a package to be properly stable on gentoo, they set it
> stable.
> Packages that are not quite deemed stable are masked, but you can easily
> tell the system to try to install it anyway.  This is what I did to go
> from 2.0.4 to 2.0.6.  A package that is in the tree, but not deemed
> stable enough to even try to install (probably very new or has not been
> tested yet or depends on something funny) will be hard masked (set to
> masked in a file).  To install these you need to unmask the package in
> the mask file and then tell it to install.

This seems rather arbitrary. Why is 2.0.4 considered more stable than
2.0.6? 2.0.6 is purely minor bugfixes over 2.0.4, so if anything, 2.0.6
should be considered more stable than 2.0.4. So this doesn't make any
sense.

> Gimp 2.2.0 is currently hard masked.
> 
> As I dug around (and tried compiling gimp2 from the stock source), I
> discovered that gimp 2.2.x require freetype 2.1.7 or greater.
> The current stable version in gentoo is 2.1.5-r1.
> 2.1.7 is not in portage.
> 2.1.9 is masked in portage because of problems with it and Mozilla and
> Firefox being compiled with older versions.
> To install 2.1.9, you must first uninstall Mozilla and Firefox.
> For me, however, they would not recompile afterwards (I'll have to try
> again later and see if it was just a fluke).
> 
> So the current state of gimp 2.2.x on gentoo seems to depend on the
> freetype/Mozilla issue.

Except there isn't an issue with freetype 2.1.9 and mozilla. Other
distros are working happily with this combination. Again, this doesn't
make any sense.

This didn't really clear anything up. It just looks like a bunch of
arbritrary rules not grounded in reality.

-Yosh
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user