Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp contextual F1 help Crimson Editor in Windows
Hi, Matthew H. Plough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With that in mind, I think that a GIMP reinstall might solve your problem, but it's not the most elegant fix in the world. I don't see how a GIMP reinstall could solve this problem. GIMP doesn't put the name of the browser application anywhere. All it does is calling the function that I quoted here earlier. A reinstall is not going to change that. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Partially transparent layer
I have a layer that I want to make partially transparent by deleting out a checkerboard pattern in it. What would be the easiest way to do this? Thanks, Matt ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Partially transparent layer
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:42, matt-nc wrote: I have a layer that I want to make partially transparent by deleting out a checkerboard pattern in it. What would be the easiest way to do this? Filters-Render-Pattern-Checker Select by color, click on layer, edit-cut Thanks, Matt ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Partially transparent layer
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:42, matt-nc wrote: I have a layer that I want to make partially transparent by deleting out a checkerboard pattern in it. What would be the easiest way to do this? Oh..sorry - these steps I mentioned are for a blank layer. For a layer with images already you might: Add new layer, filters-render-pattern-checker Select by color click on layer switch back to your target layer, edit-cut OR: Right click on layer icon, on layer dialogs box, Add a layer mask filters-render-pattern-checker (having BW as your default colors) (ensuring you are editng layer mask, barely visible due to a white border around the layer icon - we need suggestions on how to improve the indicator that the layer mask is active) Thanks, Matt ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] lossless jpeg transformations
There are some lossless jpeg transformations - flip and rotate (as Ifran view does under Windows). Are there any plans to introduce them in GIMP? -- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
RE: [Gimp-user] Gimp contextual F1 help Crimson Editor in Windows
I can't remember if html files has been associated to crimson. May be, but now aren't associated. I haved tried tipical solution: unistall crimson, gimp, look for crimson association in the windows register. I have not found a solution. Thanks. Rubén, now consoleted, de Diego -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Matthew H. Plough Enviado el: jueves, 17 de febrero de 2005 2:07 Para: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Asunto: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp contextual F1 help Crimson Editor in Windows Rubén de Diego Martínez wrote: Do you understand now why I'm confused? I certainly do. That's a really, really bizarre behavior. I'll mull it over for a couple of days and see if I can figure out why it's doing that. Did you ever have Crimson Editor associated as the default application to open HTML files? I ran into a thing with Trillian on Windows where it would open pages in IE, even though I had switched the default app to Firefox. A reinstall solved the problem. With that in mind, I think that a GIMP reinstall might solve your problem, but it's not the most elegant fix in the world. Matt ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] lossless jpeg transformations
On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:24, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: There are some lossless jpeg transformations - flip and rotate (as Ifran view does under Windows). Are there any plans to introduce them in GIMP? Hmmm. No. They would not make much sense in the GIMP. Once an image is open, the GIMP doesn't 'know' were it came from - but for it's name and save options. For this to work, the transform tools would have to be 'jpeg aware' - moreover, no other image editing of any kind could be done besides the rotate or flip, before the image is saved back again. In short: you'd better doing these trasnforms with another program that doesn't do general editing of a image. Ok - I can think of one way of this being feasible - when the structure for the macro recorder is in place, or when an API for the undo steps is in place, the Jpeg filter could check, on save, if a) The image was loaded from a jpeg, and the original file is still available b) The only operations performed on the image were images that can be performed in lossless way And them it would: c) Discard the Gimp image data, and perform the transform by itself on the orginal file. --That means, that the jpeg plug-in would do the job, not the GIMP. It would be feasible, but I do not see it making much sense, and would be a terrible hack. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] lossless jpeg transformations
Could it be done via additional menu item: open for the lossless transformations with only few operations active? The operation itself has sense for digital images with portrait orientation. It would be nice to store the original images without data loss but with corrected orientation. By the way, I'm just curious, is it possible to apply different jpeg settings to the different parts of an image? :) To different pixels? I mean if the jpg image haven't undergo transformations affected the whole image, the unaffected parts of the image could be saved as the original compressed data without recompression (at least beyond adjacent points). These pixels could be obtained by the simple comparison with the original file. Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: Ok - I can think of one way of this being feasible - when the structure for the macro recorder is in place, or when an API for the undo steps is in place, the Jpeg filter could check, on save, if a) The image was loaded from a jpeg, and the original file is still available b) The only operations performed on the image were images that can be performed in lossless way And them it would: c) Discard the Gimp image data, and perform the transform by itself on the orginal file. --That means, that the jpeg plug-in would do the job, not the GIMP. It would be feasible, but I do not see it making much sense, and would be a terrible hack. ___ -- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] lossless jpeg transformations
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:02:31PM +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could it be done via additional menu item: open for the lossless transformations with only few operations active? The operation itself has sense for digital images with portrait orientation. It would be nice to store the original images without data loss but with corrected orientation. I think it makes very little sense to put this into the gimp. The extra work is IMHO just not worth it, a specialized extra application would be more useful. Or a plug-in. The number of (useful, lossless) operations that can be done on jpegs is very limited. By the way, I'm just curious, is it possible to apply different jpeg settings to the different parts of an image? Yes, you can vary quantizazion factors, but i don't think the jpeg library can handle that. The best you can do with respect to such tricks is to use scan scripts to achieve some effects, for example, the image at URLhttp://kaya.schmorp.de/sofia/p1010043.jpg has the monochrome parts first which has the effect of first showing the grayscale image on slow-enough connections. mean if the jpg image haven't undergo transformations affected the whole image, the unaffected parts of the image could be saved as the original compressed data without recompression (at least beyond adjacent points). These pixels could be obtained by the simple comparison with the original file. That would be easy iff the underlying jpeg library supports it, and could be limited to the jpeg plug-in. However, if you only use the ijg jpeg library and take care of not changing the quantization factors you will see that the pixels will already not change, i.e. there will be losless compression. So there is probably little demand for that. It would be far more useful to have a way of knowing the quality the file was saved with (by the ijg library) so it can be saved with the same quantizazion factor again, if possible (i.e. as long as you use the same library to compres/decompress the file). -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/ -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp contextual F1 help Crimson Editor in Windows
Hi, Rubn de Diego Martnez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't remember if html files has been associated to crimson. May be, but now aren't associated. I haved tried tipical solution: unistall crimson, gimp, look for crimson association in the windows register. This is not at all about filetype association. GIMP help calls the default web browser, so that's what you should be looking for. It appears that Crimson is set to be the default browser on your system. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
RE: [Gimp-user] Gimp contextual F1 help Crimson Editor in Windows
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] Rubén de Diego Martínez wrote: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:36:57 +0100 From: [iso-8859-1] Rubén de Diego Martínez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Matthew H. Plough' [EMAIL PROTECTED], gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: RE: [Gimp-user] Gimp contextual F1 help Crimson Editor in Windows I can't remember if html files has been associated to crimson. May be, but now aren't associated. I haved tried tipical solution: unistall crimson, gimp, look for crimson association in the windows register. At this stage all I can think of is that windows might have different associations for .htm (firefox) and .html (crimson) (or vice versa) I know on occasion I've had completely different programs for .jpeg and .jpg I have not found a solution. Hope we can figure this out. Sincerely Alan Horkan ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
