[Gimp-user] Best File Format For Scanned Images

2006-10-25 Thread Tom Purl
Hi.  I still use a film 35 mm SLR to take most of my real pictures,
and then scan them into my computer using Xsane and edit them use Gimp.

I would like to start archiving these images in a format that adheres to
the following requirements:

* Fidelity - The higher the better.  I would like the images to be of a
high enough quality where they could be easily used to create a clear 8
x 10.  I realize that other factors affect the clearness of a large
image (such as film speed and such).  File size isn't a factor.

* Compatibility - I would like the freedom of being able to send my
images to multiple developing companies and have them all be able to use
the image.  What's a good standard format that most real developing
companies accept?

* Bitrot - I would like to use a format that will probably be around for
a while.  I know that no format is completely future-proof, but I don't
want to convert these images more than once every couple of decades if
possible.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Tom Purl

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Best File Format For Scanned Images

2006-10-25 Thread Markus Kamp

Hi Tom!

In my opinion plain TIFF would be the format of choice for all the  
criteria mentioned.
Using none of the features supported by non-ancient versions of  
Photoshop like i.e. multi layers and omitting any kind of compression  
you should be fine for the forseeable future.


Regards Markus


Am 25.10.2006 um 17:39 schrieb Tom Purl:


Hi.  I still use a film 35 mm SLR to take most of my real pictures,
and then scan them into my computer using Xsane and edit them use  
Gimp.


I would like to start archiving these images in a format that  
adheres to

the following requirements:

* Fidelity - The higher the better.  I would like the images to be  
of a
high enough quality where they could be easily used to create a  
clear 8

x 10.  I realize that other factors affect the clearness of a large
image (such as film speed and such).  File size isn't a factor.

* Compatibility - I would like the freedom of being able to send my
images to multiple developing companies and have them all be able  
to use

the image.  What's a good standard format that most real developing
companies accept?

* Bitrot - I would like to use a format that will probably be  
around for
a while.  I know that no format is completely future-proof, but I  
don't

want to convert these images more than once every couple of decades if
possible.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Tom Purl

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Best File Format For Scanned Images

2006-10-25 Thread Tom Purl
Thanks Markus and Chris for the advice!

I checked out the Wikipedia page on the JPEG format, and found this
excellent link on image degradation when you edit a jpeg:

* http://www.jmg-galleries.com/articles/jpeg_compression.html

It appears that at the very least, I should first convert my image into
a TIFF before I edit the image.

 * Fidelity - The higher the better.  I would like the images to be of
 a high enough quality where they could be easily used to create a
 clear 8 x 10.  I realize that other factors affect the clearness of a
 large image (such as film speed and such).  File size isn't a factor.

It looks like both TIFF's and JPEG's will work equally well here, as
long as I convert the image to a different format (like TIFF or XCF)
*before* I edit it.

 * Compatibility - I would like the freedom of being able to send my
 images to multiple developing companies and have them all be able to
 use the image.  What's a good standard format that most real
 developing companies accept?

I'm pretty sure that my local Work Camera will print photos from a TIFF,
and I'm pretty sure that Flickr will do it too.  I just tried uploading
a TIFF to Snapfish, however, and it was rejected.  Thank goodness it's a
trivial task to convert it to a JPEG using ImageMagick.

 * Bitrot - I would like to use a format that will probably be around
 for a while.  I know that no format is completely future-proof, but I
 don't want to convert these images more than once every couple of
 decades if possible.

Both formats seem equally well-suited in this regard.

 Markus Kamp said:

 Using none of the features supported by non-ancient versions of
 Photoshop like i.e. multi layers and omitting any kind of compression
 you should be fine for the forseeable future.

Thanks for the tips!  If I start working with layers or anything like
that, I'll be sure to save the file as a Gimp XCF.

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Best File Format For Scanned Images

2006-10-25 Thread Alan Wolfe
Just curious, is there a reason that PNG is a bad choice for this?

Lossless compression seems like it'd be a great advantage and it isn't a fly by night file format.
On 10/25/06, Tom Purl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Markus and Chris for the advice!I checked out the Wikipedia page on the JPEG format, and found this
excellent link on image degradation when you edit a jpeg:* http://www.jmg-galleries.com/articles/jpeg_compression.htmlIt appears that at the very least, I should first convert my image into
a TIFF before I edit the image. * Fidelity - The higher the better.I would like the images to be of a high enough quality where they could be easily used to create a clear 8 x 10.I realize that other factors affect the clearness of a
 large image (such as film speed and such).File size isn't a factor.It looks like both TIFF's and JPEG's will work equally well here, aslong as I convert the image to a different format (like TIFF or XCF)
*before* I edit it. * Compatibility - I would like the freedom of being able to send my images to multiple developing companies and have them all be able to use the image.What's a good standard format that most real
 developing companies accept?I'm pretty sure that my local Work Camera will print photos from a TIFF,and I'm pretty sure that Flickr will do it too.I just tried uploadinga TIFF to Snapfish, however, and it was rejected.Thank goodness it's a
trivial task to convert it to a JPEG using ImageMagick. * Bitrot - I would like to use a format that will probably be around for a while.I know that no format is completely future-proof, but I
 don't want to convert these images more than once every couple of decades if possible.Both formats seem equally well-suited in this regard. Markus Kamp said: Using none of the features supported by non-ancient versions of
 Photoshop like i.e. multi layers and omitting any kind of compression you should be fine for the forseeable future.Thanks for the tips!If I start working with layers or anything likethat, I'll be sure to save the file as a Gimp XCF.
___Gimp-user mailing listGimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Best File Format For Scanned Images

2006-10-25 Thread Matthias Julius
Alan Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Just curious, is there a reason that PNG is a bad choice for this?

 Lossless compression seems like it'd be a great advantage and it isn't a fly
 by night file format.

Does PNG support 16 bit per channel?  If not then TIFF is probably the
better choice for those.

And if there is the possibility that the pictures need to be modified
they should not be saved in a lossy format to begin with.  Lossy
formats introduce artifacts that are normally not visible.  But
certain image enhancing operations can enhance those, too.

Matthias

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Best File Format For Scanned Images

2006-10-25 Thread Jeffrey Brent McBeth
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:37:55PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
 Alan Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Just curious, is there a reason that PNG is a bad choice for this?
 
  Lossless compression seems like it'd be a great advantage and it isn't a fly
  by night file format.
 
 Does PNG support 16 bit per channel?  If not then TIFF is probably the
 better choice for those.

Yes, it does.  I do medical diagnostic software, and we use the 16-bit
support of PNG every day.

Jeff

-- 

Computer Science is as much about computers as astronomy is about telescopes
-- Edsger Wybe Dijkstra (1930-2002)



pgpmQnge0AMeu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user