On 12/07, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > Convert 'fill_directory()' to use the pathspec struct interface from
> > using the '_raw' entry in the pathspec struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams
> > ---
> > dir.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> > index 7df292b..8730a4f 100644
> > --- a/dir.c
> > +++ b/dir.c
> > @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ int fill_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, const struct
> > pathspec *pathspec)
> > len = common_prefix_len(pathspec);
> >
> > /* Read the directory and prune it */
> > - read_directory(dir, pathspec->nr ? pathspec->_raw[0] : "", len,
> > pathspec);
> > + read_directory(dir, pathspec->nr ? pathspec->items[0].match : "",
> > + len, pathspec);
>
> Or even better, use common_prefix()'s return value here. I took me a
> while to realize this code was not buggy. It is fine to just pick the
> first item because the first characters of _all_ pathspec items
> must be the same. Something like this
>
> prefix = common_prefix(..)
> read_directory(..., prefix, strlen(prefix), pathspec);
>
> expresses it much better. Yeah one extra mem allocation, no big deal
> since fill_directory() is not called very often.
I didn't even notice that. Now looking at this you're right that its
not immediately obvious that what's there is correct. I'll change this.
>
> > return len;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
> >
> --
> Duy
--
Brandon Williams