Re: [Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-08-14 Thread richard lucassen
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 20:10:11 -0400
Laurent Dumont  wrote:

> Was it a bad raid in the end?

No, it was due to some bitrot I suppose on a USB2 port talking USB-1
only. Therefore it was 12Mbit max. After a new kernel reboot the port
functioned as expected.

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


Re: [Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-08-13 Thread Laurent Dumont
Was it a bad raid in the end?

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 3:24 PM richard lucassen 
wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:59:51 +0200
> richard lucassen  wrote:
>
> > > BTW, it is all hardware raid1 with 3.4GB SSD's. The server is a
> > > beast, a Dell R630
> >
> > I'll come back to the issue, I'm too busy at the moment.
>
> Finally it was a piece of broken hardware. Glusterfs is running ok now.
>
> --
> richard lucassen
> http://contact.xaq.nl/
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-08-13 Thread richard lucassen
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:59:51 +0200
richard lucassen  wrote:

> > BTW, it is all hardware raid1 with 3.4GB SSD's. The server is a
> > beast, a Dell R630
> 
> I'll come back to the issue, I'm too busy at the moment.

Finally it was a piece of broken hardware. Glusterfs is running ok now.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


[Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-07-18 Thread richard lucassen
I run glusterfs server on a sys-V version of Debian Gluster. The
machine is an 8-core/256GB/SSD server and I want to copy 400GB to a
mounted gluster device. The copy now runs for more than a day and it
has only copied 79GB. The network activity is around 4 to 8 Mbit.

Is this a known issue of version 5.5-3? I did not touch the defaults.

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


Re: [Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-06-30 Thread richard lucassen
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:57:40 +0200
richard lucassen  wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:06:48 +0300
> Strahil  wrote:
> 
> > I forgot to ask what kind of storage do you have on your gluster
> > machines. Is it rotational SATA, SAS or NVMe ?
> 
> I'm a bit busy now, I'll have a look at all your suggestions when I
> have some time. Hope I'll have some time during the weekend.
> 
> BTW, it is all hardware raid1 with 3.4GB SSD's. The server is a
> beast, a Dell R630

I'll come back to the issue, I'm too busy at the moment.

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


Re: [Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-06-27 Thread richard lucassen
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:06:48 +0300
Strahil  wrote:

> I forgot to ask what kind of storage do you have on your gluster
> machines. Is it rotational SATA, SAS or NVMe ?

I'm a bit busy now, I'll have a look at all your suggestions when I
have some time. Hope I'll have some time during the weekend.

BTW, it is all hardware raid1 with 3.4GB SSD's. The server is a beast, a
Dell R630

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


[Gluster-users] very poor performance on Debian Buster

2019-06-27 Thread richard lucassen
I run glusterfs server on a sys-V version of Debian Gluster. The
machine is an 8-core/256GB/SSD server and I want to copy 400GB to a
mounted gluster device. The copy now runs for more than 3 days and it
has only copied 243GB. The network activity is around 4 to 8 Mbit.

Is this a known issue of version 5.5-3? I did not touch the defaults.

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users