[gmx-users] my big problem

2007-03-29 Thread �zge
Hi everybody,
   
  I have a problem with my molcule.I have protein- ligand complex.One of my 
friends works with the same ligand.First of all we use the same mdp files.We 
made the simulation.But my calculations were halted.This is the error :
  Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
  Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8
  7 additional processes aborted (not shown)
   I only can think about the difference may be caused because of my protein 
-ligand complex is very big.It has 2 chains.
   
  After that I changed nstcomm ,nstxout ,nstvout ,nstfout, nstlog ,nstenergy,  
nstxtcoutvalues than it started to run. But the graphics after the analyze 
part(rmsd,gyration...) are very bad.I saw very sharp and meaningless pics.Then 
I would like to do the same thing with a paper.In this paper they made the 
calculation for 50 ps with position restarint.After they made for 50 ps without 
position restraint.At the end they made for 20 ns again full mdp.Idid the 
same.But the gyration and rmsd calculations are not the same.Again meaningless 
graphics.I have tried to solve the problems for two months.If anything exist to 
solve the problems I can send my mdp files.Is there a mistake for my mdp files?
   
  thank you ..

 
-
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] my big problem

2007-03-29 Thread Mark Abraham

? wrote:

Hi everybody,
 
I have a problem with my molcule.I have protein- ligand complex.One of 
my friends works with the same ligand.First of all we use the same mdp 
files.We made the simulation.But my calculations were halted.This is the 
error :

Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8
7 additional processes aborted (not shown)


This is just a generic MPI error message. You haven't established what 
has caused it yet. Try running the system for a short time on a single 
processor, to eliminate parallelism as a source of the problems (you'll 
need to re-grompp, of course).


 I only can think about the difference may be caused because of my 
protein -ligand complex is very big.It has 2 chains.
 
After that I changed 
nstcomm ,nstxout ,nstvout ,nstfout, nstlog ,nstenergy,  nstxtcoutvalues 
than it started to run. But the graphics after the analyze 
part(rmsd,gyration...) are very bad.I saw very sharp and meaningless 
pics.


Probably your topology is broken or your structure is insufficiently 
minimized or equilibrated.


Then I would like to do the same thing with a paper.In this paper 
they made the calculation for 50 ps with position restarint.After they 
made for 50 ps without position restraint.At the end they made for 20 ns 
again full mdp.Idid the same.But the gyration and rmsd calculations are 
not the same.Again meaningless graphics.I have tried to solve the 
problems for two months.If anything exist to solve the problems I can 
send my mdp files.Is there a mistake for my mdp files?


We can't tell yet, since you haven't told us any symptoms that are 
useful diagnostically.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] my big problem

2007-03-29 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar

Hi Ozge, Mark,

Mark is of course completely right regarding the MPI error.., you're
messing up something. Where was my mind? Sharp peaks in the RMSD and
radius of gyration plots may indicate jumps over the periodic
boundaries. But, that should not be a cause for breaking a simulation.
The only parameter you mentioned that could be linked to the stability
of the simulation is the nstcomm, the others only control output.

Of course you should try to understand what made your simulation
crash, in stead of treating symptoms, possibly covering up some flaw
in the set up of the simulation. Check the .log file.

Tsjerk

On 3/29/07, Mark Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

? wrote:
 Hi everybody,

 I have a problem with my molcule.I have protein- ligand complex.One of
 my friends works with the same ligand.First of all we use the same mdp
 files.We made the simulation.But my calculations were halted.This is the
 error :
 Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
 Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8
 7 additional processes aborted (not shown)

This is just a generic MPI error message. You haven't established what
has caused it yet. Try running the system for a short time on a single
processor, to eliminate parallelism as a source of the problems (you'll
need to re-grompp, of course).

  I only can think about the difference may be caused because of my
 protein -ligand complex is very big.It has 2 chains.

 After that I changed
 nstcomm ,nstxout ,nstvout ,nstfout, nstlog ,nstenergy,  nstxtcoutvalues
 than it started to run. But the graphics after the analyze
 part(rmsd,gyration...) are very bad.I saw very sharp and meaningless
 pics.

Probably your topology is broken or your structure is insufficiently
minimized or equilibrated.

Then I would like to do the same thing with a paper.In this paper
 they made the calculation for 50 ps with position restarint.After they
 made for 50 ps without position restraint.At the end they made for 20 ns
 again full mdp.Idid the same.But the gyration and rmsd calculations are
 not the same.Again meaningless graphics.I have tried to solve the
 problems for two months.If anything exist to solve the problems I can
 send my mdp files.Is there a mistake for my mdp files?

We can't tell yet, since you haven't told us any symptoms that are
useful diagnostically.

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] my big problem

2007-03-29 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar

Hi Mark,

Apparently, my mind was strongly biased towards reports on RMSD
radius of gyration sharp peaks, ignoring too much of what went
before started to run. I fully agree that I was careless here. But
he seems to say he did a simulation of 20 ns and then wonders why the
RMSD plots are different. Hasn't heard of stochastic processes. In any
case, having a two-component system with sharp peaks in RMSD and RGYR
does indicate PBC jumps, though that doesn't justify my neglect of the
other matters.

Tsjerk


On 3/29/07, Tsjerk Wassenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Ozge, Mark,

Mark is of course completely right regarding the MPI error.., you're
messing up something. Where was my mind? Sharp peaks in the RMSD and
radius of gyration plots may indicate jumps over the periodic
boundaries. But, that should not be a cause for breaking a simulation.
The only parameter you mentioned that could be linked to the stability
of the simulation is the nstcomm, the others only control output.

Of course you should try to understand what made your simulation
crash, in stead of treating symptoms, possibly covering up some flaw
in the set up of the simulation. Check the .log file.

Tsjerk

On 3/29/07, Mark Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ? wrote:
  Hi everybody,
 
  I have a problem with my molcule.I have protein- ligand complex.One of
  my friends works with the same ligand.First of all we use the same mdp
  files.We made the simulation.But my calculations were halted.This is the
  error :
  Error on node 1, will try to stop all the nodes
  Halting parallel program mdrun_mpi on CPU 1 out of 8
  7 additional processes aborted (not shown)

 This is just a generic MPI error message. You haven't established what
 has caused it yet. Try running the system for a short time on a single
 processor, to eliminate parallelism as a source of the problems (you'll
 need to re-grompp, of course).

   I only can think about the difference may be caused because of my
  protein -ligand complex is very big.It has 2 chains.
 
  After that I changed
  nstcomm ,nstxout ,nstvout ,nstfout, nstlog ,nstenergy,  nstxtcoutvalues
  than it started to run. But the graphics after the analyze
  part(rmsd,gyration...) are very bad.I saw very sharp and meaningless
  pics.

 Probably your topology is broken or your structure is insufficiently
 minimized or equilibrated.

 Then I would like to do the same thing with a paper.In this paper
  they made the calculation for 50 ps with position restarint.After they
  made for 50 ps without position restraint.At the end they made for 20 ns
  again full mdp.Idid the same.But the gyration and rmsd calculations are
  not the same.Again meaningless graphics.I have tried to solve the
  problems for two months.If anything exist to solve the problems I can
  send my mdp files.Is there a mistake for my mdp files?

 We can't tell yet, since you haven't told us any symptoms that are
 useful diagnostically.

 Mark
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623




--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] genion halted

2007-03-29 Thread Sampo Karkola

Dear list,

the genion program gets halted when I'm trying to replace the solvent 
molecules with ions. The command


genion -s protein_in_waterbox.tpr -o protein_out.gro -p topology.top 
-pname NA+ -nname CL- -random -neutral -conc 0.1


asks for the group of solvent molecules and when I tell him to use it I 
get this output


Selected 12: 'SOL'
Number of (3-atomic) solvent molecules: 9918

Processing topology
Replacing 9875 solute molecules in topology file (fdt.top)  by 22 NA+ 
and 21 CL- ions.


Back Off! I just backed up fdt.top to ./#fdt.top.2#
Replacing solvent molecule 1163 (atom 6250) with NA+

and then nothing happens. genion.log gets generated only half way. My 
system is Ubuntu 6.10 on AMD AthlonX2 and I've tried the packages via 
synaptic and also built from source. The same thing happens in both of 
them. Gromacs version is 3.3.1. However, when I try the same thing on 
another machine, a HP Proliant ML350 with Debian Sarge and Gromacs 
3.3.1, everything goes well.


None of the gromacs programs gives any errors before genion.

I'll give you more info about the system configuration if anyone asks :)

Sampo
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] genion halted

2007-03-29 Thread Sampo Karkola

Hi,

the same one, gcc-4.1. Have you tried with other versions?

Sampo

andrea spitaleri wrote:

Hi
which gcc have you used for compiling gromacs? I have the same problem in one 
pc in which I have
build gromacs using gcc-4.1

Regards

andrea

Sampo Karkola wrote:

Dear list,

the genion program gets halted when I'm trying to replace the solvent
molecules with ions. The command

genion -s protein_in_waterbox.tpr -o protein_out.gro -p topology.top
-pname NA+ -nname CL- -random -neutral -conc 0.1

asks for the group of solvent molecules and when I tell him to use it I
get this output

Selected 12: 'SOL'
Number of (3-atomic) solvent molecules: 9918

Processing topology
Replacing 9875 solute molecules in topology file (fdt.top)  by 22 NA+
and 21 CL- ions.

Back Off! I just backed up fdt.top to ./#fdt.top.2#
Replacing solvent molecule 1163 (atom 6250) with NA+

and then nothing happens. genion.log gets generated only half way. My
system is Ubuntu 6.10 on AMD AthlonX2 and I've tried the packages via
synaptic and also built from source. The same thing happens in both of
them. Gromacs version is 3.3.1. However, when I try the same thing on
another machine, a HP Proliant ML350 with Debian Sarge and Gromacs
3.3.1, everything goes well.

None of the gromacs programs gives any errors before genion.

I'll give you more info about the system configuration if anyone asks :)

Sampo
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] genion halted

2007-03-29 Thread Sampo Karkola

Hi,

so you got genion working with 4.0.2?

Sampo

andrea spitaleri wrote:

gcc-4.0.2 seems ok for gmx-3.3.1
I have also submitted in bugzilla a similar problem with g_rdf


Regards

andrea

Sampo Karkola wrote:

Hi,

the same one, gcc-4.1. Have you tried with other versions?

Sampo

andrea spitaleri wrote:

Hi
which gcc have you used for compiling gromacs? I have the same problem
in one pc in which I have
build gromacs using gcc-4.1

Regards

andrea

Sampo Karkola wrote:

Dear list,

the genion program gets halted when I'm trying to replace the solvent
molecules with ions. The command

genion -s protein_in_waterbox.tpr -o protein_out.gro -p topology.top
-pname NA+ -nname CL- -random -neutral -conc 0.1

asks for the group of solvent molecules and when I tell him to use it I
get this output

Selected 12: 'SOL'
Number of (3-atomic) solvent molecules: 9918

Processing topology
Replacing 9875 solute molecules in topology file (fdt.top)  by 22 NA+
and 21 CL- ions.

Back Off! I just backed up fdt.top to ./#fdt.top.2#
Replacing solvent molecule 1163 (atom 6250) with NA+

and then nothing happens. genion.log gets generated only half way. My
system is Ubuntu 6.10 on AMD AthlonX2 and I've tried the packages via
synaptic and also built from source. The same thing happens in both of
them. Gromacs version is 3.3.1. However, when I try the same thing on
another machine, a HP Proliant ML350 with Debian Sarge and Gromacs
3.3.1, everything goes well.

None of the gromacs programs gives any errors before genion.

I'll give you more info about the system configuration if anyone asks :)

Sampo
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] g_sdf again

2007-03-29 Thread syma
Hi,

I am using g_sdf to calculating the spatial distribution of lipid headgroups
around other species in my system.

The thing is when I get the gro file (produced by using the -r flag in
g_sdf) and then look at this in vmd or chimera with my spatial density file
(plt), the reference gro file is not positioned 'in' the box of density
produced by g_sdf.

Is this as it should be and I am interpreting my results incorrectly, or
have I set up my coordinate system incorrectly?

Many thanks in advance for help with this.

-Syma

***

Dr Syma Khalid  
Department of Biochemistry,   
University of Oxford   
South Parks Road,
Oxford
OX1 3QU
U.K.



***


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Carbon Nanotube Simulations

2007-03-29 Thread Robert Johnson

Do you want to simulate an infinite nanotube or a finite one?
Bob

On 3/28/07, George Abadir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

There is no C1 and C2 atom in the input PDB file, and the topology file
is not generated because x2top doesn't generate a topology because of
the errors. I don't understand what C (1) and C (2) means but it is not
C1 and C2; I mean not two different types of atoms. The PDB file is
generated simply from tubegen and I defined the residue type in the rtp
file.
Thanks

Mark Abraham wrote:

 George Abadir wrote:

 Hi, thank you very much for your help.
 I capped the CNT with hydrogen atoms (i.e., I changed the carbon
 atoms at the ends of the tube into hydrogen atoms), but now I get an
 error No
 forcefield type for atom C(1) with 2 bonds instead of No
 forcefield type for atom C(2) with 1 bonds ! Is there any way to
 solve this?


 Not without knowing what's wrong with the topology for C1 and C2.
 That's your job :-)

 Mark
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
 posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: How can I do the simulation of a protein with Tyr (SO3H)

2007-03-29 Thread Yang Ye

fulya caglar wrote:

Hi Tsjerk,
Thanks for your help.You're right about taking paths well walked by 
others,before starting new trails but I have to do this simulation 
for my study:(

Then do it in a right way. Hurry up!

Thanks very much for your suggestions again.
Sincerely
Fulya
*/Tsjerk Wassenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

Hi Fulya,

In addition to Mark's comments, if you have a friend who has the
proper background for such parameterization he/she will know what to
do and I don't need to describe the process. The basic thing is that
if you're a novice with MD, it's best to first take the paths well
walked by others, before starting new trails (in terms of
methodology/parameters; I don't want to suggest to repeat projects
from others, that's basically what tutorials are for, but I would
advice to use proteins/dna with no strings attached).

Regarding the mail server, the first two mails only arrived as
forwarded mails, with a lot of junk around the main question (which
makes reading less convenient).

Best,

Tsjerk

On 3/28/07, Mark Abraham wrote:
 fulya caglar wrote:
  Hi Tsjerk,
  Do you know how can I add parameters for sulfite bound?You are
right
  I have little experience in this field but maybe one of my
friends can
  do this.I would be very grateful if you can explain
parameterization
  briefly.

 It's an involved process, which varies considerably depending on the
 force field you're trying to extend. You should start by reading the
 paper that describes the parameterization of the force field you're
 trying to extend, and then thinking hard about how you can follow a
 similar process to get parameters that are consistent.

 Mark
 ___
 gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love 
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49980/*http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. 
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49980/*http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] query about making a pdb file

2007-03-29 Thread Jagannath Mondal

Hi all,
   I am a gromacs beginner. I am dealing with a 10-residue molecule  
each of which is un-natural amino acid called beta-peptide. I was  
wondering whether there is any option of making a PDB file so that I  
can use it to prepare the corresponding .gro file in gromacs. I  
somehow could generate the cartesian coordinates of the molecule.  At  
least, can you  suggest some software which are free and have mac- 
version so that I can generate the coresponding PDB file of the  
molecule from the cartesian coordinates.

 Thanks,
  Jagannath Mondal
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Carbon Nanotube Simulations

2007-03-29 Thread George Abadir

A finite one.
Thanks alot,
George

Robert Johnson wrote:


Do you want to simulate an infinite nanotube or a finite one?
Bob

On 3/28/07, George Abadir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


There is no C1 and C2 atom in the input PDB file, and the topology file
is not generated because x2top doesn't generate a topology because of
the errors. I don't understand what C (1) and C (2) means but it is not
C1 and C2; I mean not two different types of atoms. The PDB file is
generated simply from tubegen and I defined the residue type in the rtp
file.
Thanks

Mark Abraham wrote:

 George Abadir wrote:

 Hi, thank you very much for your help.
 I capped the CNT with hydrogen atoms (i.e., I changed the carbon
 atoms at the ends of the tube into hydrogen atoms), but now I get an
 error No
 forcefield type for atom C(1) with 2 bonds instead of No
 forcefield type for atom C(2) with 1 bonds ! Is there any way to
 solve this?


 Not without knowing what's wrong with the topology for C1 and C2.
 That's your job :-)

 Mark
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
 posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
posting!

Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php






___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] two chains

2007-03-29 Thread �zge
Hi 
   
  Thank you for your advices.I want to ask a question.Is there a difference in 
the MD simulation between A protein complex which has 2 chains and a molecule 
that has 1 chain?Are the parameters must be different ?Also I want to ask about 
trajconv.Where I had to add the pbc?I want to send you my directions.
  1.  pdb2gmx_mpi -f 1ppbfree.pdb -p 1ppbfree.top -o  1ppbfree.gro   
  2.editconf_mpi -f 1ppbfree.gro -o -d 0.8 -bt octahedron
  3.  genbox_mpi -cp out.gro -cs -p 1ppbfree.top -o 1ppbfree-gen.gro
  4.  grompp_mpi -v -f 1ppbfree-en.mdp -c 1ppbfree-gen.gro -o 
1ppbfree-en.tpr -p 1ppbfree.top
  5.mdrun_mpi -v -s 1ppbfree-en.tpr -o 1ppbfree-en.trr -c 1ppbfree-aftermin.gro 
-g 1ppbfree-en.log -e 1ppbfree-en.edr
   
  or is the pbc used in the script?
  Thank You very much
  Özge
   

 
-
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] query about making a pdb file

2007-03-29 Thread Jagannath Mondal

Hi,
   Thanks, But is it possible to get the corresponding PDB format of  
that molcule  from pymol after drawing it? Basically, I installed the  
pymol. But I could not find an option for writing the corresponding  
PDB structure of the entire molecule

  Jagannath

On Mar 29, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Jay Mashl wrote:

PyMOL (http://pymol.sf.net) is one option for building the chain  
based on natural amino acids and subsequently performing mutations.


Jay


On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Jagannath Mondal wrote:


Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:54:27 -0500
From: Jagannath Mondal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] query about making a pdb file Hi all,
  I am a gromacs beginner. I am dealing with a 10-residue molecule  
each of which is un-natural amino acid called beta-peptide. I was  
wondering whether there is any option of making a PDB file so that  
I can use it to prepare the corresponding .gro file in gromacs. I  
somehow could generate the cartesian coordinates of the molecule.   
At least, can you  suggest some software which are free and have  
mac-version so that I can generate the coresponding PDB file of  
the molecule from the cartesian coordinates.

Thanks,
Jagannath Mondal
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before  
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww  
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before  
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www  
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] g_sdf again

2007-03-29 Thread Dallas B. Warren
Syma,

 I am using g_sdf to calculating the spatial distribution of 
 lipid headgroups around other species in my system.
 
 The thing is when I get the gro file (produced by using the -r flag in
 g_sdf) and then look at this in vmd or chimera with my 
 spatial density file (plt), the reference gro file is not 
 positioned 'in' the box of density produced by g_sdf.
 
 Is this as it should be and I am interpreting my results 
 incorrectly, or have I set up my coordinate system incorrectly?

That does sound a bit unusual.

However, I use g_sdf quite extensively but don't use the reference
structure function.  Reason for this, is I have found that the one
generated for the molecules I simulate it is highly distorted and the
corresponding atom locations do not match up with where they they are
located if you calculate the sdf for the non-coordinate atoms within the
molecule.  So I use a representative molecule, rotate to match the sdf
for atoms within the molecule, then use that.  Not the best way to do
it, but it gets what I need.

Catch ya,

Dr. Dallas Warren
Lecturer
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology and Pharmacology
Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3010
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+61 3 9903 9524
-
When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble
a nail.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] query about making a pdb file

2007-03-29 Thread Jay Mashl


See 'help save'. Apparently there is no menu option for saving the 'all' group.

Jay


On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Jagannath Mondal wrote:


Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:41:35 -0500
From: Jagannath Mondal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jay Mashl [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] query about making a pdb file 


Hi,
 Thanks, But is it possible to get the corresponding PDB format of that
 molcule  from pymol after drawing it? Basically, I installed the pymol. But
 I could not find an option for writing the corresponding PDB structure of
 the entire molecule
 Jagannath

On Mar 29, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Jay Mashl wrote:

PyMOL (http://pymol.sf.net) is one option for building the chain based on 
natural amino acids and subsequently performing mutations.


Jay


On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Jagannath Mondal wrote:

 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:54:27 -0500
 From: Jagannath Mondal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
 To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Subject: [gmx-users] query about making a pdb file Hi all,
   I am a gromacs beginner. I am dealing with a 10-residue molecule each 
 of which is un-natural amino acid called beta-peptide. I was wondering 
 whether there is any option of making a PDB file so that I can use it to 
 prepare the corresponding .gro file in gromacs. I somehow could generate 
 the cartesian coordinates of the molecule.  At least, can you  suggest 
 some software which are free and have mac-version so that I can generate 
 the coresponding PDB file of the molecule from the cartesian coordinates.

 Thanks,
 Jagannath Mondal

___

 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
 posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww 
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] two chains

2007-03-29 Thread Mark Abraham

? wrote:

Hi
 


You've asked four different questions in the space of one paragraph, 
with little clarity. Please consider asking each question with some 
organised background information that you think will help us give you 
the answer you want.


Thank you for your advices.I want to ask a question.Is there a 
difference in the MD simulation between A protein complex which has 2 
chains and a molecule that has 1 chain?


No. If there's a covalent link then they'll need to end up as one 
molecule, otherwise more than one.


Are the parameters must be 
different ?


No. Why would they?


Also I want to ask about trajconv.


What did you want to ask? :-)

Where I had to add the 
pbc?I want to send you my directions.


As Dallas said, you introduce pbc with your choice of parameters in your 
.mdp file. It sounds like you should learn some things by looking at 
your .mdp files and understanding the effects of each parameter by 
looking them up in section 7.3


1.  pdb2gmx_mpi -f 1ppbfree.pdb -p 1ppbfree.top -o  1ppbfree.gro  
2.editconf_mpi -f 1ppbfree.gro -o -d 0.8 -bt octahedron

3.  genbox_mpi -cp out.gro -cs -p 1ppbfree.top -o 1ppbfree-gen.gro
4.  grompp_mpi -v -f 1ppbfree-en.mdp -c 1ppbfree-gen.gro -o 
1ppbfree-en.tpr -p 1ppbfree.top
5.mdrun_mpi -v -s 1ppbfree-en.tpr -o 1ppbfree-en.trr -c 
1ppbfree-aftermin.gro -g 1ppbfree-en.log -e 1ppbfree-en.edr
 
or is the pbc used in the script?


What script?

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] two chains

2007-03-29 Thread Yang Ye

özge kül wrote:

Hi
 
Thank you for your advices.I want to ask a question.Is there a 
difference in the MD simulation between A protein complex which has 2 
chains and a molecule that has 1 chain?

Yes. There is difference. But somehow, you need to rephrase your question.
Are the parameters must be different ?Also I want to ask about 
trajconv.Where I had to add the pbc?

the second step, editconf impose PBC onto the system.

I want to send you my directions.
1.  pdb2gmx_mpi -f 1ppbfree.pdb -p 1ppbfree.top -o  1ppbfree.gro  
2.editconf_mpi -f 1ppbfree.gro -o -d 0.8 -bt octahedron

3.  genbox_mpi -cp out.gro -cs -p 1ppbfree.top -o 1ppbfree-gen.gro
4.  grompp_mpi -v -f 1ppbfree-en.mdp -c 1ppbfree-gen.gro -o 
1ppbfree-en.tpr -p 1ppbfree.top
5.mdrun_mpi -v -s 1ppbfree-en.tpr -o 1ppbfree-en.trr -c 
1ppbfree-aftermin.gro -g 1ppbfree-en.log -e 1ppbfree-en.edr
 
or is the pbc used in the script?

Thank You very much
Özge
 



It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts 
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ 
with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. 
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ 




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Orientation of DMSO

2007-03-29 Thread David van der Spoel

Dinesh Pinisetty wrote:

Hello,

As suggested I tried using g_order with an .ndx file for 
only DMSO molecules. I did get an output file which did not have 
anything in it.


# This file was created by g_order which is part of G R O M A C S:

# GROningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation # All this happened at: Thu 
Mar 29 17:00:05 2007#


@ title Order tensor diagonal elements

@ xaxis label Atom

@ yaxis label S

@TYPE xy

I did not get any data, what I desire to achieve is to get an 
orientation profile for DMSO molecules. Can anyone please suggest me how 
to achieve it.


Sincerely,

Dinesh.

I didn't follow this thread, but g_order is not what you want. You may 
want to try g_dipoles -sl instead.


--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php