Re: [gmx-users] Running MD only for selected part of molecule

2008-10-17 Thread vivek sharma
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your reply...
and apologies for asking you again.

If I want to keep a part of my molecule fix, say part out of 12 angstrom
radius from the ligand and also want to make avoid energy calculation for
the same, (using energy_excl)
Do I need to mention the separate group for that part of molecule, (as I
already did to make that part position restrained), and next how I will
mention those part in .mdp file...
Is it like...
energy_excl   groupname protein/solvent   (if I want to avoid energy
calculation between the group and protein/solvent)
or something else need to be done than that (like during genpr option).

Please explainAs I have no idea to play with such option...

My apologies again, if these small question irritates you...

With Thanks,
Vivek

2008/10/15 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 vivek sharma wrote:


 Dear Justin,
 Thanks for your reply..
 But I am not getting how and where should I give the option of
 energy_excl. For freezing a part of molecule ?


 In the .mdp file.

  what are the other checks to be done for the same ?


 I don't know what you're asking.

 -Justin

  With Thanks,
 Vivek
 2008/10/14 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



vivek sharma wrote:



2008/10/14 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




   vivek sharma wrote:

   Hi there,

   I tried the mdrun by keeping a group of residue position
   restrained, and it is working well (verified by comparing
RMSD
   plot for the same), thanks for your suggestions regarding
the same.
   But, I have seen that the part of the molecule I kept for
PR is
   still having some motion, how can I keep that part rigid ?


   Position restraints do not necessarily guarantee that atomic
   positions stay absolutely fixed.  Instead, there is an energy
   penalty for moving them, which could in some cases be overcome.


   I am not getting any idea of energy_excl option mentioned
above,
   please explain.


   The freezegrps option can be used to fix atomic positions, but
 in
   this case large forces can be generated within the frozen
group.  As
   such, you can apply energygrp_excl to exclude energetic terms
within
   the frozen group.


Will it help me in reducing the time taken for the simulation if
I'll keep the part of molecule frozen ?


I've never used freezegrps for any large set of atoms, so maybe.  If
you've got surrounding solvent, though, the nonbonded interactions
are still calculated between the frozen group and solvent, unless
you turn that off too.  But then it starts getting really
unphysical, in my view.

-Justin

Thanks,
~Vivek



   -Justin

   With Thanks,
   Vivek

   2008/10/12 Erik Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  Hi,


  On Oct 10, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:


  I want to run MD over a part of my molecule ,
for few
  residues only (not the whole molecule).
  Can I do it using GROMACS ?
  I searched for the online documentation and
mailing list,
  but unable to get appropriate information.
  If somebody has already tried such things
earlier, please
  suggest and direct me for appropriate link and
address.


  Well, if your goal is to keep certain parts fixed
and allow
  others to move, probably the easiest way to do it
is to apply
  position restraints to the fixed part.


  You can also set parts of the system as a freeze
group, in which
  case you can exclude all nonbonded interactions inside
the freeze
  group with the energygrp_excl option in your mdp file.

  The main advantage of this is of course that you will
improve
  performance if 99% of your system is frozen (although all
  interactions between the frozen and non-frozen parts
 still
   have to
  be calculated). On the other hand, completely freezing
part
   of the
  system is not very realistic, and you're likely to get
strange
  behavior in the 

[gmx-users] ErrorBox was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file

2008-10-17 Thread vivek sharma
Hi Tehre,
i am running a job by keeping a part of molecule freeze by using the
.mdp option
__
energygrps_excl=  Terminal Terminal Terminal SOL  ! To remove
computation of nonbonding interactions between the frozen groups with
each other

and surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL)
freezegrps  =  Terminal  ! Index group to freeze
freezedim   =  Y Y Y
! Freeze this group in all directions, x,
y, and z
___


where frreze is a group mentioned in the index file...
During the run the job is being terminated with the following error
.
__
Step 1  Warning: pressure scaling more than 1%, mu: -3.51079e+22
-3.51079e+22 -3.51079e+22

---
Program mdrun_d, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: ns.c, line: 258

Fatal error:
Box was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file.
---

Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_d on CPU 0 out of 24

srun: error: n216: task0: Aborted
srun: Terminating job
__

Can somebody give an insight in the problem for figuring out the probable
cause of the error.

PS::Before the run I mentioned the boxsize in editconf as -box 7.5 5 6 ,
to keep the size of box and number of solvent optimum.
Does it have anything to do with the mentioned error ?


Looking for suggestions..
 with thanks,
Vivek
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] range of gen_seed

2008-10-17 Thread sarbani chattopadhyay
  
Hi everyone,
   I want to start from the same starting structure with 
different velocities.

In the .mdp file. I used 3 different values for gen_seed for three 
different runs : 1. one is 
the default, the other two are 1 and 571.

I want to know that does this ensure that the mdrun starts with diffrent 
velocities ?

Is there any defined range for the random number generator?

Thanks in advance.___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] trjconv in Parallel run

2008-10-17 Thread sudheer babu
Hi all,
I have been running mdrun in Parallel for few hours due to full disk it
crashed in between, later when I use trjconv command trjconv -f .trr -o xtc
for convert .trr to .xtc its showing

Program trjconv, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: trnio.c, line: 66

File input/output error:
Can not determine precision of trn file

cant I make .trr to .xtc?
what may be the problem how can I remedy this error.
Any suggestions would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] range of gen_seed

2008-10-17 Thread Omer Markovitch
I believe that (-1) as the seed takes the time or something as the actual
seed, thus ensuring no two identical seeds, and no two identical velocities.
Omer.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:11, sarbani chattopadhyay 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 I want to know that does this ensure that the mdrun starts with diffrent
 velocities ?

 Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science.
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx....

2008-10-17 Thread Alberto Sergio Garay

Dear David (van der Spoel)

I made a trial with pdb2gmx using -ter option as you suggested but  
without success. I also tried with -inter option but it didn't work.  
The program did not give me any chance to reject the option of adding  
TER or other kind of atoms. It just gives me the same error. Am I  
doing something wrong?
I have also read a lot of messages in the gromacs list related with  
pdb2gmx errors but no one give me any idea of how to resolve my  
problem. The reading of chapter 5 of gromacs manual neither. I found  
in the gromacs list many people complaining about pdb2gmx looked for  
atoms which it didn't exist in their pdb's or rtp files. Quite similar  
to my problem, but aparently they were able to solve it.


Below I am adding the complete error mesagge of pdb2gmx, may be you  
can give any clue of what is happening.


Opening library file ffG53a6.rtp
Opening library file aminoacids.dat
Reading polymer.gro...
Read 'Generated by trjconv : 14 TEQ-VBT 1:1 t= 1750.00024', 309 atoms
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/xlateat.dat
26 out of 26 lines of xlateat.dat converted succesfully
Analyzing pdb file
There are 1 chains and 0 blocks of water and 14 residues with 309 atoms

  chain  #res #atoms
  1 '-'14309

No occupancies in polymer.gro
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6.atp
Atomtype 57
Reading residue database... (ffG53a6)
Opening library file ffG53a6.rtp
Using default: not generating all possible dihedrals
Using default: excluding 3 bonded neighbors
Using default: generating 1,4 H--H interactions
Using default: removing impropers on same bond as a proper
Residue 119
Sorting it all out...
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6.hdb
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6-n.tdb
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6-c.tdb

Processing chain 1 (309 atoms, 14 residues)

---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: pdb2gmx.c, line: 421

Fatal error:
Atom H1 in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
 while sorting atoms. Maybe different protonation state.
 Remove this hydrogen or choose a different protonation state.
 Option -ignh will ignore all hydrogens in the input.


I'm trying to build a polymer with a new building block. I have  
included the new topology block inside the force field rtp file,  
which I've choosen

for my simulation (ffG53a6.rtp).
I've also prepared a gro input file, where the atoms of each residue follows
the same order as in the rtp file I also added the new residues names in
aminoacids.dat



The problem is: when I run pdb2gmx to obtain the topology of my system it
gives me the following error:



Fatal error:
Atom H1 in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms while sorting
atoms. Maybe different protonation state. Remove this hydrogen or choose a
different protonation state. Option -ignh will ignore all hydrogens in the
input.



But there's no H1 atom in my residues. Is pdb2gmx including some extra atoms
to complete my molecule?
Could anyone give any clue about my problem?



David van der Spoel wrote:
yes. pdb2gmx thinks your molecule is a protein and want to add Hydrogens
to the termini. Use the -ter flag and select None.



below there's a part of my rtp file
...
[ VBT ]
 [ atoms ]
; name   type   charge   chargegroup
  CC1   CH2 0.0 1
  CC2   CH1 0.12000 2
  CR1 C-0.12000 3
  CR2 C-0.14000 4
  HR2HC 0.14000 4
  CR3 C-0.08000 5
  HR3HC 0.08000 5
  CR4 C-0.05000 6
  CT1   CH2 0.37000 6
  NT1NR-0.32000 6
  CR5 C-0.13000 7
  HR5HC 0.13000 7
  CR6 C-0.17000 8
  HR6HC 0.17000 8
  CT2 C-0.21000 9
  HT1HC 0.21000 9
  CT3 C-0.0900010
  CT4   CH3 0.0900010
  CT5 C 0.5800011
  OT1 O-0.5800011
  NT2NR-0.2200012
  HT2 H 0.2200012
  CT6 C 0.5400013
  OT2 O-0.5400013

part of my *.gro file

2VBTCC1   21   3.221   5.305   1.589
2VBTCC2   22   3.143   5.334   1.460
2VBTCR1   23   3.115   5.221   1.384
2VBTCR2   24   3.196   5.155   1.293
2VBTHR2   25   3.305   5.159   1.298
2VBTCR3   26   3.132   5.074   1.200
2VBTHR3   27   3.198   5.003   1.151
2VBTCR4   28   2.995   5.068   1.175
2VBTCT1   29   2.948   5.023   1.052
2VBTNT1   30   3.028   5.038   0.928
2VBTCR5   31   2.919   5.144   1.263
2VBTHR5   32   2.810   5.142   1.268
2VBTCR6   33   2.977   5.208   1.372
2VBTHR6   34   2.916   5.232   1.459
2VBTCT2   35   3.070   4.916   0.874
2VBTHT1   36   3.009   4.827   0.860
2VBTCT3   37   3.190   4.911   0.804

Re: [gmx-users] trjconv in Parallel run

2008-10-17 Thread Jochen Hub
sudheer babu wrote:
 Hi all,
 I have been running mdrun in Parallel for few hours due to full disk it
 crashed in between, later when I use trjconv command trjconv -f .trr -o xtc
 for convert .trr to .xtc its showing
 
 Program trjconv, VERSION 3.3.1
 Source code file: trnio.c, line: 66
 
 File input/output error:
 Can not determine precision of trn file

have you tried trjconv -ndec ?

Jochen

 
 cant I make .trr to .xtc?
 what may be the problem how can I remedy this error.
 Any suggestions would be appreciated
 Thanks in advance
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-- 

Dr. Jochen Hub
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Computational biomolecular dynamics group
Am Fassberg 11
D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] range of gen_seed

2008-10-17 Thread Jochen Hub
sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:
   
 Hi everyone,
I want to start from the same starting structure with 
 different velocities.
 
 In the .mdp file. I used 3 different values for gen_seed for three 
 different runs : 1. one is 
 the default, the other two are 1 and 571.
 
 I want to know that does this ensure that the mdrun starts with diffrent 
 velocities ?

You can have a look at the starting velocities by converting the tpr in
a gro file with editconf.

Jochen

 
 Is there any defined range for the random number generator?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-- 

Dr. Jochen Hub
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Computational biomolecular dynamics group
Am Fassberg 11
D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] trjconv in Parallel run

2008-10-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



sudheer babu wrote:

Hi all,
I have been running mdrun in Parallel for few hours due to full disk it 
crashed in between, later when I use trjconv command trjconv -f .trr -o 
xtc for convert .trr to .xtc its showing
 
Program trjconv, VERSION 3.3.1

Source code file: trnio.c, line: 66

File input/output error:
Can not determine precision of trn file



That usually means something is corrupted; what does gmxcheck tell you about the 
.trr?


-Justin


cant I make .trr to .xtc?
what may be the problem how can I remedy this error.
Any suggestions would be appreciated
Thanks in advance




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] ErrorBox was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file

2008-10-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



vivek sharma wrote:

Hi Tehre,
i am running a job by keeping a part of molecule freeze by using the 
.mdp option


What is your entire .mdp file?

-Justin


__



energygrps_excl=  Terminal Terminal Terminal SOL  ! To remove
computation of nonbonding interactions between the frozen groups with each other 


and surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL)
freezegrps  =  Terminal  ! Index group to freeze
freezedim   =  Y Y Y 
! Freeze this group in all directions, x,

y, and z
___


where frreze is a group mentioned in the index file...
During the run the job is being terminated with the following error
.
__
Step 1  Warning: pressure scaling more than 1%, mu: -3.51079e+22 
-3.51079e+22 -3.51079e+22


---
Program mdrun_d, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: ns.c, line: 258

Fatal error:
Box was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file.
---

Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_d on CPU 0 out of 24

srun: error: n216: task0: Aborted
srun: Terminating job
__

Can somebody give an insight in the problem for figuring out the 
probable cause of the error.


PS::Before the run I mentioned the boxsize in editconf as -box 7.5 5 6 
, to keep the size of box and number of solvent optimum.

Does it have anything to do with the mentioned error ?


Looking for suggestions..
 with thanks,
Vivek




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] ErrorBox was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file

2008-10-17 Thread vivek sharma
Hi justin,

thanks for your response.
following is the .mdp file pasted..

_
title   = trp_drg
warnings= 10
cpp = /lib/cpp ; location of cpp on SGI
define  = -DPOSRES
constraints = all-bonds
integrator  = md
dt  = 0.002 ; ps !
nsteps  = 250 ; total 5000.0 ps.
nstcomm = 1
nstxout = 25000 ; output coordinates every 0.5 ps
nstvout = 10 ; output velocities every 2.0 ps
nstfout = 0
nstlog  = 10
nstenergy   = 10
nstlist = 10
ns_type = grid
rlist   = 0.9
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb= 0.9
rvdw= 1.0
energygrps_excl = freeze freeze freeze SOL  ! To remove
computation of interactions between the frozen groups with
surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL)

fourierspacing  = 0.12
fourier_nx  = 0
fourier_ny  = 0
fourier_nz  = 0
pme_order   = 6
ewald_rtol  = 1e-5
optimize_fft= yes
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in four groups
Tcoupl  = berendsen
tau_t   = 0.10.1   0.1
tc_grps = proteinsol   NDP
ref_t   = 300300   300
; Pressure coupling is on
Pcoupl  = berendsen
pcoupltype  = isotropic
tau_p   = 0.5
compressibility = 4.5e-5
ref_p   = 1.0
; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
gen_vel = yes
gen_temp= 300.0
gen_seed= 173529
; Non-equilibrium MD stuff
freezegrps   = freeze
freezedim= Y Y Y


With Thanks,
Vivek

2008/10/17 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 vivek sharma wrote:

 Hi Tehre,
 i am running a job by keeping a part of molecule freeze by using the
 .mdp option


 What is your entire .mdp file?

 -Justin

  __

 

 energygrps_excl=  Terminal Terminal Terminal SOL  ! To remove
 computation of nonbonding interactions between the frozen groups with each
 other
 and surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL)
 freezegrps  =  Terminal  ! Index group to freeze
 freezedim   =  Y Y Y ! Freeze this group in all
 directions, x,
 y, and z
 ___


 where frreze is a group mentioned in the index file...
 During the run the job is being terminated with the following error
 .
 __
 Step 1  Warning: pressure scaling more than 1%, mu: -3.51079e+22
 -3.51079e+22 -3.51079e+22

 ---
 Program mdrun_d, VERSION 3.3.3
 Source code file: ns.c, line: 258

 Fatal error:
 Box was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file.
 ---

 Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
 Halting parallel program mdrun_d on CPU 0 out of 24

 srun: error: n216: task0: Aborted
 srun: Terminating job
 __

 Can somebody give an insight in the problem for figuring out the probable
 cause of the error.

 PS::Before the run I mentioned the boxsize in editconf as -box 7.5 5 6 ,
 to keep the size of box and number of solvent optimum.
 Does it have anything to do with the mentioned error ?


 Looking for suggestions..
  with thanks,
 Vivek


 

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
 posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


 --
 

 Justin A. Lemkul
 Graduate Research Assistant
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read 

Re: [gmx-users] ErrorBox was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file

2008-10-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
There are several potential problems all combined into one.  As has been 
reported on the list, applying freezegrps, constraints, and pressure coupling 
all at the same time do not mix well.  The best bet is to turn off the pressure 
coupling if you're set on using freezegrps.  Otherwise, use position restraints 
if you require NPT.


-Justin

vivek sharma wrote:

Hi justin,

thanks for your response.
following is the .mdp file pasted..

_
title   = trp_drg
warnings= 10
cpp = /lib/cpp ; location of cpp on SGI
define  = -DPOSRES
constraints = all-bonds
integrator  = md
dt  = 0.002 ; ps !
nsteps  = 250 ; total 5000.0 ps.
nstcomm = 1
nstxout = 25000 ; output coordinates every 0.5 ps
nstvout = 10 ; output velocities every 2.0 ps
nstfout = 0
nstlog  = 10
nstenergy   = 10
nstlist = 10
ns_type = grid
rlist   = 0.9
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb= 0.9
rvdw= 1.0
energygrps_excl = freeze freeze freeze SOL  ! To remove 
computation of interactions between the frozen groups with surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL) 


fourierspacing  = 0.12
fourier_nx  = 0
fourier_ny  = 0
fourier_nz  = 0
pme_order   = 6
ewald_rtol  = 1e-5
optimize_fft= yes
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in four groups
Tcoupl  = berendsen
tau_t   = 0.10.1   0.1
tc_grps = proteinsol   NDP
ref_t   = 300300   300
; Pressure coupling is on
Pcoupl  = berendsen
pcoupltype  = isotropic
tau_p   = 0.5
compressibility = 4.5e-5
ref_p   = 1.0
; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
gen_vel = yes
gen_temp= 300.0
gen_seed= 173529
; Non-equilibrium MD stuff
freezegrps   = freeze
freezedim= Y Y Y


With Thanks,
Vivek

2008/10/17 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



vivek sharma wrote:

Hi Tehre,
i am running a job by keeping a part of molecule freeze by
using the .mdp option


What is your entire .mdp file?

-Justin

__



energygrps_excl=  Terminal Terminal Terminal SOL  ! To
remove
computation of nonbonding interactions between the frozen groups
with each other
and surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL)
freezegrps  =  Terminal  ! Index group to freeze
freezedim   =  Y Y Y ! Freeze this group in all
directions, x,
y, and z
___


where frreze is a group mentioned in the index file...
During the run the job is being terminated with the following error
.
__
Step 1  Warning: pressure scaling more than 1%, mu: -3.51079e+22
-3.51079e+22 -3.51079e+22

---
Program mdrun_d, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: ns.c, line: 258

Fatal error:
Box was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file.
---

Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
Halting parallel program mdrun_d on CPU 0 out of 24

srun: error: n216: task0: Aborted
srun: Terminating job
__

Can somebody give an insight in the problem for figuring out the
probable cause of the error.

PS::Before the run I mentioned the boxsize in editconf as -box
7.5 5 6 , to keep the size of box and number of solvent optimum.
Does it have anything to do with the mentioned error ?


Looking for suggestions..
 with thanks,
Vivek




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-- 



Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu http://vt.edu | (540) 231-9080

Re: [gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx....

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Alberto Sergio Garay wrote:

Dear David (van der Spoel)

I made a trial with pdb2gmx using -ter option as you suggested but 
without success. I also tried with -inter option but it didn't work. The 
program did not give me any chance to reject the option of adding TER or 
other kind of atoms. It just gives me the same error. Am I doing 
something wrong?
I have also read a lot of messages in the gromacs list related with 
pdb2gmx errors but no one give me any idea of how to resolve my problem. 
The reading of chapter 5 of gromacs manual neither. I found in the 
gromacs list many people complaining about pdb2gmx looked for atoms 
which it didn't exist in their pdb's or rtp files. Quite similar to my 
problem, but aparently they were able to solve it.


Below I am adding the complete error mesagge of pdb2gmx, may be you can 
give any clue of what is happening.

please give the whole command line

pdb2gmx -ignh -ter should be OK, but if you nee dhydrogens you also have 
to make/update the hdb file.




Opening library file ffG53a6.rtp
Opening library file aminoacids.dat
Reading polymer.gro...
Read 'Generated by trjconv : 14 TEQ-VBT 1:1 t= 1750.00024', 309 atoms
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/xlateat.dat
26 out of 26 lines of xlateat.dat converted succesfully
Analyzing pdb file
There are 1 chains and 0 blocks of water and 14 residues with 309 atoms

  chain  #res #atoms
  1 '-'14309

No occupancies in polymer.gro
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6.atp
Atomtype 57
Reading residue database... (ffG53a6)
Opening library file ffG53a6.rtp
Using default: not generating all possible dihedrals
Using default: excluding 3 bonded neighbors
Using default: generating 1,4 H--H interactions
Using default: removing impropers on same bond as a proper
Residue 119
Sorting it all out...
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6.hdb
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6-n.tdb
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG53a6-c.tdb

Processing chain 1 (309 atoms, 14 residues)

---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: pdb2gmx.c, line: 421

Fatal error:
Atom H1 in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
 while sorting atoms. Maybe different protonation state.
 Remove this hydrogen or choose a different protonation state.
 Option -ignh will ignore all hydrogens in the input.


I'm trying to build a polymer with a new building block. I have 
included the new topology block inside the force field rtp file, which 
I've choosen

for my simulation (ffG53a6.rtp).
I've also prepared a gro input file, where the atoms of each residue 
follows

the same order as in the rtp file I also added the new residues names in
aminoacids.dat



The problem is: when I run pdb2gmx to obtain the topology of my system it
gives me the following error:



Fatal error:
Atom H1 in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms while 
sorting
atoms. Maybe different protonation state. Remove this hydrogen or 
choose a
different protonation state. Option -ignh will ignore all hydrogens in 
the

input.


But there's no H1 atom in my residues. Is pdb2gmx including some extra 
atoms

to complete my molecule?
Could anyone give any clue about my problem?



David van der Spoel wrote:
yes. pdb2gmx thinks your molecule is a protein and want to add Hydrogens
to the termini. Use the -ter flag and select None.



below there's a part of my rtp file
...
[ VBT ]
 [ atoms ]
; name   type   charge   chargegroup
  CC1   CH2 0.0 1
  CC2   CH1 0.12000 2
  CR1 C-0.12000 3
  CR2 C-0.14000 4
  HR2HC 0.14000 4
  CR3 C-0.08000 5
  HR3HC 0.08000 5
  CR4 C-0.05000 6
  CT1   CH2 0.37000 6
  NT1NR-0.32000 6
  CR5 C-0.13000 7
  HR5HC 0.13000 7
  CR6 C-0.17000 8
  HR6HC 0.17000 8
  CT2 C-0.21000 9
  HT1HC 0.21000 9
  CT3 C-0.0900010
  CT4   CH3 0.0900010
  CT5 C 0.5800011
  OT1 O-0.5800011
  NT2NR-0.2200012
  HT2 H 0.2200012
  CT6 C 0.5400013
  OT2 O-0.5400013

part of my *.gro file

2VBTCC1   21   3.221   5.305   1.589
2VBTCC2   22   3.143   5.334   1.460
2VBTCR1   23   3.115   5.221   1.384
2VBTCR2   24   3.196   5.155   1.293
2VBTHR2   25   3.305   5.159   1.298
2VBTCR3   26   3.132   5.074   1.200
2VBTHR3   27   3.198   5.003   1.151
2VBTCR4   28   2.995   5.068   1.175
2VBTCT1   29   2.948   5.023   1.052
2VBTNT1   30   3.028   5.038   0.928
2VBTCR5   31   2.919   5.144   1.263
2VBTHR5   32   2.810   5.142   1.268
2VBTCR6   33   2.977   5.208   1.372
2VBTHR6   34  

RE: [gmx-users] ErrorBox was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file

2008-10-17 Thread Berk Hess









Hi,

In 3.3 position restraints and NPT can also cause trouble when the amount of 
scaling is large.

In 4.0 there is the new refcoord_scaling option that allows scaling
of the position restraint reference coordinates or their COM.
We would also like to have such a scaling for frozen atoms,
but that is not implemented yet.

Berk


 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:57:34 -0400
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] ErrorBox was shifted at least 10 times. Please see  
 log-file
 CC: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 
 There are several potential problems all combined into one.  As has been 
 reported on the list, applying freezegrps, constraints, and pressure coupling 
 all at the same time do not mix well.  The best bet is to turn off the 
 pressure 
 coupling if you're set on using freezegrps.  Otherwise, use position 
 restraints 
 if you require NPT.
 
 -Justin
 
 vivek sharma wrote:
  Hi justin,
  
  thanks for your response.
  following is the .mdp file pasted..
  
  _
  title   = trp_drg
  warnings= 10
  cpp = /lib/cpp ; location of cpp on SGI
  define  = -DPOSRES
  constraints = all-bonds
  integrator  = md
  dt  = 0.002 ; ps !
  nsteps  = 250 ; total 5000.0 ps.
  nstcomm = 1
  nstxout = 25000 ; output coordinates every 0.5 ps
  nstvout = 10 ; output velocities every 2.0 ps
  nstfout = 0
  nstlog  = 10
  nstenergy   = 10
  nstlist = 10
  ns_type = grid
  rlist   = 0.9
  coulombtype = PME
  rcoulomb= 0.9
  rvdw= 1.0
  energygrps_excl = freeze freeze freeze SOL  ! To remove 
  computation of interactions between the frozen groups with surroundings 
  (i.e. the solvent, SOL) 
  
  fourierspacing  = 0.12
  fourier_nx  = 0
  fourier_ny  = 0
  fourier_nz  = 0
  pme_order   = 6
  ewald_rtol  = 1e-5
  optimize_fft= yes
  ; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in four groups
  Tcoupl  = berendsen
  tau_t   = 0.10.1   0.1
  tc_grps = proteinsol   NDP
  ref_t   = 300300   300
  ; Pressure coupling is on
  Pcoupl  = berendsen
  pcoupltype  = isotropic
  tau_p   = 0.5
  compressibility = 4.5e-5
  ref_p   = 1.0
  ; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
  gen_vel = yes
  gen_temp= 300.0
  gen_seed= 173529
  ; Non-equilibrium MD stuff
  freezegrps   = freeze
  freezedim= Y Y Y
  
  
  With Thanks,
  Vivek
  
  2008/10/17 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  vivek sharma wrote:
  
  Hi Tehre,
  i am running a job by keeping a part of molecule freeze by
  using the .mdp option
  
  
  What is your entire .mdp file?
  
  -Justin
  
  __
  
  
  
  energygrps_excl=  Terminal Terminal Terminal SOL  ! To
  remove
  computation of nonbonding interactions between the frozen groups
  with each other
  and surroundings (i.e. the solvent, SOL)
  freezegrps  =  Terminal  ! Index group to freeze
  freezedim   =  Y Y Y ! Freeze this group in all
  directions, x,
  y, and z
  ___
  
  
  where frreze is a group mentioned in the index file...
  During the run the job is being terminated with the following error
  .
  __
  Step 1  Warning: pressure scaling more than 1%, mu: -3.51079e+22
  -3.51079e+22 -3.51079e+22
  
  ---
  Program mdrun_d, VERSION 3.3.3
  Source code file: ns.c, line: 258
  
  Fatal error:
  Box was shifted at least 10 times. Please see log-file.
  ---
  
  Error on node 0, will try to stop all the nodes
  Halting parallel program mdrun_d on CPU 0 out of 24
  
  srun: error: n216: task0: Aborted
  srun: Terminating job
  __
  
  Can somebody give an insight in the problem for figuring out the
  probable cause of the error.
  
  PS::Before the run I mentioned the boxsize in editconf as -box
  7.5 5 6 , to keep the size of box and number of solvent optimum.
  Does it have anything to do with the mentioned error ?
  
  
  Looking for suggestions..
   with thanks,
  Vivek
  
  
  
  

[gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx....

2008-10-17 Thread Alberto Sergio Garay

Dear David (van der Spoel)

Thank you for your time.

Firstly: I don't need to add any H atom to my polymer. All atoms that I
need are in the rtp topology file. So I did not change the hdb file.

Using this command (as you suggested in the last message):

pdb2gmx -ignh -ter -f polymer.gro -p top

Below  I extracted the main differences with the previous pdb2gmx error:

Processing chain 1 (239 atoms, 14 residues)

Fatal error:
Atom O in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
 while sorting atoms

Evidently, pdb2gmx is doing something funny with my polymer, because  
it found 239 atoms in my gro file, when it really contains 309.  
Without the option -ignh (as I did it before) it found the correct  
number of atoms (309).
Finally it also found the atom O in my gro files, which (again) it  
doesn't really exist.


What is pdb2gmx doing? I don't understand what I am doing wrong.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.

Sergio

--
Dr. Sergio Garay
Facultad de Bioquimica y Cs. Biológicas
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Santa Fe - Argentina
C.C. 242 - Ciudad Universitaria - C.P. S3000ZAA
Argentina
Ph. +54 (342) 4575-213
Fax. +54 (342) 4575-221





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] gromacs-4.0 error in grompp

2008-10-17 Thread Claus Valka
Hello,

While I'm trying to use the grompp command I get this error :

Program grompp, VERSION 4.0
Source code file: topio.c, line: 415

Fatal error:
Syntax error - File topol.top, line 4
Last line read:
' [ system ]'
Invalid order for directive system

I do not get this error in version 3.3.3 or 3.3.2 though. Any thought?

Thank you, 
Nikos


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs-4.0 error in grompp

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Claus Valka wrote:

Hello,

While I'm trying to use the grompp command I get this error :

Program grompp, VERSION 4.0
Source code file: topio.c, line: 415

Fatal error:
Syntax error - File topol.top, line 4
Last line read:
' [ system ]'
Invalid order for directive system

I do not get this error in version 3.3.3 or 3.3.2 though. Any thought?


Are you sure it is not a problem with the file?

If it is reproducible you can submit a bugzilla.



Thank you,
Nikos


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz 
gegen Massenmails.

http://mail.yahoo.com




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx....

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Alberto Sergio Garay wrote:

Dear David (van der Spoel)

Thank you for your time.

Firstly: I don't need to add any H atom to my polymer. All atoms that I
need are in the rtp topology file. So I did not change the hdb file.

Using this command (as you suggested in the last message):

pdb2gmx -ignh -ter -f polymer.gro -p top

Below  I extracted the main differences with the previous pdb2gmx error:

Processing chain 1 (239 atoms, 14 residues)

Fatal error:
Atom O in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
 while sorting atoms


This still looks like it is doing something to your termini, or you 
could have an error in the rtp file. Can you try to make a minimal 
system and post it to the list?




Evidently, pdb2gmx is doing something funny with my polymer, because it 
found 239 atoms in my gro file, when it really contains 309. Without the 
option -ignh (as I did it before) it found the correct number of atoms 
(309).
Finally it also found the atom O in my gro files, which (again) it 
doesn't really exist.


What is pdb2gmx doing? I don't understand what I am doing wrong.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.

Sergio




--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Gromacs4: minimization hangs

2008-10-17 Thread Lillian Chong
Dear Gromacs Users,

When I run a steepest descent minimization with the parallel version
of mdrun in Gromacs 4, it runs to completion (all 1000 steps), but
does not exit.  See below for the tail end of the log file (notice
there are not timings and the usual Gromacs quote at the end).  The
serial version of the Gromacs 4 mdrun runs this minimization fine and
exits as it should.  I did not have this issue with the Gromacs4rc3
parallel mdrun.  Do you know what might be going wrong?

I've attached the min.mdp and min.tpr files.

Best regards,
Lillian

Tail end of log file:
  Step   Time Lambda
  1000 1000.00.0

  Energies (kJ/mol)
  Bond  AngleProper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell.  LJ-14
   2.75995e+011.01358e+025.12660e+001.82811e+022.18810e+02
Coulomb-14LJ (SR)  Disper. corr.   Coulomb (SR)   Coul. recip.
   8.24670e+021.97157e+04   -9.79168e+02   -1.44989e+05   -1.75892e+04
 Potential Pressure (bar)
  -1.42482e+051.42736e+04


min.mdp
Description: Binary data
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs4: minimization hangs

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Lillian Chong wrote:

Dear Gromacs Users,

When I run a steepest descent minimization with the parallel version
of mdrun in Gromacs 4, it runs to completion (all 1000 steps), but
does not exit.  See below for the tail end of the log file (notice
there are not timings and the usual Gromacs quote at the end).  The
serial version of the Gromacs 4 mdrun runs this minimization fine and
exits as it should.  I did not have this issue with the Gromacs4rc3
parallel mdrun.  Do you know what might be going wrong?


Which mpi version are you using?


I've attached the min.mdp and min.tpr files.

Best regards,
Lillian

Tail end of log file:
  Step   Time Lambda
  1000 1000.00.0

  Energies (kJ/mol)
  Bond  AngleProper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell.  LJ-14
   2.75995e+011.01358e+025.12660e+001.82811e+022.18810e+02
Coulomb-14LJ (SR)  Disper. corr.   Coulomb (SR)   Coul. recip.
   8.24670e+021.97157e+04   -9.79168e+02   -1.44989e+05   -1.75892e+04
 Potential Pressure (bar)
  -1.42482e+051.42736e+04




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs4: minimization hangs

2008-10-17 Thread Lillian Chong
I ran the following for the minimization using mpich2:
mpiexec -n 8 mdrun_mpi -s min.tpr -c min.gro -o min.trr -g min.log -e min.edr

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:36 PM, David van der Spoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Lillian Chong wrote:

 Dear Gromacs Users,

 When I run a steepest descent minimization with the parallel version
 of mdrun in Gromacs 4, it runs to completion (all 1000 steps), but
 does not exit.  See below for the tail end of the log file (notice
 there are not timings and the usual Gromacs quote at the end).  The
 serial version of the Gromacs 4 mdrun runs this minimization fine and
 exits as it should.  I did not have this issue with the Gromacs4rc3
 parallel mdrun.  Do you know what might be going wrong?

 Which mpi version are you using?

 I've attached the min.mdp and min.tpr files.

 Best regards,
 Lillian
 
 Tail end of log file:
  Step   Time Lambda
  1000 1000.00.0

  Energies (kJ/mol)
  Bond  AngleProper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell.  LJ-14
   2.75995e+011.01358e+025.12660e+001.82811e+022.18810e+02
Coulomb-14LJ (SR)  Disper. corr.   Coulomb (SR)   Coul. recip.
   8.24670e+021.97157e+04   -9.79168e+02   -1.44989e+05   -1.75892e+04
 Potential Pressure (bar)
  -1.42482e+051.42736e+04


 

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


 --
 David.
 
 David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
 Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
 Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
 phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
 [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




-- 
Lillian T. Chong
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemistry
University of Pittsburgh
219 Parkman Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
(412) 624-6026
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs4: minimization hangs

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Lillian Chong wrote:

I ran the following for the minimization using mpich2:
mpiexec -n 8 mdrun_mpi -s min.tpr -c min.gro -o min.trr -g min.log -e min.edr

And does it work on fewer processors? In particular on one processor?
If so please submit a bugzilla.



On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:36 PM, David van der Spoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Lillian Chong wrote:

Dear Gromacs Users,

When I run a steepest descent minimization with the parallel version
of mdrun in Gromacs 4, it runs to completion (all 1000 steps), but
does not exit.  See below for the tail end of the log file (notice
there are not timings and the usual Gromacs quote at the end).  The
serial version of the Gromacs 4 mdrun runs this minimization fine and
exits as it should.  I did not have this issue with the Gromacs4rc3
parallel mdrun.  Do you know what might be going wrong?

Which mpi version are you using?

I've attached the min.mdp and min.tpr files.

Best regards,
Lillian

Tail end of log file:
 Step   Time Lambda
 1000 1000.00.0

 Energies (kJ/mol)
 Bond  AngleProper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell.  LJ-14
  2.75995e+011.01358e+025.12660e+001.82811e+022.18810e+02
   Coulomb-14LJ (SR)  Disper. corr.   Coulomb (SR)   Coul. recip.
  8.24670e+021.97157e+04   -9.79168e+02   -1.44989e+05   -1.75892e+04
Potential Pressure (bar)
 -1.42482e+051.42736e+04




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php








--
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] implicit solvent in gromacs 4.0?

2008-10-17 Thread jagannath mondal
Hi,
  I was curious to know whether gromacs 4.0 supports implicit solvent 
simulation or not. If not, is there any  possibility  that the implicit solvent 
model will be implemented in near future ?

Thanks
Jagannath Mondal

Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download 
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Using MPI gromacs with CONDOR

2008-10-17 Thread Arthur Roberts

Hi, all,

I was wondering if there was anyone out there that has successfully  
used Gromacs, MPI, and CONDOR.  One thing that would be particularly  
useful would be submit scripts.  I have installed MPI on my own  
account, but I haven't figured out how to use MPI with condor.  I  
would appreciate your help.


Best wishes,
Art


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx ....

2008-10-17 Thread Alberto Sergio Garay

Dear David (van der Spoel)

Thank you for help again!

I'm sending a part of my gro input file, which includes the first 2
residues. The VBT 2 is the one which pdb2gmx complains about:

pdb2gmx -f polymer.gro -ter -ignh -p top

Processing chain 1 (239 atoms, 14 residues)
Fatal error:
Atom O in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
while sorting atoms

Generated by trjconv : 14 TEQ-VBT 1:1 t= .0
  309
1TQLCTL1   3.058   5.402   1.733
1TQLCC22   3.144   5.276   1.717
1TQLCR13   3.225   5.235   1.822
1TQLCR24   3.184   5.124   1.894
1TQLHR25   3.092   5.069   1.874
1TQLCR36   3.257   5.086   2.006
1TQLHR37   3.237   4.993   2.060
1TQLCR48   3.373   5.150   2.048
1TQLCR59   3.414   5.263   1.977
1TQLHR5   10   3.510   5.311   1.994
1TQLCR6   11   3.337   5.303   1.869
1TQLHR6   12   3.370   5.401   1.832
1TQLCN4   13   3.439   5.090   2.154
1TQL  N   14   3.558   5.089   2.242
1TQLCN1   15   3.575   5.230   2.281
1TQLCN2   16   3.664   5.062   2.144
1TQLCN3   17   3.522   4.977   2.330
1TQLCE1   18   3.523   5.373   2.263
1TQLCE2   19   3.817   5.054   2.153
1TQLCE3   20   3.588   4.905   2.448
2VBTCC1   21   3.221   5.305   1.589
2VBTCC2   22   3.143   5.334   1.460
2VBTCR1   23   3.115   5.221   1.384
2VBTCR2   24   3.196   5.155   1.293
2VBTHR2   25   3.305   5.159   1.298
2VBTCR3   26   3.132   5.074   1.200
2VBTHR3   27   3.198   5.003   1.151
2VBTCR4   28   2.995   5.068   1.175
2VBTCT1   29   2.948   5.023   1.052
2VBTNT1   30   3.028   5.038   0.928
2VBTCR5   31   2.919   5.144   1.263
2VBTHR5   32   2.810   5.142   1.268
2VBTCR6   33   2.977   5.208   1.372
2VBTHR6   34   2.916   5.232   1.459
2VBTCT2   35   3.070   4.916   0.874
2VBTHT1   36   3.009   4.827   0.860
2VBTCT3   37   3.190   4.911   0.804
2VBTCT4   38   3.245   4.779   0.750
2VBTCT5   39   3.264   5.027   0.784
2VBTOT1   40   3.364   5.030   0.712


Below it is a part of the rtp file which includes the VBT building block:

[ VBT ]
 [ atoms ]
; name   type   charge   chargegroup
  CC1   CH2 0.0 1
  CC2   CH1 0.12000 2
  CR1 C-0.12000 3
  CR2 C-0.14000 4
  HR2HC 0.14000 4
  CR3 C-0.08000 5
  HR3HC 0.08000 5
  CR4 C-0.05000 6
  CT1   CH2 0.37000 6
  NT1NR-0.32000 6
  CR5 C-0.13000 7
  HR5HC 0.13000 7
  CR6 C-0.17000 8
  HR6HC 0.17000 8
  CT2 C-0.21000 9
  HT1HC 0.21000 9
  CT3 C-0.0900010
  CT4   CH3 0.0900010
  CT5 C 0.5800011
  OT1 O-0.5800011
  NT2NR-0.2200012
  HT2 H 0.2200012
  CT6 C 0.5400013
  OT2 O-0.5400013
;
 [ bonds ]
; atom1 atom2 b0 kb
  CC2  +CC1gb_27
  CC1   CC2gb_27
  CC2   CR1gb_15
  CR1   CR2gb_16
  CR2   CR3gb_16
  CR3   CR4gb_16
  CR4   CR5gb_16
  CR5   CR6gb_16
  CR6   CR1gb_16
  CR2   HR2gb_3
  CR3   HR3gb_3
  CR5   HR5gb_3
  CR6   HR6gb_3
  CR4   CT1gb_15
  CT1   NT1gb_23
  NT1   CT2gb_17
  CT2   HT1gb_3
  CT2   CT3gb_16
  CT3   CT4gb_27
  CT3   CT5gb_16
  CT5   OT1gb_5
  CT5   NT2gb_17
  NT2   HT2gb_2
  NT2   CT6gb_17
  CT6   OT2gb_5
  CT6   NT1gb_17

 [ angles ]
;  aiajak   gromos type
 -CC2   CC1   CC2ga_15
  CC1   CC2  +CC1ga_15
  CR1   CC2  +CC1ga_15
  CC1   CC2   CR1ga_15
  CC2   CR1   CR2ga_25
  CC2   CR1   CR6ga_25
  CR1   CR2   CR3ga_27
  CR2   CR3   CR4ga_27
  CR3   CR4   CR5ga_27
  CR4   CR5   CR6ga_27
  CR5   CR6   CR1ga_27
  CR6   CR1   CR2ga_27
  CR1   CR2   HR2ga_25
  HR2   CR2   CR3ga_25
  CR2   CR3   HR3ga_25
  HR3   CR3   CR4ga_25
  CR4   CR5   HR5ga_25
  HR5   CR5   CR6ga_25
  CR5   CR6   HR6ga_25
  HR6   CR6   CR1ga_25
  CR3   CR4   CT1ga_25
  CR5   CR4   CT1ga_25
  CR4   CT1   NT1ga_8
  CT1   NT1   CT2ga_27
  CT1   NT1   CT6ga_27
  NT1   CT2   HT1ga_25
  NT1   CT2   CT3ga_27
  NT1   CT6   OT2ga_27
  NT1   CT6   NT2ga_27
  HT1   CT2   CT3ga_25
  CT2   CT3   CT4ga_27
  CT2   CT3   CT5ga_27
  CT4   CT3   CT5ga_27
  CT3   CT5   OT1ga_27
  CT3   CT5   NT2ga_27
  OT1   CT5   NT2ga_27
  CT5   NT2   HT2ga_25
  CT6   NT2   HT2ga_25
  CT5   NT2   CT6ga_27
  NT2   CT6   OT2ga_27
  CT6   NT1   CT2ga_27
 -CCE   CC2  +CC1ga_15
 -CCE   CC2   CR1ga_15
;
 [ impropers ]
;  aiajakal   gromos type
  CC2   CC1   CR1  +CC1gi_2
; tymine 

Re: [gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx ....

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Alberto Sergio Garay wrote:

Dear David (van der Spoel)

Thank you for help again!

I'm sending a part of my gro input file, which includes the first 2
residues. The VBT 2 is the one which pdb2gmx complains about:


try renaming your OT1 to OX1 or something like this. pdb2gmx might think 
it is  an O-terminal (as you have in proteins)




pdb2gmx -f polymer.gro -ter -ignh -p top

Processing chain 1 (239 atoms, 14 residues)
Fatal error:
Atom O in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
while sorting atoms

Generated by trjconv : 14 TEQ-VBT 1:1 t= .0
  309
1TQLCTL1   3.058   5.402   1.733
1TQLCC22   3.144   5.276   1.717
1TQLCR13   3.225   5.235   1.822
1TQLCR24   3.184   5.124   1.894
1TQLHR25   3.092   5.069   1.874
1TQLCR36   3.257   5.086   2.006
1TQLHR37   3.237   4.993   2.060
1TQLCR48   3.373   5.150   2.048
1TQLCR59   3.414   5.263   1.977
1TQLHR5   10   3.510   5.311   1.994
1TQLCR6   11   3.337   5.303   1.869
1TQLHR6   12   3.370   5.401   1.832
1TQLCN4   13   3.439   5.090   2.154
1TQL  N   14   3.558   5.089   2.242
1TQLCN1   15   3.575   5.230   2.281
1TQLCN2   16   3.664   5.062   2.144
1TQLCN3   17   3.522   4.977   2.330
1TQLCE1   18   3.523   5.373   2.263
1TQLCE2   19   3.817   5.054   2.153
1TQLCE3   20   3.588   4.905   2.448
2VBTCC1   21   3.221   5.305   1.589
2VBTCC2   22   3.143   5.334   1.460
2VBTCR1   23   3.115   5.221   1.384
2VBTCR2   24   3.196   5.155   1.293
2VBTHR2   25   3.305   5.159   1.298
2VBTCR3   26   3.132   5.074   1.200
2VBTHR3   27   3.198   5.003   1.151
2VBTCR4   28   2.995   5.068   1.175
2VBTCT1   29   2.948   5.023   1.052
2VBTNT1   30   3.028   5.038   0.928
2VBTCR5   31   2.919   5.144   1.263
2VBTHR5   32   2.810   5.142   1.268
2VBTCR6   33   2.977   5.208   1.372
2VBTHR6   34   2.916   5.232   1.459
2VBTCT2   35   3.070   4.916   0.874
2VBTHT1   36   3.009   4.827   0.860
2VBTCT3   37   3.190   4.911   0.804
2VBTCT4   38   3.245   4.779   0.750
2VBTCT5   39   3.264   5.027   0.784
2VBTOT1   40   3.364   5.030   0.712


Below it is a part of the rtp file which includes the VBT building block:

[ VBT ]
 [ atoms ]
; name   type   charge   chargegroup
  CC1   CH2 0.0 1
  CC2   CH1 0.12000 2
  CR1 C-0.12000 3
  CR2 C-0.14000 4
  HR2HC 0.14000 4
  CR3 C-0.08000 5
  HR3HC 0.08000 5
  CR4 C-0.05000 6
  CT1   CH2 0.37000 6
  NT1NR-0.32000 6
  CR5 C-0.13000 7
  HR5HC 0.13000 7
  CR6 C-0.17000 8
  HR6HC 0.17000 8
  CT2 C-0.21000 9
  HT1HC 0.21000 9
  CT3 C-0.0900010
  CT4   CH3 0.0900010
  CT5 C 0.5800011
  OT1 O-0.5800011
  NT2NR-0.2200012
  HT2 H 0.2200012
  CT6 C 0.5400013
  OT2 O-0.5400013
;
 [ bonds ]
; atom1 atom2 b0 kb
  CC2  +CC1gb_27
  CC1   CC2gb_27
  CC2   CR1gb_15
  CR1   CR2gb_16
  CR2   CR3gb_16
  CR3   CR4gb_16
  CR4   CR5gb_16
  CR5   CR6gb_16
  CR6   CR1gb_16
  CR2   HR2gb_3
  CR3   HR3gb_3
  CR5   HR5gb_3
  CR6   HR6gb_3
  CR4   CT1gb_15
  CT1   NT1gb_23
  NT1   CT2gb_17
  CT2   HT1gb_3
  CT2   CT3gb_16
  CT3   CT4gb_27
  CT3   CT5gb_16
  CT5   OT1gb_5
  CT5   NT2gb_17
  NT2   HT2gb_2
  NT2   CT6gb_17
  CT6   OT2gb_5
  CT6   NT1gb_17

 [ angles ]
;  aiajak   gromos type
 -CC2   CC1   CC2ga_15
  CC1   CC2  +CC1ga_15
  CR1   CC2  +CC1ga_15
  CC1   CC2   CR1ga_15
  CC2   CR1   CR2ga_25
  CC2   CR1   CR6ga_25
  CR1   CR2   CR3ga_27
  CR2   CR3   CR4ga_27
  CR3   CR4   CR5ga_27
  CR4   CR5   CR6ga_27
  CR5   CR6   CR1ga_27
  CR6   CR1   CR2ga_27
  CR1   CR2   HR2ga_25
  HR2   CR2   CR3ga_25
  CR2   CR3   HR3ga_25
  HR3   CR3   CR4ga_25
  CR4   CR5   HR5ga_25
  HR5   CR5   CR6ga_25
  CR5   CR6   HR6ga_25
  HR6   CR6   CR1ga_25
  CR3   CR4   CT1ga_25
  CR5   CR4   CT1ga_25
  CR4   CT1   NT1ga_8
  CT1   NT1   CT2ga_27
  CT1   NT1   CT6ga_27
  NT1   CT2   HT1ga_25
  NT1   CT2   CT3ga_27
  NT1   CT6   OT2ga_27
  NT1   CT6   NT2ga_27
  HT1   CT2   CT3ga_25
  CT2   CT3   CT4ga_27
  CT2   CT3   CT5ga_27
  CT4   CT3   CT5ga_27
  CT3   CT5   OT1ga_27
  CT3   CT5   NT2ga_27
  OT1   CT5   NT2ga_27
  CT5   NT2   HT2ga_25
  CT6   NT2   HT2ga_25
  CT5   NT2   CT6ga_27
  NT2   CT6   OT2ga_27
  CT6   NT1   CT2

[gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx ....

2008-10-17 Thread Alberto Sergio Garay

Dear David

I renamed the atom OT1 to OX1 in the gro and rtp files but pdb2gmx  
still gives me the same error:


Processing chain 1 (239 atoms, 14 residues)
There are 7 donors and 13 acceptors
There are 0 hydrogen bonds

---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: pdb2gmx.c, line: 421

Fatal error:
Atom O in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
while sorting atoms.

It is strange that it found 14 residues (which it  is correct) but  
only 239 atoms (the system has 309 atoms) so it seems that pdb2gmx  
would have taken out all the H atoms of the system.

What are the steps that pdb2gmx follows when it works on a molecule?

I will be working on it. Thank you in advance for helping me.



--
Dr. Sergio Garay
Facultad de Bioquimica y Cs. Biológicas
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Santa Fe - Argentina
C.C. 242 - Ciudad Universitaria - C.P. S3000ZAA
Argentina
Ph. +54 (342) 4575-213
Fax. +54 (342) 4575-221





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] segmentation fault after first header line is printed

2008-10-17 Thread Shan-ho Tsai

Hello,

I compiled GROMACS version 4.0 on an AMD Opteron, running
Red Hat Linux (RHEL4), with the Portland Group compilers,
v. 7.2. The compilation appears to work fine, with the
following procedure:

export CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/fftw-3.1.2/include
export LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/fftw-3.1.2/lib
export CC=pgcc
export F77=pgf77
export LIBS=-L/usr/X11R6/lib64

Configure with the options: 
--prefix=/usr/local/gromacs-4.0
--enable-double --enable-shared

Then I edited 1 line in the libtool file generated by 
configure: 

replaced:
hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=\${wl}--rpath \${wl}\$libdir
by:
hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=-R\$libdir

The reason for this last step is that pgcc does not 
recognize the --rpath option. The equivalent option
is -R.

Then 

  make
  make install

worked fine. 

Then I did

  source /usr/local/gromacs-4.0/bin/GMXRC

If I run any GROMACS binaries after this, by
calling the name itself, e.g.

   grompp_d -h

The program outputs a header line

   :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

and then I get a segmentation fault. And similarly
for other commands, such as mdrun_d, pdb2gmx_d, etc.
However, if I invoke the program with the full
path, e.g.

   /usr/local/gromacs-4.0/bin/grompp_d -h

then it is fine. I did an strace on both
commands (without and with the full path)
and it appears that the segmentation fault
comes from the binary trying to open a file
whose name is my environment PATH compounded
many times until the filename is too long.

Interestingly, when I compiled gromacs with
gcc 3.4.6, both ways of invoking the binaries
(with or without the full path) work fine. 

Compilation of v.3.3.3 using the PGI compilers
resulted in the same problem (that is, invoking
a binary without the full path generates a
segmentation fault).

I would really like to use gromacs compiled with
the PGI compilers, and be able to invoke the binaries
without the full path. 

I would appreciate any ideas how to get this problem
resolved.

Thank you very much,
Shan-Ho



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Gromacs 4.0 and threads

2008-10-17 Thread Ricardo Rios
Hi folks,

I have a question that has already been discussed before about other versions.

I would like to know if Gromacs 4.0 has a multi-thread implementation.
I downloaded and compiled this release with the commands:

$ ./configure --enable-threads
$ make
# make install

However, when i perform the command mdrun with option '-nt' is shown
the next message:

Fatal error:
GROMACS compiled without threads support - can only use one thread

Regards,
Ricardo Rios
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Problem building a new polymer using pdb2gmx ....

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Alberto Sergio Garay wrote:

Dear David

I renamed the atom OT1 to OX1 in the gro and rtp files but pdb2gmx still 
gives me the same error:


Processing chain 1 (239 atoms, 14 residues)
There are 7 donors and 13 acceptors
There are 0 hydrogen bonds

---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: pdb2gmx.c, line: 421

Fatal error:
Atom O in residue VBT 2 not found in rtp entry with 24 atoms
while sorting atoms.

It is strange that it found 14 residues (which it  is correct) but only 
239 atoms (the system has 309 atoms) so it seems that pdb2gmx would have 
taken out all the H atoms of the system.

What are the steps that pdb2gmx follows when it works on a molecule?

I will be working on it. Thank you in advance for helping me.



If you use the -ignh flag the you need to recreate hydrogens using the 
hydrogen database, If not, then all names in the coordinate file need to 
match exactly the rtp file. pdb2gmx also renames atoms according to the 
table in xlateat.dat. You may want to generate a file in your working 
directory called xlateat.dat which contains just a single zero on the 
first line. In this way no atom renaming is done.


--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 4.0 and threads

2008-10-17 Thread David van der Spoel

Ricardo Rios wrote:

Hi folks,

I have a question that has already been discussed before about other versions.

I would like to know if Gromacs 4.0 has a multi-thread implementation.
I downloaded and compiled this release with the commands:

$ ./configure --enable-threads
$ make
# make install

However, when i perform the command mdrun with option '-nt' is shown
the next message:

Fatal error:
GROMACS compiled without threads support - can only use one thread


There is no thread support. Sorry.


Regards,
Ricardo Rios
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Re: Blue Gene Compile - GROMACS 4

2008-10-17 Thread Mark Abraham

Mike Hanby wrote:

Howdy,

 


I'm looking at compiling Gromacs 4 for the Blue Gene/L and am stuck at
the compilation of the prerequisite FFTW 3.1.3.

 


If anyone out there has successfully cross compiled FFTW and Gromacs for
the Blue Gene, would you mind sharing your settings used to run the
./configure scripts?

 


I'm getting cannot compute sizeof (unsigned int) which tells me I'm
not giving it enough information for the cross compilation.


There's two key components: using the BG/L cross compilers (blrts_xlc 
and blrts_xlf) and letting configure know that you are using cross 
compilers, so that its tests are constructed using successful 
compilation, not successful execution.


I've successfully used

#!/bin/bash

CFLAGS=-O5 -qbgl -qarch=440d 
-qcache=level=1:type=i:size=32:line=32:assoc=64:cost=8 
-qcache=level=1:type=d:size=32:line=32:assoc=64:cost=8 
-qcache=level=2:type=c:size=4096:line=128:assoc=8:cost=40 -qnoautoconfig 
-qfloat=norngchk -qhot -qignerrno


./configure CC=blrts_xlc --host=powerpc --build=ppc64

Note that some of those compiler flags are probably redundant, and you 
should read up on whether you actually want them all.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Re: implicit solvent in gromacs 4.0?

2008-10-17 Thread Matthew Hoopes
Depending on how you want to implement the solvent, you can do it now with
tabulated potentials.

I am moving a project I was doing in another MD package to GROMACS 4.0 that
simulates
CG lipid bilayers in an implicit solvent according to the following paper.

I. R. Cooke and M. Deserno, Journal of Chemical Physics 123, 224710 (2005).

-Matt

-
Matthew Hoopes
Biophysics Graduate Group
University of California, Davis

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
530-752-6452
- 

jagannath mondal wrote:
 Hi,
   I was curious to know whether gromacs 4.0 supports implicit solvent 
 simulation or not. If not, is there any  possibility  that the 
 implicit solvent model will be implemented in near future ?
 
No, 4.1 or 4.2.

 Thanks
 Jagannath Mondal
 
 Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. 
 Download Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-- 
David.

David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205  fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Re: Simulation of a protein confined in a box

2008-10-17 Thread Matthew Hoopes
As you may have seen in the GROMACS 4.0 manual, Walls can only be used with
pbc=xy so its more of a floor/ceiling. You still may want a solution beyond
the feature mentioned in chapter 7. Particle based realizations for walls
may
be a bit more work but very doable. See the following paper.

Chenyue Xing and Roland Faller J. Phys. Chem. B, 112 (23), 7086-7094, 2008.

-Matt



--

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:41:39 -0400
From: Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Simulation of a protein confined in a box
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed



Lee Soin wrote:
 This seems to me a very complicated realization. Why doesn't
 GROMACS provide an easy way for wall simulation?


How about reading manual section 7.3.20 Walls in the Gromacs-4.0 manual?
I 
think that would be what you're after.

-Justin


 2008/10/11 Omer Markovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Oh, I didn't read carefully.
 My suggestion would be, perhaps, to physically put atoms on the
 sides of the box (possibly, fill each side completely), and to place
 on them very high repulsion.
 You might want to freeze them up, and exclude their self
 interactions from the energy calculation.
 
 Good guess Suman. Omer.
 
  
 Koby Levy research group,
 Weizmann Institute of Science.
 http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/
 
 
 On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 09:26, Suman Chakrabarty
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Possibly what he is interested in is a system WITHOUT PBC? I
 don't think
 with PBC the system is really confined, since there is no true
 wall to
 reflect the colliding molecules. Thus to study the effect of real
 confinement, it is necessary to remove PBC and impose reflective
 boundary conditions. I am only guessing! :)
 
 
 --Suman.
 
 
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
 posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sun Li
 Department of Physics
 Nanjing University, China
 
 
 
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Double precision gives infinite force while single doesn't

2008-10-17 Thread Alexey Zeifman
Hi!
When I'm using double precision calculations, for instance minimization with 
mdrun_d, I receive infinite forces on the 1 atom each time. But running simple 
mdrun with quite the same parameters results in normal minimization. I've 
compiled source code of gromacs-3.3.3, gromacs-4.0 and i always have this 
problem. Maybe there's some hints for compiling double precision version in 
Mandriva 2008? 
Thank you, Alexey Zeifman
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] ffamber99 topologies for ligand

2008-10-17 Thread Ragnarok sdf
How do I create topology files for a ligand when using ffamber99 in gromacs?
Thank you
Fabrício Bracht
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php