[gmx-users] what do you do?

2010-12-14 Thread mohsen ramezanpour
Dear All

I want to know what project any Gromacs user is doing.
In the other words what can we do by Gromacs.

** I am calculating binding free energy of drugs to their corresponding
proteins  **

Thanks in advance for your replies
Mohsen
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] Umberella sampling

2010-12-14 Thread mohsen ramezanpour
Dear All

I can't understand correctly what we do when we are using umberella sampling
for obtaining PMF.
I explain that ,please modify or complete it.


(I think we define some sampling windows,each related to an reference
distance.
for each distance ,relative to it's distance,we define a spring constant.
our spring is at rest in the center of windows,
then we do a short simulation within each windows such that our molecule is
connected to the spring and it's potential energy is depending to it's
displacement from the center of windows.
Then we have potential energy of two molecules in any distance from each
other.
Having potential energy along the reaction path or here falong the degree of
freedom(distance between two molecules) is PMF oof interest and
the difference between limits of PMF plot is delta-free energy of interest)

what do you think ?do you agree with me?
Thanks in advance for your atteintion.
Mohsen
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] g-WHAM

2010-12-14 Thread mohsen ramezanpour
Dear All

What is the algorithm of g-WHAM?
in the other words ,what is the weighted histogeram analysis method?
Thanks in advance for your reply
Mohsen
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] g-WHAM

2010-12-14 Thread Carsten Kutzner
Hi Mohsen, 

for a start, it is always a good idea to read the help
text of a command you are interested in, or to check
the most recent version of the manual. Using Gromacs 4.5

g_wham -h 

will guide you to a JCTC paper about g_wham, which
is a nice starting point. Check out this paper as well
as the references therein!

Also Google is your friend here:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct100494z
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.540130812/pdf

Carsten


On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:20 AM, mohsen ramezanpour wrote:

 Dear All 
 
 What is the algorithm of g-WHAM?
 in the other words ,what is the weighted histogeram analysis method?
 Thanks in advance for your reply
 Mohsen
 
 -- 
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
Dr. Carsten Kutzner
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical and Computational Biophysics
Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-2012313, Fax: +49-551-2012302
http://www.mpibpc.mpg.de/home/grubmueller/ihp/ckutzne




--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


RE: [gmx-users] HBOND probability

2010-12-14 Thread Poojari, Chetan

Hello Justin,

I deleted the original file and re ran the script. I did get the output as 
such:  

#DonorAcceptor   % Exist.
  
0.040
  ASP1   N  SOL171  OW   0.020
  ASP1   N  SOL172  OW   0.020
  ASP1   N  SOL175  OW   0.100
.
.
.

But in the second line of the output theres no donor or acceptor but still i 
gives 0.040 % existence number. I scrolled down to end of the output file to 
check if incase the %exist. is missing for the last atom...but everything 
seems to be fine.

Please can i know why is it showing this number.




Kind regards,
chetan.







From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf 
Of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
Sent: 13 December 2010 22:48
To: Gromacs Users' List
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] HBOND probability

Poojari, Chetan wrote:
 Hello Justin,

 I commented out  line 151 and braces enclosing it.

 #   unless ($resn =~ /SOL/) {
 for (my $z=1; $z=$nres; $z++) {
if ($donors{$z} == $natom) {
$donor_names[$z] = $name;
 $donor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
 } elsif ($acceptors{$z} == $natom) {
 $acceptor_names[$z] = $name;
 $acceptor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
 }
 }
# }


 Following is the ouput:

 In the beginning of the file i had these :

 #Donor  Acceptor   % Exist.
0.040
   ASP1 N   0.020
   ASP1 N   0.020
   ASP1 N   0.100

  GLU11   OE1   0.020
GLU11 OE2   0.020
HIS13O  
 0.040
GLN15 OE1   0.040


 Following these i had below lines., in the same file:

 #Donor  Acceptor   % Exist.
0.040
   ASP1 N  SOL171  OW   0.020
   ASP1 N  SOL172  OW   0.020
   ASP1 N  SOL175  OW   0.100
   ASP1 N  SOL177  OW   0.020
   ASP1 N  SOL179  OW   0.020
 .
 .
 .
 .
 SOL682OW   HIS13 O 
 0.020
 SOL682OW   GLN15 OE1   0.020
 SOL682OW   GLN15 NE2   0.040
 SOL682OW   ALA21   O   0.020
 SOL682OW   GLU22 OE1   0.140



Delete the original file and run the script again.  The output is simply
appended if the same file is already present.  Or, modify the output routines.
The latter part of the file is the expected output.

-Justin


 Kind regards,
 chetan.




 
 From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf 
 Of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
 Sent: 13 December 2010 19:54
 To: Gromacs Users' List
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] HBOND probability

 Poojari, Chetan wrote:
 Hello Justin,

 I commented out the lines from 151-161

 #   unless ($resn =~ /SOL/) {
# for (my $z=1; $z=$nres; $z++) {
 #if ($donors{$z} == $natom) {
 #$donor_names[$z] = $name;
 #$donor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
# } elsif ($acceptors{$z} == $natom) {
# $acceptor_names[$z] = $name;
# $acceptor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
   #  }
   #  }
   #  }



 I am ending up with the similar output.


 Please comment out *just* the unless line (151) and the brace that encloses 
 it,
 not the entire section.  Otherwise, I suspect that nothing actually happened.
 That's the entire pattern matching operation there.  Without it, the script
 probably doesn't do anything at all.

 -Justin



 Kind regards,
 chetan.




 ___
 From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
 Behalf Of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
 Sent: 13 December 2010 19:06
 To: Gromacs Users' List
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] HBOND 

[gmx-users] gmx-4.5.3 CMake build fails

2010-12-14 Thread Reinhold Bader
 Hello,

   building gromacs 4.5.3 with Cmake 2.6.3 fails because the build system 
cannot link
  g_analyze

Linking C executable g_analyze
../gmxlib/libgmx.a(gmx_matrix.c.o): In function `matrix_invert':
gmx_matrix.c:(.text+0x1d62): undefined reference to `dgetrf_'
gmx_matrix.c:(.text+0x2442): undefined reference to `dgetri_'

  Note that I have

 GMX_EXTERNAL_BLAS -- ON
 GMX_EXTERNAL_LAPACK -- ON

  and the subsequently requested MKL_ settings have been properly inserted. 
I've tried
  to work around this by also adding the MKL libraries to 
CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS,
  without avail.

  Any ideas?

Regards
Reinhold
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] ERROR: Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

2010-12-14 Thread udaya kiran
Hello madam,

The command id

*csh* *md.csh

*As I see, there is no error in the command.  All other commands are
properly working (like eq.csh, em.csh etc ). The problem is only with
md.csh.

yours sincerely,
uday.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Coarse-grained simulation with MARTINI

2010-12-14 Thread XAvier Periole


On Dec 14, 2010, at 7:29, samio u940...@oz.nthu.edu.tw wrote:

 Hello
 
 I am trying to perform a CG simulation on the solvated protein but there is 
 one question that I would like to ask for suggestion. The problem is: the 
 volume of the periodic box varied a lot depending on the Van der Waals 
 distance of the CG water molecule.
 
 I guess the volume variation is because of the system needs to relax to the 
 correct density, since the number of water molecule is depending on the Van 
 der Waals distance. Is it reasonable if I start the simulation after the 
 volume become stable under position restraint? 
Yes it is. 

You may also want to tune the vdW radius you use in genbox to minimize the 
equilibration. More accurate the number, the quicker the equilibration. 
 
 Thanks in advance for reading this post.
 
 --
 
 Kuang-Yu Chang
 Institute of Bioinformatic and Structural Biology 
 National Tsin Hua University
 101, section 2, Kuang-Fu Road,
 Hsinchu 30013
 Taiwan
 -- 
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] ERROR: Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

2010-12-14 Thread Sarath Chandra
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:07 AM, udaya kiran kiran.ud...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello madam,

 The command id

 *csh* *md.csh

 *


Please paste your md.csh file and the error you get in detail.


 **As I see, there is no error in the command.  All other commands are
 properly working (like eq.csh, em.csh etc ). The problem is only with
 md.csh.

 yours sincerely,
 uday.

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



Best Wishes,


Sarath
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] ERROR: Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

2010-12-14 Thread udaya kiran
Hello,

Here I am sending the complete output after the md.csh command with the
errors in bold.


COMMAND: csh md.csh


 :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

   Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulation

:-)  VERSION 4.0.5  (-:


  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

  :-)  grompp (double precision)  (-:

Option Filename  Type Description

  -f  md-md.mdp  Input, Opt!  grompp input file with MD parameters
 -po   inmd.mdp  Output   grompp input file with MD parameters
  -c results/eq1bar300K.gro  InputStructure file: gro g96 pdb tpr
tpb
   tpa
  -r   conf.gro  Input, Opt.  Structure file: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
 -rb   conf.gro  Input, Opt.  Structure file: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
  -n  Index_sol.ndx  Input, Opt!  Index file
  -p topol_sol_hbond_131210.top  InputTopology file
 -pp  processed.top  Output, Opt. Topology file
  -o   inmd.tpr  Output   Run input file: tpr tpb tpa
  -t   traj.trr  Input, Opt.  Full precision trajectory: trr trj cpt
  -e   ener.edr  Input, Opt.  Energy file: edr ene

Option   Type   Value   Description
--
-[no]h   bool   no  Print help info and quit
-niceint0   Set the nicelevel
-[no]v   bool   yes Be loud and noisy
-timereal   -1  Take frame at or first after this time.
-[no]rmvsbds bool   yes Remove constant bonded interactions with virtual

sites
-maxwarn int0   Number of allowed warnings during input
processing
-[no]zerobool   no  Set parameters for bonded interactions without
defaults to zero instead of generating an error
-[no]renum   bool   yes Renumber atomtypes and minimize number of
atomtypes

*ERROR
---
Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.5
Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

Invalid command line argument:

---*

Thanx for Using GROMACS - Have a Nice Day

[1] 16658
: Command not found.
 :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

   Great Red Oystrich Makes All Chemists Sane

:-)  VERSION 4.0.5  (-:


  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

   :-)  mdrun (double precision)  (-:

achje05
(/loch/akbl1/marelli/PROJECTS/16L4_16_aAALAA/16L4_GROMACS_RUN_HB3_131210)
Option Filename  Type Description

  -s   inmd.tpr  InputRun input file: tpr tpb tpa
  -o MDResults/md.trr  Output   Full precision trajectory: trr trj cpt
  -x MDResults/md.xtc  Output, Opt. Compressed trajectory (portable xdr
   format)
-cpi MDResults/md.cpt  Input, Opt.  Checkpoint file
-cpo MDResults/md.cpt  Output, Opt. Checkpoint file
  -c MDResults/md.gro  Output   Structure file: gro g96 pdb
  -e MDResults/md.edr  Output   Energy file: edr ene
  -g MDResults/md.log  Output   Log file
-dgdl MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
-field MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
-table MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
-tablep MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
-tableb MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
-rerun MDResults/md.xtc  Input, Opt.  Trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
cpt
-tpi MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
-tpid MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -ei MDResults/md.edi  Input, Opt.  ED sampling input
 -eo MDResults/md.edo  Output, Opt. ED sampling output
  -j MDResults/md.gct  Input, Opt.  General coupling stuff
 -jo MDResults/md.gct  Output, Opt. 

Re: [gmx-users] ERROR: Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

2010-12-14 Thread Sarath Chandra
The input to your grompp command is wrong. You have selected an invalid
grompp option. Please verify the grompp command and rerun the script.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, udaya kiran kiran.ud...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 Here I am sending the complete output after the md.csh command with the
 errors in bold.


 COMMAND: csh md.csh


  :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulation

 :-)  VERSION 4.0.5  (-:


   Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
 check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
   modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
  as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
  of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

   :-)  grompp (double precision)  (-:

 Option Filename  Type Description
 
   -f  md-md.mdp  Input, Opt!  grompp input file with MD parameters
  -po   inmd.mdp  Output   grompp input file with MD parameters
   -c results/eq1bar300K.gro  InputStructure file: gro g96 pdb tpr
 tpb
tpa
   -r   conf.gro  Input, Opt.  Structure file: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
  -rb   conf.gro  Input, Opt.  Structure file: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
   -n  Index_sol.ndx  Input, Opt!  Index file
   -p topol_sol_hbond_131210.top  InputTopology file
  -pp  processed.top  Output, Opt. Topology file
   -o   inmd.tpr  Output   Run input file: tpr tpb tpa
   -t   traj.trr  Input, Opt.  Full precision trajectory: trr trj cpt
   -e   ener.edr  Input, Opt.  Energy file: edr ene

 Option   Type   Value   Description
 --
 -[no]h   bool   no  Print help info and quit
 -niceint0   Set the nicelevel
 -[no]v   bool   yes Be loud and noisy
 -timereal   -1  Take frame at or first after this time.
 -[no]rmvsbds bool   yes Remove constant bonded interactions with
 virtual
 sites
 -maxwarn int0   Number of allowed warnings during input
 processing
 -[no]zerobool   no  Set parameters for bonded interactions without
 defaults to zero instead of generating an error

 -[no]renum   bool   yes Renumber atomtypes and minimize number of
 atomtypes

 *ERROR
 ---
 Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.5
 Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

 Invalid command line argument:

 ---*

 Thanx for Using GROMACS - Have a Nice Day

 [1] 16658
 : Command not found.
  :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

Great Red Oystrich Makes All Chemists Sane

 :-)  VERSION 4.0.5  (-:


   Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
 check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
   modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
  as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
  of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

:-)  mdrun (double precision)  (-:

 achje05
 (/loch/akbl1/marelli/PROJECTS/16L4_16_aAALAA/16L4_GROMACS_RUN_HB3_131210)
 Option Filename  Type Description
 
   -s   inmd.tpr  InputRun input file: tpr tpb tpa
   -o MDResults/md.trr  Output   Full precision trajectory: trr trj cpt
   -x MDResults/md.xtc  Output, Opt. Compressed trajectory (portable xdr
format)
 -cpi MDResults/md.cpt  Input, Opt.  Checkpoint file
 -cpo MDResults/md.cpt  Output, Opt. Checkpoint file
   -c MDResults/md.gro  Output   Structure file: gro g96 pdb
   -e MDResults/md.edr  Output   Energy file: edr ene
   -g MDResults/md.log  Output   Log file
 -dgdl MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -field MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
 -table MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
 -tablep MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
 -tableb MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
 -rerun MDResults/md.xtc  Input, Opt.  Trajectory: xtc trr trj gro g96 pdb
 cpt
 -tpi 

Re: [gmx-users] ERROR: Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

2010-12-14 Thread T.M.D. Graen

Hey there,
just a guess into the blue... did you write that md.csh script yourself? 
It very much seems like that script is broken badly (see grompp output). 
Use your favorite text editor, open md.csh and paste it's content here.

best,
timo

On 12/14/2010 11:13 AM, udaya kiran wrote:

Hello,

Here I am sending the complete output after the md.csh command with the
errors in bold.


COMMAND: csh md.csh


  :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulation

 :-)  VERSION 4.0.5  (-:


   Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
 check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
   modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
  as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
  of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

   :-)  grompp (double precision)  (-:

Option Filename  Type Description

   -f  md-md.mdp  Input, Opt!  grompp input file with MD parameters
  -po   inmd.mdp  Output   grompp input file with MD parameters
   -c results/eq1bar300K.gro  InputStructure file: gro g96 pdb
tpr tpb
tpa
   -r   conf.gro  Input, Opt.  Structure file: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
  -rb   conf.gro  Input, Opt.  Structure file: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
   -n  Index_sol.ndx  Input, Opt!  Index file
   -p topol_sol_hbond_131210.top  InputTopology file
  -pp  processed.top  Output, Opt. Topology file
   -o   inmd.tpr  Output   Run input file: tpr tpb tpa
   -t   traj.trr  Input, Opt.  Full precision trajectory: trr trj cpt
   -e   ener.edr  Input, Opt.  Energy file: edr ene

Option   Type   Value   Description
--
-[no]h   bool   no  Print help info and quit
-niceint0   Set the nicelevel
-[no]v   bool   yes Be loud and noisy
-timereal   -1  Take frame at or first after this time.
-[no]rmvsbds bool   yes Remove constant bonded interactions with
virtual
 sites
-maxwarn int0   Number of allowed warnings during input
processing
-[no]zerobool   no  Set parameters for bonded interactions without
 defaults to zero instead of generating an
error
-[no]renum   bool   yes Renumber atomtypes and minimize number of
 atomtypes

*ERROR
---
Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.5
Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

Invalid command line argument:

---*

Thanx for Using GROMACS - Have a Nice Day

[1] 16658
: Command not found.
  :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

Great Red Oystrich Makes All Chemists Sane

 :-)  VERSION 4.0.5  (-:


   Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
 check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
   modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
  as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
  of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

:-)  mdrun (double precision)  (-:

achje05
(/loch/akbl1/marelli/PROJECTS/16L4_16_aAALAA/16L4_GROMACS_RUN_HB3_131210)
Option Filename  Type Description

   -s   inmd.tpr  InputRun input file: tpr tpb tpa
   -o MDResults/md.trr  Output   Full precision trajectory: trr trj cpt
   -x MDResults/md.xtc  Output, Opt. Compressed trajectory (portable xdr
format)
-cpi MDResults/md.cpt  Input, Opt.  Checkpoint file
-cpo MDResults/md.cpt  Output, Opt. Checkpoint file
   -c MDResults/md.gro  Output   Structure file: gro g96 pdb
   -e MDResults/md.edr  Output   Energy file: edr ene
   -g MDResults/md.log  Output   Log file
-dgdl MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
-field MDResults/md.xvg  Output, Opt. xvgr/xmgr file
-table MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
-tablep MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
-tableb MDResults/md.xvg  Input, Opt.  xvgr/xmgr file
-rerun MDResults/md.xtc  Input, Opt.  Trajectory: xtc 

[gmx-users] How to define Center of Mass velocity of a specific group

2010-12-14 Thread Tomy van Batis
Dear all

I have a system consisting of 2 substrates (20 nm distance between them) and
inside them there are polymer chains. I would like during my NVT simulations
the substrates NOT to move (I suppose I have to put  the velocity of the COM
of it's substrate to be zero).

Does anyone know how to do that?

Thanks in advance
Chrysostomos
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Terminal_ARG_residue causing problem in pdb2gmx

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Abraham

On 14/12/2010 6:35 PM, shahid nayeem wrote:

Dear Gromacs User
My pdb is homodimer with  Arg as c-terminal residue. With this pdb I 
am etting following error in pdb2gmx command

Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.0.7
Source code file: pdb2gmx.c, line: 429

Fatal error:
Atom OXT in residue ARG 107 not found in rtp entry with 17 atoms
 while sorting atoms
The command executed is as follows
 pdb2gmx   -f.pdb   -o.gro   -p  .top
I tried to change the OXT atom name in pdb file to O2, then also I am 
getting the same error.
In .rtp entry there is ARG residue as N-ter  but for C-ter ARG there 
is no residue.

Please suggest.
Waiting for  helps from gromacs users.
Shahid Nayem


There have been problems with terminal oxygen atoms. Please upgrade to 
4.5.3 and see if you still have problems.


Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] How to define Center of Mass velocity of a specific group

2010-12-14 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Tomy van Batis wrote:

Dear all

I have a system consisting of 2 substrates (20 nm distance between them) 
and inside them there are polymer chains. I would like during my NVT 
simulations the substrates NOT to move (I suppose I have to put  the 
velocity of the COM of it's substrate to be zero).


Does anyone know how to do that? 



The simplest way is to just use position restraints.  The positions may change 
very slightly, but not a noticeable amount.


If you absolutely require no movement at all, use freezegrps in the .mdp file.

-Justin


Thanks in advance
Chrysostomos



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] HBOND probability

2010-12-14 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Poojari, Chetan wrote:

Hello Justin,

I deleted the original file and re ran the script. I did get the output as such:  


#DonorAcceptor   % Exist.
  
0.040
  ASP1   N  SOL171  OW   0.020
  ASP1   N  SOL172  OW   0.020
  ASP1   N  SOL175  OW   0.100
.
.
.

But in the second line of the output theres no donor or acceptor but still i 
gives 0.040 % existence number. I scrolled down to end of the output file to 
check if incase the %exist. is missing for the last atom...but everything 
seems to be fine.

Please can i know why is it showing this number.



I have no idea.  There is some mismatch between the lines of the .xpm file and 
the .ndx file, or for some reason the numbers in the .ndx file cannot be mapped 
back onto the .pdb file.  It could mean that this particular hydrogen bond is 
undefined for those reasons, or something else later in the output file (since 
the .xpm file is read backward, so to speak) has caused a problem and shifted 
the indices.


If you send me your input files (off-list), I will try to find out what's going 
on with them.  No promises, but I'll try to find some time.


-Justin





Kind regards,
chetan.







From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf 
Of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
Sent: 13 December 2010 22:48
To: Gromacs Users' List
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] HBOND probability

Poojari, Chetan wrote:

Hello Justin,

I commented out  line 151 and braces enclosing it.

#   unless ($resn =~ /SOL/) {
for (my $z=1; $z=$nres; $z++) {
   if ($donors{$z} == $natom) {
   $donor_names[$z] = $name;
$donor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
} elsif ($acceptors{$z} == $natom) {
$acceptor_names[$z] = $name;
$acceptor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
}
}
   # }


Following is the ouput:

In the beginning of the file i had these :

#Donor  Acceptor   % Exist.
   0.040
  ASP1 N   0.020
  ASP1 N   0.020
  ASP1 N   0.100

 GLU11   OE1   0.020
   GLU11 OE2   0.020
   HIS13O  0.040
   GLN15 OE1   0.040


Following these i had below lines., in the same file:

#Donor  Acceptor   % Exist.
   0.040
  ASP1 N  SOL171  OW   0.020
  ASP1 N  SOL172  OW   0.020
  ASP1 N  SOL175  OW   0.100
  ASP1 N  SOL177  OW   0.020
  ASP1 N  SOL179  OW   0.020
.
.
.
.
SOL682OW   HIS13 O 0.020
SOL682OW   GLN15 OE1   0.020
SOL682OW   GLN15 NE2   0.040
SOL682OW   ALA21   O   0.020
SOL682OW   GLU22 OE1   0.140




Delete the original file and run the script again.  The output is simply
appended if the same file is already present.  Or, modify the output routines.
The latter part of the file is the expected output.

-Justin


Kind regards,
chetan.





From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf 
Of Justin A. Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu]
Sent: 13 December 2010 19:54
To: Gromacs Users' List
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] HBOND probability

Poojari, Chetan wrote:

Hello Justin,

I commented out the lines from 151-161

#   unless ($resn =~ /SOL/) {
   # for (my $z=1; $z=$nres; $z++) {
#if ($donors{$z} == $natom) {
#$donor_names[$z] = $name;
#$donor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
   # } elsif ($acceptors{$z} == $natom) {
   # $acceptor_names[$z] = $name;
   # $acceptor_resn[$z] = join('', $resn, $resnum);
  #  }
  #  }
  #  }



I am ending up with the similar output.


Please comment out *just* the unless line 

[gmx-users] Umberella sampling

2010-12-14 Thread chris . neale

http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/umbrella/index.html

-- original message --

I can't understand correctly what we do when we are using umberella sampling
for obtaining PMF.
I explain that ,please modify or complete it.


(I think we define some sampling windows,each related to an reference
distance.
for each distance ,relative to it's distance,we define a spring constant.
our spring is at rest in the center of windows,
then we do a short simulation within each windows such that our molecule is
connected to the spring and it's potential energy is depending to it's
displacement from the center of windows.
Then we have potential energy of two molecules in any distance from each
other.
Having potential energy along the reaction path or here falong the degree of
freedom(distance between two molecules) is PMF oof interest and
the difference between limits of PMF plot is delta-free energy of interest)

what do you think ?do you agree with me?
Thanks in advance for your atteintion.
Mohsen


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: gb_saltconc in implicit water simulations

2010-12-14 Thread Bob Johnson
Can anyone answer this question or guide me somewhere with helpful
information?
Thanks,
Bob

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bob Johnson bobjohnson1...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello everyone,
 I am trying to use implicit solvent with a CG DNA model. The model,
 however, uses explicit charges, which means that the DNA carries an overall
 negative charge. When using implicit solvent with a charged system in other
 codes (e.g. Amber), the electrolyte is taken care of implicitly as well.
 However, in Gromacs this is currently not implemented since gb_saltconc is
 always set to 0. Without any salt, the DNA duplex is obviously unstable. Are
 there plans on implementing implicit counterions so that one can set
 gb_saltconc to nonzero values?

 It doesn't seem natural to include explicit counterions to neutralize the
 system when using implicit solvent. Is there a typical protocol one follows
 to neutralize charged systems when using implicit solvent?
 Thanks,
 Bob

 --
 Bob Johnson, PhD
 Institute for Computational Molecular Science
 Temple University
 1900 North 12th Street
 Philadelphia, PA 19122
 http://astro.temple.edu/~rjohnson http://astro.temple.edu/%7Erjohnson




-- 
Bob Johnson, PhD
Institute for Computational Molecular Science
Temple University
1900 North 12th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
http://astro.temple.edu/~rjohnson
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Re: gb_saltconc in implicit water simulations

2010-12-14 Thread devicerandom

On 14/12/10 18:35, Bob Johnson wrote:

Can anyone answer this question or guide me somewhere with helpful
information?
Thanks,
Bob


I was going to send a very similar mail -namely, I have a coarse-grain 
system in vacuum where I'd like to simulate a charged polymer. My idea 
was that of adding a single ghost counter-ion with zero VdW 
interactions, perhaps keeping it fixed in one corner of the box, but I'd 
like to know how meaningful it is.


thanks!
m.



On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bob Johnson bobjohnson1...@gmail.com
mailto:bobjohnson1...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello everyone,
I am trying to use implicit solvent with a CG DNA model. The model,
however, uses explicit charges, which means that the DNA carries an
overall negative charge. When using implicit solvent with a charged
system in other codes (e.g. Amber), the electrolyte is taken care of
implicitly as well. However, in Gromacs this is currently not
implemented since gb_saltconc is always set to 0. Without any salt,
the DNA duplex is obviously unstable. Are there plans on
implementing implicit counterions so that one can set gb_saltconc to
nonzero values?

It doesn't seem natural to include explicit counterions to
neutralize the system when using implicit solvent. Is there a
typical protocol one follows to neutralize charged systems when
using implicit solvent?
Thanks,
Bob

--
Bob Johnson, PhD
Institute for Computational Molecular Science
Temple University
1900 North 12th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
http://astro.temple.edu/~rjohnson http://astro.temple.edu/%7Erjohnson




--
Bob Johnson, PhD
Institute for Computational Molecular Science
Temple University
1900 North 12th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
http://astro.temple.edu/~rjohnson



--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: gb_saltconc in implicit water simulations

2010-12-14 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



devicerandom wrote:

On 14/12/10 18:35, Bob Johnson wrote:

Can anyone answer this question or guide me somewhere with helpful
information?
Thanks,
Bob


I was going to send a very similar mail -namely, I have a coarse-grain 
system in vacuum where I'd like to simulate a charged polymer. My idea 
was that of adding a single ghost counter-ion with zero VdW 
interactions, perhaps keeping it fixed in one corner of the box, but I'd 
like to know how meaningful it is.




In vacuum and implicit solvent are very different concepts.  If you are 
indeed simulating in a vacuum, I would be willing to bet that your charged 
polymer will rapidly associate with your dummy ion simply due to attractive 
Coulombic interactions that are not screened by any intervening solvent.


In regards to the original post, I have seen this question asked and ignored 
several times already, unfortunately.  Most of the literature I have read (which 
primarily uses CHARMM) does not specify how counterions are handled, if at all. 
 Maybe there is some intrinsic compensating factor in CHARMM that I simply 
don't know about.  I found this:


http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20874

But again, it uses CHARMM and fancy modified electrostatic models.

I would really hope that someone who knows about the proper GROMACS methodology 
would comment.  This has been a curiosity of mine for some time, as well.  I 
have not had a pressing need to try out the implicit solvent features, but in 
the absence of being sure of the methodology, I am unlikely to do so.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: gb_saltconc in implicit water simulations

2010-12-14 Thread devicerandom

On 14/12/10 19:04, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

I was going to send a very similar mail -namely, I have a coarse-grain
system in vacuum where I'd like to simulate a charged polymer. My idea
was that of adding a single ghost counter-ion with zero VdW
interactions, perhaps keeping it fixed in one corner of the box, but
I'd like to know how meaningful it is.



In vacuum and implicit solvent are very different concepts. If you
are indeed simulating in a vacuum, I would be willing to bet that your
charged polymer will rapidly associate with your dummy ion simply due to
attractive Coulombic interactions that are not screened by any
intervening solvent.


Heh, I know very well that -and that is one of the reasons I wanted to 
know how does one cope with that.


I mean, if it's a single polymer, perhaps one can naively position 
restrain the ion in a corner of the box, away from the polymer, while 
the polymer stays on its center of mass. But if I want multiple objects 
in my box, I guess it's not going to work.


I'd like very much to use implicit solvent as well but I have to see how 
deep is the performance impact on my model -after all, one does coarse 
grain to be raw but *fast* :)




In regards to the original post, I have seen this question asked and
ignored several times already, unfortunately. Most of the literature I
have read (which primarily uses CHARMM) does not specify how counterions
are handled, if at all. Maybe there is some intrinsic compensating
factor in CHARMM that I simply don't know about. I found this:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20874

But again, it uses CHARMM and fancy modified electrostatic models.

I would really hope that someone who knows about the proper GROMACS
methodology would comment. This has been a curiosity of mine for some
time, as well. I have not had a pressing need to try out the implicit
solvent features, but in the absence of being sure of the methodology, I
am unlikely to do so.


Perhaps the developers of the implicit solvent know about that? I hope so...

m.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: gb_saltconc in implicit water simulations

2010-12-14 Thread Per Larsson
Hi!

Sorry that I missed this discussion, we recently moved the lab and there where 
quite many things to attend to.

When we did the implementation of implicit solvent into Gromacs, one of the 
strong points was to see how fast we could make it, to speed up conformational 
sampling as much as possible. Adding in the extra Debye-Huckel term for a 
non-zero salt-concentration was not a priority at the time. It might be a bit 
unfortunate that the option anyway exists in the mdp-file. 
I will try and see if I can find the time to put it in, but that will not 
happen in the next coming weeks although I agree that it would be very useful 
to have :-)

When it comes to the use of explicit ions in an implicit solvent, I hate to say 
that I'm not much of an expert, really. Having said that, and someone else is 
very welcome to correct me on this point, there does not seem to exist a wide 
body of literature about this. In addition to the paper that Justin pointed to, 
there is some work done by Michael Feig (eg. 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16928023). 
Also I think that particularly with DNA there are problems with the theory 
itself as it does not handle high salt-concentrations very well.

Cheers
/Per



14 dec 2010 kl. 20.22 skrev devicerandom:

 On 14/12/10 19:04, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
 I was going to send a very similar mail -namely, I have a coarse-grain
 system in vacuum where I'd like to simulate a charged polymer. My idea
 was that of adding a single ghost counter-ion with zero VdW
 interactions, perhaps keeping it fixed in one corner of the box, but
 I'd like to know how meaningful it is.
 
 
 In vacuum and implicit solvent are very different concepts. If you
 are indeed simulating in a vacuum, I would be willing to bet that your
 charged polymer will rapidly associate with your dummy ion simply due to
 attractive Coulombic interactions that are not screened by any
 intervening solvent.
 
 Heh, I know very well that -and that is one of the reasons I wanted to know 
 how does one cope with that.
 
 I mean, if it's a single polymer, perhaps one can naively position restrain 
 the ion in a corner of the box, away from the polymer, while the polymer 
 stays on its center of mass. But if I want multiple objects in my box, I 
 guess it's not going to work.
 
 I'd like very much to use implicit solvent as well but I have to see how deep 
 is the performance impact on my model -after all, one does coarse grain to be 
 raw but *fast* :)
 
 
 In regards to the original post, I have seen this question asked and
 ignored several times already, unfortunately. Most of the literature I
 have read (which primarily uses CHARMM) does not specify how counterions
 are handled, if at all. Maybe there is some intrinsic compensating
 factor in CHARMM that I simply don't know about. I found this:
 
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20874
 
 But again, it uses CHARMM and fancy modified electrostatic models.
 
 I would really hope that someone who knows about the proper GROMACS
 methodology would comment. This has been a curiosity of mine for some
 time, as well. I have not had a pressing need to try out the implicit
 solvent features, but in the absence of being sure of the methodology, I
 am unlikely to do so.
 
 Perhaps the developers of the implicit solvent know about that? I hope so...
 
 m.
 -- 
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] gmx-4.5.3 CMake build fails

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Abraham

On 14/12/2010 8:02 PM, Reinhold Bader wrote:

  Hello,

building gromacs 4.5.3 with Cmake 2.6.3 fails because the build system 
cannot link
   g_analyze

Linking C executable g_analyze
../gmxlib/libgmx.a(gmx_matrix.c.o): In function `matrix_invert':
gmx_matrix.c:(.text+0x1d62): undefined reference to `dgetrf_'
gmx_matrix.c:(.text+0x2442): undefined reference to `dgetri_'

   Note that I have

  GMX_EXTERNAL_BLAS --  ON
  GMX_EXTERNAL_LAPACK --  ON

   and the subsequently requested MKL_ settings have been properly inserted. 
I've tried
   to work around this by also adding the MKL libraries to 
CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS,
   without avail.


Use make VERBOSE=1 and see how the produced linker line agrees with your 
MKL documentation.


Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] md.log

2010-12-14 Thread Ramachandran G
Hi Itamar,
Thanks for your help. Without the md.log file i could able to
extend the simulation time but i could not able to append to results
to my old .trr and .edr files.
Rama


On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Itamar Kass itamar.k...@monash.edu wrote:
 Hi,

 the log file is not needed for extension. Use something like:

 grompp -f md_extension.mdp -c MD_01.gro -n system.ndx -p system.top -t
 MD_01.trr -r MD_01.edr -o MD_02.tpr

 Itamar

 On 14/12/10 1:29 PM, Ramachandran G wrote:

 Hi gmx-users:
     I am trying to extend my simulation run but unfortunately i
 deleted the file md.log. Is there any way i get my md.log file using
 the existing .edr or .trr files so that i can proceed further.
 Thank you.
 Rama

 --


 In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in
 practice, there is. - Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

 ===
 | Itamar Kass, Ph.D.
 | Postdoctoral Research Fellow
 |
 | Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
 | Building 77 Clayton Campus
 | Wellington Road
 | Monash University,
 | Victoria 3800
 | Australia
 |
 | Tel: +61 3 9902 9376
 | Fax: +61 3 9902 9500
 | E-mail: itamar.k...@monash.edu
 

 --
 gmx-users mailing list    gmx-us...@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Postdoctoral Research Scholar,
Department of Chemistry,
University of Nevada, Reno.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] md.log

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Abraham

On 15/12/2010 10:07 AM, Ramachandran G wrote:

Hi Itamar,
 Thanks for your help. Without the md.log file i could able to
extend the simulation time but i could not able to append to results
to my old .trr and .edr files.


That is what trjcat and eneconv are for.

Mark


Rama


On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Itamar Kassitamar.k...@monash.edu  wrote:

Hi,

the log file is not needed for extension. Use something like:

grompp -f md_extension.mdp -c MD_01.gro -n system.ndx -p system.top -t
MD_01.trr -r MD_01.edr -o MD_02.tpr

Itamar

On 14/12/10 1:29 PM, Ramachandran G wrote:

Hi gmx-users:
 I am trying to extend my simulation run but unfortunately i
deleted the file md.log. Is there any way i get my md.log file using
the existing .edr or .trr files so that i can proceed further.
Thank you.
Rama

--


In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in
practice, there is. - Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

===
| Itamar Kass, Ph.D.
| Postdoctoral Research Fellow
|
| Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
| Building 77 Clayton Campus
| Wellington Road
| Monash University,
| Victoria 3800
| Australia
|
| Tel: +61 3 9902 9376
| Fax: +61 3 9902 9500
| E-mail: itamar.k...@monash.edu


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] freezegrps concept

2010-12-14 Thread YUVRAJ UBOVEJA
Hello

I am trying to simulate lipase in water in ffamber99sb-ildn. Chosen cubic
as box with distance of 1nm b/w solute n box.
Protein is going out of the box after equilibration step. Any solution?

Should i use *freezegrps* option to restrict protein movement. Please
provide some light to this option. What effect it will have on the whole
system?

-- 
Yuvraj
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] freezegrps concept

2010-12-14 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



YUVRAJ UBOVEJA wrote:

Hello

I am trying to simulate lipase in water in ffamber99sb-ildn. Chosen 
cubic as box with distance of 1nm b/w solute n box.

Protein is going out of the box after equilibration step. Any solution?



FAQ #11.

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/FAQs

Please also note that if you search for a generic phrase like protein out of 
box on the mailing list archive, your answer will turn up as the first post 
(and then several hundred more).


Should i use *freezegrps* option to restrict protein movement. Please 
provide some light to this option. What effect it will have on the whole 
system?




If you're trying to fit the position of the protein into some preconceived 
notion of what it should be doing, stop.  If you are trying to appropriately 
equilibrate the solvent while keeping the protein fixed (in any arbitrary 
location), position restraints are much easier because:


1. They are already present in the topology and are easily invoked
2. Freezing is incompatible with pressure coupling
3. If proper energygrp_excl are not used, you can end up generating very large 
forces


-Justin


--
Yuvraj



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] freezegrps concept

2010-12-14 Thread Sarath Chandra Dantu
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:53 AM, YUVRAJ UBOVEJA yuvrajthe...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello

 I am trying to simulate lipase in water in ffamber99sb-ildn. Chosen cubic
 as box with distance of 1nm b/w solute n box.
 Protein is going out of the box after equilibration step. Any solution?


The protein does not diffuse out of the box. Use for eg:   trjconv -pbc
nojump on your trajectory. For more information refer to the link below...


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions


Best Wishes,


Sarath


 Should i use *freezegrps* option to restrict protein movement. Please
 provide some light to this option. What effect it will have on the whole
 system?

 --
 Yuvraj


 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] HPC mpi how to run

2010-12-14 Thread gromacs
Hi ,
 
I have installed PSFTP and PuTTY. I have seen the Gromacs-4.0.7 in ./opt in 
wivenhoe (cluster), and i know how to upload my file to my folder using PSFTP. 
However i donot know how to run it in HPC; when i using Gromacs-4.0.7 in my 
desktop, if the Gromacs is installed properly, there will be a line when i type 
the command 'luck'.
 
How can i see the gromacs whether it istalled properly?
how can i run simulations on HPC? 
Thanks!
 -- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] HPC mpi how to run

2010-12-14 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



gromacs wrote:

Hi ,
 
I have installed PSFTP and PuTTY. I have seen the Gromacs-4.0.7 in ./opt 
in wivenhoe (cluster), and i know how to upload my file to my folder 
using PSFTP. However i donot know how to run it in HPC; when i using 
Gromacs-4.0.7 in my desktop, if the Gromacs is installed properly, there 
will be a line when i type the command 'luck'.
 
How can i see the gromacs whether it istalled properly?
how can i run simulations on HPC? 


Add the Gromacs installation to your PATH and proceed as you would anything 
else.  Beyond that, consult your sysadmin for help.  The exact sequence of 
commands will be dictated by your MPI environment, presence/absence of a queuing 
system, etc.


-Justin


Thanks!
 





--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Appropriate (desktop) hardware for Gromacs

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Abraham

On 15/12/2010 1:03 PM, Tom Dupree wrote:


Greetings all,

We are looking at setting up Linux desktop in our lab for setting up 
some simulations to be run externally, as well some short simulations.


I am new to Linux and Gromos.



I'm going to presume you mean GROMACS.

I have done some reading of the gmx-users list archive and have a few 
questions.


I was wondering if there is anything in particular to avoid/choose in 
terms of hardware for such a system?




Since you are not running with MPI parallelism, no.


Specifically does Gromos prefer a particular architecture? (INTEL/AMD)



No. Any chip with SSE or SSE2 is fine.

I understand there is now some GPU computing support with Gromos, are 
there any problems using consumer grade cards? (GeForce GTX 460/480)




The manual lists some compatible cards.

Is Gromos happier in a particular flavour of Linux, given we will be 
running on a desktop?




No. Some distros do have GROMACS available via their package managers 
(usually in their extras section).


Mark


Thanks for your time in looking at these (noobish) questions.

Tom



-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: Re: [gmx-users] ERROR: Source code file: statutil.c, line: 727

2010-12-14 Thread sharada
Uday,


You are  reproducing the output of md.csh.  I would also like to see the 
contents of md.csh to know the gromacs commands therein. This would help to see 
where the error is coming. Please paste the file md.csh.


sharada









-- Original Message --

From: udaya kiran kiran.ud...@gmail.com

To: Sarath Chandra 
sarathchandrada...@gmail.com

Cc: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
gmx-users@gromacs.org

Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:13:05 +0100

Subject: Re: [gmx-users] ERROR: Source code 
file: statutil.c, line: 727



Hello,



Here I am sending the complete output after the 
md.csh command with the errors in bold.





COMMAND: csh md.csh





:-) G R O M A C S (-:



Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulation



:-) VERSION 4.0.5 (-:





Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, 
Berk Hess, and others.

Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of 
Groningen, The Netherlands.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS 
development team,

check out 
http://www.gromacs.orghttp://www.gromacs.org for more information.



This program is free software; you can 
redistribute it and/or

modify it under the terms of the GNU General 
Public License

as published by the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 2

of the License, or (at your option) any later 
version.



:-) grompp (double precision) (-:



Option Filename Type Description




-f md-md.mdp Input, Opt! grompp input file with 
MD parameters

-po inmd.mdp Output grompp input file with MD 
parameters

-c results/eq1bar300K.gro Input Structure file: 
gro g96 pdb tpr tpb

tpa

-r conf.gro Input, Opt. Structure file: gro g96 
pdb tpr tpb tpa

-rb conf.gro Input, Opt. Structure file: gro 
g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa

-n Index_sol.ndx Input, Opt! Index file

-p topol_sol_hbond_131210.top Input Topology 
file

-pp processed.top Output, Opt. Topology file

-o inmd.tpr Output Run input file: tpr tpb tpa

-t traj.trr Input, Opt. Full precision 
trajectory: trr trj cpt

-e ener.edr Input, Opt. Energy file: edr ene



Option Type Value Description


--

-[no]h bool no Print help info and quit

-nice int 0 Set the nicelevel

-[no]v bool yes Be loud and noisy

-time real -1 Take frame at or first after this 
time.

-[no]rmvsbds bool yes Remove constant bonded 
interactions with virtual

sites

-maxwarn int 0 Number of allowed warnings 
during input processing

-[no]zero bool no Set parameters for bonded 
interactions without

defaults to zero instead of generating an error

-[no]renum bool yes Renumber atomtypes and 
minimize number of

atomtypes



ERROR


---

Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.5

Source code file: statutil.c, line: