Re: [gmx-users] How to set up constraint distcance pulling

2012-06-07 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



On 6/7/12 9:14 AM, xiaowu759 wrote:

Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 07:59:27 -0400
From: "Justin A. Lemkul" mailto:jalem...@vt.edu>>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] How to set up constraint distcance pulling
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
Message-ID: <4fd0979f.4020...@vt.edu <mailto:4fd0979f.4020...@vt.edu>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Thank you very much!

On 6/7/12 7:38 AM, xiaowu759 wrote:
 >> Dear gmxers,
 >> I am performing COM pulling using GMX4.0.7, to obtain the PMF as a function 
of
 >> distance between the COMs of two molecules. However, quite strange resuluts 
are
 >> generated, i.e., the distance can not be fixed at the value defined by
 >>pull_init1. The pull opinions are given below. Could you please tell me how 
to
 >> deal with this? Thanks a lot for any reply.

 >How far away from the target value are the results in terms of COM distance?
A: very far, several hundreds vs. 0.8 nm


A distance of several hundred nm would indicate to me that the system blew up.


 >> Chaofu Wu
 >> ;Pull opinions
 >> pull = constraint
 >> pull_geometry = distance
 >> ;pull_dim = Y Y Y

 >The comment here has no effect; pull_dim defaults to "Y Y Y."
A: Yes
 >> pull_group0 = r1
 > >pull_group1 = r2
 > >pull_nstxout = 0
 > >pull_nstfout = 5
 >> pull_init1 = 0.80

 >How does this pull_init1 value compare to the COM separation in the coordinate
 >file? If the distance is not very close, the constraint algorithm may fail.
A: The COM separation in the coordinate file is 0.567 nm, which should be not
too larger than 0.80 defined by pull_init1.


That's a 29% difference, which is quite large.  If constraints are not easily 
satisfied, the simulation can blow up.  Your statement above makes that seem 
very likely.  Your restraint distance should match the actual coordinates very 
closely, otherwise you will likely need to equilibrate better under e.g. an 
umbrella potential and relatively weak force constant to obtain better starting 
structures if you're intent on using a rigid constraint for the PMF calculation.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] How to set up constraint distcance pulling

2012-06-07 Thread xiaowu759
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 07:59:27 -0400
From: "Justin A. Lemkul" 
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] How to set up constraint distcance pulling
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
Message-ID: <4fd0979f.4020...@vt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Thank you very much!
 
On 6/7/12 7:38 AM, xiaowu759 wrote:
>> Dear gmxers,
>> I am performing COM pulling using GMX4.0.7, to obtain the PMF as a function 
>> of
>> distance between the COMs of two molecules. However, quite strange resuluts 
>> are
>> generated, i.e., the distance can not be fixed at the value defined by
>>pull_init1. The pull opinions are given below. Could you please tell me how to
>> deal with this? Thanks a lot for any reply.

>How far away from the target value are the results in terms of COM distance?
A: very far, several hundreds vs. 0.8 nm
>> Chaofu Wu
>> ;Pull opinions
>> pull = constraint
>> pull_geometry = distance
>> ;pull_dim = Y Y Y

>The comment here has no effect; pull_dim defaults to "Y Y Y."
A: Yes
>> pull_group0 = r1
> >pull_group1 = r2
> >pull_nstxout = 0
> >pull_nstfout = 5
>> pull_init1 = 0.80

>How does this pull_init1 value compare to the COM separation in the coordinate 
>file? If the distance is not very close, the constraint algorithm may fail.
A: The COM separation in the coordinate file is 0.567 nm, which should be not 
too larger than 0.80 defined by pull_init1. 
>-Justin

-- 


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
  
  --
   Department of Chemistry and Materials Science

 Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, 
 Loudi 417000, the People's Republic of China (P.R. China)-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] How to set up constraint distcance pulling

2012-06-07 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



On 6/7/12 7:38 AM, xiaowu759 wrote:

Dear gmxers,
I am performing COM pulling using GMX4.0.7, to obtain the PMF as a function of
distance between the COMs of two molecules. However, quite strange resuluts are
generated, i.e., the distance can not be fixed at the value defined by
pull_init1. The pull opinions are given below. Could you please tell me how to
deal with this? Thanks a lot for any reply.


How far away from the target value are the results in terms of COM distance?


Chaofu Wu
;Pull opinions
pull = constraint
pull_geometry = distance
;pull_dim = Y Y Y


The comment here has no effect; pull_dim defaults to "Y Y Y."


pull_group0 = r1
pull_group1 = r2
pull_nstxout = 0
pull_nstfout = 5
pull_init1 = 0.80


How does this pull_init1 value compare to the COM separation in the coordinate 
file?  If the distance is not very close, the constraint algorithm may fail.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] How to set up constraint distcance pulling

2012-06-07 Thread xiaowu759
Dear gmxers,
 I am performing COM pulling using GMX4.0.7, to obtain the PMF as a function of 
distance between the COMs of two molecules. However, quite strange resuluts are 
generated, i.e., the distance can not be fixed at the value defined by 
pull_init1. The pull opinions are given below. Could you please tell me how to 
deal with this? Thanks a lot for any reply.
 Chaofu Wu
  
 ;Pull opinions
 pull  = constraint
pull_geometry  = distance
;pull_dim = Y Y Y
pull_group0  = r1
pull_group1  = r2
pull_nstxout = 0
pull_nstfout  = 5
 pull_init1  = 0.80
  --
   Department of Chemistry and Materials Science

 Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, 
 Loudi 417000, the People's Republic of China (P.R. China)-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists