Re: [gmx-users] Pulling in GROMACS 4.0.3

2009-08-04 Thread Johnny Lam
Hi again,

I actually figured it out. Turns out, it was a stupid formatting error in
the .mdp file. Even though I had it as shown, it didn't read the pull
command because it wasn't formatted properly (thought it was still a part
of the first line). Sorry guys.

--Johnny

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thx for the reply. By pull apart, I just wanted to expose an 'activation
> site' by using a force. It is somewhat similar to pulling two domains of a
> protein away from each other. I'm not aiming to undo any secondary
> structure. I hope this is clearer. Thanks again!
>
> --Johnny
>
>
>>
>>
>> Johnny Lam wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to pull apart a CG protein (to verify CG results with those
>>> of
>>> already published works using atomistic MD). Using the previous
>>> suggestions, my new pull code is the following:
>>>
>>
>> By "pull apart," do you mean to unwind the secondary structure of the
>> protein?
>> If so, I don't think it will work.  Doesn't MARTINI fix certain backbone
>> parameters such that secondary structure remains very rigid over time?
>>
>> If that's the case, then the vibrations you're seeing are just the
>> structure
>> trying to resist being pulled apart.
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>> --
>> 
>>
>> Justin A. Lemkul
>> Ph.D. Candidate
>> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
>> Department of Biochemistry
>> Virginia Tech
>> Blacksburg, VA
>> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
>> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>>
>> 
>>
>
>
> -
> Johnny Lam
> ISPE Berkeley Chapter External Vice President
> Department of Bioengineering
> College of Engineering
> University of California, Berkeley
> Tel: (408) 655- 6829
> Email: john...@berkeley.edu
>
>
>


-
Johnny Lam
ISPE Berkeley Chapter External Vice President
Department of Bioengineering
College of Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
Tel: (408) 655- 6829
Email: john...@berkeley.edu


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Pulling in GROMACS 4.0.3

2009-08-04 Thread Johnny Lam
Hi Justin,

Thx for the reply. By pull apart, I just wanted to expose an 'activation
site' by using a force. It is somewhat similar to pulling two domains of a
protein away from each other. I'm not aiming to undo any secondary
structure. I hope this is clearer. Thanks again!

--Johnny


>
>
> Johnny Lam wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to pull apart a CG protein (to verify CG results with those
>> of
>> already published works using atomistic MD). Using the previous
>> suggestions, my new pull code is the following:
>>
>
> By "pull apart," do you mean to unwind the secondary structure of the
> protein?
> If so, I don't think it will work.  Doesn't MARTINI fix certain backbone
> parameters such that secondary structure remains very rigid over time?
>
> If that's the case, then the vibrations you're seeing are just the
> structure
> trying to resist being pulled apart.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> 
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> 
>


-
Johnny Lam
ISPE Berkeley Chapter External Vice President
Department of Bioengineering
College of Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
Tel: (408) 655- 6829
Email: john...@berkeley.edu


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Pulling in GROMACS 4.0.3

2009-08-04 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Johnny Lam wrote:

Hi again,


I am trying to pull apart a CG protein (to verify CG results with those of
already published works using atomistic MD). Using the previous
suggestions, my new pull code is the following:



By "pull apart," do you mean to unwind the secondary structure of the protein? 
If so, I don't think it will work.  Doesn't MARTINI fix certain backbone 
parameters such that secondary structure remains very rigid over time?


If that's the case, then the vibrations you're seeing are just the structure 
trying to resist being pulled apart.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Pulling in GROMACS 4.0.3

2009-08-04 Thread Johnny Lam
Hi again,


I am trying to pull apart a CG protein (to verify CG results with those of
already published works using atomistic MD). Using the previous
suggestions, my new pull code is the following:

title= Martini
cpp  = /usr/bin/cpp

integrator   = md
; start time and timestep in ps
tinit= 0.0
dt   = 0.030
nsteps   = 2500
; number of steps for center of mass motion removal =
nstcomm  = 1
comm-grps=

; OUTPUT CONTROL OPTIONS =
; Output frequency for coords (x), velocities (v) and forces (f) =
nstxout  = 2500
nstvout  = 2500
nstfout  = 0
; Output frequency for energies to log file and energy file =
nstlog   = 1000
nstenergy= 1000
; Output frequency and precision for xtc file =
nstxtcout= 33
xtc_precision= 100
; This selects the subset of atoms for the xtc file. You can =
; select multiple groups. By default all atoms will be written. =
xtc-grps =
; Selection of energy groups =
energygrps   =

; nblist update frequency =
nstlist  = 10
; ns algorithm (simple or grid) =
ns_type  = grid
; Periodic boundary conditions: xyz or none =
pbc  = xyz
; nblist cut-off =
rlist= 1.4

; Method for doing electrostatics =
coulombtype  = Shift
rcoulomb_switch  = 0.0
rcoulomb = 1.2
; Dielectric constant (DC) for cut-off or DC of reaction field =
epsilon_r= 15
; Method for doing Van der Waals =
vdw_type = Shift
; cut-off lengths=
rvdw_switch  = 0.9
rvdw = 1.2
; Apply long range dispersion corrections for Energy and Pressure =
DispCorr = No


; Temperature coupling   =
tcoupl   = V-Rescale
; Groups to couple separately =
tc-grps  = PROTEIN W
; Time constant (ps) and reference temperature (K) =
tau_t= 0.3 0.3
ref_t= 323 323
; Pressure coupling  =
Pcoupl   = berendsen
Pcoupltype   = isotropic
; Time constant (ps), compressibility (1/bar) and reference P (bar) =
tau_p= 3.0
compressibility  = 3e-5
ref_p= 1.0

; GENERATE VELOCITIES FOR STARTUP RUN =
gen_vel  = no
gen_temp = 323
gen_seed = 666


constraints  = none
; Type of constraint algorithm =
constraint_algorithm = SHAKE
; Do not constrain the start configuration =
unconstrained_start  = no
; Highest order in the expansion of the constraint coupling matrix =
lincs_order  = 4
; Lincs will write a warning to the stderr if in one step a bond =
; rotates over more degrees than =
lincs_warnangle  = 60

; FREEZE GROUP
; freezegrps = freeze
; freezedim  = Y Y Y

; Pulling

pull=  umbrella

pull_geometry   =  distance

pull_start  =  yes

pull_nstxout=  10

pull_nstfout=  10

pull_ngroups=  1

pull_group0 =  freeze

pull_group1 =  pull

pull_init1  =  0.0 0.0 0.0

pull_rate1  =  5000.0

pull_k1 =  100


The reason why the number of time steps is quite small, the pull_rate
quite high, and the force constant low is because I wanted to verify that
the code actually works before doing the actual production run (around 13
ns). The issue I'm running into is that when I check the results using
VMD, it seems almost as if the simulation ignored all of my pull commands.
I changed the rate, force constant, and the # timesteps to many different
values but to no avail. Every result seems to indicate that my pull
commands were not read (nothing happens aside from vibration). I highly
doubt that there is a bug (as mentioned in an earlier post). I don't know
why this is happening. Is there something wrong with the code? I really
appreciate the help!


--Johnny


-
Johnny Lam
ISPE Berkeley Chapter External Vice President
Department of Bioengineering
College of Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
Tel: (408) 655- 6829
Email: john...@berkeley.edu


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php