[gmx-users] ensemble selection

2013-09-24 Thread fatemeh ramezani


 Dear Justin

I'm simulating gold nanoparticle interaction with protein by OPLSAA forcefield. 
I'm confused for selection an ensemble for my md run. I did energy minimization 
by NPT . then I did the MD by NVT. I did it because of studying of two paper 
that were similar to my project (Adsorption of histidine and 
histidine-containing peptides on Au(1 1 1):A molecular dynamics study by Zhen 
Xu, Shi-Ling Yuan and Interaction of b-Sheet Folds with a Gold Surface by 
Martin Hoefling, Susanna Monti, Stefano Corni).

But in manual and tutorials of gromacs  is proposed energy minimization should 
be done by NVT and NPT and then MD should be done with NPT ensemble.
in your idea should  I repeat my MD run by NPT ensemble? what is the difference 
of my result  between this two?

thank you

Fatemeh Ramezani
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] ensemble selection

2013-09-24 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/24/13 2:40 PM, fatemeh ramezani wrote:



Dear Justin

I'm simulating gold nanoparticle interaction with protein by OPLSAA
forcefield. I'm confused for selection an ensemble for my md run. I did
energy minimization by NPT . then I did the MD by NVT. I did it because of


Let's take a step back.  EM is a non-dynamical process (there are no velocities) 
and thus does not belong to any sort of statistical mechanical ensemble. 
Therefore, EM is not done under NPT, NVT, NVE etc.



studying of two paper that were similar to my project (Adsorption of
histidine and histidine-containing peptides on Au(1 1 1):A molecular dynamics
study by Zhen Xu, Shi-Ling Yuan and Interaction of b-Sheet Folds with a Gold
Surface by Martin Hoefling, Susanna Monti, Stefano Corni).

But in manual and tutorials of gromacs  is proposed energy minimization
should be done by NVT and NPT and then MD should be done with NPT ensemble.
in your idea should  I repeat my MD run by NPT ensemble? what is the
difference of my result  between this two?



You need to eliminate the perception that manuals and tutorials dictate the only 
way that things should be done.  These are merely suggestions for 
accomplishing a particular task.  What is true, however, is that you need to 
prepare and equilibrate the system such that it can be simulated under a 
relevant ensemble that models the experimental reality you wish to represent.  A 
protocol that follows: EM, NVT, NPT, and production is typically robust since it 
introduces temperature and pressure scaling sequentially, rather than all at 
once, which can lead to instability.


People often conduct simulations of biomolecules under NPT conditions because 
that's the ensemble present in a test tube in a lab or in the human body.  To 
understand the fundamental differences between partitioning functions, 
ensembles, free energies, etc between different ensembles, consult any 
statistical mechanics or molecular modeling book.  Just about all books on MM 
and MD feature some introductory material on these topics.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists