Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx -merge non interactive

2009-12-18 Thread Oliver Stueker
Hallo André,

Check the wiki:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Making_Commands_Non-Interactive

Oliver

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:59, Wojtyczka, André
 wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> is it possible to have the -merge option in pdb2gmx set to non-interactive?
>
> I need to merge 8 copies of a protein into one definition (.top) because if
> i don't do that all the chains are included into the .top-file. It is then not
> possible for me (in an easy way) to include my restraints into the same .top 
> file
> because that would lead to a wrong order.
>
> To cut a long story short... I need -merge in a script and there i don't need
> interactivity at all ;)
>
> Thx for your time
> André
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx -merge non interactive

2009-12-18 Thread Wojtyczka , André
Hmm...

"although it is necessary to run
it through on the command line once to see what the order of arguments
should be"

...exactly is the main problem as I don't know all the time how many chains
are in the files I'm processing.
Pdb2gmx asks for every chain included in your files.

Though I can assume 8 chains in 99% of the files, I wanted to know if there
may be a switch included in pdb2gmx like -ff.

Maybe I prescan my files to get the amount of chains and then pass that
value to my pdb2gmx script.

Anyway, thanks for your answer, I appreciate it!


< What exactly did you try? Something like this?
<
< pdb2gmx -f a.gro << EOF
< 5
< y
< EOF
<
< I have not done -merge myself, but I often pass in multiple
< 'command-line' arguments in a scripts, although it is necessary to run
< it through on the command line once to see what the order of arguments
< should be. I could be the one whose wrong as I have never done -merge,
< but then again I have never had a problem automating any of the
< gromacs tools and I don't see why this one should be any different.
<
<
< -- original message --

<< Hi, thanks for your answer!
<<
<< I think this only refers to the -ff force field selection.
<< I tried several scripting solutions to pass "y" to the pdb2gmx questions
<< whether to do the merging or not.
<<
<< Maybe my wires are just crossed but i did not find any hint to
<< get rid of this questions.
<<
<< < Can't you just do one of these:
<< <
<< < echo "5" | pdb2gmx -f a.gro
<< <
<< < or
<< <
<< < pdb2gmx -f a.gro << EOF
<< < 5
<< < EOF
<< <
<< < --original message--



--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] pdb2gmx -merge non interactive

2009-12-18 Thread chris . neale

What exactly did you try? Something like this?

pdb2gmx -f a.gro << EOF
5
y
EOF

I have not done -merge myself, but I often pass in multiple  
'command-line' arguments in a scripts, although it is necessary to run  
it through on the command line once to see what the order of arguments  
should be. I could be the one whose wrong as I have never done -merge,  
but then again I have never had a problem automating any of the  
gromacs tools and I don't see why this one should be any different.



-- original message --

Hi, thanks for your answer!

I think this only refers to the -ff force field selection.
I tried several scripting solutions to pass "y" to the pdb2gmx questions
whether to do the merging or not.

Maybe my wires are just crossed but i did not find any hint to
get rid of this questions.

< Can't you just do one of these:
<
< echo "5" | pdb2gmx -f a.gro
<
< or
<
< pdb2gmx -f a.gro << EOF
< 5
< EOF
<
< --original message--



--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx -merge non interactive

2009-12-18 Thread Wojtyczka , André
Hi, thanks for your answer!

I think this only refers to the -ff force field selection.
I tried several scripting solutions to pass "y" to the pdb2gmx questions
whether to do the merging or not.

Maybe my wires are just crossed but i did not find any hint to
get rid of this questions.

< Can't you just do one of these:
<
< echo "5" | pdb2gmx -f a.gro
<
< or
<
< pdb2gmx -f a.gro << EOF
< 5
< EOF
<
< --original message--

<< Hi List,
<<
<< is it possible to have the -merge option in pdb2gmx set to non-interactive?
<<
<< I need to merge 8 copies of a protein into one definition (.top) because if
<< i don't do that all the chains are included into the .top-file. It is then 
not
<< possible for me (in an easy way) to include my restraints into the
<< same .top file
<< because that would lead to a wrong order.
<<
<< To cut a long story short... I need -merge in a script and there i don't need
<< interactivity at all ;)
<<
<< Thx for your time
<< André



Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] pdb2gmx -merge non interactive

2009-12-18 Thread chris . neale

Can't you just do one of these:

echo "5" | pdb2gmx -f a.gro

or

pdb2gmx -f a.gro << EOF
5
EOF

--original message--

Hi List,

is it possible to have the -merge option in pdb2gmx set to non-interactive?

I need to merge 8 copies of a protein into one definition (.top) because if
i don't do that all the chains are included into the .top-file. It is then not
possible for me (in an easy way) to include my restraints into the  
same .top file

because that would lead to a wrong order.

To cut a long story short... I need -merge in a script and there i don't need
interactivity at all ;)

Thx for your time
André


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] pdb2gmx -merge non interactive

2009-12-18 Thread Wojtyczka , André
Hi List,

is it possible to have the -merge option in pdb2gmx set to non-interactive?

I need to merge 8 copies of a protein into one definition (.top) because if
i don't do that all the chains are included into the .top-file. It is then not
possible for me (in an easy way) to include my restraints into the same .top 
file
because that would lead to a wrong order.

To cut a long story short... I need -merge in a script and there i don't need
interactivity at all ;)

Thx for your time
André



Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php