Re: [gmx-users] problem obtaining similar force fields for protein and ligand
On 18/11/2011 6:54 PM, swati patel wrote: Hello Users, I am facing a problem in obtaining topologies for my ligand.I tried working on acpype,bt it seems very complex to me.PRODRG is easy but it uses gromos87 force field.PRODRG 2.5 is still not available for download. can anyone suggest me how to obtain topologies for my protein and ligand using same force fields? Suggestions can be found here - http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Steps_to_Perform_a_Simulation Mark -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] problem obtaining similar force fields for protein and ligand
Hello Users, I am facing a problem in obtaining topologies for my ligand.I tried working on acpype,bt it seems very complex to me.PRODRG is easy but it uses gromos87 force field.PRODRG 2.5 is still not available for download. can anyone suggest me how to obtain topologies for my protein and ligand using same force fields? thanks. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
