Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

Dear Gmx Users,

Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

[ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the same
type


No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying combination 
rules between any atoms.



[ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of
different type


No, these override combination rules.


[ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions

If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column? How
nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different type?
The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are provided.
Would you please explain?



Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating nonbonded 
interactions that are not always the same for a given atomtype.  Other force 
fields just use straight combination rules and thus never need [nonbond_params].


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different type
approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum of two
potentials of those atoms?


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

 Dear Gmx Users,

 Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

 [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the same
 type


 No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
 combination rules between any atoms.


  [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of
 different type


 No, these override combination rules.


  [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions

 If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column? How
 nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different type?
 The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are provided.
 Would you please explain?


 Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating
 nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given atomtype.
  Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus never need
 [nonbond_params].

 -Justin

 --
 ==**==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 ==**==
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different type
approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum of two
potentials of those atoms?



No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on combination rules and 
how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.


-Justin



On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:


Dear Gmx Users,

Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

[ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the same
type



No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
combination rules between any atoms.


  [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of

different type



No, these override combination rules.


  [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions


If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column? How
nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different type?
The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are provided.
Would you please explain?



Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating
nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given atomtype.
  Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus never need
[nonbond_params].

-Justin

--
==**==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

==**==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
 posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read 
http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

 Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different type
 approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum of two
 potentials of those atoms?


 No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on combination
 rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.

 -Justin


I read it.
I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 - So that
means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C and A
values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have the sum
of it.

Steven





 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

  Dear Gmx Users,

 Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

 [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the same
 type


 No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
 combination rules between any atoms.


   [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of

 different type


 No, these override combination rules.


   [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions


 If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column?
 How
 nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different type?
 The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are provided.
 Would you please explain?


  Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating
 nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given atomtype.
   Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus never
 need
 [nonbond_params].

 -Justin

 --
 ====


 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 

 ====

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchh**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**
 Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
 posting!

 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists
 http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 


 --
 ==**==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 ==**==
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
I got it. However,

I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a combination
rule 1. When running grompp:

Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:


Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of nonbonded
parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me this please?



On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:




 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

 Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different type
 approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum of two
 potentials of those atoms?


 No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on combination
 rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.

 -Justin


 I read it.
 I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 - So that
 means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C and A
 values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
 So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have the sum
 of it.

 Steven





 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

  Dear Gmx Users,

 Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

 [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the
 same
 type


 No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
 combination rules between any atoms.


   [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of

 different type


 No, these override combination rules.


   [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions


 If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column?
 How
 nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different type?
 The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are provided.
 Would you please explain?


  Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating
 nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given
 atomtype.
   Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus never
 need
 [nonbond_params].

 -Justin

 --
 ====


 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 

 ====

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchh**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**
 Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
 posting!

 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists
 http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 


 --
 ==**==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 ==**==
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 * Please don't post 

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
An why do I have 1830 non bonded? 60*60/2 = 1800. There are 57 of 1-4
combinations so it should be lower than 1800...
And why 1830 1-4 interactions as I have only 57... Please, help/

Steven


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:

 I got it. However,

 I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a combination
 rule 1. When running grompp:

 Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
 Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 1Protein residues
 Analysing Protein...
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
 This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

 when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:


 Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
 Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 1Protein residues
 Analysing Protein...
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
 This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

 So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of nonbonded
 parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me this please?



 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:




 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

 Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different type
 approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum of
 two
 potentials of those atoms?


 No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on combination
 rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.

 -Justin


 I read it.
 I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 - So that
 means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C and A
 values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
 So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have the sum
 of it.

 Steven





 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
 wrote:



 On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

  Dear Gmx Users,

 Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

 [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the
 same
 type


 No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
 combination rules between any atoms.


   [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of

 different type


 No, these override combination rules.


   [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions


 If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column?
 How
 nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different type?
 The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are
 provided.
 Would you please explain?


  Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating
 nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given
 atomtype.
   Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus
 never need
 [nonbond_params].

 -Justin

 --
 ====


 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 

 ====

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchh**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**
 Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
 posting!

 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists
 http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 


 --
 ==**==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 ==**==
 --
 gmx-users mailing list

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Mark Abraham
grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters given
your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation will
depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not excluded.

Mark


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:

 I got it. However,

 I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a combination
 rule 1. When running grompp:

 Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
 Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 1Protein residues
 Analysing Protein...
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
 This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

 when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:


 Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
 Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 1Protein residues
 Analysing Protein...
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
 This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

 So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of nonbonded
 parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me this please?



 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 
 
  On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
 
  Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different type
  approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum of
 two
  potentials of those atoms?
 
 
  No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on combination
  rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.
 
  -Justin
 
 
  I read it.
  I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 - So that
  means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C and A
  values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
  So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have the sum
  of it.
 
  Steven
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
 wrote:
 
 
 
  On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
 
   Dear Gmx Users,
 
  Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp
 
  [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of the
  same
  type
 
 
  No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
  combination rules between any atoms.
 
 
[ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of
 
  different type
 
 
  No, these override combination rules.
 
 
[ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions
 
 
  If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes] column?
  How
  nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different
 type?
  The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are
 provided.
  Would you please explain?
 
 
   Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of generating
  nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given
  atomtype.
Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus
 never
  need
  [nonbond_params].
 
  -Justin
 
  --
  ====
 
 
  Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
  Research Scientist
  Department of Biochemistry
  Virginia Tech
  Blacksburg, VA
  jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
  http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 http://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
  h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
  
 
  ====
 
  --
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-users
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  
  * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
  Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchh**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**
  Mailing_Lists/Search
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 
  * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
  interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists
  http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
  
 
 
  --
  ==**==
 
  Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
  Research Scientist
  Department of Biochemistry
  Virginia Tech
  Blacksburg, VA
  jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
  

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Mark Abraham
Parameters for possible interactions is not the same as interactions.
The latter depend on the configuration and cut-offs... grompp is not doing
a neighbor search!

Mark


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters given
  your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation will
  depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not excluded.
 
  Mark


 I understand...but why for 60 mer polypeptide there are 1830 nonbonded
 interactions ?

 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   I got it. However,
  
   I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a
 combination
   rule 1. When running grompp:
  
   Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
   Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
   Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
   Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
   Analysing residue names:
   There are: 1Protein residues
   Analysing Protein...
   Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
   This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
  
   when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:
  
  
   Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
   Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
   Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
   Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
   Analysing residue names:
   There are: 1Protein residues
   Analysing Protein...
   Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
   This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
  
   So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of nonbonded
   parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me this
  please?
  
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann 
 s.neuman...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   
   
   
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
  wrote:
   
   
   
On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
   
Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different
 type
approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a sum
 of
   two
potentials of those atoms?
   
   
No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on
 combination
rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.
   
-Justin
   
   
I read it.
I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 - So
  that
means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C and
 A
values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have the
  sum
of it.
   
Steven
   
   
   
   
   
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
   wrote:
   
   
   
On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
   
 Dear Gmx Users,
   
Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp
   
[ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of
 the
same
type
   
   
No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when applying
combination rules between any atoms.
   
   
  [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between atoms
 of
   
different type
   
   
No, these override combination rules.
   
   
  [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions
   
   
If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes]
  column?
How
nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a different
   type?
The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are
   provided.
Would you please explain?
   
   
 Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of
 generating
nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given
atomtype.
  Other force fields just use straight combination rules and thus
   never
need
[nonbond_params].
   
-Justin
   
--
====
   
   
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
   http://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justin
   http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

   
====
   
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
   http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-users
   http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users

* Please search the archive at 

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
All possible interactions = 60*60/2 = 1800. Where grompp takes another 30
from?


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.comwrote:

 Parameters for possible interactions is not the same as interactions.
 The latter depend on the configuration and cut-offs... grompp is not doing
 a neighbor search!

 Mark


 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters
 given
   your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation will
   depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not
 excluded.
  
   Mark
 
 
  I understand...but why for 60 mer polypeptide there are 1830 nonbonded
  interactions ?
 
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann 
 s.neuman...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
I got it. However,
   
I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a
  combination
rule 1. When running grompp:
   
Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
   
when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:
   
   
Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
   
So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of nonbonded
parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me this
   please?
   
   
   
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann 
  s.neuman...@gmail.com
wrote:
   



 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
   wrote:



 On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

 Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different
  type
 approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a
 sum
  of
two
 potentials of those atoms?


 No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on
  combination
 rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.

 -Justin


 I read it.
 I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 -
 So
   that
 means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C
 and
  A
 values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
 So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have
 the
   sum
 of it.

 Steven





 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
 
wrote:



 On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

  Dear Gmx Users,

 Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

 [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms of
  the
 same
 type


 No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when
 applying
 combination rules between any atoms.


   [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between
 atoms
  of

 different type


 No, these override combination rules.


   [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions


 If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes]
   column?
 How
 nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a
 different
type?
 The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are
provided.
 Would you please explain?


  Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of
  generating
 nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given
 atomtype.
   Other force fields just use straight combination rules and
 thus
never
 need
 [nonbond_params].

 -Justin

 --
 ====


 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
http://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justin
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 

 ====

 

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
and 1830 1-4 interactions... there are 57 all possible 1-4 interactions


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:

 All possible interactions = 60*60/2 = 1800. Where grompp takes another 30
 from?


 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mark Abraham 
 mark.j.abra...@gmail.comwrote:

 Parameters for possible interactions is not the same as interactions.
 The latter depend on the configuration and cut-offs... grompp is not doing
 a neighbor search!

 Mark


 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Mark Abraham 
 mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters
 given
   your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation will
   depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not
 excluded.
  
   Mark
 
 
  I understand...but why for 60 mer polypeptide there are 1830 nonbonded
  interactions ?
 
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann 
 s.neuman...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
I got it. However,
   
I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a
  combination
rule 1. When running grompp:
   
Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
   
when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:
   
   
Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
   
So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of nonbonded
parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me this
   please?
   
   
   
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann 
  s.neuman...@gmail.com
wrote:
   



 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
   wrote:



 On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

 Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a different
  type
 approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a
 sum
  of
two
 potentials of those atoms?


 No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on
  combination
 rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.

 -Justin


 I read it.
 I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12 -
 So
   that
 means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C
 and
  A
 values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
 So two of them approaching each other in my system will have have
 the
   sum
 of it.

 Steven





 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul 
 jalem...@vt.edu
wrote:



 On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

  Dear Gmx Users,

 Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

 [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms
 of
  the
 same
 type


 No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when
 applying
 combination rules between any atoms.


   [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between
 atoms
  of

 different type


 No, these override combination rules.


   [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions


 If that is correct why amber force filed has only [atomtypes]
   column?
 How
 nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a
 different
type?
 The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ] are
provided.
 Would you please explain?


  Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of
  generating
 nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a given
 atomtype.
   Other force fields just use straight combination rules and
 thus
never
 need
 [nonbond_params].

 -Justin

 --
 ====


 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
http://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Mark Abraham
How many atom *types* are there?


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:

 and 1830 1-4 interactions... there are 57 all possible 1-4 interactions


 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  All possible interactions = 60*60/2 = 1800. Where grompp takes another
 30
  from?
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Parameters for possible interactions is not the same as
 interactions.
  The latter depend on the configuration and cut-offs... grompp is not
 doing
  a neighbor search!
 
  Mark
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Mark Abraham 
  mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters
  given
your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation
 will
depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not
  excluded.
   
Mark
  
  
   I understand...but why for 60 mer polypeptide there are 1830 nonbonded
   interactions ?
  
   
   
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann 
  s.neuman...@gmail.com
wrote:
   
 I got it. However,

 I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a
   combination
 rule 1. When running grompp:

 Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
 Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 1Protein residues
 Analysing Protein...
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
 This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

 when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:


 Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
 Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
 Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
 Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
 Analysing residue names:
 There are: 1Protein residues
 Analysing Protein...
 Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
 This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

 So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of
 nonbonded
 parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me
 this
please?



 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann 
   s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul 
 jalem...@vt.edu
wrote:
 
 
 
  On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
 
  Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a
 different
   type
  approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy is a
  sum
   of
 two
  potentials of those atoms?
 
 
  No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on
   combination
  rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.
 
  -Justin
 
 
  I read it.
  I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and A=4epsSig^12
 -
  So
that
  means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded your C
  and
   A
  values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
  So two of them approaching each other in my system will have
 have
  the
sum
  of it.
 
  Steven
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul 
  jalem...@vt.edu
 wrote:
 
 
 
  On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
 
   Dear Gmx Users,
 
  Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp
 
  [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between atoms
  of
   the
  same
  type
 
 
  No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when
  applying
  combination rules between any atoms.
 
 
[ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between
  atoms
   of
 
  different type
 
 
  No, these override combination rules.
 
 
[ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions
 
 
  If that is correct why amber force filed has only
 [atomtypes]
column?
  How
  nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a
  different
 type?
  The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ]
 are
 provided.
  Would you please explain?
 
 
   Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of
   generating
  nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a
 given
  atomtype.
Other force fields just use straight combination rules and
  thus
 never
  need
  [nonbond_params].
 
  -Justin
 
  --
  ====
 

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
60 types of atoms and 60 atoms in total belonging to one residue


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.comwrote:

 How many atom *types* are there?


 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  and 1830 1-4 interactions... there are 57 all possible 1-4 interactions
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   All possible interactions = 60*60/2 = 1800. Where grompp takes another
  30
   from?
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mark Abraham 
 mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   Parameters for possible interactions is not the same as
  interactions.
   The latter depend on the configuration and cut-offs... grompp is not
  doing
   a neighbor search!
  
   Mark
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Steven Neumann 
 s.neuman...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Mark Abraham 
   mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
wrote:
   
 grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters
   given
 your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation
  will
 depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not
   excluded.

 Mark
   
   
I understand...but why for 60 mer polypeptide there are 1830
 nonbonded
interactions ?
   


 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann 
   s.neuman...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I got it. However,
 
  I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a
combination
  rule 1. When running grompp:
 
  Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
  Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
  Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
  Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
  Analysing residue names:
  There are: 1Protein residues
  Analysing Protein...
  Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
  This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
 
  when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:
 
 
  Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
  Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
  Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
  Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
  Analysing residue names:
  There are: 1Protein residues
  Analysing Protein...
  Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
  This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data
 
  So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of
  nonbonded
  parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me
  this
 please?
 
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann 
s.neuman...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul 
  jalem...@vt.edu
 wrote:
  
  
  
   On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
  
   Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a
  different
type
   approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy
 is a
   sum
of
  two
   potentials of those atoms?
  
  
   No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on
combination
   rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.
  
   -Justin
  
  
   I read it.
   I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and
 A=4epsSig^12
  -
   So
 that
   means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded
 your C
   and
A
   values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
   So two of them approaching each other in my system will have
  have
   the
 sum
   of it.
  
   Steven
  
  
  
  
  
   On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul 
   jalem...@vt.edu
  wrote:
  
  
  
   On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
  
Dear Gmx Users,
  
   Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp
  
   [ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between
 atoms
   of
the
   same
   type
  
  
   No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when
   applying
   combination rules between any atoms.
  
  
 [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between
   atoms
of
  
   different type
  
  
   No, these override combination rules.
  
  
 [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions
  
  
   If that is correct why amber force filed has only
  [atomtypes]
 column?
   How
   nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a
   different
  type?
   The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ]
  are
  provided.
   Would you please explain?
  
  
Gromos force 

Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Justin Lemkul


On 6/12/13 8:01 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

60 types of atoms and 60 atoms in total belonging to one residue


The number of possible combinations is (N(N+1))/2, thus you get 1830 from 60 
atom types.


-Justin




On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.comwrote:


How many atom *types* are there?


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com

wrote:



and 1830 1-4 interactions... there are 57 all possible 1-4 interactions


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com

wrote:



All possible interactions = 60*60/2 = 1800. Where grompp takes another

30

from?


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mark Abraham 

mark.j.abra...@gmail.com

wrote:


Parameters for possible interactions is not the same as

interactions.

The latter depend on the configuration and cut-offs... grompp is not

doing

a neighbor search!

Mark


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Steven Neumann 

s.neuman...@gmail.com

wrote:



On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Mark Abraham 

mark.j.abra...@gmail.com

wrote:



grompp is just enumerating the possible combinations of parameters

given

your inputs. Whether any of those will be used in the simulation

will

depend on whether atoms of given types are close enough and not

excluded.


Mark



I understand...but why for 60 mer polypeptide there are 1830

nonbonded

interactions ?




On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Steven Neumann 

s.neuman...@gmail.com

wrote:



I got it. However,

I have 60  atoms in my chain all with given C6 and C12 with a

combination

rule 1. When running grompp:

Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

when changing nrexcl in my topology to 0:


Generated 1830 of the 1830 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1
Generated 1830 of the 1830 1-4 parameter combinations
Excluding 0 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_X'
Analysing residue names:
There are: 1Protein residues
Analysing Protein...
Number of degrees of freedom in T-Coupling group rest is 118.00
This run will generate roughly 2 Mb of data

So if I exclude 1-3 interactions I have the same number of

nonbonded

parameters as well as 1-4 interactions. Can someone explain me

this

please?




On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Steven Neumann 

s.neuman...@gmail.com

wrote:






On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Justin Lemkul 

jalem...@vt.edu

wrote:





On 6/12/13 6:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:


Thank you. That means that e.g. when two LJ atoms of a

different

type

approaching each other the non bonded LJ potential energy

is a

sum

of

two

potentials of those atoms?



No, please refer to the Gromacs manual for discussion on

combination

rules and how they fit into the Lennard-Jones equation.

-Justin



I read it.
I used combination rule 1 in which C=4epsSig^6 and

A=4epsSig^12

-

So

that

means that when you provide in [atomtypes] in ffnonbonded

your C

and

A

values each atom has a specific LJ potential shape. Right?
So two of them approaching each other in my system will have

have

the

sum

of it.

Steven







On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Justin Lemkul 

jalem...@vt.edu

wrote:





On 6/12/13 5:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

  Dear Gmx Users,


Please, correct me if I am wrong. In ffnonbonded.itp

[ atomtypes ] - these are nonbonded parameters between

atoms

of

the

same
type



No, these are the nonbonded parameters that are used when

applying

combination rules between any atoms.


   [ nonbond_params ] these are nonbonded parameters between

atoms

of



different type



No, these override combination rules.


   [ pairtypes ] - 1-4 interactions



If that is correct why amber force filed has only

[atomtypes]

column?

How
nonbonded parameters are calculated between atoms of a

different

type?

The same with charmm - only [atomtypes ] and [pairtypes ]

are

provided.

Would you please explain?


  Gromos force fields, for instance, have complex ways of

generating

nonbonded interactions that are not always the same for a

given

atomtype.
   Other force fields just use straight combination rules

and

thus

never

need
[nonbond_params].

-Justin

--
====


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.

vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin



http://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin



h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justin

http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin





Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Steven Neumann
So how come 1830 1-4 interaction? There should be 57 of 1-4 interactions
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Nonbonded parameters

2013-06-12 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 6/12/13 8:16 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:

So how come 1830 1-4 interaction? There should be 57 of 1-4 interactions



Mark already told you this - interactions that exist are different from possible 
interactions.  You may have 57 interactions, but that's specific to your system 
because of how many atoms there are (which is also independent of how many atom 
types are used therein).  grompp generates a bunch of information (a matrix of 
possible interactions that could theoretically occur with N atom types); whether 
or not it uses that information is not necessarily relevant.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists