Re: [gmx-users] Re,problem with EM

2012-11-20 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 11/20/12 1:04 PM, Ali Alizadeh wrote:

Dear Justin

Thank you for the quick reply


Dear All users

I want my energy minimization of my system is converged to considered
value, when i do it,

It is converged because it reachs to Fmax and i see this message :

Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 10 in 31702 steps
Potential Energy  = -1.6531438e+03
Maximum force =  9.8014317e+00 on atom 162
Norm of force =  2.9060462e+00

my result:

http://alichemical.persiangig.com/document/em.jpg

When i represent profile of potential energy by g_energy, i can't see
my considered results,

I should reach this result that this link is related to it,

http://alichemical.persiangig.com/document/11.jpg




That's right, I knew it but in your opinion, How can i get same
result, What's the value of emtol for my system?


Justin wrote:
  If you want to reproduce the results of an MD trajectory, you
need to be doing
  MD, not EM.

  -Justin

I do not know my emtol value, How can i determine it?



emtol is simply a target value for the maximum force to reach during energy 
minimization.  I don't know that there is a terribly scientific way to determine 
what it should be, except for NMA calculations where it is particularly 
important.  The goal of EM is to achieve a reasonably stable system that is at 
an energy minimum and can be simulated further.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re, problem with EM

2012-11-20 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 11/20/12 12:17 PM, Ali Alizadeh wrote:

Dear Justin

Thank you for your reply,



1- In the first plot, unit of y axis is kj/mol, and you said above i
should use -nmol, i  confused, Why is the unit of y axis kj/mol
without using -nmol?



  Because that's the energy unit Gromacs always uses.  The
energy given is kJ per
  mole of equivalent systems.  In the second plot shown above,
the magnitude of
  the energy suggests kJ per mole of individual molecules.

I understood,



2- I want do EM so that energy of my system reaches to considered
value, but i never reach it exactly, what's wrong?



   You set an EM tolerance of 10 kJ/(mol-nm), which is a force,
and mdrun achieved
that.  You can't ask an EM algorithm to produce the same
result as a long-time
MD run, as is shown above.

-Justin

That's right, I knew it but in your opinion, How can i get same
result, What's the value of emtol for my system?



If you want to reproduce the results of an MD trajectory, you need to be doing 
MD, not EM.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re, problem with EM

2012-11-20 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 11/20/12 11:30 AM, Ali Alizadeh wrote:

  Dear All users


I want my energy minimization of my system is converged to considered
value, when i do it,

It is converged because it reachs to Fmax and i see this message :

Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 10 in 31702 steps
Potential Energy  = -1.6531438e+03
Maximum force =  9.8014317e+00 on atom 162
Norm of force =  2.9060462e+00

my result:

http://alichemical.persiangig.com/document/em.jpg

When i represent profile of potential energy by g_energy, i can't see
my considered results,

I should reach this result that this link is related to it,

http://alichemical.persiangig.com/document/11.jpg


Justin wrote:
  The first plot shows the result of EM, the second is the
result of a relatively
 long MD simulation.  I would not expect them to show the same
result.  Further,
 it appears that the second plot pertains to the
configurational energy per water
molecule (based on magnitude), while the first simply measures
the potential
energy of the whole system.  Since the system is homogeneous,
you can use the
-nmol option of g_energy to divide the energy terms by the
number of molecules.

   -Justin

Dear Justin

Thank you for your reply,

1- In the first plot, unit of y axis is kj/mol, and you said above i
should use -nmol, i  confused, Why is the unit of y axis kj/mol
without using -nmol?



Because that's the energy unit Gromacs always uses.  The energy given is kJ per 
mole of equivalent systems.  In the second plot shown above, the magnitude of 
the energy suggests kJ per mole of individual molecules.



2- I want do EM so that energy of my system reaches to considered
value, but i never reach it exactly, what's wrong?



You set an EM tolerance of 10 kJ/(mol-nm), which is a force, and mdrun achieved 
that.  You can't ask an EM algorithm to produce the same result as a long-time 
MD run, as is shown above.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists