Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1
Hi, I recommend to run the regressiontests. The simplest way is to build GROMACS with cmake -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD, and run make check. See http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Installation_Instructions#.c2.a7_4.12._Testing_GROMACS_for_correctness for more details. Roland On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Amil G. Anderson aander...@wittenberg.edu wrote: Gromacs users: I have just built and installed gromacs-4.6.1 on my Xeon 5500 compute cluster running Centos 5. The installation was done with gcc 4.7.0 I have run a simple test (the old tutor/gmxdemo) which fails at the first mdrun step with a segmentation fault. The command line for this step is: mdrun -nt 1 -s cpeptide_em -o cpeptide_em -c cpeptide_b4pr -v -debug 1 where I have included the debug flag and have restricted the run to one core. The files associated with this run are located at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I have done a test build of gromacs-4.5.4 (version I have been running the last year) with the same build environment as the 4.6.1 build, including using cmake. The rebuild of gromacs-4.5.4 runs the demo completely. Given the limited information for the run (segmentation fault seems to occur just after reading in the parameters), I'm not sure how to further pursue the source of this error. I have also tried building gromacs-4.6.2 but have the same error for mdrun. Thanks for any insight that you may be able to provide. Dr. Amil Anderson Associate Professor of Chemistry Wittenberg University -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
On 12/04/2012 3:30 PM, priya thiyagarajan wrote: hello sir, Thanks for your kind reply.. i am performing final md run for 60molecules .. after i submitted my job for 5ns, when i analyse the result my run is completed only for 314ps initially.. At this point, you should have looked at your .log file and your stdout and stderr files to see why the simulation stopped, rather than blindly continuing. then i extende my simulation.. but again it completed only for 500ps.. initially i thought because of queue limit its getting stopped.. but 3rd time i extended my simulation it came for 538ps.. when i analysed my log file it just showing like this DD step 268999 load imb.: force 1.5% Step Time Lambda 269000 538.00.0 Energies (kJ/mol) G96AngleProper Dih. Improper Dih. LJ-14 Coulomb-14 9.84673e+035.10424e+031.80376e+032.90591e+03 -2.97052e+03 LJ (SR) Disper. corr. Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential 9.69125e+04 -1.59583e+03 -7.80231e+05 -3.04364e+04 -6.98661e+05 Kinetic En. Total EnergyTemperature Pres. DC (bar) Pressure (bar) 1.17775e+05 -5.80886e+052.97568e+02 -1.04033e+02 2.31825e+01 Constr. rmsd 2.24598e-05 when i checked my errorfile i got this is because of segmentation fault.. my errorfile showed like this Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates /var/spool/PBS/mom_priv/jobs/244266.vega.SC http://244266.vega.SC: line 11: 26308 Segmentation fault mdrun -s md.tpr -o md3.trr -c md3.pdb -e md3.edr -g md3.log -cpi state2.cpt -cpo state3.cpt -x traj3.xtc -noappend There should be more descriptive error output somewhere. In any case, you are probably http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up and need to follow the diagnostic advice there. Mark http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up i searched in archieves but i didnt get the point clearly... can anyone please help me by explaining that reason for my problem and solve it. i am waiting for your reply.. pls help me with your valuable answer.. i am using gromacs 4.5.5 version. thanking you, -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
shivangi nangia wrote: Hello gmx users, My system for NVT equilbration runs into segmentation fault as soon as I try to run it. It does not give any warning or hint of what might be going wrong. Since I am a new user I am having difficulty exploring the plausible reasons. System: Protein( polyhistidine), 20 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid anions, 1:1 water: methanol (~3000 molecules of each) in 8 nm cube I had had EM of the system using steepest decent. Outcome: Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps, but did not reach the requested Fmax 1000. Potential Energy = 1.5354981e+19 Maximum force =inf on atom 651 Norm of force =inf You were already told that this is the source of your problem and any procedure is destined to fail. What's more, you were given hints on how to solve your issue: http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2011-April/060268.html -Justin -- Justin A. Lemkul Ph.D. Candidate ICTAS Doctoral Scholar MILES-IGERT Trainee Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
Hello gmx users, My system for NVT equilbration runs into segmentation fault as soon as I try to run it. It does not give any warning or hint of what might be going wrong. Since I am a new user I am having difficulty exploring the plausible reasons. System: Protein( polyhistidine), 20 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid anions, 1:1 water: methanol (~3000 molecules of each) in 8 nm cube I had had EM of the system using steepest decent. Outcome: Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps, but did not reach the requested Fmax 1000. Potential Energy = 1.5354981e+19 Maximum force =inf on atom 651 Norm of force =inf So that's broken already - you have enormous positive energy and infinite forces. Stop there and fix it. Either your starting configuration has severe atomic overlaps (go and visualize it with the periodic box), or some of your topology is broken (try a box of methanol on its own, try the protein in vacuum, try a single acid in vacuum) Mark *The minim.mdp *is: ; minim.mdp - used as input into grompp to generate em.tpr ; Parameters describing what to do, when to stop and what to save integrator = steep ; Algorithm (steep = steepest descent minimization) emtol= 1000.0; Stop minimization when the maximum force 1000.0 kJ/mol/nm emstep = 0.02 ; Energy step size nsteps = 5 ; Maximum number of (minimization) steps to perform ; Parameters describing how to find the neighbors of each atom and how to calculate the interactions nstlist = 1 ; Frequency to update the neighbor list and long range forces ns_type = grid ; Method to determine neighbor list (simple, grid) rlist= 1.0; Cut-off for making neighbor list (short range forces) coulombtype = PME; Treatment of long range electrostatic interactions rcoulomb = 1.0; Short-range electrostatic cut-off rvdw = 1.0; Short-range Van der Waals cut-off pbc = xyz ; Periodic Boundary Conditions (yes/no) constraints = none *The nvt.mdp*: title= hist NVT equilibration define = -DPOSRES ; position restrain the protein ; Run parameters integrator = md ; leap-frog integrator nsteps = 5 ; 2 * 5 = 100 ps dt= 0.002 ; 2 fs ; Output control nstxout = 100; save coordinates every 0.2 ps nstvout = 100; save velocities every 0.2 ps nstenergy = 100; save energies every 0.2 ps nstlog = 100; update log file every 0.2 ps ; Bond parameters continuation = no ; first dynamics run constraint_algorithm = lincs ; holonomic constraints constraints = none ; lincs_iter = 1 ; accuracy of LINCS lincs_order = 4 ; also related to accuracy ; Neighborsearching ns_type = grid ; search neighboring grid cells nstlist = 5 ; 10 fs rlist= 1.0; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm) rcoulomb = 1.0; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm) rvdw = 1.0; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm) ; Electrostatics coulombtype = PME; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range electrostatics pme_order = 4 ; cubic interpolation fourierspacing = 0.16 ; grid spacing for FFT ; Temperature coupling is on tcoupl = V-rescale ; modified Berendsen thermostat tc-grps = Protein Non-Protein ; two coupling groups - more accurate tau_t= 0.1 0.1 ; time constant, in ps ref_t= 300300 ; reference temperature, one for each group, in K ; Pressure coupling is off pcoupl = no ; no pressure coupling in NVT ; Periodic boundary conditions pbc = xyz; 3-D PBC ; Dispersion correction DispCorr = EnerPres ; account for cut-off vdW scheme ; Velocity generation gen_vel = yes; assign velocities from Maxwell distribution gen_temp = 300; temperature for Maxwell distribution gen_seed = -1 ; generate a random seed I tried to decrease the step size, that also runs into seg fault error. Kindly guide. Thanks, SN -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
Sikandar Mashayak wrote: Hi I have gromacs input files for md simulation, with these set up files (*.mdp,*.top,*.itp *.gro), I can successfully run grompp and mdrun on one machine, but when I move it to other machine, I get segmentation fault when I do mdrun. Both the machines have exactly same types of installation of gromacs 4.0.7 . Also, I can run water tutorials successfully on both the machines. So what could be the source of segmentation fault? MD is chaotic, so you may not get the same result every time you run a simulation. Since you've not said how quickly the seg fault occurs it is exceptionally hard to diagnose. Generally, seg faults with mdrun occur because the system crashes from an instability. Without substantially more information (system contents, .mdp settings, relevant log file output, etc) there is not much more to suggest. -Justin thanks sikandar -- Justin A. Lemkul Ph.D. Candidate ICTAS Doctoral Scholar MILES-IGERT Trainee Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
It happens immediately at step 0., and the log file looks like :
Input Parameters:
integrator = md
nsteps = 2
init_step= 0
ns_type = Grid
nstlist = 10
ndelta = 2
nstcomm = 0
comm_mode= Linear
nstlog = 1000
nstxout = 600
nstvout = 600
nstfout = 600
nstenergy= 1000
nstxtcout= 1000
init_t = 0
delta_t = 0.001
xtcprec = 1
nkx = 44
nky = 42
nkz = 120
pme_order= 4
ewald_rtol = 1e-05
ewald_geometry = 1
epsilon_surface = -1
optimize_fft = FALSE
ePBC = xyz
bPeriodicMols= FALSE
bContinuation= FALSE
bShakeSOR= FALSE
etc = Nose-Hoover
epc = No
epctype = Isotropic
tau_p= 1
ref_p (3x3):
ref_p[0]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
ref_p[1]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
ref_p[2]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
compress (3x3):
compress[0]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
compress[1]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
compress[2]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
refcoord_scaling = No
posres_com (3):
posres_com[0]= 0.0e+00
posres_com[1]= 0.0e+00
posres_com[2]= 0.0e+00
posres_comB (3):
posres_comB[0]= 0.0e+00
posres_comB[1]= 0.0e+00
posres_comB[2]= 0.0e+00
andersen_seed= 815131
rlist= 1.1
rtpi = 0.05
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb_switch = 0
rcoulomb = 1.1
vdwtype = Cut-off
rvdw_switch = 0
rvdw = 1.1
epsilon_r= 1
epsilon_rf = 1
tabext = 1
implicit_solvent = No
gb_algorithm = Still
gb_epsilon_solvent = 80
nstgbradii = 1
rgbradii = 2
gb_saltconc = 0
gb_obc_alpha = 1
gb_obc_beta = 0.8
gb_obc_gamma = 4.85
sa_surface_tension = 2.092
DispCorr = EnerPres
free_energy = no
init_lambda = 0
sc_alpha = 0
sc_power = 0
sc_sigma = 0.3
delta_lambda = 0
nwall= 0
wall_type= 9-3
wall_atomtype[0] = -1
wall_atomtype[1] = -1
wall_density[0] = 0
wall_density[1] = 0
wall_ewald_zfac = 3
pull = no
disre= No
disre_weighting = Conservative
disre_mixed = FALSE
dr_fc= 1000
dr_tau = 0
nstdisreout = 100
orires_fc= 0
orires_tau = 0
nstorireout = 100
dihre-fc = 1000
em_stepsize = 0.01
em_tol = 100
niter= 20
fc_stepsize = 0
nstcgsteep = 1000
nbfgscorr= 10
ConstAlg = Lincs
shake_tol= 0.0001
lincs_order = 4
lincs_warnangle = 30
lincs_iter = 1
bd_fric = 0
ld_seed = 1993
cos_accel= 0
deform (3x3):
deform[0]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
deform[1]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
deform[2]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
userint1 = 0
userint2 = 0
userint3 = 0
userint4 = 0
userreal1= 0
userreal2= 0
userreal3= 0
userreal4= 0
grpopts:
nrdf: 0 12822
ref_t: 0 300
tau_t: 0 0.2
anneal: No No
ann_npoints: 0 0
acc: 0 0 0
nfreeze: Y Y Y N
N N
energygrp_flags[ 0]: 1 0
energygrp_flags[ 1]: 0 0
efield-x:
n = 0
efield-xt:
n = 0
efield-y:
n = 0
efield-yt:
n = 0
efield-z:
n = 0
efield-zt:
n = 0
bQMMM= FALSE
QMconstraints= 0
QMMMscheme = 0
scalefactor = 1
qm_opts:
ngQM = 0
Table routines are used for coulomb: TRUE
Table routines are used for vdw: FALSE
Will do PME sum in reciprocal space.
PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE
U. Essman, L. Perela, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee and L. G. Pedersen
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
J. Chem. Phys. 103 (1995)
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
Sikandar Mashayak wrote:
It happens immediately at step 0., and the log file looks like :
That suggests to me that the system is inherently unstable, which can occur for
a variety of reasons.
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up
A few more comments below.
Input Parameters:
integrator = md
nsteps = 2
init_step= 0
ns_type = Grid
nstlist = 10
ndelta = 2
nstcomm = 0
comm_mode= Linear
nstlog = 1000
nstxout = 600
nstvout = 600
nstfout = 600
nstenergy= 1000
nstxtcout= 1000
init_t = 0
delta_t = 0.001
xtcprec = 1
nkx = 44
nky = 42
nkz = 120
pme_order= 4
ewald_rtol = 1e-05
ewald_geometry = 1
epsilon_surface = -1
optimize_fft = FALSE
ePBC = xyz
bPeriodicMols= FALSE
bContinuation= FALSE
bShakeSOR= FALSE
etc = Nose-Hoover
epc = No
epctype = Isotropic
tau_p= 1
ref_p (3x3):
ref_p[0]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
ref_p[1]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
ref_p[2]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
compress (3x3):
compress[0]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
compress[1]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
compress[2]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
refcoord_scaling = No
posres_com (3):
posres_com[0]= 0.0e+00
posres_com[1]= 0.0e+00
posres_com[2]= 0.0e+00
posres_comB (3):
posres_comB[0]= 0.0e+00
posres_comB[1]= 0.0e+00
posres_comB[2]= 0.0e+00
andersen_seed= 815131
rlist= 1.1
rtpi = 0.05
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb_switch = 0
rcoulomb = 1.1
vdwtype = Cut-off
rvdw_switch = 0
rvdw = 1.1
epsilon_r= 1
epsilon_rf = 1
tabext = 1
implicit_solvent = No
gb_algorithm = Still
gb_epsilon_solvent = 80
nstgbradii = 1
rgbradii = 2
gb_saltconc = 0
gb_obc_alpha = 1
gb_obc_beta = 0.8
gb_obc_gamma = 4.85
sa_surface_tension = 2.092
DispCorr = EnerPres
free_energy = no
init_lambda = 0
sc_alpha = 0
sc_power = 0
sc_sigma = 0.3
delta_lambda = 0
nwall= 0
wall_type= 9-3
wall_atomtype[0] = -1
wall_atomtype[1] = -1
wall_density[0] = 0
wall_density[1] = 0
wall_ewald_zfac = 3
pull = no
disre= No
disre_weighting = Conservative
disre_mixed = FALSE
dr_fc= 1000
dr_tau = 0
nstdisreout = 100
orires_fc= 0
orires_tau = 0
nstorireout = 100
dihre-fc = 1000
em_stepsize = 0.01
em_tol = 100
niter= 20
fc_stepsize = 0
nstcgsteep = 1000
nbfgscorr= 10
ConstAlg = Lincs
shake_tol= 0.0001
lincs_order = 4
lincs_warnangle = 30
lincs_iter = 1
bd_fric = 0
ld_seed = 1993
cos_accel= 0
deform (3x3):
deform[0]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
deform[1]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
deform[2]={ 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00}
userint1 = 0
userint2 = 0
userint3 = 0
userint4 = 0
userreal1= 0
userreal2= 0
userreal3= 0
userreal4= 0
grpopts:
nrdf: 0 12822
ref_t: 0 300
tau_t: 0 0.2
anneal: No No
ann_npoints: 0 0
acc: 0 0 0
nfreeze: Y Y Y N
N N
energygrp_flags[ 0]: 1 0
energygrp_flags[ 1]: 0 0
efield-x:
n = 0
efield-xt:
n = 0
efield-y:
n = 0
efield-yt:
n = 0
efield-z:
n = 0
efield-zt:
n = 0
bQMMM= FALSE
QMconstraints= 0
QMMMscheme = 0
scalefactor = 1
qm_opts:
ngQM = 0
Table routines are used for coulomb: TRUE
Table routines are used for vdw:
Re: [gmx-users] mdrun segmentation fault
sunny mishra wrote: Dear all, At the final step of my mdrun I get LINCS warning. I don't know whats the issue. Please help me out. If I had a nickel for every time I saw a LINCS warning on this list... :) The answer is always the same. There is something physically unrealistic about your simulation such that it is blowing up. See here: http://www.gromacs.org/WIKI-import/Blowing_Up And the relevant entry here: http://www.gromacs.org/WIKI-import/Main_Page/Errors -Justin Step 0, time 0 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 51.050964, max 314.598846 (between atoms 3 and 4) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 51 52 90.00.2700 16.3676 0.2700 51 53 90.00.2700 17.4243 0.2700 52 53 90.20.2700 2.1691 0.2700 57 58 90.00.2700 19.9248 0.2700 57 59 90.00.2700 27.7437 0.2700 58 59 89.90.2700 9.5994 0.2700 67 68 89.10.2700 11.0711 0.2700 67 69 89.50.2700 17.3915 0.2700 68 69 89.10.2700 8.9722 0.2700 68 70 88.70.2700 7.4897 0.2700 69 70 89.10.2700 10.5427 0.2700 74 75 90.00.2700 15.9658 0.2700 74 76 90.00.2700 14.3261 0.2700 75 76 90.00.2700 15.3014 0.2700 78 79 53.00.2700 0.3682 0.2700 78 80 36.00.2700 0.2621 0.2700 79 80 78.80.2700 0.3108 0.2700 79 81 74.60.2700 0.2500 0.2700 96 97 90.00.2700 5.6881 0.2700 96 98 90.00.2700 12.4635 0.2700 97 98 90.00.2700 12.2473 0.2700 105106 92.00.2700 5.3689 0.2700 105107 90.90.2700 4.9643 0.2700 106107 89.50.2700 5.2502 0.2700 106108 90.20.2700 12.9074 0.2700 107108 89.80.2700 13.3348 0.2700 123124 90.00.2700 0.3295 0.2700 123125 90.00.2700 0.4033 0.2700 124125 90.00.2700 0.4582 0.2700 134135 89.80.2700 7.5418 0.2700 134136 89.80.2700 7.6180 0.2700 135136 89.80.2700 7.5943 0.2700 177178 90.00.2700 21.0157 0.2700 177179 90.00.2700 21.3382 0.2700 178179 90.00.2700 5.0506 0.2700 206207 90.10.2700 3.7166 0.2700 206208 90.00.2700 17.1633 0.2700 207208 90.00.2700 14.3937 0.2700 210211 90.00.2700 1.4919 0.2700 210212 90.00.2700 1.4477 0.2700 229230 89.90.2700 46.6891 0.2700 229231 89.80.2700 12.4685 0.2700 230231 89.90.2700 34.3535 0.2700 233234 90.00.2700 17.0640 0.2700 233235 90.00.2700 12.0837 0.2700 234235 90.00.2700 21.1578 0.2700 240241 90.10.2700 14.3404 0.2700 240242 89.90.2700 5.5938 0.2700 241242 89.50.2700 10.7072 0.2700 241243 90.10.2700 11.1853 0.2700 242243 89.90.2700 14.6316 0.2700 278279 90.40.2700 0.4126 0.2700 278280 90.30.2700 0.6367 0.2700 279280 90.30.2700 0.6632 0.2700 321322 90.10.2700 13.7866 0.2700 321323 90.10.2700 8.6467 0.2700 322323 90.10.2700 6.2637 0.2700 325327 89.90.2700 5.2665 0.2700 326327 89.90.2700 5.3472 0.2700 343344 90.20.2700 5.8168 0.2700 343345 90.50.2700 5.0440 0.2700 344345 90.20.2700 5.9636 0.2700 344346 89.70.2700 6.8436 0.2700 345346 89.50.2700 2.4697 0.2700 364365 89.90.2700 1.8601 0.2700 364366 90.00.2700 2.8203 0.2700 365366 89.90.2700 1.4138 0.2700 389390 90.00.2700 0.4660 0.2700 389391 90.00.2700 0.4625 0.2700 390391 90.00.2700 0.4644 0.2700 417418 89.90.2700 3.9010 0.2700 417419 89.90.2700 3.8294 0.2700 418
