Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-04-05 Thread Mark Abraham

On 5/04/2011 3:57 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

Dear Tsjerk,

Hi Ahmet,

As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have zero charge,
nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups for EDO,
which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take the COH
groups as separate charge groups. I also note that the COH groups,
although chemically identical - H3NC(COH)3, right?-, have different
charges. That doesn't seem proper.

Hope it helps,

Tsjerk


nonrevised .itp file:
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

nonrevised .itp file:
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 1 *0.000*  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 1 *0.000*  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

can you show me on the itp file? how do I seperate two COH groups? 
Please help me


We didn't say to use zero *charges*. We said you need small charge 
groups. Since EDO is neutral, then by symmetry each half must also be 
neutral.


Have a look at the way charge groups are used in the .rtp file for your 
forcefield. You need to do similar things. If you don't understand the 
file formats yet, you need to read up on chapter 5 of the manual.


Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-04-05 Thread ahmet yıldırım
Dear Mark,

Now, are the files correct?
*EDO.itp*:
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H   1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC *2*0.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD *2*   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H   1  EDO HAF *2 *   0.031   1.0080

*TRS.itp:*
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
TRS  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
 2 H 1  TRS  H13 10.032   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
 4  CCl4 1  TRSC *3*0.055  12.0110
 5   CH2 1  TRS  C3* 4 *   0.049  14.0270
 6OA 1  TRS  O3 *4*   -0.205  15.9994
 7 H 1  TRS  H33* 4*0.019   1.0080
 8NL 1  TRS N* 5*0.206  14.0067
 9 H 1  TRS H2   * 5*0.004   1.0080
10 H 1  TRSH3 *5*0.004   1.0080
11 H 1  TRSH1 *5 *  0.004   1.0080
12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 *6 *   0.150  14.0270
13OA 1  TRS  O2 *6*   -0.205  15.9994
14 H 1  TRS  H23* 6*0.019   1.0080

Thanks for your helps

05 Nisan 2011 09:03 tarihinde Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au yazdı:

  On 5/04/2011 3:57 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

 Dear Tsjerk,

 Hi Ahmet,

 As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
 charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have zero charge,
 nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups for EDO,
 which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take the COH
 groups as separate charge groups. I also note that the COH groups,
 although chemically identical - H3NC(COH)3, right?-, have different
 charges. That doesn't seem proper.

 Hope it helps,

 Tsjerk


 nonrevised .itp file:
 EDO  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
  2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
  4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
  5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
  6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

 nonrevised .itp file:
 EDO  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
  2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 1*0.000*  14.0270
  4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 1*0.000*  14.0270
  5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
  6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

 can you show me on the itp file? how do I seperate two COH groups? Please
 help me


 We didn't say to use zero *charges*. We said you need small charge groups.
 Since EDO is neutral, then by symmetry each half must also be neutral.

 Have a look at the way charge groups are used in the .rtp file for your
 forcefield. You need to do similar things. If you don't understand the file
 formats yet, you need to read up on chapter 5 of the manual.

 Mark

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Ahmet YILDIRIM
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-04-05 Thread Mark Abraham

On 5/04/2011 9:59 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

Dear Mark,

Now, are the files correct?


They're well-formed, but you've not taken Tsjerk's advice and arranged 
for (COH)3(NH3+)C to have charges consistent with its symmetry. When 
people donate their time to you, please use it or demonstrate why you 
shouldn't :-)


Mark


*EDO.itp*:
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H   1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC *2*0.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD *2*   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H   1  EDO HAF *2 *   0.031   1.0080

*TRS.itp:*
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
TRS  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
 2 H 1  TRS  H13 10.032   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
 4  CCl4 1  TRSC *3*0.055  12.0110
 5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 *4 *   0.049  14.0270
 6OA 1  TRS  O3 *4*   -0.205  15.9994
 7 H 1  TRS  H33 *4*0.019   1.0080
 8NL 1  TRS N *5*0.206  14.0067
 9 H 1  TRS H2 *5*0.004   1.0080
10 H 1  TRSH3 *5*0.004   1.0080
11 H 1  TRSH1 *5 *  0.004   1.0080
12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 *6 *   0.150  14.0270
13OA 1  TRS  O2 *6*   -0.205  15.9994
14 H 1  TRS  H23 *6*0.019   1.0080

Thanks for your helps

05 Nisan 2011 09:03 tarihinde Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au 
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au yazdı:


On 5/04/2011 3:57 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

Dear Tsjerk,

Hi Ahmet,

As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have
zero charge,
nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups
for EDO,
which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take
the COH
groups as separate charge groups. I also note that the COH
groups,
although chemically identical - H3NC(COH)3, right?-, have
different
charges. That doesn't seem proper.

Hope it helps,

Tsjerk


nonrevised .itp file:
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

nonrevised .itp file:
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 1 *0.000*  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 1 *0.000*  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

can you show me on the itp file? how do I seperate two COH
groups? Please help me


We didn't say to use zero *charges*. We said you need small charge
groups. Since EDO is neutral, then by symmetry each half must also
be neutral.

Have a look at the way charge groups are used in the .rtp file for
your forcefield. You need to do similar things. If you don't
understand the file formats yet, you need to read up on chapter 5
of the manual.

Mark

--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
Ahmet YILDIRIM


-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-04-04 Thread ahmet yıldırım
Dear Tsjerk,

Hi Ahmet,

 As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
 charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have zero charge,
 nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups for EDO,
 which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take the COH
 groups as separate charge groups. I also note that the COH groups,
 although chemically identical - H3NC(COH)3, right?-, have different
 charges. That doesn't seem proper.

 Hope it helps,

 Tsjerk


nonrevised .itp file:
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

nonrevised .itp file:
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 1*0.000*  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 1*0.000*  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080

can you show me on the itp file? how do I seperate two COH groups? Please
help me

31 Mart 2011 12:10 tarihinde Tsjerk Wassenaar tsje...@gmail.com yazdı:

 Hi Ahmet,

 Why would I get angry? :) Sending a reply to the list will not usually
 be taken as asking for private tutoring...

 As Mark pointed out, you need to get familiar with the format of the
 files. That's the first thing you should do if you get to the point of
 needing to use non standard topologies. Read the manual, look at
 existing files. As for the immediate question, under the [ atoms ]
 section is a line indicating which column denotes what. You'd need to
 modify the columns 'cgnr' (charge group number) and probably 'charge'.
 For finding proper charge groups, in general you best draw your
 molecule, with the charges added, and then see which atoms would
 almost naturally group together.

 TRS.itp:
 ..
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 TRS  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
 2 H 1  TRS H13 10.032   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
 4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 20.055  12.0110
 5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 20.049  14.0270
 6OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994

 Hope it helps,

 Tsjerk



 2011/3/31 ahmet yıldırım ahmedo...@gmail.com:
  Dear Tsjerk,
 
  I will ask you one thing but please do not get angry (I know you are not
 a
  private tutor but I need your helps).
 
  How do I apply on the files (EDO.itp and TRS.itp) that you said? (or can
 you
  suggest a tutorial?)
 
  Thanks
 
  2011/3/31 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
 
  On 31/03/2011 5:18 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:
 
  Dear users,
 
  Before energy minimization step , I performed the preprosessing step
 using
  grompp .
  However, there are two note that :
 
  NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 52]:
System has non-zero total charge: -1.50e+01
 
  This is an integer. See
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation and
  http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic
 
  NOTE 2 [file topol.top]:
The largest charge group contains 11 atoms.
Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the
  charge
groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large
 charge
groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few
 atoms.
For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO,
 etc.
 
  See Tsjerk's email.
 
  Mark
 
 
  PS: TRS and EDO are not aminoacid
 
  TRS.itp:
  ..
  [ moleculetype ]
  ; Name nrexcl
  TRS  3
 
  [ atoms ]
  ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
   1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
   2 H 1  TRS H13 10.032   1.0080
   3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
   4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 20.055  12.0110
   5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 20.049  14.0270
   6OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994
   7 H 1  TRS H33 20.019   1.0080
   8NL 1  TRS   N 20.206  14.0067
   9 H 1  TRS  H2 20.004   1.0080
  10 H 1  TRS  H3 20.004   1.0080
  11 H 1  TRS  H1 20.004   1.0080
  12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 2 

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-03-31 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Ahmet,

As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have zero charge,
nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups for EDO,
which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take the COH
groups as separate charge groups. I also note that the COH groups,
although chemically identical - H3NC(COH)3, right?-, have different
charges. That doesn't seem proper.

Hope it helps,

Tsjerk

2011/3/31 ahmet yıldırım ahmedo...@gmail.com:
 Dear users,

 Before energy minimization step , I performed the preprosessing step using
 grompp .
 However, there are two note that :

 NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 52]:
   System has non-zero total charge: -1.50e+01

 NOTE 2 [file topol.top]:
   The largest charge group contains 11 atoms.
   Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the charge
   groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large charge
   groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
   For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few atoms.
   For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO, etc.

 PS: TRS and EDO are not aminoacid

 TRS.itp:
 ..
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 TRS  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1    OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
  2 H 1  TRS H13 1    0.032   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 1    0.087  14.0270
  4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 2    0.055  12.0110
  5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 2    0.049  14.0270
  6    OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994
  7 H 1  TRS H33 2    0.019   1.0080
  8    NL 1  TRS   N 2    0.206  14.0067
  9 H 1  TRS  H2 2    0.004   1.0080
     10 H 1  TRS  H3 2    0.004   1.0080
     11 H 1  TRS  H1 2    0.004   1.0080
     12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 2    0.050  14.0270
     13    OA 1  TRS  O2 2   -0.205  15.9994
     14 H 1  TRS H23 2    0.019   1.0080
 ...

 EDO.itp
 ...
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 EDO  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1    OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
  2 H 1  EDO HAE 1    0.031   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 1    0.080  14.0270
  4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 1    0.080  14.0270
  5    OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
  6 H 1  EDO HAF 1    0.031   1.0080
 ...

 topol.top:
 ..
 ; Include water topology
 #include gromos43a1.ff/spc.itp
 #include TRS.itp
 #include EDO.itp
 ..
 [ molecules ]
 ; Compound    #mols
 Protein_chain_A 1
 Protein_chain_B 1
 SOL   185
 SOL   143
 TRS    1
 EDO    1
 SOL 44125

 Conf.gro:
 MTA/SAH NUCLEOSIDASE; 5 NUCLEOSIDASE
  5354
     2GLN  N    1   1.458  -1.158   0.739
     2GLN H1    2   1.520  -1.083   0.763
 ...
   485HOH    HW1 5333   0.221  -3.864  -2.291
   485HOH    HW2 5334   0.303  -3.946  -2.407
     1TRS  O1   1  -3.812  -0.471  -2.002
     1TRS  H13  2  -3.865  -0.443  -1.922
     1TRS  C1   3  -3.672  -0.469  -1.971
     1TRS  C    4  -3.635  -0.571  -1.863
     1TRS  C3   5  -3.711  -0.547  -1.731
     1TRS  O3   6  -3.694  -0.414  -1.679
     1TRS  H33  7  -3.746  -0.404  -1.594
     1TRS  N    8  -3.673  -0.705  -1.911
     1TRS  H2   9  -3.625  -0.725  -1.996
     1TRS  H3  10  -3.771  -0.707  -1.927
     1TRS  H1  11  -3.649  -0.774  -1.842
     1TRS  C2  12  -3.483  -0.573  -1.840
     1TRS  O2  13  -3.428  -0.445  -1.806
     1TRS  H23 14  -3.470  -0.412  -1.722
     1EDO  OAB  1   0.307  -2.792   0.149
     1EDO  HAE  2   0.390  -2.826   0.104
     1EDO  CAA  3   0.239  -2.901   0.212
     1EDO  CAC  4   0.111  -2.851   0.281
     1EDO  OAD  5   0.144  -2.763   0.388
     1EDO  HAF  6   0.060  -2.731   0.432
    8.13100   7.04165  13.54850   0.0   0.0  -4.06550   0.0
 0.0   0.0

 How can I fixed these notes(note 1 and note 2)?

 Thanks in advance
 --
 Ahmet YILDIRIM

 --
 gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

post-doctoral researcher
Molecular Dynamics Group
* Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
* Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
University of Groningen
The Netherlands

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-03-31 Thread Mark Abraham

On 31/03/2011 5:18 PM, ahmet y?ld?r?m wrote:

Dear users,

Before energy minimization step , I performed the preprosessing step 
using grompp .

However, there are two note that :

*_NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 52]:_*
  System has non-zero total charge: -1.50e+01


This is an integer. See 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation and 
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic



_*NOTE 2 [file topol.top]:*_
  The largest charge group contains 11 atoms.
  Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the 
charge

  groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large charge
  groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
  For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few atoms.
  For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO, etc.


See Tsjerk's email.

Mark


*
PS: *TRS and EDO are not aminoacid*

_TRS.itp:_*
..
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
TRS  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
 2 H 1  TRS H13 10.032   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
 4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 20.055  12.0110
 5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 20.049  14.0270
 6OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994
 7 H 1  TRS H33 20.019   1.0080
 8NL 1  TRS   N 20.206  14.0067
 9 H 1  TRS  H2 20.004   1.0080
10 H 1  TRS  H3 20.004   1.0080
11 H 1  TRS  H1 20.004   1.0080
12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 20.050  14.0270
13OA 1  TRS  O2 2   -0.205  15.9994
14 H 1  TRS H23 20.019   1.0080
...

_*EDO.itp*_
...
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080
...
_*
topol.top:*_
..
; Include water topology
#include gromos43a1.ff/spc.itp
#include TRS.itp
#include EDO.itp
..
[ molecules ]
; Compound#mols
Protein_chain_A 1
Protein_chain_B 1
SOL   185
SOL   143
TRS1
EDO1
SOL 44125
*_
Conf.gro:_*
MTA/SAH NUCLEOSIDASE; 5 NUCLEOSIDASE
 5354
2GLN  N1   1.458  -1.158   0.739
2GLN H12   1.520  -1.083   0.763
...
  485HOHHW1 5333   0.221  -3.864  -2.291
  485HOHHW2 5334   0.303  -3.946  -2.407
1TRS  O1   1  -3.812  -0.471  -2.002
1TRS  H13  2  -3.865  -0.443  -1.922
1TRS  C1   3  -3.672  -0.469  -1.971
1TRS  C4  -3.635  -0.571  -1.863
1TRS  C3   5  -3.711  -0.547  -1.731
1TRS  O3   6  -3.694  -0.414  -1.679
1TRS  H33  7  -3.746  -0.404  -1.594
1TRS  N8  -3.673  -0.705  -1.911
1TRS  H2   9  -3.625  -0.725  -1.996
1TRS  H3  10  -3.771  -0.707  -1.927
1TRS  H1  11  -3.649  -0.774  -1.842
1TRS  C2  12  -3.483  -0.573  -1.840
1TRS  O2  13  -3.428  -0.445  -1.806
1TRS  H23 14  -3.470  -0.412  -1.722
1EDO  OAB  1   0.307  -2.792   0.149
1EDO  HAE  2   0.390  -2.826   0.104
1EDO  CAA  3   0.239  -2.901   0.212
1EDO  CAC  4   0.111  -2.851   0.281
1EDO  OAD  5   0.144  -2.763   0.388
1EDO  HAF  6   0.060  -2.731   0.432
   8.13100   7.04165  13.54850   0.0   0.0  -4.06550   
0.0   0.0   0.0


How can I fixed these notes(note 1 and note 2)?

Thanks in advance
--
Ahmet YILDIRIM


-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-03-31 Thread ahmet yıldırım
Dear Tsjerk,

I will ask you one thing but please do not get angry (I know you are not a
private tutor but I need your helps).

How do I apply on the files (EDO.itp and TRS.itp) that you said? (or can you
suggest a tutorial?)

Thanks

2011/3/31 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

  On 31/03/2011 5:18 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

 Dear users,

 Before energy minimization step , I performed the preprosessing step using
 grompp .
 However, there are two note that :

 *NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 52]:*
   System has non-zero total charge: -1.50e+01


 This is an integer. See
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation and
 http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic

 *NOTE 2 [file topol.top]:*
   The largest charge group contains 11 atoms.
   Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the
 charge
   groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large charge
   groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
   For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few atoms.
   For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO, etc.


 See Tsjerk's email.

 Mark


 *
 PS: *TRS and EDO are not aminoacid*

 TRS.itp:*
 ..
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 TRS  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
  2 H 1  TRS H13 10.032   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
  4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 20.055  12.0110
  5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 20.049  14.0270
  6OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994
  7 H 1  TRS H33 20.019   1.0080
  8NL 1  TRS   N 20.206  14.0067
  9 H 1  TRS  H2 20.004   1.0080
 10 H 1  TRS  H3 20.004   1.0080
 11 H 1  TRS  H1 20.004   1.0080
 12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 20.050  14.0270
 13OA 1  TRS  O2 2   -0.205  15.9994
 14 H 1  TRS H23 20.019   1.0080
 ...

 *EDO.itp*
 ...
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 EDO  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
  2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
  4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
  5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
  6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080
 ...
 *
 topol.top:*
 ..
 ; Include water topology
 #include gromos43a1.ff/spc.itp
 #include TRS.itp
 #include EDO.itp
 ..
 [ molecules ]
 ; Compound#mols
 Protein_chain_A 1
 Protein_chain_B 1
 SOL   185
 SOL   143
 TRS1
 EDO1
 SOL 44125
 *
 Conf.gro:*
 MTA/SAH NUCLEOSIDASE; 5 NUCLEOSIDASE
  5354
 2GLN  N1   1.458  -1.158   0.739
 2GLN H12   1.520  -1.083   0.763
 ...
   485HOHHW1 5333   0.221  -3.864  -2.291
   485HOHHW2 5334   0.303  -3.946  -2.407
 1TRS  O1   1  -3.812  -0.471  -2.002
 1TRS  H13  2  -3.865  -0.443  -1.922
 1TRS  C1   3  -3.672  -0.469  -1.971
 1TRS  C4  -3.635  -0.571  -1.863
 1TRS  C3   5  -3.711  -0.547  -1.731
 1TRS  O3   6  -3.694  -0.414  -1.679
 1TRS  H33  7  -3.746  -0.404  -1.594
 1TRS  N8  -3.673  -0.705  -1.911
 1TRS  H2   9  -3.625  -0.725  -1.996
 1TRS  H3  10  -3.771  -0.707  -1.927
 1TRS  H1  11  -3.649  -0.774  -1.842
 1TRS  C2  12  -3.483  -0.573  -1.840
 1TRS  O2  13  -3.428  -0.445  -1.806
 1TRS  H23 14  -3.470  -0.412  -1.722
 1EDO  OAB  1   0.307  -2.792   0.149
 1EDO  HAE  2   0.390  -2.826   0.104
 1EDO  CAA  3   0.239  -2.901   0.212
 1EDO  CAC  4   0.111  -2.851   0.281
 1EDO  OAD  5   0.144  -2.763   0.388
 1EDO  HAF  6   0.060  -2.731   0.432
8.13100   7.04165  13.54850   0.0   0.0  -4.06550   0.0
 0.0   0.0

 How can I fixed these notes(note 1 and note 2)?

 Thanks in advance
 --
 Ahmet YILDIRIM



 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Ahmet YILDIRIM
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before 

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-03-31 Thread Mark Abraham

On 31/03/2011 6:17 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

Dear Tsjerk,

I will ask you one thing but please do not get angry (I know you are 
not a private tutor but I need your helps).


How do I apply on the files (EDO.itp and TRS.itp) that you said? (or 
can you suggest a tutorial?)


You'll need to become familiar with the file format, so that you know 
what all the columns of data mean, so you know where the charge groups 
are specified. Chapter 5 of the manual is your first port of call. If 
you have read that and still have questions about detail, please ask on 
the list :-)


Mark

2011/3/31 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au 
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au


On 31/03/2011 5:18 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

Dear users,

Before energy minimization step , I performed the preprosessing
step using grompp .
However, there are two note that :

*_NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 52]:_*
  System has non-zero total charge: -1.50e+01


This is an integer. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation and
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic


_*NOTE 2 [file topol.top]:*_
  The largest charge group contains 11 atoms.
  Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of
the charge
  groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too
large charge
  groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
  For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a
few atoms.
  For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2,
CO, etc.


See Tsjerk's email.

Mark



*
PS: *TRS and EDO are not aminoacid*

_TRS.itp:_*
..
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
TRS  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
 2 H 1  TRS H13 10.032   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
 4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 20.055  12.0110
 5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 20.049  14.0270
 6OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994
 7 H 1  TRS H33 20.019   1.0080
 8NL 1  TRS   N 20.206  14.0067
 9 H 1  TRS  H2 20.004   1.0080
10 H 1  TRS  H3 20.004   1.0080
11 H 1  TRS  H1 20.004   1.0080
12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 20.050  14.0270
13OA 1  TRS  O2 2   -0.205  15.9994
14 H 1  TRS H23 20.019   1.0080
...

_*EDO.itp*_
...
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
EDO  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
 2 H 1  EDO HAE 10.031   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 10.080  14.0270
 4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 10.080  14.0270
 5OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
 6 H 1  EDO HAF 10.031   1.0080
...
_*
topol.top:*_
..
; Include water topology
#include gromos43a1.ff/spc.itp
#include TRS.itp
#include EDO.itp
..
[ molecules ]
; Compound#mols
Protein_chain_A 1
Protein_chain_B 1
SOL   185
SOL   143
TRS1
EDO1
SOL 44125
*_
Conf.gro:_*
MTA/SAH NUCLEOSIDASE; 5 NUCLEOSIDASE
 5354
2GLN  N1   1.458  -1.158   0.739
2GLN H12   1.520  -1.083   0.763
...
  485HOHHW1 5333   0.221  -3.864  -2.291
  485HOHHW2 5334   0.303  -3.946  -2.407
1TRS  O1   1  -3.812  -0.471  -2.002
1TRS  H13  2  -3.865  -0.443  -1.922
1TRS  C1   3  -3.672  -0.469  -1.971
1TRS  C4  -3.635  -0.571  -1.863
1TRS  C3   5  -3.711  -0.547  -1.731
1TRS  O3   6  -3.694  -0.414  -1.679
1TRS  H33  7  -3.746  -0.404  -1.594
1TRS  N8  -3.673  -0.705  -1.911
1TRS  H2   9  -3.625  -0.725  -1.996
1TRS  H3  10  -3.771  -0.707  -1.927
1TRS  H1  11  -3.649  -0.774  -1.842
1TRS  C2  12  -3.483  -0.573  -1.840
1TRS  O2  13  -3.428  -0.445  -1.806
1TRS  H23 14  -3.470  -0.412  -1.722
1EDO  OAB  1   0.307  -2.792   0.149
1EDO  HAE  2   0.390  -2.826   0.104
1EDO  CAA  3   0.239  -2.901   0.212
1EDO  CAC  4   0.111  -2.851   0.281
1EDO  OAD  5   0.144  -2.763   0.388
1EDO  HAF  6   0.060  -2.731   0.432
   8.13100   7.04165  13.54850   0.0   0.0  -4.06550  

Re: [gmx-users] the total charge of system is not an integer

2011-03-31 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Ahmet,

Why would I get angry? :) Sending a reply to the list will not usually
be taken as asking for private tutoring...

As Mark pointed out, you need to get familiar with the format of the
files. That's the first thing you should do if you get to the point of
needing to use non standard topologies. Read the manual, look at
existing files. As for the immediate question, under the [ atoms ]
section is a line indicating which column denotes what. You'd need to
modify the columns 'cgnr' (charge group number) and probably 'charge'.
For finding proper charge groups, in general you best draw your
molecule, with the charges added, and then see which atoms would
almost naturally group together.

TRS.itp:
..
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
TRS  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
 2 H 1  TRS H13 10.032   1.0080
 3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 10.087  14.0270
 4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 20.055  12.0110
 5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 20.049  14.0270
 6OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994

Hope it helps,

Tsjerk



2011/3/31 ahmet yıldırım ahmedo...@gmail.com:
 Dear Tsjerk,

 I will ask you one thing but please do not get angry (I know you are not a
 private tutor but I need your helps).

 How do I apply on the files (EDO.itp and TRS.itp) that you said? (or can you
 suggest a tutorial?)

 Thanks

 2011/3/31 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

 On 31/03/2011 5:18 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:

 Dear users,

 Before energy minimization step , I performed the preprosessing step using
 grompp .
 However, there are two note that :

 NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 52]:
   System has non-zero total charge: -1.50e+01

 This is an integer. See
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation and
 http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic

 NOTE 2 [file topol.top]:
   The largest charge group contains 11 atoms.
   Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the
 charge
   groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large charge
   groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
   For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few atoms.
   For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO, etc.

 See Tsjerk's email.

 Mark


 PS: TRS and EDO are not aminoacid

 TRS.itp:
 ..
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 TRS  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1    OA 1  TRS  O1 1   -0.119  15.9994
  2 H 1  TRS H13 1    0.032   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  TRS  C1 1    0.087  14.0270
  4  CCl4 1  TRS   C 2    0.055  12.0110
  5   CH2 1  TRS  C3 2    0.049  14.0270
  6    OA 1  TRS  O3 2   -0.205  15.9994
  7 H 1  TRS H33 2    0.019   1.0080
  8    NL 1  TRS   N 2    0.206  14.0067
  9 H 1  TRS  H2 2    0.004   1.0080
     10 H 1  TRS  H3 2    0.004   1.0080
     11 H 1  TRS  H1 2    0.004   1.0080
     12   CH2 1  TRS  C2 2    0.050  14.0270
     13    OA 1  TRS  O2 2   -0.205  15.9994
     14 H 1  TRS H23 2    0.019   1.0080
 ...

 EDO.itp
 ...
 [ moleculetype ]
 ; Name nrexcl
 EDO  3

 [ atoms ]
 ;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
  1    OA 1  EDO OAB 1   -0.111  15.9994
  2 H 1  EDO HAE 1    0.031   1.0080
  3   CH2 1  EDO CAA 1    0.080  14.0270
  4   CH2 1  EDO CAC 1    0.080  14.0270
  5    OA 1  EDO OAD 1   -0.111  15.9994
  6 H 1  EDO HAF 1    0.031   1.0080
 ...

 topol.top:
 ..
 ; Include water topology
 #include gromos43a1.ff/spc.itp
 #include TRS.itp
 #include EDO.itp
 ..
 [ molecules ]
 ; Compound    #mols
 Protein_chain_A 1
 Protein_chain_B 1
 SOL   185
 SOL   143
 TRS    1
 EDO    1
 SOL 44125

 Conf.gro:
 MTA/SAH NUCLEOSIDASE; 5 NUCLEOSIDASE
  5354
     2GLN  N    1   1.458  -1.158   0.739
     2GLN H1    2   1.520  -1.083   0.763
 ...
   485HOH    HW1 5333   0.221  -3.864  -2.291
   485HOH    HW2 5334   0.303  -3.946  -2.407
     1TRS  O1   1  -3.812  -0.471  -2.002
     1TRS  H13  2  -3.865  -0.443  -1.922
     1TRS  C1   3  -3.672  -0.469  -1.971
     1TRS  C    4  -3.635  -0.571  -1.863
     1TRS  C3   5  -3.711  -0.547  -1.731
     1TRS  O3   6  -3.694  -0.414  -1.679
     1TRS  H33  7  -3.746  -0.404  -1.594
     1TRS  N    8  -3.673  -0.705  -1.911
     1TRS  H2   9  -3.625  -0.725  -1.996
     1TRS  H3  10  -3.771  -0.707  -1.927
     1TRS