shared NFS root filesystems
Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm anticipating is that each client would assume it had that filesystem to itself and overwrite modifications already made by other clients. I can imagine various hax and trickery I might commit while attempting to solve this problem but I hope not reinvent any wheels... ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: shared NFS root filesystems
Take a look at what the Linux Terminal Server Project is doing (ltsp.org). They've been doing net booting for at least two years. It's been a while since I played with it, but they must have addressed this issue already. -Mark On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:54:34AM -0400, Michael O'Donnell wrote: Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm anticipating is that each client would assume it had that filesystem to itself and overwrite modifications already made by other clients. I can imagine various hax and trickery I might commit while attempting to solve this problem but I hope not reinvent any wheels... ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: shared NFS root filesystems
Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm anticipating is that each client would assume it had that filesystem to itself and overwrite modifications already made by other clients. I can imagine various hax and trickery I might commit while attempting to solve this problem but I hope not reinvent any wheels... I don't think you really want to. Years ago I setup a diskless linux cluster where all the disk space was served from a common server. At that time what I came up with was a mounted root unique to each client with less than 15MB per client. They all mounted the same /usr and /home partitions, but had there own / with configurations and /var /tmp. The unique partition for each was actually a copy of one of them, they just each had exclusive access to modify it without clobbering the others. Our cluster booted off of a floppy and then mounted root as nfs. If you put CDROM's in the clients you might be able to do the same thing but use a large ramdisk for the unique roots. If you really need to not have unique roots the only way I can think of is using a ramdisk for the clients and them mount your common file systems. -- Robert E. Anderson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programmer phone: (603) 862-3489 UNH Research Computing Centerfax: (603) 862-1761 -- ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: shared NFS root filesystems
Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm The NFS root HOWTO describes how you can do it. I believe they even provide some scripts to help. They play games with symbolic links so the clients have private areas of needed directories. Pat -- Patrick O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Apache configuration
Bob Bell wrote: Directory /var/www/html/photo/ order deny,allow deny from all allow from 10.0.0. /Directory Files /var/www/html/photo/index.cgi order allow,deny allow from all /Files That's your problem. Files takes a simple filename, not a complete path. Change this to: Directory /var/www/html/photo/ order deny,allow deny from all allow from 10.0.0. Files index.cgi order allow,deny allow from all /Files /Directory and it should work. This will also grant access to all index.cgi files in subdirectories, but your next stanza did that anyway. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
[gnhlug-announce] MELBA Meeting tonight
Hi all, Just a reminder that we have another topic-less meeting tonight: Who:Anyone who wants to show up :) What: Who knows, we'll make it up as we go along When: 19:30ish (for dinner, show up between 17:30-18:00) Where: Martha's Exchange, 2nd floor (Dinner, in the restaurant) (see directions at http://www.gnhlug.org under Meetings) Why:Why not (and to heckle Ben, though it'll probably be in absentia :( -- Paul Lussier Senior Systems and Network Engineer Co-Chairman, Greater New Hampshire Linux User's Group (GNHLUG) Chairman, Nashua Chapter GNHLUG http://www.gnhlug.org Events: http://www.gnhlug.org/lug_cal/month.php ___ gnhlug-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-announce ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
IOW, I want to: - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B. - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the proper pop server on the net - take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back to system A - - - | |_| |_| POP/| | A | | B | | NET | - - - Any ideas how to do this? This oughta work: While standing on systemA you say: ssh -o 'LocalForward somePortNumber popServer:110' systemB ...and then you'd tell fetchmail on systemA to connect to localhost:somePortNumber ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
OT (sorta) Removing Linux
I have to remove Linux and install Windows from a Dell Latitude LS laptop that currently houses Red Hat 7 with grub as the boot loader. This computer has no floppy or internal cdrom, just a pcmcia card with a Sony Vaio cd player attached. The machine can't boot from this until the pcmcia module is loaded. I have tried a serial port connected floppy drive as well, but can't get the machine to boot from that either. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I might get Windows onto this machine? It's not mine btw, and Linux is not an option for the owners. I'm trying to do them a favor here is all. --charlie ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B. - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the proper pop server on the net - take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back to system A from system A: ssh systemB -R 110:popserver:110 systemB will now listen on port 110 and forward traffic on to popserver on port 110. (SystemB has to not be listening on port 110, of course.. and since it's a privileged port, you'd have to ssh as root.) Ben -- Simulated disorder postulates perfect discipline; simulated fear postulates courage; simulated weakness postulates strength. ~ Sun Tzu ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 1:53pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B. - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the proper pop server on the net - take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back to system A From a command prompt on system A [1], you want to SSH to system B. Use SSH port forwarding to forward connections from the local system (A) out from the other end (B). Specify the POP server hostname and port number for the remote end. You will need to use a non-standard port number, since POP3 is TCP 110, and only root can listen on ports 1024. You will also need to tell fetchmail about this non-standard port number. For example: ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110 fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost In the above, fetchmail connects to port 8110 on the local system (A). The SSH client is listening on port 8110, and forwards the connection to the SSH server on system B. System B then connects to pop-server on TCP port 110, and finishes the connection. Footnotes - [1] Why don't people ever use the real names of the servers in their examples? It just confuses things, and you end up saying things like the server -- not the mail server, I mean the other server. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Boston User Groups Megameeting tonight
Just a reminder that the Boston User Groups Megameeting is tonight: When: 9/25/2002 6:30PM Where:Sheraton Tara, 1657 Worcester Road, Framingham, MA WHO WILL PRESENT? ? Bob Davis, former CEO of Lycos and Terra Lycos, and currently a venture partner at Highland Capital Partners, will present Street Smart Lessons from the Front Lines of Business. Bob will also be available following the presentation for a book signing of Speed Is Life. ? Steve Melanson, president of Northeast Data Vault (formerly USDataCenters, location of last year's MegaMeeting), will present The State of Internet Data Centers and Security in the post-9/11 Era. For more information, please consult the web page: http://www.bostonusergroups.com/MegaMeeting/Default.htm Cost:$10 ($8 if you are preregistered). Both the BLU, the GNHLUG and the Metrowest Linux groups will be there. Also, there will be at least 2 full SuSE Linux 8.0 Professional boxed sets given away as well as a whole bunch of Linux toys while they last. -- Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OT (sorta) Removing Linux
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, for small money you can pick up a 3.5 to 2.5 hard driver adaptor. Yes. I paid about $12 for my 44-pin adapter. :) Then you can install Windows to the 2.5 drive setup as master on another box. It is a much better idea to either (1) copy files needed to bootstrap the CD-ROM reader to the hard disk, or (2) copy the contents of the Windows CD-ROM to the hard disk. You can then move the drive back and do the actual Windows install on the target computer. ... you will likely go through several rounds of found new hardware and reboot cycles. Indeed, and the new system will likely never be completely right in the head. According to what Microsoft PSS (Product Support Services) has told me, MS-Windows will generally not survive a change in motherboard correctly. Apparently, the device tree is tied to the motherboard type somehow, and switching that can permanently hose the device manager. This was for Windows 95, as I remember, but I haven't seen anything to lead me to believe that things are different for any other version of MS-Windows. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones? Two separate ones, both executed on 'A'. I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do: ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110 I end up logged into system-b at a command prompt. Geez. Open up another xterm. I assumed you could figure that part out on your own. ;-) It says insert disk two, but only one will fit in the drive at a time! That's why I used systemA and systemB. It makes it very clear to everyone which is which. If I said 'tater' and 'taz', I'd be the only one who really understood which system did which. Well, maybe it is just me, but I find names like 'tater' and 'taz' much easier to work with than 'A', 'B', 'C', and so on. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly: ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110 fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones? Two. I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do: ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110 I end up logged into system-b at a command prompt. Yes, you do. Unfortunately, ssh ties up a terminal whenever you do a port redirection; i.e. you must log into the system to do this. It's possible for the ssh session to not run any command with the -N option, but this still ties up a terminal (it just sits there, as if some program were running in the foreground, producing no output -- because that's exactly what's happening). - -- Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG! GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9kg7HdjdlQoHP510RAjghAJ9KpZ54gVU2/t6O3byaUS8gnrx94ACeMS5x Ag9oQzuGYjYKro4jlbsugIo= =YaTD -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OT (sorta) Removing Linux
I've had better luck moving a hard drive from one system to another but I like your idea better. Basically, repartition and format the drive as a bootable system disk (MS-DOS) and then copy the Windows kit to a directory on the drive. That would certainly work and I've done that before too. One nice thing about copying the kit onto the hard drive is that when Windows inevitably demands the installation media, you only need to point it to the kit so that it can get it's drivers etc.. -Alex P.S. I just did a Libranet (Debian) based Linux installation which was impressively smooth. Another alternative (probably too expensive by the sounds of things) would be to install Win4Lin on the Linux drive. Then the users can run Windows apps to their hearts content. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Greater NH Linux User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: Re: OT (sorta) Removing Linux On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, for small money you can pick up a 3.5 to 2.5 hard driver adaptor. Yes. I paid about $12 for my 44-pin adapter. :) Then you can install Windows to the 2.5 drive setup as master on another box. It is a much better idea to either (1) copy files needed to bootstrap the CD-ROM reader to the hard disk, or (2) copy the contents of the Windows CD-ROM to the hard disk. You can then move the drive back and do the actual Windows install on the target computer. ... you will likely go through several rounds of found new hardware and reboot cycles. Indeed, and the new system will likely never be completely right in the head. According to what Microsoft PSS (Product Support Services) has told me, MS-Windows will generally not survive a change in motherboard correctly. Apparently, the device tree is tied to the motherboard type somehow, and switching that can permanently hose the device manager. This was for Windows 95, as I remember, but I haven't seen anything to lead me to believe that things are different for any other version of MS-Windows. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 2:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: which is slightly different than: pop.paul.com listens on port 110 I want the box I'm sshing -to- to listen on 110 and connect me with pop.paul.com so I do: ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -R 110:pop.paul.com:110 With your above example, I start out on 'A'. When I connect to the SSH server, the '-R' you give will cause the SSH server to try and listen on TCP port 110. Any connection attempts made to that listener will be forwarded to 'pop.paul.com' on TCP port 110. There are three potential problems with that. One, you would need to instruct fetchmail to connect to system 'B' instead of 'localhost', which means the forwarded connection would go over the wire in cleartext. Granted, in this case, that does not matter, since Paul is going to end up transmitting over the public Internet in any event. But in a different scenario (e.g., you are gatewaying *in* to a trusted network), that would be bad. Second, by default, the OpenSSH server binds forwarded ports to the loopback address, preventing remote hosts from connecting to them. So fetchmail would be rejected. You can change this by putting 'GatewayPorts yes' in your 'sshd_config' file, but maybe Paul cannot do that, or does not want to. Third, you need root privileges to use ports below 1024. Again, Paul might not want or be able to do that. The difference is -L listens on the box you're running ssh on and -R listens on the box you're sshing to.. at least, that's my understanding.. Yup. I am telling SSH to listen on system 'A', and forward the connection via SSH from system 'B' to system 'C'. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OT (sorta) Removing Linux
I have swapped out motherboards using windows me and after several ok like 10 reboots it did in fact work fine. -Neal Richardson On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 15:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, for small money you can pick up a 3.5 to 2.5 hard driver adaptor. Yes. I paid about $12 for my 44-pin adapter. :) Then you can install Windows to the 2.5 drive setup as master on another box. It is a much better idea to either (1) copy files needed to bootstrap the CD-ROM reader to the hard disk, or (2) copy the contents of the Windows CD-ROM to the hard disk. You can then move the drive back and do the actual Windows install on the target computer. ... you will likely go through several rounds of found new hardware and reboot cycles. Indeed, and the new system will likely never be completely right in the head. According to what Microsoft PSS (Product Support Services) has told me, MS-Windows will generally not survive a change in motherboard correctly. Apparently, the device tree is tied to the motherboard type somehow, and switching that can permanently hose the device manager. This was for Windows 95, as I remember, but I haven't seen anything to lead me to believe that things are different for any other version of MS-Windows. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:40:07 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones? Two separate ones, both executed on 'A'. I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do: ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110 I end up logged into system-b at a command prompt. Geez. Open up another xterm. I assumed you could figure that part out on your own. ;-) I've got plenty open, but it doesn't seem to be working the way I expect it to (of course, maybe my expectations are out of line :) On tater: pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:110 # pll@taz:/home/pll[1001] $ On tater in another xterm: pll@tater:~$ fetchmail -vc lanminds.com --port 8110 --protocol pop3 Enter password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying lanminds.com (protocol POP3) at Wed Sep 25 15:29:44 2002: poll started fetchmail: couldn't find canonical DNS name of lanminds.com fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying lanminds.com (protocol POP3) at Wed Sep 25 15:30:24 2002: poll completed fetchmail: normal termination, status 11 pll@tater:~$ fetchmail -vc 199.174.114.33 --port 8110 --protocol pop3 Enter password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying 199.174.114.33 (protocol POP3) at Wed Sep 25 15:31:28 2002: poll started POP3 connection to 199.174.114.33 failed: No route to host fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying 199.174.114.33 (protocol POP3) at Wed Sep 25 15:31:31 2002: poll completed fetchmail: normal termination, status 2 pll@tater:~$ So, I seem to be missing something :) It says insert disk two, but only one will fit in the drive at a time! Ahh, there's plenty of room if you use compression :) Well, maybe it is just me, but I find names like 'tater' and 'taz' much easier to work with than 'A', 'B', 'C', and so on. :-) So be it! -- Seeya, Paul It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:36:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got plenty open, but it doesn't seem to be working the way I expect it to (of course, maybe my expectations are out of line :) On tater: pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:110 # pll@taz:/home/pll[1001] $ On tater in another xterm: pll@tater:~$ fetchmail -vc lanminds.com --port 8110 --protocol pop3 Enter password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying lanminds.com (protocol POP3) at Wed Sep 25 15:29:44 2002: poll started fetchmail: couldn't find canonical DNS name of lanminds.com fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying lanminds.com (protocol POP3) at Wed Sep 25 15:30:24 2002: poll completed fetchmail: normal termination, status 11 You want to connect to port 8110 of taz, not of the real POP server. -- Bob Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Duct tape is like The Force. It has a light side, a dark side and it holds the universe together. -- Carl Zwanzig ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:30pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you do. Unfortunately, ssh ties up a terminal whenever you do a port redirection; i.e. you must log into the system to do this. If this really bothers people that much, and you are using SSH protocol version 2 (and you *are* doing that, right?), you can do this: ssh -N pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110 fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:110 pll@tater:~$ fetchmail -vc lanminds.com --port 8110 --protocol pop3 *exasperated sigh* My workstation is named DRAGON. Our mail server is named ITCHY. Say the intermediate computer is named LACE (it would be). Like this: DRAGON LACE - ITCHY First, on DRAGON, I execute this command: ssh LACE -L 8110:ITCHY:110 That opens up a connection to LACE. It also causes the SSH client to listen on local TCP port 8110. When the SSH client receives a connection on TCP port 8110, it will forward the connection to the SSH server on LACE. The SSH server on LACE will open a connection to TCP port 110 on ITCHY. Next, also on DRAGON, I execute this command: fetchmail LOCALHOST --port 8110 --protocol pop3 That causes fetchmail to connect to DRAGON, on TCP port 8110, using the POP3 protocol. SSH will get that connection, forward it over the SSH tunnel to LACE, and make the connection from LACE to ITCHY. In your examples, you use -R instead of -L, and you tell fetchmail to connect to 'lanminds.com' instead of 'localhost. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:10:42 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: *exasperated sigh* That makes two of us :) (ever try getting something which *should* be very straight-forward working *and* tend to the needs of an infant!? :) In your examples, you use -R instead of -L, and you tell fetchmail to connect to 'lanminds.com' instead of 'localhost. Yeah, somewhere between e-mails and the yells of the infant, I got things all mixed up :) Sorry, and thanks, it's now working! -- Seeya, Paul It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OT (sorta) Removing Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Neal Richardson hath spake thusly: I have swapped out motherboards using windows me and after several ok like 10 reboots it did in fact work fine. I've done this with win98 as well, but with varying success. It /usually/ works, but I think the point is there are no guarantees, and users do so at their own risk. Microsoft does not want to be blamed if it doesn't work for you. Of course, as we all know, it actually is their fault. Linux, for example, has no such problems... Mmmm, donuts... - -- Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG! GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9kiDTdjdlQoHP510RAuBOAJ9MSsRQ0A9jIA2g1jXtyD9PImOolQCeK1HZ TxMLZAG1eYvm/8OlcIeueCc= =3HT5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: ssh port redirection ?
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 5:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While standing on systemA you say: When I do that the case sort of crumples. I guess the system's load average was too high. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
