Re: Fwd: Linux reference on subs
It would be interesting to see how the Linux systems have performed after 2.5 years at sea. I've never been able to forget the Navy's previous disasters with adrift surface ships, and non Unix upgrades. "US vessel, the Yorktown" .."The entire network of Windows NT machines crashed. The Navy claims the ship was dead in the water for about three hours;" http://www.ganssle.com/articles/Asgoodasitgets.htm http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1998/07/13987 2.5 years at see in the submarine fleet, sounds very successful, overall. I would expect the Navy would be working on a performance report. Michael Nolin On Mon Jun 6 22:28 , Joshua Judson Rosensent: "Jon \"maddog\" Hall" mad...@li.org writes: On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:24 -0400, Jeffry Smith wrote: http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/archive/331544-196/uss-new-hampshire-surfaces-on-seacoast.html quote: "The $2.4 billion New Hampshire is so high-tech that it has no periscope, and uses Linux-based computers to provide deck officers with views of the outside world from various external cameras, using multiple parts of the spectrum." It was not until I read the comments to the article and saw that they were posted two years ago that I realized the article was written in October of 2008. It would be interesting to see how the Linux systems have performed after 2.5 years at sea. If anyone finds out..., the article in Wikipedia is pretty scant on details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_New_Hampshire_\(SSN-778) -- "Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr." ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Re: Fwd: Linux reference on subs
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM, mno...@embedded-unlimited.com wrote: US vessel, the Yorktown ..The entire network of Windows NT machines crashed. The Navy claims the ship was dead in the water for about three hours; There's not much real information on this, but supposedly the problem was in userland code: A divide by zero error crashed the database that supported the ship systems. Doesn't sound like an OS issue. Franky, I wouldn't want to trust my life to anything running on any general-purpose OS or software, be it Linux, Unix, Microsoft, Plan 9, whatever. I'd like something with known, documented, well-understood, finite, deterministic states and transitions, please. Preferably implemented in discrete controls with manual alternatives. I think it was the estimable Bill Sconce who had a shirt that summed it up nicely: As a programmer, I find your faith in computers amusing. -- Ben ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Re: Fwd: Linux reference on subs
Benjamin Scott dragonh...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM, mno...@embedded-unlimited.com wrote: US vessel, the Yorktown ..The entire network of Windows NT machines crashed. The Navy claims the ship was dead in the water for about three hours; There's not much real information on this, but supposedly the problem was in userland code: A divide by zero error crashed the database that supported the ship systems. Doesn't sound like an OS issue. Franky, I wouldn't want to trust my life to anything running on any general-purpose OS or software, be it Linux, Unix, Microsoft, Plan 9, whatever. I'd like something with known, documented, well-understood, finite, deterministic states and transitions, please. Preferably implemented in discrete controls with manual alternatives. FYI, Wikipedia says the the (Linux-based) USS New Hampshire's oxygen-generator failed, two months ago; cites Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/21/us-unitedtechnologies-submarine-idUSTRE72K7U420110321 Not clear what OS, if any, was running the generator. Dead in the water describes a whole other prospect there, though I think it was the estimable Bill Sconce who had a shirt that summed it up nicely: As a programmer, I find your faith in computers amusing. Yes. And..., um..., I'll forgo the opportunity to expand on that, for the time being :) I'll just say, `I like my science peer-reviewed, please'. -- Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Re: Fwd: Linux reference on subs
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:24 -0400, Jeffry Smith wrote: bounced for some reason - jeff -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeffry Smith jsm...@alum.mit.edu Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM Subject: Linux reference on subs To: Greater New Hampshire LUG gnh...@gnhlug.org http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/archive/331544-196/uss-new-hampshire-surfaces-on-seacoast.html quote: The $2.4 billion New Hampshire is so high-tech that it has no periscope, and uses Linux-based computers to provide deck officers with views of the outside world from various external cameras, using multiple parts of the spectrum. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ It was not until I read the comments to the article and saw that they were posted two years ago that I realized the article was written in October of 2008. It would be interesting to see how the Linux systems have performed after 2.5 years at sea. md ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Re: Fwd: Linux reference on subs
Jon \maddog\ Hall mad...@li.org writes: On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:24 -0400, Jeffry Smith wrote: http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/archive/331544-196/uss-new-hampshire-surfaces-on-seacoast.html quote: The $2.4 billion New Hampshire is so high-tech that it has no periscope, and uses Linux-based computers to provide deck officers with views of the outside world from various external cameras, using multiple parts of the spectrum. It was not until I read the comments to the article and saw that they were posted two years ago that I realized the article was written in October of 2008. It would be interesting to see how the Linux systems have performed after 2.5 years at sea. If anyone finds out..., the article in Wikipedia is pretty scant on details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_New_Hampshire_(SSN-778) -- Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Re: Fwd: Linux reference on subs
Well, you can find out a bit more information by visiting some of the links in the following page: http://www.ussnewhampshire.org/ Unfortunately for everyone curious about details, you probably are not going to find much out about the technology that the Navy doesn't want to release. Have served in the Submarine Service, I have first hand experience that they don't call it The Silent Service for nothing. The Virginia Class, Seawolf submarines are amazing pieces of technology. We learned about them in the last school that I attended in the Navy and have to say that they are quite unmatched. Some day that may release more information, but whatever we find probably won't be to the detail level we would all like. Sorry to be the buzz kill. Of course I would love it if I were proved wrong on that, but am not holding my breath. Regards, Jeff 2011/6/6 Jefferson Kirkland numberw...@gmail.com Well, you can find out a bit more information by visiting some of the links in the following page: http://www.ussnewhampshire.org/ Unfortunately for everyone curious about details, you probably are not going to find much out about the technology that the Navy doesn't want to release. Have served in the Submarine Service, I have first hand experience that they don't call it The Silent Service for nothing. The Virginia Class, Seawolf submarines are amazing pieces of technology. We learned about them in the last school that I attended in the Navy and have to say that they are quite unmatched. Some day that may release more information, but whatever we find probably won't be to the detail level we would all like. Sorry to be the buzz kill. Of course I would love it if I were proved wrong on that, but am not holding my breath. Regards, Jeff On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen roz...@geekspace.com wrote: Jon \maddog\ Hall mad...@li.org writes: On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:24 -0400, Jeffry Smith wrote: http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/archive/331544-196/uss-new-hampshire-surfaces-on-seacoast.html quote: The $2.4 billion New Hampshire is so high-tech that it has no periscope, and uses Linux-based computers to provide deck officers with views of the outside world from various external cameras, using multiple parts of the spectrum. It was not until I read the comments to the article and saw that they were posted two years ago that I realized the article was written in October of 2008. It would be interesting to see how the Linux systems have performed after 2.5 years at sea. If anyone finds out..., the article in Wikipedia is pretty scant on details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_New_Hampshire_(SSN-778) -- Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Fwd: Linux reference on subs
bounced for some reason - jeff -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeffry Smith jsm...@alum.mit.edu Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM Subject: Linux reference on subs To: Greater New Hampshire LUG gnh...@gnhlug.org http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/archive/331544-196/uss-new-hampshire-surfaces-on-seacoast.html quote: The $2.4 billion New Hampshire is so high-tech that it has no periscope, and uses Linux-based computers to provide deck officers with views of the outside world from various external cameras, using multiple parts of the spectrum. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/