[GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Re: https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2022-July/102045.html > You're correct that the Python bindings aren't included. I'd be happy with a non-standard download available that included the bindings. It wouldn't need gui support. ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Yes I did, thanks Chris. I intend to play with that soon. That is an interesting approach. Regards, Adrien On 8/9/22 6:49 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: AdrienM: You may have seen my successful experiment in building on Linux (or WSL2) using Nix to load the dependencies into a temporary shell for building. Note this is not considered canon. https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash-on-nix ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
AdrienM: You may have seen my successful experiment in building on Linux (or WSL2) using Nix to load the dependencies into a temporary shell for building. Note this is not considered canon. https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash-on-nix On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 04:36, Adrien Monteleone < adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: > Aha, thanks John. I wonder how much trouble it would be for a user to > update their compiler or if that is just a mess for the rest of the > system. (all else being equal, which I'm sure it isn't) > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 8/9/22 3:06 PM, John Ralls wrote: > > Caveat: Check the dependency requirements in README.dependencies for the > GnuCash version you're trying to build against what a particular OS release > provides. Pay particular attention to the C++ standard level supported by > the compiler, Boost, Cmake, and GLib. You can't build GnuCash 4.x on Ubuntu > 14.04 or 16.04 because the compilers in those releases don't support C++17 > and that's required for GnuCash 4.x and later. > > > ___ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > - > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Aha, thanks John. I wonder how much trouble it would be for a user to update their compiler or if that is just a mess for the rest of the system. (all else being equal, which I'm sure it isn't) Regards, Adrien On 8/9/22 3:06 PM, John Ralls wrote: Caveat: Check the dependency requirements in README.dependencies for the GnuCash version you're trying to build against what a particular OS release provides. Pay particular attention to the C++ standard level supported by the compiler, Boost, Cmake, and GLib. You can't build GnuCash 4.x on Ubuntu 14.04 or 16.04 because the compilers in those releases don't support C++17 and that's required for GnuCash 4.x and later. ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Caveat: Check the dependency requirements in README.dependencies for the GnuCash version you're trying to build against what a particular OS release provides. Pay particular attention to the C++ standard level supported by the compiler, Boost, Cmake, and GLib. You can't build GnuCash 4.x on Ubuntu 14.04 or 16.04 because the compilers in those releases don't support C++17 and that's required for GnuCash 4.x and later. Regards, John Ralls > On Aug 9, 2022, at 11:37 AM, Adrien Monteleone > wrote: > > Seems reasonable to me. > > I'd think the only versions with instructions that are useful are those still > supported by Canonical, namely, these LTS releases: > > 14.04 - EOL 4/24 (ESS 4/19) > 16.04 - EOL 4/26 (ESS 4/21) > 18.04 - EOL 4/28 (ESS 4/23) > 20.04 - EOL 4/30 (ESS 4/25) > 22.04 - EOL 4/32 (ESS 4/27) > > Plus: > > 22.10, 23.04 & 23.10 (and other future non-LTS versions) when they are > released and nuances are determined to need special instructions. (with those > to be deprecated as they reach EOL) > > Or maybe just only provide instructions for LTS and make a note that non-LTS > versions aren't supported for long enough by Canonical to warrant their own > documentation. > > Note, the above EOL dates are based on Canonical's ESM (Extended Security > Maintenance) available for both Enterprise and Personal Use. (free for the > latter) See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases > > That is 5 years beyond 'standard support'. (indicated as ESS above) > > If the dev team wants to stick with the standard support window, then of > course 14.04 & 16.04 can also be dropped. > > Though, 16.04 was a breakpoint with respect to support for physical 32-bit > systems. At least some derivatives are still based on 16.04 for that reason. > (a recent thread from a user described some difficulty getting a 4.x version > to work on an older Linux Lite release.) > > If someone can report their various results & mileage, maybe those older LTS > releases can be sent to a sort of 'archive' page along with a note on the > last version of GnuCash that could successfully build on them. > > Of course, the recommendation can also be to advise the user to switch to a > current distribution still actively supporting 32-bit hardware. > (Debian/Devuan & Q4OS at least come to mind, I'm sure Distrowatch can inform > concerning others.) > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 8/9/22 12:49 PM, david whiting wrote: >> I think we should remove the instructions from >> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Ubuntu for 21.10. Anyone >> have any objections to that? > > > ___ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > - > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Last build I did was on 21.10 (for 4.10-65-g7e4fcc7af+(2022-04-29)). Now running 22.04 but haven't built the latest release yet -- may be a bit before I do. Maybe 5.0 will come out first <>. --Steve On 8/9/22 11:37, Adrien Monteleone wrote: Seems reasonable to me. I'd think the only versions with instructions that are useful are those still supported by Canonical, namely, these LTS releases: 14.04 - EOL 4/24 (ESS 4/19) 16.04 - EOL 4/26 (ESS 4/21) 18.04 - EOL 4/28 (ESS 4/23) 20.04 - EOL 4/30 (ESS 4/25) 22.04 - EOL 4/32 (ESS 4/27) Plus: 22.10, 23.04 & 23.10 (and other future non-LTS versions) when they are released and nuances are determined to need special instructions. (with those to be deprecated as they reach EOL) Or maybe just only provide instructions for LTS and make a note that non-LTS versions aren't supported for long enough by Canonical to warrant their own documentation. Note, the above EOL dates are based on Canonical's ESM (Extended Security Maintenance) available for both Enterprise and Personal Use. (free for the latter) See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases That is 5 years beyond 'standard support'. (indicated as ESS above) If the dev team wants to stick with the standard support window, then of course 14.04 & 16.04 can also be dropped. Though, 16.04 was a breakpoint with respect to support for physical 32-bit systems. At least some derivatives are still based on 16.04 for that reason. (a recent thread from a user described some difficulty getting a 4.x version to work on an older Linux Lite release.) If someone can report their various results & mileage, maybe those older LTS releases can be sent to a sort of 'archive' page along with a note on the last version of GnuCash that could successfully build on them. Of course, the recommendation can also be to advise the user to switch to a current distribution still actively supporting 32-bit hardware. (Debian/Devuan & Q4OS at least come to mind, I'm sure Distrowatch can inform concerning others.) Regards, Adrien On 8/9/22 12:49 PM, david whiting wrote: I think we should remove the instructions from https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Ubuntu for 21.10. Anyone have any objections to that? ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. . -- Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM stephen.m.butle...@gmail.com kg...@arrl.net 253-350-0166 --- GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8 ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
I'll add that maybe a note should be made for non-LTS (rather than provide special instructions) that GnuCash is available to Ubuntu repos from upstream Debian Testing that is current as of the Ubuntu release date. (or is that the freeze date?) So conceivably, since Ubuntu releases every 6 months, and GnuCash issues point releases every 3, a user on the non-LTS cycle would at most end up behind 2 GnuCash releases at any one time, but could be current at each OS upgrade. (though I think the packager is a release behind anyway to Testing, so maybe make that 1 or 3 GC releases behind respectively - still not so terrible.) Regards, Adrien On 8/9/22 1:37 PM, Adrien Monteleone wrote: Seems reasonable to me. I'd think the only versions with instructions that are useful are those still supported by Canonical, namely, these LTS releases: 14.04 - EOL 4/24 (ESS 4/19) 16.04 - EOL 4/26 (ESS 4/21) 18.04 - EOL 4/28 (ESS 4/23) 20.04 - EOL 4/30 (ESS 4/25) 22.04 - EOL 4/32 (ESS 4/27) Plus: 22.10, 23.04 & 23.10 (and other future non-LTS versions) when they are released and nuances are determined to need special instructions. (with those to be deprecated as they reach EOL) Or maybe just only provide instructions for LTS and make a note that non-LTS versions aren't supported for long enough by Canonical to warrant their own documentation. Note, the above EOL dates are based on Canonical's ESM (Extended Security Maintenance) available for both Enterprise and Personal Use. (free for the latter) See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases That is 5 years beyond 'standard support'. (indicated as ESS above) If the dev team wants to stick with the standard support window, then of course 14.04 & 16.04 can also be dropped. Though, 16.04 was a breakpoint with respect to support for physical 32-bit systems. At least some derivatives are still based on 16.04 for that reason. (a recent thread from a user described some difficulty getting a 4.x version to work on an older Linux Lite release.) If someone can report their various results & mileage, maybe those older LTS releases can be sent to a sort of 'archive' page along with a note on the last version of GnuCash that could successfully build on them. Of course, the recommendation can also be to advise the user to switch to a current distribution still actively supporting 32-bit hardware. (Debian/Devuan & Q4OS at least come to mind, I'm sure Distrowatch can inform concerning others.) ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Seems reasonable to me. I'd think the only versions with instructions that are useful are those still supported by Canonical, namely, these LTS releases: 14.04 - EOL 4/24 (ESS 4/19) 16.04 - EOL 4/26 (ESS 4/21) 18.04 - EOL 4/28 (ESS 4/23) 20.04 - EOL 4/30 (ESS 4/25) 22.04 - EOL 4/32 (ESS 4/27) Plus: 22.10, 23.04 & 23.10 (and other future non-LTS versions) when they are released and nuances are determined to need special instructions. (with those to be deprecated as they reach EOL) Or maybe just only provide instructions for LTS and make a note that non-LTS versions aren't supported for long enough by Canonical to warrant their own documentation. Note, the above EOL dates are based on Canonical's ESM (Extended Security Maintenance) available for both Enterprise and Personal Use. (free for the latter) See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases That is 5 years beyond 'standard support'. (indicated as ESS above) If the dev team wants to stick with the standard support window, then of course 14.04 & 16.04 can also be dropped. Though, 16.04 was a breakpoint with respect to support for physical 32-bit systems. At least some derivatives are still based on 16.04 for that reason. (a recent thread from a user described some difficulty getting a 4.x version to work on an older Linux Lite release.) If someone can report their various results & mileage, maybe those older LTS releases can be sent to a sort of 'archive' page along with a note on the last version of GnuCash that could successfully build on them. Of course, the recommendation can also be to advise the user to switch to a current distribution still actively supporting 32-bit hardware. (Debian/Devuan & Q4OS at least come to mind, I'm sure Distrowatch can inform concerning others.) Regards, Adrien On 8/9/22 12:49 PM, david whiting wrote: I think we should remove the instructions from https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Ubuntu for 21.10. Anyone have any objections to that? ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
I think we should remove the instructions from https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Ubuntu for 21.10. Anyone have any objections to that? David On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Adrien Monteleone wrote: > > Ditto concerning Ubuntu versions. > > In my experience so far building on older versions of Ubuntu, you can > stumble into a nasty nearly un-resolvable dependency hell. It *can* be > resolved (best I have figured out so far) by pinning lots of packages, > but that may not always be the best solution for everyone and is more of > an exercise to determine if it 'can be done at all'. Save for the sheer > satisfaction of having tackled it, there is little practical value. > (more than likely, those held packages are used by other apps and you'll > eventually have problems when you update them) > > As I understand, GnuCash supports whatever OS versions their respective > vendors support. So if you're using anything EOL (even in between > supported versions) you're on your own. If you can't upgrade to a > supported OS, a Flatpak is now provided should you also need/want a > newer GnuCash version than whatever is in your OS repos. > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 8/6/22 8:07 AM, Robert Simmons wrote: > > First of all, Impish is already EOL. > > > ___ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > - > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. -- David Whiting ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Ditto concerning Ubuntu versions. In my experience so far building on older versions of Ubuntu, you can stumble into a nasty nearly un-resolvable dependency hell. It *can* be resolved (best I have figured out so far) by pinning lots of packages, but that may not always be the best solution for everyone and is more of an exercise to determine if it 'can be done at all'. Save for the sheer satisfaction of having tackled it, there is little practical value. (more than likely, those held packages are used by other apps and you'll eventually have problems when you update them) As I understand, GnuCash supports whatever OS versions their respective vendors support. So if you're using anything EOL (even in between supported versions) you're on your own. If you can't upgrade to a supported OS, a Flatpak is now provided should you also need/want a newer GnuCash version than whatever is in your OS repos. Regards, Adrien On 8/6/22 8:07 AM, Robert Simmons wrote: First of all, Impish is already EOL. ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
Rob There were originally breakout pages from the building on Linux for specific information related to various Linux distributions including one for Ubuntu. That seems to have now morphed into a general installation page for Ubuntu https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Ubuntu and the Ubuntu specific build instructions seem to have diasappeared completely and what is there is now useless as it points back to the general build instructions for Linux (they were largely done on Linux Mint but I tried to make them as generic as possible). I think the intention was to collect all the Ubuntu related stuff in one point but that somewhat defeats the point of a breakout page for build stuff specific to a distribution, david Cousens On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 09:07 -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: > First of all, Impish is already EOL. You will need to use a flavor of 22.04 > LTS for the following. The documentation for how to build GnuCash is > confusing and not all in one place. The following begins with a fresh > install of Lubuntu 22.04 LTS. I use Vagrant so that everything is > deterministically built once I have finished figuring out the correct set > of steps. But, Vagrant is not a requirement; you don't have to use that. > The patch used below is the following. Put it in your /tmp directory before > starting. > https://pastebin.com/qUmxyyLq > > sudo patch /etc/apt/sources.list /tmp/sources_list.patch > sudo apt-get build-dep gnucash > mkdir ~/opt > wget > https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/releases/download/4.11/gnucash-4.11.tar.gz > mkdir build-gnucash-4.11 > tar -zxvf gnucash-4.11.tar.gz > cd build-gnucash-4.11/ > cmake -DWITH_PYTHON=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt ../gnucash-4.11 > make > make install > > > I hope this helps. > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 7:03 AM crusadeon09 via gnucash-user < > gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > > > I'm running Ubuntu, 21.10, Impish Indri. > > > > I downloaded the 4.11 tarball, gnucash-4.11.tar.bz2 > > > > I followed these directions: > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Build_Tools > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux > > > > I tried changing repositories. I ran "sudo apt update" multiple times. The > > dependencies for 4.11 simply wouldn't install. > > > > (base) chris@chris-B550-AORUS-ELITE:~$ sudo apt-get build-dep gnucash > > Reading package lists... Done > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Reading state information... Done > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libgtk-3-dev : Depends: gir1.2-gtk-3.0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but > > 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be installed > > Depends: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be > > installed or > > libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be installed > > Depends: libgtk-3-0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be > > installed > > libpython3.9-dev : Depends: libpython3.9-stdlib (= 3.9.7-2build1) but > > 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed > > Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be > > installed > > libsepol1-dev : Depends: libsepol1 (= 3.1-1ubuntu2) but 3.1-1ubuntu2.1 is > > to be installed > > libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev : Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 (= > > 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed > > Depends: gir1.2-webkit2-4.0 (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but > > 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed > > Depends: libsoup2.4-dev (>= 2.40) but it is not going to be installed > > Depends: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but it > > is not going to be installed > > libxml2-dev : Depends: libxml2 (= 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.1) but > > 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.2 is to be installed > > python3.9-dev : Depends: python3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 > > is to be installed > > Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be > > installed > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > > > I tried loading them individually, but the names are just slightly off. > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Dependencies > > > > Ubuntu sees them differently I guess. https://packages.ubuntu.com/ > > > > After a couple of hours of carefully trying to build from source, I give > > up. Looks like Ubuntu Software Center has 4.11 in a flatpak. > > > > Does anyone have any better instructions? I'd even submit to watching a > > video at this point. > > > > Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. > > ___ > > gnucash-user mailing list > > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > > To update your subscription pr
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
I either use the Flatpak version which is always updated with the latest release or I use David Whiting's script to build on Ubuntu ( https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2021-October/097864.html) - clones the git repository locally and as a newbie to building on Linux it was easy to follow and worked like a charm :-) Cheers David H. On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 at 21:03, crusadeon09 via gnucash-user < gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > I'm running Ubuntu, 21.10, Impish Indri. > > I downloaded the 4.11 tarball, gnucash-4.11.tar.bz2 > > I followed these directions: > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Build_Tools > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux > > I tried changing repositories. I ran "sudo apt update" multiple times. The > dependencies for 4.11 simply wouldn't install. > > (base) chris@chris-B550-AORUS-ELITE:~$ sudo apt-get build-dep gnucash > Reading package lists... Done > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libgtk-3-dev : Depends: gir1.2-gtk-3.0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but > 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be installed > Depends: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be > installed or > libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be installed > Depends: libgtk-3-0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be > installed > libpython3.9-dev : Depends: libpython3.9-stdlib (= 3.9.7-2build1) but > 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed > Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be > installed > libsepol1-dev : Depends: libsepol1 (= 3.1-1ubuntu2) but 3.1-1ubuntu2.1 is > to be installed > libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev : Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 (= > 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed > Depends: gir1.2-webkit2-4.0 (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but > 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed > Depends: libsoup2.4-dev (>= 2.40) but it is not going to be installed > Depends: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but it > is not going to be installed > libxml2-dev : Depends: libxml2 (= 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.1) but > 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.2 is to be installed > python3.9-dev : Depends: python3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 > is to be installed > Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be > installed > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > I tried loading them individually, but the names are just slightly off. > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Dependencies > > Ubuntu sees them differently I guess. https://packages.ubuntu.com/ > > After a couple of hours of carefully trying to build from source, I give > up. Looks like Ubuntu Software Center has 4.11 in a flatpak. > > Does anyone have any better instructions? I'd even submit to watching a > video at this point. > > Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. > ___ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > - > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
First of all, Impish is already EOL. You will need to use a flavor of 22.04 LTS for the following. The documentation for how to build GnuCash is confusing and not all in one place. The following begins with a fresh install of Lubuntu 22.04 LTS. I use Vagrant so that everything is deterministically built once I have finished figuring out the correct set of steps. But, Vagrant is not a requirement; you don't have to use that. The patch used below is the following. Put it in your /tmp directory before starting. https://pastebin.com/qUmxyyLq sudo patch /etc/apt/sources.list /tmp/sources_list.patch sudo apt-get build-dep gnucash mkdir ~/opt wget https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/releases/download/4.11/gnucash-4.11.tar.gz mkdir build-gnucash-4.11 tar -zxvf gnucash-4.11.tar.gz cd build-gnucash-4.11/ cmake -DWITH_PYTHON=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt ../gnucash-4.11 make make install I hope this helps. On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 7:03 AM crusadeon09 via gnucash-user < gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > I'm running Ubuntu, 21.10, Impish Indri. > > I downloaded the 4.11 tarball, gnucash-4.11.tar.bz2 > > I followed these directions: > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Build_Tools > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux > > I tried changing repositories. I ran "sudo apt update" multiple times. The > dependencies for 4.11 simply wouldn't install. > > (base) chris@chris-B550-AORUS-ELITE:~$ sudo apt-get build-dep gnucash > Reading package lists... Done > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libgtk-3-dev : Depends: gir1.2-gtk-3.0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but > 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be installed > Depends: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be > installed or > libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be installed > Depends: libgtk-3-0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be > installed > libpython3.9-dev : Depends: libpython3.9-stdlib (= 3.9.7-2build1) but > 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed > Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be > installed > libsepol1-dev : Depends: libsepol1 (= 3.1-1ubuntu2) but 3.1-1ubuntu2.1 is > to be installed > libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev : Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 (= > 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed > Depends: gir1.2-webkit2-4.0 (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but > 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed > Depends: libsoup2.4-dev (>= 2.40) but it is not going to be installed > Depends: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but it > is not going to be installed > libxml2-dev : Depends: libxml2 (= 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.1) but > 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.2 is to be installed > python3.9-dev : Depends: python3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 > is to be installed > Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be > installed > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > I tried loading them individually, but the names are just slightly off. > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Dependencies > > Ubuntu sees them differently I guess. https://packages.ubuntu.com/ > > After a couple of hours of carefully trying to build from source, I give > up. Looks like Ubuntu Software Center has 4.11 in a flatpak. > > Does anyone have any better instructions? I'd even submit to watching a > video at this point. > > Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. > ___ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > - > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
[GNC] Build From Source Near Impossible
I'm running Ubuntu, 21.10, Impish Indri. I downloaded the 4.11 tarball, gnucash-4.11.tar.bz2 I followed these directions: https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Build_Tools https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux I tried changing repositories. I ran "sudo apt update" multiple times. The dependencies for 4.11 simply wouldn't install. (base) chris@chris-B550-AORUS-ELITE:~$ sudo apt-get build-dep gnucash Reading package lists... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgtk-3-dev : Depends: gir1.2-gtk-3.0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be installed Depends: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be installed or libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev (>= 2.40.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgtk-3-0 (= 3.24.30-1ubuntu1) but 3.24.30-1ubuntu1.1 is to be installed libpython3.9-dev : Depends: libpython3.9-stdlib (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed libsepol1-dev : Depends: libsepol1 (= 3.1-1ubuntu2) but 3.1-1ubuntu2.1 is to be installed libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev : Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed Depends: gir1.2-webkit2-4.0 (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but 2.36.3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 is to be installed Depends: libsoup2.4-dev (>= 2.40) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev (= 2.34.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1) but it is not going to be installed libxml2-dev : Depends: libxml2 (= 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.1) but 2.9.12+dfsg-4ubuntu0.2 is to be installed python3.9-dev : Depends: python3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed Depends: libpython3.9 (= 3.9.7-2build1) but 3.9.7-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I tried loading them individually, but the names are just slightly off. https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Dependencies Ubuntu sees them differently I guess. https://packages.ubuntu.com/ After a couple of hours of carefully trying to build from source, I give up. Looks like Ubuntu Software Center has 4.11 in a flatpak. Does anyone have any better instructions? I'd even submit to watching a video at this point. Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user - Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
