Re: A place for discussing WKD spec clarifications?
On Tue 2019-10-22 21:28:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Thu 2019-10-17 11:08:46 +, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: >> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say) >>> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks >>> are OK with it. >>> >>> Werner, does that sound OK to you? >> >> This sounds good to me, but I agree it's important Werner is >> onboard. > > Werner, can you give some indication of whether this sounds reasonable > to you? This is an important spec, and i'd like to have a place where > we can keep track of implementer concerns. I spoke with Werner about this last week, and he agreed that gitlab was a reasonable place for the discussion. I've just set up https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/webkey-directory for this purpose -- it has an issue tracker and a proposed git repo (though it is of course up to Werner whether he wants to use that git repo or keep with the gnupg-docs repo for this draft). I'll follow up with more details on open...@ietf.org, because i think this draft is important for the entire OpenPGP ecosystem, not just gnupg-users. --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: A place for discussing WKD spec clarifications?
On Thu 2019-10-17 11:08:46 +, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say) >> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks >> are OK with it. >> >> Werner, does that sound OK to you? > > This sounds good to me, but I agree it's important Werner is > onboard. Werner, can you give some indication of whether this sounds reasonable to you? This is an important spec, and i'd like to have a place where we can keep track of implementer concerns. Thanks, --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: A place for discussing WKD spec clarifications?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello! Thanks for the comments, guys! Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > > > I thing gnupg-devel@ gnupg.org would be an appropriate place for > > discussing such topics. > ... > If we want general e-mail discussion about WKD concerns, i'd > suggest using the open...@ietf.org mailing list, as it will > reach implementers of more WKD clients than just gnupg-users. I'm fine with any of the named venues for discussion; I agree that it would be good to have an issue tracker as well. There were many different minor issues raised at the summit and sometimes mailing list discussions meander a bit. Having a tracker where conclusions are summarized (linking back to mailing list archives) is very useful. > I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say) > https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks > are OK with it. > > Werner, does that sound OK to you? This sounds good to me, but I agree it's important Werner is onboard. He's the author of the spec, after all, an issue tracker without his participation seems unlikely to achieve its goals. I made a bunch of minor tweaks to Mailpile's WKD implementation at and after the summit, I'm keen to share that as soon as I know what the best venue is. Ideally I'd like to create some "bug reports" against the spec, and then write a post to the appropriate list where I summarize. Cheers, - Bjarni - -- PageKite.net lets your personal computer be part of the web -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEETBSz4pzXkOHlSFMhjgA3FgDPlJEFAl2oS6cACgkQjgA3FgDP lJHUgAf/aeLK4/gN9emM/98eIYeTR0WBxFRmzCUT2PU94XGx1DNavCY/GbCToJy2 zn7PkIlMllEtFtzgCkKWjy8JCJxP8lS3dc4C6OCJfKyMh668Ugp4uDUfwWnYWInp acfXuI5F6+aTQoEZ28fxiKgck4EACeA3kEJoy3qa6CJtGtyEl9l1pxbYJEnyrFW6 pJ592k7m2q6aLI8oxqRm6m/YnbcOrWru6M7rhpJwGCiB0YW1OF3wykFguVOFz4Yd seUid2Do5fPKNMPcFaRqX2767zP5x1yzaqeoP8iMz7+KCTqwrsZ6TQ81baPIaIbl a6uZRZMMcCPZ67Oy5XQHmw9sZMu0Ew== =tkt3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: A place for discussing WKD spec clarifications?
On Tue 2019-10-15 23:01:33 +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:06, Bjarni Runar Einarsson said: > >> Would the GnuPG issue tracker be a good place to file "bug >> reports" against the spec, to work towards clarifications? > > That is okay for bug reports, but often it is more important to get the > opinions from more people than those who triage the bug reports. > > I thing gnupg-devel@ gnupg.org would be an appropriate place for > discussing such topics. WKD is a useful spec, and an increasingly important part of the OpenPGP ecosystem. If we want general e-mail discussion about WKD concerns, i'd suggest using the open...@ietf.org mailing list, as it will reach implementers of more WKD clients than just gnupg-users. That said, e-mail discussion is not the same as a tracker that allows us to keep a list of currently-known issues and concerns. If https://dev.gnupg.org/ is not appropriate for that sort of issue tracking, perhaps we could set up an issue tracker on gitlab associated with the WKD spec? I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say) https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks are OK with it. Werner, does that sound OK to you? As usual for any IETF-related interoperability discussion, i'd expect any major issues to *also* go to the mailing list for visibility and robust archiving, but i think that having an actively-maintained, publicly-accessible issue tracker related to this important work would be concretely useful. --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: A place for discussing WKD spec clarifications?
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:06, Bjarni Runar Einarsson said: > Would the GnuPG issue tracker be a good place to file "bug > reports" against the spec, to work towards clarifications? That is okay for bug reports, but often it is more important to get the opinions from more people than those who triage the bug reports. I thing gnupg-devel@ gnupg.org would be an appropriate place for discussing such topics. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
