Re: Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:51, jo...@netpage.dk said:
 I have the same problem on my german 64bit Windows 8 with Version 2.2.0-beta31

Are you shure that you are using the new version; i.e. did you reboot
your machine?


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:28, jo...@netpage.dk said:
 Yes I am sure. I even uninstalled it completely right now, rebooted
 and then reinstalled!

Thanks.  Well, there is a problem we need to figure out.

Using my Windows versions (no Windows8 here right now), I can't
replicate the problem.  Thus I build debug versions for Andre who then
tested the fix confirmed that the fix is correct.  The last step was to
remove the debug output and use this updated fix.  Something might have
gone wrong during the build process - we need to check.

 Strangely, the gibberish now changed somehow (it is shorter now), but

That is expected without the fix.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:09, w...@gnupg.org said:

 remove the debug output and use this updated fix.  Something might have
 gone wrong during the build process - we need to check.

We figured out what has gone wrong:  The problem affects only the 64
bit version of gpgex.  The gpg4win installer uses some extra code to
build 64 bit versions of some packages.  The build process consists of

   - unpack the source
   - apply patches
   - run configure
   - run make
   - stow the results

Patches are taken from a patches/PACKAGENAME-VERSION/ directory.  For 64
bit the patches are taken from patches/PACKAGENAME-VERSION-ex/
directory.  I was not aware of that separate directory and put my fix
only into the 32 bit patch directory.  Thus the 64 bit version was build
without the fix.

Given that there is currently no need for separate 64 and 32 bit
patches, we will now change this to use only one patch directory.

A new Beta version will be released in a few hours.

Thanks for beta testing.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-15 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:46, fisch@gmx.de said:

 good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
 gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe and let you know when i still have this

Actually there is a bug I am currently fixing.  We will release a new
beta in a few hours.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-15 Thread Josef Schneider
I have the same problem on my german 64bit Windows 8 with Version 2.2.0-beta31

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Josef Schneider


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:46, fisch@gmx.de said:

 good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
 gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe and let you know when i still have this

 Actually there is a bug I am currently fixing.  We will release a new
 beta in a few hours.

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-12 Thread Chris
Hi,

 That might be the cause for the problem.  The translations (*.mo) files
 from the old installer may not match the newer gettext version as used
 by gpgex.

good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe and let you know when i still have this
problem.

Thanks again for your help!

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-09 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon,  8 Jul 2013 19:39, fisch@gmx.de said:

 I've installed gpg4win-2.1.1.exe which fails to register the gpgex and
 then installed the gpgex from the archive:

 ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex/gpgex-1.0.0-beta24-bin.zip

That might be the cause for the problem.  The translations (*.mo) files
from the old installer may not match the newer gettext version as used
by gpgex.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-08 Thread Chris
Hi,

thanks for your reply.

 I can' replicate it on my German Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
 (6.01.7600).  However, I recall that I noticed such a behaviour during
 development.

My windows version here is 6.1.7601.

 - Did you just install a gpgex DLL or is that the one from
   gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe ?

I've installed gpg4win-2.1.1.exe which fails to register the gpgex and
then installed the gpgex from the archive:

ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex/gpgex-1.0.0-beta24-bin.zip

with the regsrv32 command as an admin.

 - What codepage are you using?  It is different from the default?

I'm using the default codepage Deutsch (Deutschland) of a German win7
installation.

 - Did you set one of the environment variables:  LANG, LC_ALL, or
   LS_MESSAGES?

Just checked my environment variables with SET and none of the above is
set. If you need the whole output of SET i can send it to you via a
direct e-mail.

Thanks
Chris

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-05 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed,  3 Jul 2013 23:21, fisch@gmx.de said:

 just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
 german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
 context menus [1].

I can' replicate it on my German Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
(6.01.7600).  However, I recall that I noticed such a behaviour during
development.

- Did you just install a gpgex DLL or is that the one from
  gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe ?

- Anyone else seeing this problem?

- What codepage are you using?  It is different from the default?

- Did you set one of the environment variables:  LANG, LC_ALL, or
  LS_MESSAGES?



Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-04 Thread Chris
Hi,

just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
context menus [1].

Using beta19 doesn't translate the context menu to german but the
context menu is not broken.

[1] http://s1.directupload.net/images/130703/iobbaatv.png

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-04 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed,  3 Jul 2013 23:21, fisch@gmx.de said:

 just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
 german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
 context menus [1].

Thanks.  I'll check what is going wrong.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-26 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:25, markr-gn...@signal100.com said:

 If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most applications) then the
 system-supplied file open/save dialogs for those programs with be 32bit
 and so these will use 32bit Explorer extensions.

I was not ware that GpgEX is also used by the open and save
dialogs. Just tried it with DbgView and indeed - after registering the
32 bit version of gpgex it works.  They currently share the same
registry entries - maybe I need to use different ones so that it is
possible to load both.


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:

 On my Window 7 64bit system, GnuPG 1.4.13 installed itself in c:\Program
 Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\  - the 32bit section. When I installed Gpg4win,

Yep, that is the default on English Windows systems.

 the installer offered install GPG2 in that same directory, but I added a
 2 to keep the two separate, ie. it was installed in

That may lead to conflicts with the registry - better don't do it.  Two
version of Gpg4win are not yet supported.  I am working on a portable
application feature in GnuPG which will allow that.

 Program Files directory, not the 32bit. I assumed that I needed to have
 gpgex.dll along with the other files and installed it in the \bin

Actually it doesn't really matter.  The plan to put them into bin is
merely so that we can easily provide a 32 bit and a 64 bit version of
gpgex.dll instead of providing two sets of installers.  But even that is
not yet set into stone.

gpgex.dll should work fine in .../GNU/GnuPG or in .../GNU/GnuPG/bin.

  regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll

 it just caused an error, saying The module c:\program failed to load.

You have to use quotes around it.  The Windows tab completion feature
usually does this for you.  It might be easier to cd to the directory
first and then run just

   regsvr32 gpgex.dll

 As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
 not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one
 and reboot?

Yes, you can.  The regsvr32 call is still required.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Bob Henson
On 25/06/2013 12:53 AM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
 On 06/24/2013 06:18 PM, Bob Henson wrote:
 
 When I ran

  regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll

 it just caused an error, saying The module c:\program failed to load.
 Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it to
 check for problems with the binary or dependant .dll files. The
 specified module could not be found.
 
 Try putting double quotes at the start and end of the  string,
 e.g.:
 
 regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll
 
 I can NOT assure you that this will work but it probably
 will.
 

That was my problem - thank you for the explanation.


 I wished Microsoft had used just C:/Programs/ instead of
 C:\Program Files\ for %ProgramFiles%.  I don't know what
 to say about 64 bit other than don't mix / match.  Microsoft
 could have used C:/Programs/64/ but that would have made
 too much sense.  Microsoft wants back-slashes instead of
 slashes and a nice mix of punctuation marks in addition to
 dot . plus space characters in all folder and file names.
 It doesn't work very well, especially for something done from
 cmd.exe instead of the GUI.  How bad is it?  I COPY 7za.exe
 to use it in scripts because I don't want to make registry
 changes (%Path%) just to make it work from where it is at.
 
 Sigh

I can see your points. I have only recently started using Linux, and the
command line functions are much more logical - however, using two sets
is even more confusing. Now I can't remember which way to slash :-) I
blame old age - but I get there in the end, with the help of my friends.

GpgEx is now working just fine. I used to use another explorer extension
( I forget the name - I think it used to be in Gpg4win?) which stopped
being developed so it will be handy to have one again.

Regards,

Bob



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Bob Henson
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:

 Now you may want to test it out.  Note that I also added an About menu
 which should always work, even if no UI-server is running.  The
 translations are not yet included in the ZIP file.
 

Having finally solved my problem with installation, I've been trying
GpgEX this morning and so far all seems to be fine. I've tried all the
functions separately, and had no problems at all yet - obviously I'll
report back if I get any. Thanks for the help.

Regards,

Bob



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Josef Schneider
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
 On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
 As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
 not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one
 and reboot?

 Yes, you can.  The regsvr32 call is still required.

But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit
programs, 32bit file managers...)

Best regards,
Josef Schneider

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Bob Henson
On 25/06/2013 9:40 AM, Josef Schneider wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
 On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
 As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
 not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one
 and reboot?

 Yes, you can.  The regsvr32 call is still required.
 
 But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
 processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit
 programs, 32bit file managers...)
 


I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
I'm covered anyway.

Regards,

Bob




___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:25, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:

 GpgEx is now working just fine. I used to use another explorer extension
 ( I forget the name - I think it used to be in Gpg4win?) which stopped
 being developed so it will be handy to have one again.

GpgEE.  We replaced it by GpgEX because GpgEE was written in Delphi and
there was no way to build it with a free tools chain or even cross-build.

Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:40, jo...@netpage.dk said:

 But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
 processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit

Windows 7 64 bit has no more option to use a 32 bit explorer.  This the
the very reason for the 64 bit GpgEX ;-)


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Mark Rousell
On 25/06/2013 09:56, Bob Henson wrote:
 I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
 of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
 I'm covered anyway.

If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most applications) then the
system-supplied file open/save dialogs for those programs with be 32bit
and so these will use 32bit Explorer extensions.

(Oops, forgot to reply to list previously).



-- 
MarkR

PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Mark Rousell
On 25/06/2013 14:31, Werner Koch wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:40, jo...@netpage.dk said:

 But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
 processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit

 Windows 7 64 bit has no more option to use a 32 bit explorer.  This the
 the very reason for the 64 bit GpgEX ;-)

It is true that 32bit Windows Explorer cannot be run on 64bit Windows 7
and later but what Josef said about file open/save dialogs in 32bit
programs and 32bit file managers running on 64bit Windows is correct --
these still use 32bit shell extensions Windows.


-- 
MarkR

PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-25 Thread Mark Rousell
On 26/06/2013 03:25, Mark Rousell wrote:
 On 25/06/2013 09:56, Bob Henson wrote:
 I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
 of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
 I'm covered anyway.
 
 If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most applications) then the
 system-supplied file open/save dialogs for those programs with be 32bit
 and so these will use 32bit Explorer extensions.
 
 (Oops, forgot to reply to list previously).

And I see that Josef Schneider already said the same thing. Apologies
for the repetition.


-- 
MarkR

PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-24 Thread Bob Henson
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
  Hi!
 
  I just uploaded a test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer Plugin) for
  Windows 64 bit.  This is just the bare standalone DLL without an
  installer.  If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with Gpg4win, you
  may want to test this DLL:
 
ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex/gpgex-1.0.0-beta19-bin.zip
ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex/gpgex-1.0.0-beta19-bin.zip.sig

  To install the DLL please unzip the ZIP file and as Admin store the DLL
  as
 
c:\Program files\GNU\GnuPG\bin\gpgex.dll
 

On my Window 7 64bit system, GnuPG 1.4.13 installed itself in c:\Program
Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\  - the 32bit section. When I installed Gpg4win,
the installer offered install GPG2 in that same directory, but I added a
2 to keep the two separate, ie. it was installed in

c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\

Your instructions above point to the \bin directory under the 64 bit
Program Files directory, not the 32bit. I assumed that I needed to have
gpgex.dll along with the other files and installed it in the \bin
directory with the rest of my gpg2 files ie. under

c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll.

Should I have created a new directory under the 64bit Program File
directory just for the one new file?

When I ran

 regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll

it just caused an error, saying The module c:\program failed to load.
Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it to
check for problems with the binary or dependant .dll files. The
specified module could not be found.

It looks to me as though the regsvr command is looking for a program to
run called c:\program?

As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one
and reboot?

What should I try if not, please?

Regards,

Bob





___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-24 Thread yyy

On 2013.06.24. 21:18, Bob Henson wrote:
it just caused an error, saying The module c:\program failed to 
load. Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it 
to check for problems with the binary or dependant .dll files. The 
specified module could not be found. It looks to me as though the 
regsvr command is looking for a program to run called c:\program? As 
I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I 
not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one 
and reboot? What should I try if not, please? 


Paths with spaces needs to be escaped. Put that C:\program files... in 
quotes. ().


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-06-24 Thread Henry Hertz Hobbit
On 06/24/2013 06:18 PM, Bob Henson wrote:

 When I ran
 
  regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll
 
 it just caused an error, saying The module c:\program failed to load.
 Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it to
 check for problems with the binary or dependant .dll files. The
 specified module could not be found.

Try putting double quotes at the start and end of the  string,
e.g.:

regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll

I can NOT assure you that this will work but it probably
will.

I wished Microsoft had used just C:/Programs/ instead of
C:\Program Files\ for %ProgramFiles%.  I don't know what
to say about 64 bit other than don't mix / match.  Microsoft
could have used C:/Programs/64/ but that would have made
too much sense.  Microsoft wants back-slashes instead of
slashes and a nice mix of punctuation marks in addition to
dot . plus space characters in all folder and file names.
It doesn't work very well, especially for something done from
cmd.exe instead of the GUI.  How bad is it?  I COPY 7za.exe
to use it in scripts because I don't want to make registry
changes (%Path%) just to make it work from where it is at.

Sigh


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users